Lib Dems urge Gray to apologise over cancer figures ‘spin'
The Scottish Liberal Democrats made the call after Neil Gray's response to statistics that showed 68.9% of cancer patients were seen within the 62-day treatment standard in the first three months of this year – the worst performance since records began.
Mr Gray had pointed to the average waiting times, saying 'the median wait time from urgent suspicion of cancer referral to treatment is 52 days, demonstrating the extensive work by staff across Scotland to treat people are quickly and effectively as possible'.
But the Scottish Liberal Democrats said that analysis by the party found that the 52-day wait itself was the worst on record.
Scottish Lib Dem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton said: 'The SNP are fast running out of excuses.
'The Health Secretary held up the median wait of 52 days for these cancer patients, as though that shows some kind of progress, when in fact it is nothing to celebrate because that too is the worst on record.
'It has been exposed as political spin. He ought to apologise to patients.
'Catching cancer early, then treating it fast, makes the world of difference to your chances of survival.
'However, it's been two years since the Scottish Government published its latest cancer strategy promising 'earlier treatment', but patients are waiting longer.
'There isn't a moment to lose when it comes to sorting out the critical gaps in screening, diagnosis and treatment, including tech and staff.
'If cancer comes for you, you deserve to be given the best chance of survival, and under this SNP Government that's just not happening.
'Only the Scottish Liberal Democrats will bring a real vision and a real plan for delivering the care they need.'
Last month, data from Public Health Scotland (PHS) showed 68.9% of Scots referred to the NHS with an urgent suspicion of cancer referred between January and March started treatment within 62 days, compared to 73.5% the previous quarter and 70.5% in the quarter ending in March 2024.
The figure remains well below pre-pandemic levels, with 83.7% of people having been seen within the 62-day target in the quarter ending December 2019.
The 62-day standard has not been met since the last quarter of 2012.
The Scottish Government has been approached for comment.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Trump's shock new tariff move could add $80 to Scottish products sold in the USA, says Parcelhero
Despite previously announcing that the US would keep its de minimis tariff threshold until July 2027, President Trump is now set to scrap it at the end of this month. That means all goods worth $800 or less entering the US from Scotland and the rest of the UK will no longer be exempt from US tariffs, says the international delivery expert Parcelhero. However, there are two hacks that will help senders avoid the worst impact of the new duties. Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A shock decision by President Donald Trump means that America's $800 (£600) de minimis limit is set to be scrapped at the end of this month – that's two years earlier than previously announced. The unexpected acceleration of the axing of the USA's de minimis import threshold is likely to have a substantial impact on Scottish manufacturers and exporters of of 'low-value' goods to the US, warns the international delivery expert Parcelhero. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It says sellers across Scotland and the rest of the UK were already preparing for the worst, as the scrapping of America's de minimis limit was originally announced in President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) last month. However, that legislation stated that the de minimis tariff exemptions would not be repealed until July 1, 2027. The White House now says: 'President Trump is acting more quickly to suspend the de minimis exemption than the OBBBA requires, to deal with national emergencies and save American lives and businesses NOW.' Exports of products valued at under $800 from Scotland and the rest of the UK to the US will soon cost American consumers more, as the US is set to scrap its de minimis tariff exemptions at the end of the month. Parcelhero's Head of Consumer Research, David Jinks M.I.L.T., says: 'Many UK-based exporters of products valued at $800 and under will be taken by surprise by the change. So-called low-value packages will now be subject to the same country-specific tariffs as larger shipments. The sudden increase in the cost of British goods to US consumers could result in UK exporters ending up with warehouses full of unsold items. The only alternative is to absorb the new charges themselves, rather than pass them on to their US customers. 'To give an idea of the scale of the potential impact of the axing of the de minimis limit, in the four quarters leading to the end of Q1, 2025, the UK exported £61.4bn-worth of goods to the US. While this total includes expensive products such as cars, it also includes millions of pounds worth of goods valued at $800 or less, which are about to be clobbered by tariffs for the first time. 'For example, last year the UK exported $138.87m-worth of apparel (including knitted and crocheted clothing), $109.37m-worth of ceramics and $256.75m-worth of toys, games and sports equipment to the US. Most of these products will have had a value of under $800. From the end of this month, these goods will all face new tariffs. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The UK is one of the few countries to have reached a trade deal with the US. The terms of the UK's deal are reasonably favourable compared to the tariffs many other nations face. Under the terms of the deal, UK-produced goods now attract a 10% tariff when they arrive in the US whereas, currently, Brazil is facing tariffs of up to 50%. Good deal or not, however, the fact is that all lower-priced UK-produced goods will potentially cost US shoppers more from 29 August than they pay today. 'The new Executive Order states: 'The duty-free de minimis exemption shall no longer apply to any shipment of articles… regardless of value, country of origin, mode of transportation, or method of entry. Accordingly, all such shipments… shall be subject to all applicable duties, taxes, fees, exactions, and charges.' 'At the very least, that means that, if the UK's trade deal rate of 10% is applied, a UK-made coat costing $800, for example, will cost US shoppers an extra $80 (£60), which could make all the difference between whether they purchase a UK-made product or one manufactured in the US. That may not be the only applicable tariff, however, as it could also attract a further tax depending on the item's tariff code. 'Parcelhero is also concerned that, at least initially, a potential blanket $80 duty might be applied to every package of $800 or less arriving in the US from the UK by post. That's because the new Executive Order's small print states that packages shipped through the 'international postal system' will face EITHER a duty equal to the tariff rate applicable to the country of origin of the product (which in the UK's case would be 10% of the package's value) OR a 'specific' duty ranging from $80 to $200 per package. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'This 'specific' duty could mean a tariff of $80 will be slapped on all packages sent by international mail from the UK, regardless of whether they are worth $1 or $800. That's because a specific tariff of $80 is being applied to all parcels arriving by international post for all countries whose tariff rate is under 16% (a category which includes the UK). 'Believe it or not, this $80 fee could be a lot worse. A blanket $160 will be charged on packages arriving by post if the tariff rate of the country it originates from is between 16-25%, and $200 if the tariff rate of the country the package is posted from is above 25%. 'Why are these steep charges being applied so indiscriminately? When the de minimis limit was first cancelled for goods from China back in February, it resulted in US Customs chaos, the suspension of USPS deliveries of all packages from China and significant backlogs at airport cargo facilities. This blanket duty rate is presumably a way to avoid a similar logjam at the end of August as parcels will only face a specific duty based on the country they were mailed from. 'The good news is that Parcelhero has identified two ways senders can bypass some of the worst impacts of the ending of the de minimis limit. The first is to use an international courier service, rather than traditional postal services such as the Post Office. Using a courier bypasses the 'international postal system' blanket $80 specific duty. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Our second hack applies particularly to individual senders, rather than businesses. American citizens can continue to receive bona fide gifts valued at $100 (around £75) or less duty-free. So, providing a UK-shipped parcel's documentation specifies the item is a gift and is worth less than the $100 limit, it will escape all new tariffs. 'One final piece of advice applies particularly to overseas traders considering exporting to the US via the UK, in order to qualify for the UK's preferential tariff rate. Don't try it! All goods that are considered to have been transshipped to avoid applicable duties will face a punitive 40% tariff.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The SNP has just lost their most effective candidate for independence
She says her decision not to stand for re-election next year is for domestic reasons and her desire to see more of her family. This means, sadly, in a Parliament not exactly stuffed with talent, there is no doubt that Kate Forbes will be much missed. Scotland's Deputy First Minister is one of the few talents – perhaps the only one – on that lacklustre SNP front bench. And if it really was a party with genuine ambitions and a determination to do the best for their country, it would have elected her in 2023 when she stood as a candidate for the vacancy caused by Nicola Sturgeon's resignation. That was the opportunity for the SNP to put Sturgeon's egotistical madness and her determination to become an international figure behind it and elect someone with a fresh outlook on the genuine priorities of Scottish people. Issues such as the appalling gap in educational standards between rich and poor Scots, the shocking NHS waiting times, and Europe's worst drug death record. But there wasn't really much of a chance of her party electing her. They knew she was the best candidate, with a stack of academic achievements and a genuine appeal to a wide cross-section of Scottish society. But as the voting system was announced, and after Sturgeon made it plain that she wanted her disciple Humza Yousaf as her successor, the die was cast. And just to rub salt in the wound, no sooner had Yousaf been sworn in as First Minister than he offered Forbes the post of rural affairs minister that she was quick to reject – it was a significant demotion from her the post as finance minister. But many SNP members had another – and to my mind disreputable – reason for withholding their support for Forbes becoming SNP leader and First Minister of Scotland: her religious beliefs. She is a member of the Free Church of Scotland. As a result, many SNP members rejected her views on gay marriage, abortion and trans rights. And she was further criticised for saying that having children outside of marriage was 'wrong'. However, she insisted that she would have been 'haunted' had she not answered questions about her religious beliefs. Her defeat by Yousaf saw his continuation of the disastrous Sturgeon policy agenda, but when he resigned she declined to contest the leadership, leaving the way clear for John Swinney to be elected unopposed. However, she accepted Swinney's offer as Deputy First Minister but while he tried to unpick Sturgeon's unpopular legacy, her presence – and perhaps even influence – on the national political stage appeared to diminish. At this stage we're left with the public explanation for her decision not to contest next year's Scottish Parliament election, but an intelligent politician such as she has shown herself to be would surely have been able to see clearly how the land lies with her party. It is essentially returning to the bare bones of its political agenda, and has decided to focus its campaign next year almost entirely on independence. As Ms Forbes will understand, there's nothing else for the nationalists to try and 'sell' to the voters; certainly not its education and NHS policies. And there appears to be very little support for breaking up Britain in this troubled world. As is often the case in Scottish politics, Scottish Labour's deputy leader, Dame Jackie Baillie, summed up the situation best. In offering Kate Forbes her best wishes she added: 'Kate Forbes was the future once – but now, like many of her counterparts in the SNP, she can see the writing on the wall. The truth is this is a tired government with no vision and no ideas.'
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Talented politician Kate Forbes achieved more in 10 years than many do in a lifetime, says ex-SNP spin doctor
KATE EXIT Talented politician Kate Forbes achieved more in 10 years than many do in a lifetime, says ex-SNP spin doctor Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) IT is an odd thing to be writing a political obituary for a 35-year-old. But yesterday morning Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes stunned the world of Scottish politics by announcing she will not seek re-election next May. Sign up for the Politics newsletter Sign up 2 Kate Forbes, pictured with First Minister John Swinney at Holyrood, has announced she is stepping down Credit: PA While it may appear to many observers as a bolt from the blue, it is not a decision the ever-thoughtful MSP for Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch will have reached without a great deal of soul-searching and careful consideration. The deliberate words she selected to explain her decision in an open letter to the First Minister should be taken at face value. It's a tough balancing act between ministerial office and the commitment of a young family based 150 miles from Holyrood. Nobody is likely to begrudge a mother more time to enjoy the 'precious early years of family life' with wee Naomi, her daughter, who turned three yesterday. What will have been a difficult decision for Kate now raises some even tougher questions for our politics. As the party's head of communications and research, I first encountered Kate at a SNP candidate selection day in 2015. Of the dozens of wannabe parliamentarians being assessed to stand for election, she stood out by a country mile. She was fiercely intelligent, if a bit swotty. A natural communicator, more polished than many longstanding MSPs. And she was driven by a sense of duty to serve. She flourished as a new backbencher from 2016 to 2018 — as a team player within a parliamentary group of MSPs, and an inquisitorial committee member. She was someone clearly unafraid to think for herself, championing national and constituency causes on a range of issues: economic, cultural and environmental. Kate Forbes picks her biggest scandal of the SNP's time in power It came as no surprise that Nicola Sturgeon elevated her to junior finance minister in her 2018 reshuffle, a calling she undertook diligently, quickly impressing the business community. Her ability to step up to deliver a Scottish Budget mere hours after the resignation of Finance Secretary Derek Mackay in February 2020 — the first woman to do so in the Scottish Parliament — thrust her into the limelight. Days later, the finance brief in Cabinet was deservedly hers to keep. She held this post through the toughest of times, navigating the nation's finances and support for businesses through a global pandemic. In the 2021 election she was returned to Holyrood with the largest majority of any MSP on 56 per cent of the vote and in July 2022 she blazed another trail in becoming the first Cabinet secretary in the Government to take maternity leave. 2 Ex-SNP spin doctor says Kate Forbes can be proud of her time in politics Credit: Alamy Kate returned to the political fray with her eyes set on the top job, after Ms Sturgeon resigned as First Minister in 2023. She was pipped at the post by Humza Yousaf in a bruising leadership battle and then, just a year later, became John Swinney's deputy in exchange for her support for his leadership. Despite effectively being the runner-up in two leadership contests — one fiercely fought, the other de facto — she emerged a political winner with her head held high. It's a rare thing to announce your departure from the political arena with a reputation intact — she has regularly been polled as Scotland's most popular politician, with approval ratings generally higher among the population as a whole than within the SNP rank and file. It's no secret Kate has at times felt thwarted in realising her ambitions for Scotland in government. Her focus on economic growth, creating good jobs in communities from the Borders to Benbecula, has proved more challenging than should ever have been the case. More broadly, we can undoubtedly do better by our young, talented, female MSPs. Some of that is practical and should be urgently addressed by all parties. Kate herself lambasted the lack of creche facilities for young mothers in political life back in 2023 and colleagues such as Aileen Campbell and Gail Ross also quit to spend more time with their young families. While Holyrood has few late-night sittings like Westminster, the rigours of ministerial office and constituency work mean it's more than a full-time job, with little time left for family. Scotland's geography is a challenge, but our outdated transport infrastructure doesn't help. The torrent of hateful abuse directed at politicians has grown exponentially over recent years. Female politicians receive a disproportionate share of that bile, much of it laden with misogyny. Kate faced the slings and arrows of public opinion for her deeply-held Christian faith, including from within her own party, which challenged the fundamentals of just how tolerant a Scotland we live in today. But in a decade in politics, Kate has achieved more than many could hope to achieve in a lifetime. I dearly hope to see her return. Meanwhile, work must be done to make our politics a hell of a lot better. Fergus Mutch is a former SNP head of communications and is now managing partner of advisory firm True North.
