Former Head Of Crypto Platform Celsius Sentenced 12 Years
The founder and former CEO of bankrupt cryptocurrency trading platform Celsius, Alexander Mashinsky, was sentenced Thursday to 12 years in prison on fraud charges.
Mashinsky, 50, pleaded guilty last December to securities fraud in a deal that reduced the level of charges he faced.
The sentence comes down nearly three years after the startup's collapse as a cryptocurrency platform, which offered customers the ability to invest in digital currencies, including its own coin, CEL.
According to the indictment, Celsius executives took more than $4 billion in customers' assets to finance the platform's operations, make unsecured loans and invest in high-risk items.
Mashinsky was also accused of manipulating the price of CEL by using customers' funds to purchase the currency, artificially inflating its price.
At its peak in late 2021, Celsius had more than one million clients and held more than $25 billion in assets.
But the company hit hard times in the spring of 2022 as the value of cryptocurrencies plummeted.
Facing deep customer withdrawals, Celsius on June 12, 2022 froze over $4.7 billion in customer accounts before filing for bankruptcy protection a month later.
A progress report published in March found that 93 percent of the frozen assets had been recovered and returned to former Celsius customers.
The 2022 cryptocurrency collapse affected a number of other startups in the field, including FTX, the second-largest crypto exchange that filed for bankruptcy in November 2022.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
29-05-2025
- Int'l Business Times
Man Utd Stretch Loyalty Of 'Numbed' Chinese Fans To The Limit
Yan Gang speaks for many Manchester United fans when he says: "We've been numbed by performances over the past few seasons." Manchester United once claimed to have more than 100 million followers in China, Yan among them, but like supporters of the club everywhere their loyalty is being put severely to the test. As an illustration of United's fall from grace in China and beyond, tickets for Friday's friendly at the 40,000-capacity Hong Kong Stadium against the city's representative team were still available on Thursday afternoon. Tickets also appeared on resale websites with their prices slashed 50 percent. United were beaten 1-0 in Malaysia by a Southeast Asian XI on Wednesday and booed off, a fresh low in a dismal season for Ruben Amorim's bedraggled men. "Every season ends with the same old story with no sign of recovery," said Yan, a supporter for 23 years and organiser of a United fans' association in Shenzhen, just across the border from Hong Kong in mainland China. Amorim's side left for Asia on Sunday, hours after concluding their worst season since 1974, to play friendlies in Kuala Lumpur and Hong Kong. The Old Trafford club made no attempt to hide the motivation for flying across the world straight after a draining and demoralising campaign that saw them come 15th in the Premier League and fail to lift a trophy. "Tour fixtures drive significant additional revenue which help make the club stronger, allowing us to keep investing in success on the pitch," chief executive Omar Berrada said. This week's Asia visit will generate about $10 million (GBP7.8m) for United, the BBC reported. China has the world's second-biggest economy and second-biggest population, making it a vital market. United's finances are under scrutiny with co-owner Jim Ratcliffe implementing steep cuts since buying a minority stake just over a year ago. The club recently announced a further 200 redundancies were planned after 250 jobs were cut last year. Ratcliffe claimed in March that the Red Devils would have "run out of money at Christmas" otherwise. From Kuala Lumpur, where it was 32 Celsius (90 Fahrenheit) at kickoff on Wednesday, it is a four-hour flight to a similarly sticky Hong Kong. July friendlies in the city between Tottenham and Arsenal, and Liverpool and AC Milan, sold out within hours of going on general sale. No such luck for United for their exhibition match with the Hong Kong team, and with a day until kickoff they face the ignominy of playing in front of empty seats. The 39-year-old fan Yan said that the United supporters club in Shenzhen has about 2,000 members. That number has hardly grown in the past few years, he said. Older fans make up the vast majority of members. "I can't think of any words we can use to attract new fans because the team has a bad record and no standout stars to recruit younger fans," said Yan. He Zhiyi, a United fan for more than a decade, is flying to Hong Kong from the southwestern Chinese city of Chengdu. She had hoped to see the squad parade the Europa League trophy, but Amorim's side lost 1-0 to Tottenham in the final. With it went United's hopes of sneaking into the Champions League, which would have brought badly needed revenue, prestige and pulling power. "The team is all over the place -- players, coaches and management are not moving in one direction," said the 32-year-old He, a football content creator and author. "It feels like the team is killing the enthusiasm of the fans, as if the romance can't be sustained anymore." Zhang Chongqian, also from Chengdu, said United's "spirit and traditions" have been lost. "In recent years, our fans (in China) gradually stopped watching Manchester United or even football," the 38-year-old lifelong supporter said. Zhang will not join those fans abandoning his side, even after the poorest season in the club's recent history. "Manchester United have been experiencing a period of sinking," he said. "But there are still so many fans who will never give up on them." A man pushes a rubbish bin past posters of Manchester United players outside Hong Kong Stadium AFP Posters of Manchester United players outside Hong Kong Stadium AFP
Int'l Business Times
19-05-2025
- Int'l Business Times
$TRUMP Dinner Blurs Lines Between Profit And Politics
More than two hundred guests on Thursday will make their way to a ritzy country club just up the Potomac River from Washington, ready for a sumptuous dinner hosted by the president of the United States. The lucky few are not top officials or visiting heads of state but the 220 biggest buyers of $TRUMP, a crypto memecoin launched by the US president in January. The top 25 investors will enjoy even more special access: a private session with Trump before dinner -- which is set at the Trump National Golf Club in Potomac Falls, Virginia -- and a White House tour. "The most EXCLUSIVE INVITATION in the World," a website dedicated to the event said. "The question YOU IN?" This dinner represents perhaps the boldest commercial venture of Trump's presidency, further blurring already hazy boundaries between politics and profit. Launched hours before his January inauguration, the $TRUMP memecoin is only one example of the Trump family's ever-expanding moves into cryptocurrency. Much of the crypto industry frowns upon these coins or tokens, fearing they tarnish the sector's credibility, amid reports of quick pump-and-dump schemes that leave unwitting buyers paying for assets that end up worthless. $TRUMP saw a spike in value when it announced the dinner, but reports said that many of the winners of the offer, which closed on May 12, are now selling their memecoins. Critics, including the typically Trump-friendly Wall Street Journal editorial board, point out that Trump and his allies, as the creators of the memecoin, have made $320 million in trading fees, citing Chainalysis, a data analytic firm. They also point out that the dinner allows foreign actors who otherwise can't influence the White House to try to use the memecoin to buy favor with the government. The crypto industry, which massively contributed to his campaign, has welcomed Trump's return to the White House, praising his promise for a clear departure from the skepticism of the previous Democratic administration toward digital currencies. Those years were marked by major scandal, including the collapse of FTX, the crypto giant founded by CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, who is now serving a 25-year sentence for committing massive fraud. But the controversy surrounding the dinner is complicating efforts to pass crucial legislation that would provide clearer legal framework in stablecoins, digital assets that are considered safer and more established than more speculative corners of the sector. "The American people deserve the unwavering assurance that access to the presidency is not being offered for sale to the highest bidder in exchange for the President's own financial gain," US Senators Adam Schiff and Elizabeth Warren wrote in a letter to the Office of Government Ethics. Trump, despite previous hostility toward cryptocurrency, has already taken significant steps to reduce regulatory barriers, including an executive order establishing a "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" that would maintain government holdings of the world's leading digital currency. However, key Democrats in Congress are blocking other legislative advancements, frustrated by the dinner and other Trump family ventures into cryptocurrency. These expanding connections include investment in Binance, whose founder is seeking a presidential pardon to re-enter the US market. The investment is being made through World Liberty Financial, a cryptocurrency venture backed by the Trumps that launched in September and has made major deals in the Middle East. The company founders feature Trump's sons Donald Jr. and Eric alongside Zach Witkoff, son of Trump's diplomatic adviser Steve Witkoff. At an April crypto conference in Dubai, Eric Trump and Zach Witkoff announced that the state-backed Emirati fund MGX would use USD1, their firm's cryptocurrency, to invest $2 billion in Binance. Additionally, American Bitcoin, another venture backed by Trump's eldest sons, recently announced plans to list on the New York Stock Exchange. That company will ride lower energy costs and environmental norms to lower the cost of bitcoin mining in the United States. "The US won the space race. We better win the crypto race," Eric Trump recently told CNBC.
Int'l Business Times
13-05-2025
- Int'l Business Times
Dutch Climate Group Launches New Case Against Shell
Dutch environmental group Milieudefensie said Tuesday it was launching a new legal case against Shell, aiming to stop the fossil fuel giant investing in new oil and gas fields. In November, the Dutch Appeals Court ruled against Milieudefensie and other climate NGOs, quashing a landmark judgement from 2021 that said Shell had to reduce emissions by 45 percent by 2030. But that appeals court did say Shell had to make an "appropriate contribution" to the objectives of the Paris climate agreement, without giving the firm a clear emissions reduction target. The Paris deal committed all nations to cut carbon emissions to limit warming to two degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels and encouraged them to aim for 1.5 degrees. In a letter to Shell, Milieudefensie accused the company of being "in breach of its legal duty of care under Dutch law due to its continued investment in new oil and gas fields." "The science is crystal clear. There's a legal momentum," said Sjoukje van Oosterhout, in charge of the case at Milieudefensie. Shell responded in a statement sent to AFP: "As we have said many times, what Milieudefensie wants will not advance the energy transition." "The transition needs collaboration between governments, businesses and consumers," added the firm, which said it was "one of the largest private investors in the Dutch energy transition." Milieudefensie pointed to proposed increases in production and sales of fossil fuels by Shell after 2030, confirmed by the company at its Capital Markets Day in March. "Shell fully or partly own 700 undeveloped oil and gas assets", said Milieudefensie, citing data and modelling from Rystad Energy, an energy consultancy. "These assets, if developed, could cause 5.2 billion tons of additional CO2 emissions into the atmosphere," said the NGO, noting this was 36 times the Dutch emissions in 2024. Milieudefensie also wants the court to force Shell to cut emissions to a level compatible with the Paris Agreement's 1.5-degree goal after 2030. The group has appealed to the Supreme Court against the Appeals Court November ruling but the judgement only takes into account the period up to 2030. In March, Milieudefensie also began a legal case against top bank ING, aiming to force the institution to halve carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 2030.
