$TRUMP Dinner Blurs Lines Between Profit And Politics
More than two hundred guests on Thursday will make their way to a ritzy country club just up the Potomac River from Washington, ready for a sumptuous dinner hosted by the president of the United States.
The lucky few are not top officials or visiting heads of state but the 220 biggest buyers of $TRUMP, a crypto memecoin launched by the US president in January.
The top 25 investors will enjoy even more special access: a private session with Trump before dinner -- which is set at the Trump National Golf Club in Potomac Falls, Virginia -- and a White House tour.
"The most EXCLUSIVE INVITATION in the World," a website dedicated to the event said. "The question is...ARE YOU IN?"
This dinner represents perhaps the boldest commercial venture of Trump's presidency, further blurring already hazy boundaries between politics and profit.
Launched hours before his January inauguration, the $TRUMP memecoin is only one example of the Trump family's ever-expanding moves into cryptocurrency.
Much of the crypto industry frowns upon these coins or tokens, fearing they tarnish the sector's credibility, amid reports of quick pump-and-dump schemes that leave unwitting buyers paying for assets that end up worthless.
$TRUMP saw a spike in value when it announced the dinner, but reports said that many of the winners of the offer, which closed on May 12, are now selling their memecoins.
Critics, including the typically Trump-friendly Wall Street Journal editorial board, point out that Trump and his allies, as the creators of the memecoin, have made $320 million in trading fees, citing Chainalysis, a data analytic firm.
They also point out that the dinner allows foreign actors who otherwise can't influence the White House to try to use the memecoin to buy favor with the government.
The crypto industry, which massively contributed to his campaign, has welcomed Trump's return to the White House, praising his promise for a clear departure from the skepticism of the previous Democratic administration toward digital currencies.
Those years were marked by major scandal, including the collapse of FTX, the crypto giant founded by CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, who is now serving a 25-year sentence for committing massive fraud.
But the controversy surrounding the dinner is complicating efforts to pass crucial legislation that would provide clearer legal framework in stablecoins, digital assets that are considered safer and more established than more speculative corners of the sector.
"The American people deserve the unwavering assurance that access to the presidency is not being offered for sale to the highest bidder in exchange for the President's own financial gain," US Senators Adam Schiff and Elizabeth Warren wrote in a letter to the Office of Government Ethics.
Trump, despite previous hostility toward cryptocurrency, has already taken significant steps to reduce regulatory barriers, including an executive order establishing a "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" that would maintain government holdings of the world's leading digital currency.
However, key Democrats in Congress are blocking other legislative advancements, frustrated by the dinner and other Trump family ventures into cryptocurrency.
These expanding connections include investment in Binance, whose founder is seeking a presidential pardon to re-enter the US market.
The investment is being made through World Liberty Financial, a cryptocurrency venture backed by the Trumps that launched in September and has made major deals in the Middle East.
The company founders feature Trump's sons Donald Jr. and Eric alongside Zach Witkoff, son of Trump's diplomatic adviser Steve Witkoff.
At an April crypto conference in Dubai, Eric Trump and Zach Witkoff announced that the state-backed Emirati fund MGX would use USD1, their firm's cryptocurrency, to invest $2 billion in Binance.
Additionally, American Bitcoin, another venture backed by Trump's eldest sons, recently announced plans to list on the New York Stock Exchange.
That company will ride lower energy costs and environmental norms to lower the cost of bitcoin mining in the United States.
"The US won the space race. We better win the crypto race," Eric Trump recently told CNBC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Kristi Noem Once Called Federal Use of National Guard as 'Attack on States' Rights'. Now She Supports Trump's Use in LA Protests
Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, once a vocal defender of states' rights against federal use of the National Guard, now supports President Donald Trump's deployment of troops in California. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is facing criticism for backing President Donald Trump 's decision to deploy the National Guard in Los Angeles, despite having strongly opposed similar proposed federal action under former President Joe Biden. In February 2024, while serving as South Dakota's governor, Noem accused Biden of threatening "a direct attack on states' rights" when Democrats urged him to federalize the National Guard in Texas. If Joe Biden federalizes the National Guard, that would be a direct attack on states' the last several years, we've seen Democrats try to take away our Freedoms of religion, assembly, and speech. We can't let them take away our right to defend ourselves, too. South… — Kristi Noem (@KristiNoem) February 6, 2024 Noem said the move would trigger a "war" between Washington D.C. and Republican-led states. Noem even traveled to Texas to personally support Gov. Greg Abbott's border crackdown, which included National Guard troops interfering with federal immigration agents. But on June 8, Noem publicly supported Trump's use of 2,000 federally deployed National Guard troops to quell anti-immigration protests in Los Angeles—over the objections of California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom. If @GavinNewsom was doing his job our ICE agents would not be injured and attacked while doing their jobs and carrying out immigration enforcement. Under the leadership of @POTUS Trump we will put the safety of American citizens FIRST not these criminal illegal aliens that… — Secretary Kristi Noem (@Sec_Noem) June 8, 2025 "If [Newsom] was doing his job," Noem posted on X, "our ICE agents would not be injured and attacked while doing their jobs and carrying out immigration enforcement." On CBS's "Face the Nation" Sunday, she justified her shift by saying Trump acted because Newsom "makes bad decisions." Newsom himself called out Noem's change in opinion, reposting the homeland security secretary's 2024 tweet with the caption, "This aged well." Trump authorized the 60-day deployment under a federal statute allowing Guard use in emergencies where state leaders are unable, or unwilling, to enforce federal laws. Newsom called the move "a serious breach of state sovereignty" and demanded the order be revoked. Originally published on Latin Times Donald trump Joe biden Los Angeles California © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Elon Musk Boosts Several Trump Posts Slamming 'Lawless' LA Protests Following Their Public Feud
Billionaire Elon Musk boosted multiple posts initially published by President Donald Trump regarding the immigration protests in Los Angeles, California, over the weekend, despite publicly feuding with the president just last week. Musk took to X to share a post initially made by the president on Truth Social, in which Trump calls upon senior Trump administration officials to quell the anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles. "A once great American City, Los Angeles, has been invaded and occupied by Illegal Aliens and Criminals. Now violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents to try and stop our deportation operations — But these lawless riots only strengthen our resolve," Trump began in his post. "I am directing Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, in coordination with all other relevant Departments and Agencies, to take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion, and put an end to these Migrant riots. Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" he continued. Musk then reposted Trump's post, captioning it with two American flag emojis. The Tesla CEO also reshared another Trump Truth Social post minutes later, this time without a comment or caption. "Governor Gavin Newscum and 'Mayor' Bass should apologize to the people of Los Angeles for the absolutely horrible job that they have done, and this now includes the ongoing L.A. riots. These are not protesters, they are troublemakers and insurrectionists. Remember, NO MASKS!" Trump said in the post shared by Musk. Social media users took to the replies of Musk's posts to question the relationship between the SpaceX CEO and the 47th president, who recently fell out publicly. "So are y'all besties again or?" asked one user. "You jumping back on the Trump Train?" questioned another. "Is the gang getting back together," asked one user. "Yo. You called that dude a pedophile 5 days ago," one user added, referring to the post Musk made Thursday where he claimed the reason the files on Jeffrey Epstein have not been shared is because the president is in them. That tweet has since been deleted. Musk publicly denounced the Trump-backed GOP spending bill last week in a series of X posts. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," Musk wrote. The post, which shocked many supporters of the alliance between Musk and Trump, launched a public feud between two of the world's most powerful men, resulting in them hurling insults and accusations at each other online. Originally published on Latin Times
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
US, Chinese officials meet in London for further trade talks – DW – 06/09/2025
The two countries have begun talks in London and are likely to discuss the US' restrictions on the sale of high-tech products to China, as well as China's restrictions on the export of rare earth minerals Top US and Chinese officials met in London on Monday for trade talks amidst tensions between to the two superpowers. Beijing has sent Vice Premier He Lifeng for the negotiations while Washington is being represented by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at Lancaster House. Issues up for discussion are likely to include US restrictions on the sale of high-tech products to China, and China's restrictions on the export of rare earth minerals, where it dominates the global market. US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to the meeting in a phone call on Thursday. It's the first time officials from the two countries are meeting since May, when tariffs on both sides were cut back considerably following discussions in Switzerland. A spokesperson for the British government confirmed only that the meeting will take place in the UK and that the country "welcomes the dialogue." Harvard students from China, Taiwan in limbo To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video US officials desire 'handshake' agreement According to Trump, the talks will focus on the details of the May trade agreement. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt called on China to keep its side of the agreement to pave the way for a more comprehensive deal. "The purpose of the meeting today is to make sure that they're serious, but to literally get handshakes," Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told CNBC in an interview. He said the expectation was that immediately after the handshake, export controls would be eased and rare earths released in volume. After the phone call between the two presidents last week, China has also called on the US to stick to the agreement, while refraining from criticism. The talks, which could run into Tuesday, come at a crucial time for both economies, with investors looking for relief from Trump's cascade of tariff orders since his return to the White House in January. Edited by: Zac Crellin
