Chinese exporters to US tread warily as tariff uncertainties linger
BEIJING/SHENZHEN, May 13 (Reuters) - When she heard the news that Washington had slashed punitive tariffs on China for at least 90 days, Deng Jinling, manager of a Chinese company that exports thermos flasks to the U.S., popped open a bottle of champagne with her husband.
While Deng celebrated the reprieve with bubbles, she worries about what might happen after 90 days, and has sent her 20-year-old daughter to the U.S. to help scout for a warehouse there to mitigate risks and guard against any further fallout from tariffs.
"My biggest worry is Trump will forget tomorrow what he said today," said Deng, manager of Lucky Bird Trade, based in the export manufacturing hub of Yiwu, the world's largest wholesale hub for small manufactured items, referring to U.S. President Donald Trump.
Chinese factories are heavily dependent on the U.S. market, but manufacturers in China have buckled up, uncertain on how to navigate an increasingly unpredictable trade war that has threatened to upend global supply chains - and the uncertainty prevails despite the temporary truce.
After talks with Chinese officials, the U.S. said on Monday the two sides had agreed to a 90-day pause under which Washington will cut tariffs on Chinese imports to 30% from 145% and Chinese duties on U.S. imports will drop to 10% from 125%.
While the news lifted global markets, the cheer has been tempered by caution among some manufacturers in China, given the uncertainty over what could happen after 90 days, with some still intent on scouring for opportunities overseas to hedge their bets.
Christian Gassner, General Manager of Limoss, a German manufacturer of control panels and remote devices based in the Chinese manufacturing hub of Dongguan, is in Malaysia seeking to expand operations for the U.S. market with a partner there, and says he will continue to do so despite the tariff pause.
"Even with the 90-day pause, it feels more like someone just hit the snooze button on a fire alarm. Tariffs, politics, and policy mood swings don't exactly scream 'stable business environment'," he said.
"Sticking to one region these days is like building your house on a trampoline. For Limoss, the U.S. is a top-three market, so crossing our fingers isn't a strategy - we need real options, real fast, before the next plot twist drops."
Candice Li, marketing manager of a medical devices maker based in China's southern province of Guangdong, said her first reaction was suspicion and she wondered if the 30% tariff would soon translate to 60%.
"As the president of a country, he talks as easily as telling a joke, threatening his credibility," Li said, referring to Trump.
Her company had paused deals with U.S. buyers for more than a month, but Li said she now expected clients to resume trade and pay the tariffs.
With around 60% of orders coming from the U.S., her company had scaled back work hours and shifts after the tariffs were hiked to 145%.
'People from supporting departments only worked for half of the month, which is equal to a pay cut,' Li said.
The timing of the truce is key for some Chinese manufacturers. The month of May is when U.S. retailers traditionally make orders for year-end holidays such as Halloween, Thanksgiving and Christmas.
Jessica Guo, who manages a Christmas tree factory in Jinhua in eastern China, said she was scrambling to get orders out.
"American clients are particularly anxious for us to ship the Christmas trees, but we can't produce them fast enough. We can only schedule orders until the end of August, but by then, the situation between the U.S. and China is uncertain."
Analysts said customers will take the 90-day window of opportunity to ship as many goods as possible into the United States, although the outlook beyond that is uncertain.
On Monday, the container shipping industry welcomed the agreement between Washington and Beijing, saying it expected the deal to boost bookings.
Some smaller exporters with businesses in emerging markets see opportunities in the U.S.-China agreement.
Eileen Xiong, sales director at Dongguan Vdette Information Tech Co, an air purifier manufacturer, said many Chinese exporters focusing on the U.S. market had suspended deals over the past month amid the trade war and that had intensified competition in emerging markets where she operates, such as India, forcing her to lower prices.
"We are a small company ... For big brands, they will not give up the U.S. market. They started to put some energy into emerging markets or markets with lower prices. Now, with a better environment, they may focus their attention back to the U.S., leaving less pressure on us," said Xiong.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Israel hits Iran's energy industry and defence ministry as conflict escalates
Israel attacked Iran's energy industry and defence ministry on the third day of an escalating conflict, as several Iranian missiles evaded Israeli air defences to hit a refinery and rip through a high-rise apartment block south of Tel Aviv. As fuel depots outside Tehran blazed, Donald Trump presided over the US's biggest military parade in decades. He later said the arsenal on display could be deployed against Iran if it targeted American assets. The US president said in a social media post: 'If we are attacked in any way shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before.' There is little question that Israel would like the US to join its campaign. Only American weapons can attempt to reach parts of the Iranian project like the Fordow enrichment plant, which is buried deep under a mountain. But while Iran has called off talks with the US on the future of its nuclear programme, and accused Washington of being Israel's 'partner' in the offensive launched on Friday, it has held off attacking US bases, embassies or other targets. With most of its top military echelon assassinated, Israel claiming domination of Iranian airspace from western Iran to Tehran, and several key nuclear sites seriously damaged, the regime in Tehran now faces a potentially existential threat. Perhaps in an appeal to Trump's promotion of himself as the ultimate dealmaker, and his election pitch that he would end America's decades of overseas wars, Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, signalled that Iran was open to attempts to de-escalate. If Israeli strikes on Iran stopped, 'our responses will also stop', he said. Trump had earlier posted: 'We can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel, and end this bloody conflict!!!' The US is already trying to promote an exchange of messages with Iran to 'calm tensions' with Israel, although the effort falls short of formal mediation, the Haaretz newspaper reported quoting foreign sources. Trump has spoken about the war with Iranian ally Vladimir Putin, and the emir of Qatar, Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, who has been in direct contact with the Iranian president, Masoud Pezeshkian, since Friday. G7 leaders flying to Canada for a summit that starts on Sunday are likely to try and use their time with Trump to argue against escalation. Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, called the leader of Oman, Sultan Haitham bin Tariq al-Said, who had been due to host US-Iran talks, a government spokesperson said. They discussed the importance of halting the conflict and stopping Iran getting nuclear weapons. For Israel, Saturday night was the bloodiest of the conflict, despite its success in knocking out much of Iran's military hierarchy and parts of its missile systems over the previous day. Ten people were killed by Iranian strikes on residential buildings, including at least three children, and more than 200 people were injured. Rescuers spent Sunday searching for at least four people missing in the rubble of an apartment block in Bat Yam south of Tel Aviv. An Israeli military official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that even advanced air defences could not stop every missile when Iran launched large barrages, as it did on Saturday night. 'In these amounts, of hundreds of projectiles, sadly there will be hits,' the official said. 'Even the greatest aerial defence system doesn't get to 100%.' Benjamin Netanyahu visited the site of the strike on Sunday to see the damage and meet rescue workers. The Israeli prime minister said: 'Iran will pay a very heavy price for the premeditated murder of civilians, women and children.' Israeli attacks on Iran have killed dozens of civilians since Friday, including at least 30 children who died when a missile brought down a high-rise apartment building in Tehran on Saturday. Israel's military says it does not intentionally target civilians. Iran deployed about 70 missiles overnight, and dozens of drones, although Israel has a higher success rate intercepting those slower-moving projectiles. Over two nights, Iran fired more than 200 missiles at Israel, the official said, and between 20 and 24 of them evaded air defences. One of those appeared to target a refinery in the northern city of Haifa. In a statement to the Tel Aviv stock exchange, Bazan group said there were no injuries at its plant but pipelines and transmission lines were damaged forcing some facilities to shut down. Netanyahu said he ordered the pre-emptive operation because Iranian progress towards developing nuclear weapons posed a critical security threat. After taking out the top of the military hierarchy and vital nuclear scientists, as well as striking key parts of the nuclear programme, Israel now appears to be widening its campaign. It hit energy facilities overnight including an oil depot near Tehran that blazed through the night and a refinery in Bushehr province on the Gulf, and has told people living near arms factories in Iran to evacuate their homes. An Israeli military official said in the coming days there would be more attacks on 'dual use' facilities, and strikes to prevent Iran expanding its stockpile of missiles, estimated to stand at about 2,000 before Friday.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Poll: Neither political party gets good marks on honesty
Neither party has a distinct advantage when it comes to Americans looking for honesty in U.S. politics. A new NBC News Decision Desk Poll, powered by SurveyMonkey, asked Americans to rate the honesty of politicians from the two major parties on a sliding scale — whether they are "always honest, sometimes honest, about equally honest and dishonest, sometimes dishonest, or always dishonest?" The largest shares say politicians of both parties are sometimes or always dishonest. Among adults, 48% say that describes politicians from the Republican Party, and a slightly smaller 44% say that describes Democratic politicians. Close to one-third of adults say politicians from each party are 'about equally honest and dishonest,' while around 20% say politicians from each party are sometimes or always honest. The new data underscores the lack of trust in institutions that has bolstered political outsiders and fueled electoral backlash against incumbent parties and political leaders, not just in the U.S., but across the globe. And the cynicism extends to both political parties — as President Donald Trump, known for often spreading falsehoods, has returned to the White House, and as former President Joe Biden, who launched his successful 2020 campaign against Trump by calling for "truth over lies," has faced serious and growing criticism that he and his closest allies were not honest about his fitness for office. Biden has said claims he was experiencing cognitive decline while in office are "wrong." Americans are also critical of their own political parties, with majorities of Republicans and Democrats saying their own parties have at least some dishonest tendencies. A higher share of Republicans (22%) than Democrats (14%) say politicians from their own parties are sometimes or always dishonest. On the Republican side, 20% of those who align with President Donald Trump's 'Make America Great Again' movement say GOP politicians are sometimes or always dishonest, and 25% of Republicans who align more with the party say the same. Democrats who say they are aligned more with progressive causes than the party itself are more likely to say their own party has dishonest politicians, with 18% saying they are sometimes or always dishonest, compared to 11% who say they align more with the Democratic Party. The distrust of politicians, even those aligned with their views, underscores how Americans are down on both parties. When asked which party fights for people like them, the largest share of Americans (37%) say neither party does, while 24% say the Democratic Party fights for them, 22% say the GOP does so, and 18% say both parties fight for them. Both parties' images are also underwater, with majorities viewing them unfavorably. Among adults, 57% view the Democratic Party unfavorably, while 43% view it favorably. And 56% view the GOP unfavorably while 44% view it favorably.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Poll: Americans disapprove of Trump's performance, as Republicans manage splits over spending plans
President Donald Trump's second-term approval rating remains stuck in negative territory, along with general attitudes toward his administration's policies, according to a new NBC News Decision Desk Poll powered by SurveyMonkey. But immigration and border security remains an exception, as the president tries to drive national attention back toward his strongest issue — though Americans are closely divided even on that area of relative strength. Americans' ratings of two of the other defining projects of Trump's second term, tariffs and the Department of Government Efficiency, are more negative. And as Congress works on another major Trump initiative, a massive tax and spending plan, the poll illustrates how Republicans must manage internal differences over competing priorities on taxes and government debt. A majority (55%) of all adults over 18 years old said they disapprove of the way Trump's handling his job as president, while 45% approve, unchanged from April's NBC News Stay Tuned Poll. While the overall number was stable, under the surface there are small signs of waning enthusiasm for the president, with the share of adults who strongly approve decreasing slightly since April. The share who strongly disapprove also fell slightly, though intense negative feelings remain stronger than intense positive feelings in this poll. Republicans were 5 percentage points less likely to say that they strongly support the president compared to April, with much of this movement coming from Republicans who say they identify as being part of the MAGA movement moving into the 'somewhat approve' category. The poll was conducted May 30-June 10, surveying 19,410 adults online nationwide with a margin of error of plus or minus 2.1 percentage points. When asked to identify emotions about the president and his actions, fewer MAGA supporters picked 'thrilled' compared to April, too. Thirty-seven percent said they're thrilled about the actions the Trump administration has taken so far during its term, down from 46% in April. In contrast, a majority (51%) of Democrats say they are 'furious' at the Trump administration's actions, showing a disparity in the intensity of feeling between the two parties. Indeed, Republicans shifted 7 percentage points away from being thrilled toward more neutral feelings about the president since April. This type of intensity gap has played a major role in past nonpresidential election cycles, and it may prove notable in off-cycle elections in New Jersey and Virginia this November, which generally see relatively lower turnout. Congressional Republicans and Trump will want to drive up enthusiasm among their base as they prepare to defend seats in the 2026 midterm elections. A majority of independents said they feel dissatisfied, angry or furious with the actions of the administration. That's reflected in independents' approval rating of the president, with 65% saying they disapprove of his performance. Immigration remains Trump's strongest issue A majority of Americans said they approve of Trump's handling of border security and immigration, though the public is closely split on even his strongest issue, with 51% approving of his handling of immigration and border security and 49% disapproving. While the survey was being conducted, Trump deployed National Guard troops and Marines to the Los Angeles area due to mounting protests over Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity in the county. He has spoken repeatedly about the issue in recent days. While the public overall is divided on Trump's immigration policy, his base is motivated by the issue and his handling of it. While 9% of Americans overall said immigration is the issue that matters most to them right now, 20% of MAGA supporters said immigration is the most important issue, second only to the economy. Trump's overall numbers on immigration were similar to the April poll, but Republicans, MAGA Republicans and independents were all slightly more likely to say now that they strongly approve of the way Trump is handling border security and immigration. In recent months, the administration's immigration policies have overlapped with its higher education policies, especially those aimed at foreign students across the United States. The poll found a majority of Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of issues related to college and universities, with 56% disapproving of Trump's actions toward universities, including a 42% plurality who said they strongly disapprove. Trump's base, however, strongly approves of his handling of universities. MAGA supporters overwhelmingly approve, including 72% who said they strongly approve. Most Republicans also approve, including 57% who strongly approve of Trump's handling of the issue. On the question of how institutions like Harvard University affect the U.S., a plurality of Americans said they help the country (44%) and about a quarter (24%) said they hurt the country. Another 31% said colleges and universities like Harvard are not making a difference. Harvard has been at the forefront of legal battles with the Trump administration over grant money and the ability to enroll foreign students. A majority of MAGA supporters (65%) and Republicans (53%) said universities like Harvard are mostly hurting the country, whereas three-quarters of Democrats said they help the country. Among independents, 46% said colleges and universities aren't making a difference and 42% said they're helping the country. Americans gave Trump negative ratings on how he's handling several other issues, including tariffs (40% approve, 60% disapprove), cost of living and inflation (39%-61%) and diversity, equity and inclusion efforts (44%-56%). Republicans split on priorities in Trump's big bill A slight majority of Americans (51%) said maintaining current spending levels on programs like Medicaid is the most important matter as Congress considers Trump-backed budget legislation this year. But it's closely split, within the margin of error, against a combined 49% who say a pair of Republican-aligned priorities are most important to them. The poll also illustrates how Republicans are trying to balance priorities and the demands of different parts of their narrow congressional majorities as they design the package. Mirroring the divisions among the Republican lawmakers negotiating the bill, 40% of Republicans said they care most about ensuring the national debt is reduced, while an almost identical share (39%) said they care most about continuing and expanding income tax cuts and credits enacted in 2017 by Trump. Another 2 in 10 Republicans said maintaining current spending is their most important budget priority. The findings come after a brief but explosive online feud between Trump and his former billionaire adviser, Elon Musk, who tarred the Republican legislation as a ' disgusting abomination ' over its spending levels. Several Republican senators have also expressed concerns about spending levels in the bill, even while backing the idea of extending the 2017 tax breaks and enacting some new ones. Senate Republicans, who have a 53-seat majority, are aiming to pass their version of the legislation by July. Democrats surveyed in the poll overwhelmingly said their priority is maintaining current spending levels on programs like Medicaid (79%), as do a slight majority of independents (53%). DOGE ratings decline slightly Meanwhile, Americans' assessment of Musk's efforts with DOGE to reduce spending and the size of the federal government declined slightly since April. In the most recent survey, 44% rated it as a success or partial success, down from 47%, while 56% rated it a failure or partial failure, up from 52%. The change included an erosion among Trump's most fervent supporters on DOGE, with 49% of MAGA supporters now saying the effort is a success, down from 66% in April. The survey was in the field during Trump and Musk's recent feud, though the results on this question did not change appreciably over time. Economic concerns Economic ratings remain lukewarm: 45% of Americans said their personal financial situation is the same as one year ago and 34% said it's worse. Another 21% said they're financially better off than they were a year ago. The findings were almost identical in April. A bare majority of Americans (51%) think Trump's tariffs will make their personal finances worse in the next year. This number is slightly down from April, and most groups shifted toward saying that the tariff policies will result in their finances being 'about the same.' That finding comes as inflation was largely steady in May, with the impact of many on-again, off-again tariffs and ongoing negotiations with trade partners still unclear. The NBC News Decision Desk Poll is powered by SurveyMonkey. It was conducted online May 30-June 10 among a national sample of 19,410 adults ages 18 and over. Reported percentages exclude item nonresponse and round to the nearest percentage point. The estimated margin of error for this survey among all adults is plus or minus 2.1 percentage points.
