Stuart Layden has murder conviction restored
A man who was twice found guilty of the same murder - and had both convictions quashed - has had his conviction "restored" following a Supreme Court ruling.Stuart Layden was among five people convicted of murdering Ian Church, 40, outside the Bricklayers Arms pub in Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, in 2012.Court of Appeal judges overturned his conviction in 2015 and ordered a retrial - and in 2023 quashed a second conviction due to a procedural error.Judges at the Supreme Court said a third trial risked "bringing the criminal justice system into disrepute" and could lead to "otherwise safe" convictions being "set aside on a technicality".
Lord Hamblen concluded that Layden's murder conviction would be "restored", and issues concerning bail and his surrender to custody would be dealt with by the Court of Appeal.Layden, formerly of South Quay, Great Yarmouth, was first handed a life sentence for Mr Church's murder in April 2013.He successfully appealed against the conviction in March 2015 and was rearraigned for a new trial six months later.Layden was again found guilty in May 2016 and sentenced to almost nine years in prison.In 2022, he applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) to look at concerns around the timing of his retrial.A defendant must be rearraigned - asked how they plead - within two months of an appeal.In 2023, three appeal judges concluded he was not properly arraigned before a retrial at Norwich Crown Court in 2016, stating the failure was "entirely avoidable".The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) challenged the ruling at the Supreme Court in March, claiming the Court of Appeal had prioritised court processes over a fair trial.Lawyers for Layden opposed the appeal, claiming that ignoring the two-month time limit would "effectively neuter the 'extra safeguard' Parliament intended to introduce in Court of Appeal-ordered retrials".Earlier, five Supreme Court justices unanimously ruled in the CPS's favour.
In his ruling, Lord Hamblen said that while the law did not specify the consequences of failing to comply with procedural rules around the two-month arraignment period, invalidating proceedings entirely would be a "triumph of form over substance" and created the "perverse incentive" for a defendant to abscond or "do nothing""Parliament cannot fairly have intended total invalidity to follow from non-compliance with the procedural requirements," he added.The 27-page judgment was supported by Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Stephens and Lady Simler.
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
'I just don't think it's fair': Weinstein juror threatens to quit over other jurors' actions
NEW YORK, June 6 (Reuters) - The judge overseeing former Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein's rape and sexual assault trial refused on Friday to dismiss a juror who said some jurors were treating others on the 12-person panel unfairly. "I just don't think it's fair and just," the juror told New York Supreme Court Justice Curtis Farber in court, referring to things other jurors were saying and doing behind another juror's back. "There is a bit of a shunning happening," the juror said. The juror asked to be dismissed but Farber said there was no legal basis to do so after the juror confirmed that no one on the jury panel was pressuring him to change his view of the case. "If any other juror feels they need to talk to me, they can," the judge said. Weinstein's lawyers said they would make a proposal on how to address the matter later on Friday. Friday was the second day of jury deliberations. No other jurors were present during the exchange. Farber dismissed alternates from the jury on Thursday. Weinstein, 73, was convicted of rape by a Manhattan jury in February 2020, but the New York Court of Appeals threw out the conviction and ordered a new trial, citing errors by the trial judge. Prosecutors say the Academy Award-winning producer raped aspiring actress Jessica Mann in 2013 and assaulted two other women in 2006 and 2002. Weinstein, who has denied ever having non-consensual sex or assaulting anyone, has pleaded not guilty. He faces up to 25 years in prison for two counts of criminal sexual acts and up to four years for one count of rape. Weinstein is already serving a 16-year prison sentence after being found guilty in December 2022 of rape in a separate California case. Prosecutors with the office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg have portrayed Weinstein as a serial predator who promised career advancement in Hollywood to women, only to then coax them into private settings where he attacked them. Weinstein's defense lawyers have said his encounters with the women were consensual and accused them of lying about being raped after failing to make it big in Hollywood by sleeping with him.
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Cambridge man jailed for murdering ex-flatmate after passport row
A man who murdered his former flatmate has been jailed for Lakhani, 38, was strangled to death at his home in Greengates Court, Cambridge, in September.A trial at Huntingdon Crown Court was told that he and Jonathon Austin, 23, had argued after Mr Lakhani accused him of stealing his who had moved to a different flat in the complex off Histon Road, was found guilty of murder and was told he must serve a minimum of 16 years before being considered for parole. "You knew exactly what you were doing," said Judge David Farrell."I am sure that you intended to kill him."Judge Farrell said evidence showed that Mr Lakhani had cancer, a history of drug use, and mental health said the victim experienced "mood swings" and could appear pair were living in the same flat when prosecutors said they argued, before Austin attacked showed Mr Lakhani suffered a cardiac arrest after Austin strangled had autism, but Judge Farrell said this did not have a "significant impact" on his "culpability"."You knew how to handle him," the judge told him."You are much bigger, fitter and a younger man."He said Austin had disarmed Mr Lakhani and could have "simply walked out". In a statement read out by a lawyer, Mr Lakhani's mother Chandrika Lakhani said her son's death had a "devastating impact"."No words can truly express the depth of my pain," she said."There is always an empty chair." Austin, who had no previous convictions and is from South Africa, had told police how Mr Lakhani was "often abusive" and behaved said he stopped living with Mr Lakhani a few weeks Nichola Cafferkey, who represented Austin, argued that her client may have thought he had no choice but to defend well as autism he had a background of trauma, she said. A detective who led the investigation said after the hearing said "walking away is always the best option"."There were plenty of opportunities in that flat for Mr Austin to walk away - and he chose not to," said Det Insp Lee Martin."And at one point he said in court that he wanted to stay to be the bigger man." Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
BreakingNews.ie
5 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Man (23) appears in court in connection with shooting incident at Ennis halting site
A 23-year-old Dublin man has appeared in court concerning three shots allegedly fired at a caravan in an Ennis halting site last week. At Ennis District Court on Friday, Johnny Donovan of Bay 3, Rathmichael, Shankill, Co Dublin appeared in connection with four charges arising from the shooting incident at Ballaghboy halting site, Quin Rd, Ennis on Thursday, May 29th last. Advertisement At a contested bail hearing, Det Garda Aoife O'Malley told the court that there had been unrest all week due to tensions between certain families at Ballaghboy halting site with gardai responding to multiple incidents. Det Garda O'Malley said that additional gardaí have been deployed to police the situation and she said that the shooting incident took place only 10 minutes after the Garda Armed Support Unit (ASU) had left the scene. Det Garda O'Malley said that the alleged shooting showed blatant disregard for An Garda Síochána. She said that the fire-arm has not yet been recovered. Advertisement Det Garda O'Malley said that it will be alleged that on May 29th last, 'Johnny Donovan while travelling in a grey BMW jeep entered Ballaghboy halting site, Quin Rd, Ennis and accompanied by a second male produced a hand-gun and fired three indiscriminate shots at a caravan in the first bay'. No person was shot but Det Garda O'Malley said that two people were present in the bay at the time of the shooting. She said that one of the two took a video which captures her running to a vehicle to take cover and captures three gunshots. Det Garda O'Malley said that no persons are identified in the video. Advertisement She said that a Garda Scenes of Crime Unit examined the scene and found one caravan had three bullet holes while one spent bullet was found inside the caravan. Det Garda O'Malley said that Mr Donovan is facing three charges of criminal damage of property at Ballaghboy and a fourth under the Firearms and Weapons act concerning use of a hurley or a stick. Det Garda O'Malley said there is a possibility that more serious charges are to follow and Judge Alec Gabbett described the charges before the court as holding charges. The detective said that evidence gathered confirmed that a shooting incident did occur. Advertisement She said that the video of the alleged shootings showed that a viable firearm capable of causing death of serious harm was used. Det Garda O'Malley said that Garda seized the jeep allegedly used in the shooting and found a hurley, a pitch fork, an axe and small bottles filled with accelerants. Ireland Coroner returns verdict of accidental death after... Read More She said that Mr Donovan - who, she said, has family links to Co Clare - is first cousins of the partners of the injured parties in this case. 'They are all very well known to each other and until recently would have been very friendly with each other," she said. Solicitor for Mr Donovan, John Casey applied for bail stating that Mr Donovan was willing not to enter Clare as part of his bail conditions. However, Judge Gabbett refused bail and remanded Mr Donovan in custody to Limerick prison to appear in court next Wednesday via video link.
