Tell Abu Al Kharaz: The Bronze Age Stronghold
Pottery vessels found at Tell Abu Al Kharaz (Photo courtesy of Peter Fisher)
AMMAN — Located just five kilometres from the Jordan River in the heart of the Jordan Valley, Tell Abu Al Kharaz stands as a testament to the strategic brilliance of its ancient inhabitants. Chosen in the latter part of the 4th millennium BC, this site offered a natural advantage, providing unparalleled defence and control over a large expanse of the valley.
The Tell, measuring 400 meters by 300 meters, is isolated from the surrounding foothills that rise to the east, leading up to the Transjordanian plateau. Its elevated position offers an excellent vantage point, allowing for a wide range of visibility in all directions, while the rocky western slope and the steep northern and eastern slopes acted as natural barriers against potential invaders.
"The Central Jordan Valley, visible from the summit of Tell Abu Al Kharaz, includes the hills around Nazareth, Mount Tabor, Beth Shan, the Beth Shan Valley, parts of the Harod Valley, the Samarian hills, and the area north of Tell es Saʿidiyeh," said Professor Peter Fisher. However, the view to the east is blocked by the rising hillocks of western Gilead, marking the start of the Transjordanian plateau.
Remains of formidable stone-built town walls are still visible at the southern and northern edges of the tell, which date back to the Early Bronze Age IB (Phase IB). The original walls, constructed during this period, were reinforced and altered in Early Bronze Age II. Measuring up to 5 meters wide and likely standing 6 to 8 metres high at their peak, these walls were topped with a superstructure made of sun-dried mud bricks and wood.
The walled town covered the entire upper plateau of the mound, which spans approximately 1.5 hectares (about 3.75 acres). Excavations have revealed that Early Bronze Age remains also extend to the surrounding slopes and flatlands, suggesting that the walled area was primarily used as a refuge during times of conflict. Villagers from the surrounding areas would have sought shelter within the town's fortified walls, not only for protection but to take part in defending the settlement.
Structures and Raw Materials
The relatively flat plateau of the mound, composed mainly of marly limestone, provided a convenient foundation for construction. Building materials were readily available, with smooth, portable stones scattered throughout the area. Clay, essential for producing mud bricks and fired pottery, was easily accessible from the nearby Wadi Al Yabis, an important source for the construction of domestic buildings and other structures.
Professor Fisher noted that the plans of the domestic buildings varied, including curvilinear and roughly rectangular designs. Most Early Bronze Age structures were aligned on north-south/east-west axes, which contrast with later periods when structures were typically oriented northwest-southeast/northeast-southwest.
The region surrounding Tell Abu Al Kharaz was historically more vegetated, providing ample resources for construction. Forests likely surrounded the site, offering timber for building and fuel. Even today, the vegetation in the Wadi Al Yabis area, located to the east, differs significantly from the Jordan Valley. While the valley is dominated by acacia and scrub oak, the foothills and the Cretaceous limestone mountains to the east are home to a mixed forest of pine, oak, and pistachio trees.
"Wood for construction and fuel was readily accessible, which greatly facilitated the building process for the site's inhabitants," Fisher concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Jordan Times
25-05-2025
- Jordan Times
Ammonite structure discovered on eastern side of Amman Citadel
Remains of ' the Ammonite Palace' an Iron Age structure on Amman Citadel (Photo of Saeb Rawashdeh) AMMAN — While most visitors to the Amman Citadel head towards the well-known landmarks on the western side, such as the Temple of Hercules, the Jordan Archaeological Museum and the Umayyad Palace, few venture eastward. But that may soon change following a significant archaeological discovery. Professor Zeidan Kafafi, a prominent Jordanian archaeologist, revealed that a previously overlooked section of the Citadel has yielded evidence of an ancient Ammonite structure. "Nobody thinks to come to the eastern side of the Citadel because they don't know about the important archaeological sites located there," Kafafi said. The discovery was made inadvertently. A government plan to build a school on the eastern slope prompted preliminary excavations by a construction company. Work was immediately halted when workers recognised archaeological remains beneath the surface. "When the idea of building a school was dropped, the Greater Amman Municipality decided instead to develop a public park in the area," Kafafi added. What followed was a formal excavation initiated by Jordanian archaeologist Fawzi Zayadine, who invited an international team to investigate further. Their efforts uncovered remnants of an Ammonite structure, informally referred to as the 'Ammonite Palace'. Among the most intriguing finds were four double-faced stone heads and a mysterious glass ball, discovered within the ancient structure. The project is a joint venture of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, the German Protestant Institute of Archaeology, German Archaeological Institute from Berlin and local experts like Professor Kafafi. Now in its second year, the excavation is being led by Professor Catharina Schmidt of the University of Münster, as part of the Amman Archaeological Project. The team is exploring layers dating back to the Iron Age, as well as the Roman-Byzantine period. Recent finds include fragments of ivory and alabaster, a partially burned object, and a sophisticated water channel system. "There is no spring on the Citadel, so water had to be collected and redirected into a cistern through these channels," Schmidt explained. However, the team has yet to locate the cistern itself. Excavators plan to continue their work by uncovering Roman-era housing layers and gradually digging deeper in hopes of reaching more Iron Age levels.
Jordan Times
22-05-2025
- Jordan Times
Scholar highlights Ayyubid legacy, challenges of distinguishing it from Mamluk period
The Ayyubid castle of Ajloun, located in the northwestern part of Jordan, overlooking the Jordan Valley (Photo courtesy of ACOR) AMMAN — For Professor Bethany Walker from Bonn University, it is a true challenge to differentiate some pottery objects whether they belong to Ayyubid (1171-1260) or Mamluk (1250-1517) period. Walker wants to separate two periods that are often called Ayyubit-Mamluk and belong to Middle Islamic era. "Ayyubid period was much shorter than Mamluk period," Walker said during the lecture " Jordan in the Ayyubid Age" held at the Department of Antiquities of Jordan on Wednesday, adding that if one excavates on the Mamluk site they will not find many remains older than the Mamluk period. Mamluk's powerful visual presence in Jordan also underlines Ayyubid Sultanate contribution, Walker continued, adding that Mamluks re-used Ayyubid buildings. "Vernacular buildings didn't change much from 12th until early 20th century in Jordan," Walker said, noting that to differentiate between these two periods became a challenge. The Ayyubids laid foundation for administrative buildings, fortresses and castles, as well as way stations for pilgrims and store houses for agricultural produce. They invested in network of roads and castles, reviving the world economy. One of the achievements of the Ayyubids was the beginning of the sugar industry in Jordan Valley and the Dead Sea area, where the sugar technology was brought from the Indian Subcontinent (sugar canes). "The major achievement of the Ayyubids in Jordan was economic," Walker stressed, adding that agricultural sector flourished during their reign. Rural area was economically stimulated to produce certain types of crops during that period. "The most active of the Ayyubid rulers was AlMu'azzam (1218-1227) who ruled from Damascus," Walker said, noting that in the early decades of the 13th century Karak became a scientific and educational centre. However, there are no architectural traces of these activities as no remains of madrasas and hospitals survived to our days. Al Mu'azzam built villages and the state stimulated different types of migrations to urban and rural centres. Nasser Dawoud in 1244/1245 renovate the Karak Castle, adding that palatine halls at Karak and Shobal castles represent the Ayyubid architecture. Regarding the Ayyubid bathhouse, Walker said:" It's relatively small, with three to four rooms." The Mamluks would tear down old, decrepit buildings and reuse the material for new structures, and that is one of the reasons why it is often difficult to distinguish which building belonged to the Ayyubid and which to the Mamluk period. "In some textual documentation there is evidence of these demolitions, like in chronicles, where villages around the Shobak Castle are mentioned. Here we have accounts what still functions and what is in ruins," Walker said, adding that ruins had a commercial value as a building material.
Jordan Times
22-05-2025
- Jordan Times
Archaeological survey at Khirbet Mastarah reveals clues to past human activity
AMMAN — Khirbet Mastarah is situated 8 kilometres north of Jericho and the site is land-locked between a small hill in the south and the beginning of the foothills in the northwest. Most of the area is covered with a high quantity of large pebbles of limestone, chert and flint stones, as well as pottery sherds. It is likely the site was selected for habitation also because of its convenient flat topography, while the stones were brought to the site from the wadi below. An archaeological team operated in June 2017 and found cooking pots from the Early Bronze Age, Iron Age and Mamluk periods, jars from the Byzantine and Early Islamic periods. These finds show the continuous occupation of the site, while others include, " A flat roof tile fragment [tegula] which dates to the Roman period, possibly similar in shape to Roman Legion roof tiles from Jerusalem,' said Professor of History and Religion from Averrett University Ralph Hawkins. "It is somewhat surprising to find a roof tile, even a surface find fragment, in such an isolated settlement," said Hawkins, adding that this indicates the tiles had secondary use, possibly as lids. Regarding the stone items, they include a vessel, ground-stone and rubbers. "These grinding stones are also non-indicative chronologically, with similar forms appearing from the Early Bronze through to the Byzantine periods at least. They indicate, however, the consumption of cereals at the site, possibly some grown locally,' the professor said. 'Although basalt implements such as this are heavy, they were probably carried from place to place, since basalt cannot be found in this region," Hawkins explained, noting that two spherical objects are probably pestles, hammers or sling-shots from the Roman-Byzantine Period. The stone piles or cairns located in the south-western part of the site may represent a later activity related to the preparation of the area for agricultural activities and terracing, since they overlie a layer with Roman-Byzantine sherds in it. However, they may date to a similar period as the structures, and may have been used together. It should be noted that some evidence for agriculture or grain processing was found at the site, Hawkins said. The first question that arises is why the structures are so empty of any finds attesting to human activity (pottery, bones etc.). One possibility is that the structures, which are comprised of walls with only a single course of stones, were the foundations for huts or tents. "These were inhabited for a very short time, possibly several weeks or months during the year, and then deserted [altogether, or until the next wet season?]. The artefacts were all taken by the inhabitants when they left and the floor was cleaned.' 'If that were the case, however, we might still expect to find at least a small number of finds representing the residents' garbage; in particular, some animal bones, if meat was consumed, and remains of broken pottery vessels," Hawkins suggested. Another option is that the structures are all enclosure fences and were used exclusively for corralling animals, probably herds of sheep and goats belonging to the pastoral population of the site. The animals lived and slept here, but animal bones are absent, since meat was not processed or consumed here, and dead animals were promptly removed to areas outside the site. "In this case, there would be no artefacts, since the people probably lived in tents outside the area of the enclosures, maybe in the flatter areas of the site," the scholar speculated. Hawkins added that further excavation of the structures and terrace as well as possible Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) analysis for dating them may shed light on ancient irrigation methods in a rather remote area of the Jordan Valley.
