Supreme Court declines to let Florida enforce its new immigration law
The high court's one-sentence order did not provide details on its reasoning for the denial of the emergency request from Florida's attorney general.
The case stemmed from a challenge by two immigration groups and two undocumented immigrants to legislation that Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis signed into law this year making it a crime to enter Florida after coming into the United States illegally, and re-entering the state after being deported.
U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams in April temporarily blocked enforcement of the law, and last month found Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier in civil contempt over what she said was an effort to defy her order.
A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in June denied Uthmeier's request to pause Williams' ruling, and expedited the appeal for consideration before the panel in October.
In documents filed with the Supreme Court, Uthmeier had argued that Florida was 'cognizant' of the federal government's role in immigration enforcement and the state was 'purposefully aligning the law with federal requirements and objectives.'
The Trump administration had similarly contended in a supporting brief that the measure 'complements' federal law and that the statutes 'are materially identical to the federal entry and reentry provisions.'
The American Civil Liberties Union, which filed a Supreme Court brief this month on behalf of those challenging Florida's law, argued that courts have ruled against states that have passed similar laws over the past two years. It also cited the Supreme Court's 2012 ruling in Arizona v. United States that said, "The Government of the United States has broad, undoubted power over the subject of immigration and the status of aliens."
Bacardi Jackson, executive director of the ACLU of Florida, praised the high court's ruling in a statement Wednesday.
'This ruling affirms what the Constitution demands — that immigration enforcement is a federal matter and that no one should be stripped of their liberty without due process,' Jackson said.
A spokesperson for Uthmeier's office said that Florida will proceed with its appeal in the 11th circuit.
"Florida's sovereignty cannot be left up to the whims of the next presidential administration," the spokesperson, Jae Williams, said in a statement. "The law passed by the Legislature and signed by Governor DeSantis is important to Florida's future, and we believe it will prevail on the merits."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump threatens to revoke born-in-USA Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship and calls her ‘Threat to Humanity'
Amid a disaster in Texas, conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, and a trade war of his own making, President Donald Trump on Saturday took time out to issue a threat that he'll strip the citizenship of U.S.-born comedian and talk show host Rosie O'Donnell, a longtime critic. In a major escalation of his war of words with adversaries, the president wrote on Truth Social: 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship.' He continued: 'She is a Threat to Humanity, and should remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her. GOD BLESS AMERICA!' The president has no power to strip anyone of citizenship, but since returning to the White House, Trump has sought to end birthright citizenship, guaranteed to Americans under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. The 14th Amendment states: 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.' Overturning the automatic right to citizenship for anyone born in the United States is currently the subject of a legal battle, with a federal judge just this week blocking an executive order that seeks to unilaterally redefine who qualifies as a citizen. This paves the way for another major Supreme Court case involving the president's birthright citizenship challenge. Several courts have already struck down the president's attempt to block citizenship from newborn Americans who are born to certain immigrant parents. In another alarming move, a recently unveiled memo from the Department of Justice outlines the Trump administration's plans to 'maximally pursue' denaturalization of American citizens, marking a radical expansion of the president's anti-immigration agenda. Approximately 25 million people in the U.S. are naturalized citizens, or immigrants who completed the lengthy legal process to become citizens. According to the June 11 memo, the Justice Department's civil division will 'prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence.' That evidence would need to be proof that an individual 'illegally procured' citizenship through fraud or other means. It is rare, but it does happen. In the first Trump administration, there were 94 denaturalization cases. Joe Biden 's administration pursued 64 such cases. These play out in civil courts where the burden of proof is 'clear and convincing evidence,' and a judge, not a jury, makes that decision. O'Donnell was born in Commack, New York, in 1962. Her mother was of Irish American descent, and her father was an immigrant from County Donegal, Ireland. Days before Trump's return to the White House, the 63-year-old comedian left the U.S. and moved to Ireland, which she says has helped improve her health and sleep. Nevertheless, she remains a fierce critic of Trump, and on Sunday, she blamed him for the impact of the deadly flash floods in Central Texas in a lengthy TikTok video. 'And, you know, when the president guts all of the early warning systems and the weather forecasting abilities of the government, these are the results…' O'Donnell said in part. As many as 129 people are known to have died in the disaster, with contributing factors being an insufficient early warning system and the timing of the storm, which hit as it did in the middle of the night. In March, O'Donnell questioned how Trump comfortably won every swing state in the 2024 election, claiming that one of his 'best friends owns and runs the internet,' likely referring to former 'first buddy' Elon Musk. Despite her long-running criticism of the president, there is no evidence that O'Donnell is a 'threat to humanity.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Homeland Security's Noem says in talks with five Republican-led states to build detention site
July 12 (Reuters) - U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said on Saturday that she was in talks with five Republican-led states to build another detention site inspired by the "Alligator Alcatraz" facility in Florida. "We've had several other states that are actually using Alligator Alcatraz as a model for how they can partner with us," Noem told a press conference in Florida. She declined to name the states. "Alligator Alcatraz" is a remote migrant detention center, which sits some 37 miles (60 km) from Miami in a vast subtropical wetland teeming with alligators, crocodiles and pythons.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
UN's call for second referendum is an insult to voters
L ast week, a United Nations panel called on the government to rerun last year's doomed 'care' referendum and take another shot at removing from the constitution all offensive references to women's lives 'within the home'. The UN's Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (Cedaw) recommended that the state conduct 'an independent evaluation of the referendum, carry out information campaigns on the negative reinforcement by article 41.2 of gender stereotypes about women's roles in the home, and undertake inclusive public consultations to find alternative wording with a view to holding another constitutional referendum on article 41.2 of the constitution to remove the stereotypical language on the role of women in the home'. Let me just paraphrase their message for you, especially my hard-of-thinking female readers. Since you were too stupid to understand what you were being asked last time, and voted like lemmings to maintain your constitutional enslavement, we'll just use really, really simple language with lots of big letters, short words and coloured pictures to con you into agreeing that you no longer do the lion's share of the work in the home and that your contribution to rearing your children and running your household, while probably holding down a full-time job as well, is no more valuable than that of any man. Probably less so, in fact, since when some men actually do their share, we never hear the end of it.
