How the Bezos-Trump alliance began
Amazon founder and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos last summer privately urged Donald Trump to pick Doug Burgum as Trump's vice president, saying he'd be an "excellent" choice.
Why it matters: Bezos' phone conversation with Trump in July — detailed in my forthcoming book, " Revenge: The Inside Story of Trump's Return to Power" — was a sign that Bezos was engaging with Trump on political issues months earlier than previously reported.
It wasn't until late October — three months later — that Bezos spiked the Post editorial page's planned endorsement of Kamala Harris for president, and his outreach to Trump came into focus.
Zoom in: The latest indication of Bezos' Trump-ward drift came Wednesday, when he announced that the Post's progressive-leaning opinion page would shift its mission to promote "personal liberties and free markets."
The move was praised by Trump allies such as Elon Musk but created an uproar at the Post, where David Shipley, the opinion editor, resigned.
Flashback: Since he killed the Harris editorial, Bezos — like Musk, Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, Google CEO Sundar Pichai and other tech titans whose fortunes can be swayed by the president's decisions — has continued to publicly warm to Trump.
On Nov. 6, the day after the election, Bezos praised Trump for an "extraordinary political comeback and decisive victory."
The following month, Bezos dined with Trump at the president's Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida. And in January, Bezos and his fiancée, Lauren Sánchez, attended Trump's inauguration, to which Amazon had donated $1 million.
The seeds of the Bezos-Trump alliance were planted in the July phone call. During the call, Bezos praised Trump for how he'd handled the attempt on his life at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
Bezos also told Trump that Burgum would be a great choice for VP, according to two people with knowledge of the call.
Burgum, who was North Dakota's governor at the time and like Bezos had made a fortune in the tech world, helped arrange for the call.
Burgum earlier had told Trump that Bezos wanted to speak with him, and had given Bezos' contact information to Trump aides so they would recognize the billionaire's number when he called.
Trump ultimately chose Ohio Sen. JD Vance as his VP nominee. Burgum is now Trump's Interior secretary.
Bezos' overture to Trump was a shift in their once-chilly relationship.
Bezos, who also owns a rocket company, criticized Trump for his rhetoric during the 2016 campaign and joked about sending Trump into space.
Trump tore into Bezos throughout his first presidency. Trump, who's been divorced twice, even chided Bezos for getting divorced. Trump was deeply angered by the Post's critical coverage of him, and derided the newspaper as the "Amazon Washington Post."
Trump at one point during his first term advocated for then-Postmaster General Megan Brennan to raise shipping rates on Amazon packages, which she pushed back on.
What they're saying: Representatives for Trump and Bezos did not respond to requests for comment. Nor did a spokesperson for the Washington Post.
This story has been corrected to say Sánchez is Bezos' fiancée (not his wife).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
11 minutes ago
- Politico
Bondi says violent LA protesters will face federal charges
At least nine people are facing federal charges for their involvement in protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Monday. Demonstrators face charges for attacking police with Molotov cocktails, looting and spitting on law enforcement, Bondi said in a TV interview. 'We are going to prosecute them federally,' she said in an interview on Fox News. 'If California won't protect their law enforcement, we will protect the LAPD and the sheriff's office out there.' Sporadic but at times raucous protests broke out in several parts of the Los Angeles area in recent days, prompting President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard troops and Marines despite the fact that Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the additional forces were not needed. Bondi said the Trump administration planned to take a hard line against demonstrators. 'You spit on a federal law enforcement officer no more,' she said. 'As President Trump said, you spit. we hit. Get ready. If you spit on a federal law enforcement officer, we are going to charge you with a crime federally. You are looking at up to five years maximum in prison.' Those charged already include David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union California, who was injured and arrested while protesting the arrest of workers in downtown Los Angeles. He was released Monday from federal custody on a $50,000 bond. The Trump administration's decisive treatment of demonstrators — and the president's focus on punishing those who assault police officers — stands in contrast to his sweeping pardons for roughly 1,500 people who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, seeking to overturn the election. Trump has deployed up to 4,000 soldiers from the California National Guard to help quell the demonstrations over the protests of Newsom and Bass — who say the moves are worsening tensions. The state has sued to reverse the deployments. The White House also ordered 700 Marines to join the National Guard, though it's unclear exactly what role they will play. The San Francisco Chronicle reported on Monday evening that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to direct military forces to arrest 'lawbreakers.' DHS did not immediately respond to request for comment from POLITICO, and the Department of Defense declined to comment on the story. 'You can run, you can't hide,' Bondi told Fox. 'We are coming after you federally. If you assault a police officer, if you rob a store, if you loot, if you spit on a police officer, we are coming after you.'
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more
Jun. 9—Families hoping to send money to loved ones in other countries may be hit with additional fees from a tax and spending bill proposed by the Trump administration that would slap a 3.5% tax on remittances sent by anyone who is not a U.S. citizen. The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" passed through the House in May and is now being debated by the Senate. The budget bill has several proposed tax changes, which include taxing money sent from an estimated 40 million non-US citizens — including green card holders, temporary workers and undocumented immigrants — to family and friends in other countries. The bill had a 5% tax but was reduced to 3.5%. The bill is another way the Trump administration is hoping to dissuade immigrants, both documented and undocumented, from coming into the country and moving money out of the U.S. economy. Republicans believe the bill would increase the average take-home pay of U.S. citizens, while Democrats believe the bill and increased taxes are "a transfer of wealth from the working class to the rich," said Daniel Garcia, spokesperson for the Democratic Party of New Mexico. What is a remittance? Remittances refer to sending money from one person to another and is typically done between family members from one country to another. A person living and working in the U.S. would send money to family members typically living in a developing country, where this money is a source of income that contributes to the country's gross domestic product (GDP). Payments are typically sent using an electronic payment service or a money transfer app. Banks, credit unions and money transfer services charge a fee for processing remittances, and fees average 10%, according to the International Monetary Fund. Cryptocurrency exchanges are not as heavily regulated and can be a way to avoid additional taxes and surcharges. "Taxing remittances would amount to a form of double taxation, since migrants already pay taxes in the country where they work," Esteban Moctezuma Barragán, Mexican Ambassador, wrote in a statement. "Imposing a tax on these transfers would disproportionately affect those with the least, without accounting for their ability to pay," Barragán added. However, some believe the 3.5% tax fee would give financial support to public services and is the most "pro-worker, pro-family and pro-American legislation we've seen in decades," said Amy Barela, chairwoman of the Republican Party of New Mexico. "Let's be clear, this measure is not about targeting individuals," she wrote in a statement to the Journal. "It's about ensuring the 3.5% fee, although modest, would also have a very meaningful impact in helping offset costs associated with public services, border security, and community infrastructure — relieving some of the financial pressure on hardworking New Mexicans who continue to bear the burden of an imbalanced system." Crucial source of revenue Mexico is the second-largest receiver of personally wired money behind India, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In 2024, Latin America received $160.9 billion, with the U.S. accounting for 96.6% of all remittances to Mexico. They also make up 20-30% of GDP in countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti and Honduras. "Remittance is a very important source of revenue in our government," said Patricia Pinzón, consul of Mexico. "This would affect Mexican families and the economy in general, but I would say the basic needs of Mexican families is the most worrying thing." However, "whatever happens in one economy will affect the other," said Pinzón. "Our economies are so interrelated that everything that happens here has a consequence in Mexico," she said. "Mexicans will not stop sending money; they'll just look for alternative ways to send it." Mexican migrant workers sent 16.7% of their labor income back to their families, and more than 80% of the income remains in the U.S. economy. The average amount of remittance sent to Mexico is roughly $350 every one to two months, which "could seem like nothing for the U.S., but it's money that a whole family lives on and covers their basics in Mexico," Pinzón said.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pam Bondi's ‘Pro-Trump' Brother Loses Election by Landslide
Lawyers in the nation's capital handed a stunning loss to Attorney General Pam Bondi's brother in a heated election to lead the Washington, D.C., Bar. Ninety percent of more than 38,000 members of the lawyers' association voted to elect employment law attorney Diane Seltzer as their president, the organization announced Monday. The Seltzer Law Firm principal beat Brad Bondi, a litigation partner at the firm Paul Hastings, who garnered a measly 3,490 votes. D.C. Bar CEO Bob Spagnoletti told reporters that the 'extraordinary' 43-percent turnout was more than five times the norm in a typical election. Bondi's landslide loss appeared to be a resounding rebuke of the Trump administration's war on the legal profession, which has divided the industry. 'Right now we are in a time of governmental chaos, and our members don't feel safe to practice law,' Seltzer said in a virtual showdown against Bondi last month, adding that she planned to 'make sure that we maintain and uphold the rule of law, and that people feel they can practice law safely without worrying about executive orders, or without being targeted in any possible way by the government.' President Donald Trump waged a retribution campaign against several prominent law firms in March by issuing a flurry of executive orders that revoked the security clearances and canceled government contracts with firms he perceived as political enemies. A month later, voting began at the D.C. Bar and ended June 4th. Trump's moves drove a wedge between top firms, with some caving in to the Trump administration by agreeing to do pro bono work and others filing lawsuits challenging the executive orders against them. 'I had hoped this race would be a contest of ideas to enhance services for our widely varied members,' Bondi said in a Monday LinkedIn post. 'Instead, I am disgusted by how rabid partisans lurched this election into the political gutter, turning a professional campaign into baseless attacks, identity politics, and partisan recrimination.' Bondi accused his opponent of 'smearing' him over his ties to the Attorney General and 'peddling conspiracies' about his intentions. Alicia Long, a prosecutor who was an adviser to the failed U.S. Attorney nominee Ed Martin and is now working with Jeanine Pirro, also lost her bid to become the D.C. Bar's treasurer. Long and Bondi's candidacies sparked alarm among Washington lawyers in March, when a 'high alert' obtained by NBC News and blasted on social media described the duo as 'Trump/Pam Bondi loyalists' who were 'making a bid to take over the D.C. Bar.' In April, conservative lawyer and anti-MAGA activist George Conway weighed in on the D.C. Bar election and accused Pam Bondi of helping Trump punish law firms in an 'extraordinarily perilous moment' for the legal system. 'I'm not admitted in D.C. but I have a request of those of you who are... Vote against Brad Bondi,' he said in an Instagram post. 'Ordinarily, I wouldn't hold the views or conduct of someone's relative against them... But these are not ordinary times. The Department of Justice under Pam Bondi has engaged in a full-scale assault on our Constitution and on the rule of law.'
