Organ donors' lives endangered by rushed transplant procedures, investigation finds
Several families have stated that surgeons attempted to initiate organ retrievals while patients were still alive or improving, as noted in a July 20 report from The New York Times.
Amid a growing push for increased transplants, "a growing number of patients have endured premature or bungled attempts to retrieve their organs," according to the report, which painted a picture of "rushed decision-making" and organ demand taking priority over donor safety.
In a recent investigation by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), there were more than 70 canceled organ removals in Kentucky alone "that should have been stopped sooner" because the patients showed signs of revival, the report stated.
The problem appears to be linked to an increase in "donation after circulatory death," which is when the patient has not been declared "brain dead" but is critically ill or injured.
In that case, life support is withdrawn and organs are harvested within a couple of hours after the heart stops naturally.
The Times report indicated that 55 medical workers in 19 states reported witnessing "at least one disturbing case of donation after circulatory death" — some even claiming that providers had administered drugs to "hasten the death" of donors.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released a statement on Monday announcing an initiative to reform the organ transplant system.
The push follows the HRSA's investigation, which reportedly revealed "disturbing practices by a major organ procurement organization."
"The entire system must be fixed to ensure that every potential donor's life is treated with the sanctity it deserves."
Secretary Kennedy said the investigation revealed that hospitals allowed the organ procurement process to begin "when patients showed signs of life."
"This is horrifying," Kennedy said in a statement. "The organ procurement organizations that coordinate access to transplants will be held accountable. The entire system must be fixed to ensure that every potential donor's life is treated with the sanctity it deserves."
Under this investigation, HRSA reviewed organ procurement organizations' "conduct and treatment of vulnerable patients."
"HRSA's independent investigation revealed clear negligence after the previous [Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network] OPTN board of directors claimed to find no major concerns in their internal review," the HHS noted.
HRSA examined 351 cases where organ donation was authorized but not ultimately completed, the agency indicated.
Of these, 103 cases, or over 29%, showed "concerning features," including 73 patients who had neurological signs "incompatible" with organ donation.
The investigation also discovered that at least 28 patients may not have been deceased at the time of organ procurement.
The HHS said this raises "serious ethical and legal questions."
"Evidence pointed to poor neurologic assessments, lack of coordination with medical teams, questionable consent practices and misclassification of causes of death, particularly in overdose cases," the agency said.
As part of the reform, organ procurement organizations will be required to follow "strict corrective actions" and make "system-level changes" to safeguard potential donors.
Dr. Maureen McBride, CEO of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), responded to The New York Times report in an online statement, calling the patient situations "horrific."
"This falls far below the standard that the American organ donation and transplant system — the global gold standard — demands, and it cannot be tolerated," she said.
"This sharply underscores the need for a more unified and accountable structure for overseeing the nation's organ donation and transplant system."
There are currently more than 103,000 men, women and children on the national transplant waiting list.
There is currently "fragmented oversight" of the organ transplant system — shared by the HRSA and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) — which has led to "confusion and inconsistent accountability," according to McBride.
To ensure a "safe, effective and trustworthy" system, she called for consolidated oversight and an improved patient-safety reporting system.
The federal government "remains ultimately accountable for oversight of the system," McBride noted.
"UNOS will continue to advocate for reforms to improve the system, and we look forward to sharing our proposed reforms with Congress this week and making meaningful progress in partnership with the federal government to strengthen the system," she added.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
There are currently more than 103,000 men, women and children on the national transplant waiting list, HRSA said.
Each day, 13 people die while waiting for an organ transplant.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
a minute ago
- Fast Company
What's really inside your mattress?
You probably spend more time with your mattress than any other piece of furniture. But you also probably don't know exactly what's inside it. Some companies are trying to change that. [Images: lindo12345/Getty Images, realstockvector/iStock/Getty Images Plus] BY Listen to this Article More info 0:00 / 6:49 When I recently moved and needed a new mattress, I originally considered one made from memory foam. Then I realized that I didn't know exactly what 'memory foam' was even made of. Some mattresses use fiberglass as a flame retardant. Some others include PFAS 'forever chemicals,' plasticizers, or other chemicals linked to health issues, like formaldehyde. What's inside a mattress, it turns out, takes a fair amount of research to determine. Recently, a handful of brands now make cleaner options. But building a better mattress can be complicated—and expensive. The materials you may want to avoid When fiberglass is used as a flame retardant, the material can spill out when someone removes their mattress cover or if the cover is torn. The tiny glass fibers can break and settle into dust. If you breathe it in, it can irritate your lungs. It's often present even when a mattress says that it's 'nontoxic.' In California, a new law will ban fiberglass in mattresses beginning in 2027. Still, if you buy a mattress now, there's a chance that it will have the material in it. Fiberglass was supposed to be a replacement for older chemical flame retardants that were commonly used in other furniture and caused other health problems, from endocrine disruption to neurodevelopmental toxicity. Subscribe to the Daily Company's trending stories delivered to you every day SIGN UP After regulations changed, manufacturers started phasing out most chemical flame retardants. But they still might show up in some mattresses, too. In a recent study in Canada that analyzed cheap memory foam mattresses made for children, researchers discovered flame retardants in almost every sample. In one case, a mattress contained a chemical that had been banned in Canada for more than a decade. The mattresses also contained other chemicals of concern, like plasticizers. Using the mattress can make the problem worse. 'What's happening is that the body is heating up the mattress, and the chemical comes out more when you heat it up,' says Miriam Diamond, a professor at the University of Toronto and one of the authors of the study. The study didn't look for PFAS, the 'forever chemicals' known for use in products like nonstick pans. But PFAS chemicals are also commonly used in fabric on mattresses. 'I remember when I purchased my last mattress, they said, 'We're going to sell you this breathable, water-repellent, stain-resistant mattress protector, and you need to buy it in order to get the warranty,'' says Diamond. 'And I thought, no, because those are the code words for PFAS: breathable, stain resistance.' In some cases, brands might not even know what's in the product they're selling. The researchers were surprised to find flame retardants, and speculated that some might be showing up unintentionally because the equipment used to make foam was contaminated from other uses. Foam used in car upholstery, for example, still requires flame retardants, and could sometimes end up on mattress foam by mistake. Mattresses also sometimes contain formaldehyde, a known carcinogen, in adhesives or bonding agents. Memory foam can emit other volatile organic compounds, including toluene, benzene, and acetaldehyde. If you've ever unrolled a bed-in-a-box style foam mattress, you've probably inhaled some of these chemicals. The health impacts are greatest for children and pregnant women; it's less clear how much long-term impact there might be for most adults. There's little direct research. (There's also no equivalent of the children's mattress study, yet, for mattresses made for adults.) advertisement But there's also a long list of environmental reasons to avoid foam, beginning with the fact that foam is made from petrochemicals derived from crude oil. Workers in factories that make foam can have an increased risk of cancer. At the end of a foam mattress's life, it typically isn't recycled. At a landfill, it breaks down into microplastics that can contaminate soil and water. A better mattress With all of this in mind, I looked for alternatives. Some are much pricier than others. (If you have tens of thousands of dollars to drop on a mattress, you can buy a handmade Swedish option made from horsehair, cotton, wool, and traditional springs for $34,000.) But there are several other brands now making more sustainable options, including Avocado Green, Savvy Rest, and Naturepedic. I decided to try a wool-and-latex mattress from Birch (currently $1,968), a brand that spun off from Helix, a popular decade-old mattress brand, because it had particularly good reviews for comfort. Birch sent me a sample to test. The mattress has a layer of individually wrapped coils, two different layers of latex, a layer of wool (wool is naturally fire-resistant), and a cotton cover. The design took time to develop. 'Most beds in the industry are made from polyurethane foam that have a variety of different thicknesses and densities and firmness levels where you can mix and match certain things and to kind of get to a really great bed,' says Jerry Lin, one of Helix's cofounders. 'Those options aren't as available in the natural and organic world. So honestly, it took a very long time for us to find the right mix of latex and organic wool and cotton to layer up a mattress that would be appropriate for the customer and the brand that we were serving.' The wool, for example, comes from a supplier with machinery that made the wool 'a little more bouncy,' he says, with more airflow than wool would typically have. The company similarly had to find the right suppliers for each component. The latex is certified by GOLS, the Global Organic Latex Standard, as being made from organic, raw material and meeting standards for worker health and safety. It's also certified by Greenguard Gold, a label that screens for more than 15,000 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that can pollute indoor air. When I unrolled the mattress from the box, there was no chemical smell—just a faintly sweet scent that seemed to come from the wool before it faded. Over the months that I've been testing it, it's held up well; the mattress also has a 25-year warranty. It's also very comfortable when I'm lying on my back. But as a side sleeper, it isn't exactly the right fit for me. (That's not to say it might not work for other side sleepers, but it's a little more firm than I'd like, and I've been waking up with a sore shoulder.) That's the final environmental challenge: the brand is primarily online, though it's growing its partnerships with physical stores. Like many consumers, I couldn't try it out in person first. When I find a new mattress, I'll likely have to ship another very heavy package across the country. And when I donate this one, I'll have to hope that it doesn't eventually end up in a landfill. The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Adele Peters is a senior writer at Fast Company who focuses on solutions to climate change and other global challenges, interviewing leaders from Al Gore and Bill Gates to emerging climate tech entrepreneurs like Mary Yap.. She contributed to the bestselling book Worldchanging: A User's Guide for the 21st Century and a new book from Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies called State of Housing Design 2023 More
Fox News
2 minutes ago
- Fox News
FDA Commissioner On Drugs, Dyes & Your Diet
The Trump administration continues to advance the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary are leading the initiative. Dr. Makary joins the Rundown to discuss the dangers of energy drinks and gummies containing opioid-like substances, efforts to remove dyes and chemicals from the nation's food, and how the FDA plans to update America's dietary guidelines. He also addresses some of the controversies surrounding HHS Secretary Kennedy and the MAHA movement. Violent crime has made headlines across the country, fueling public concern even as national statistics show a steady decline. Former U.S. Attorney and Executive Director of Right On Crime Brett Tolman joins the Rundown to explain how stronger border enforcement and deporting criminal illegal immigrants have helped reduce crime and argues that empowering law enforcement can further drive down violence across the country. Plus, commentary from Co-Chair of the Republican National Committee Youth Council, CJ Pearson. Photo Credit: AP Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
New York Times
3 minutes ago
- New York Times
We're About to Find Out if Kennedy Is Serious
A month into his new job as health and human services secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. explained his view of America's health woes to the Fox News host Sean Hannity: 'We are poisoning ourselves, and it's coming from principally these ultraprocessed foods.' Mr. Hannity nodded eagerly, boasted about following a keto diet and rattled off statistics about obesity rates in the United States that he said 'really scare me.' Watching this was disorienting. I had written about Michelle Obama's 'Let's Move!' campaign to tackle childhood obesity, and documented how much Republicans hated it and fought virtually every policy she pursued, from healthier school meals to banning trans fats. In 2010, Mr. Hannity railed against the effort: 'Your America is turning into a nanny state thanks to the Obama administration's efforts to rein in the junk food industry!' he shouted on his show. 'I don't want to be told how many calories are in my Big Mac meal.' Back then, food was an easy partisan wedge. But recently, Democrats and Republicans have been converging on the need for more government intervention in the food supply. According to a recent poll, about two-thirds of Democrats and Republicans now support banning processed foods from public school lunches. This attitude gives the Trump administration a rare political opportunity to make once infeasible policy changes to improve our diets. It's not just that Mr. Kennedy has the backing of the president. He also has an energized grass-roots 'Make America Healthy Again' army that could be unleashed to defend his boldest policies. Does the administration realize the power it has, and is it prepared to use it on real reforms? Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
