logo
The Trump administration is trolling all of us

The Trump administration is trolling all of us

Independent30-04-2025

Taking their cues from the right-wing culture warriors and edgelords who make up the MAGA media sphere, the Trump administration has made performative cruelty its media strategy blueprint.
With a staff largely comprised of former Fox News hosts, pro-Trump influencers, made-for-TV politicians, and Trump's 'first buddy' Elon Musk, who just so happens to own one of the largest social media platforms in the world, each day has seemingly brought about a new rage baiting stunt in the conservative media complex.
The goal for online behavior and mainstream media engagement remains the same: titillate Trump supporters while angering the left. In a word, trolling.
So far, it's working, whether it's Trump's infomercial for Musk's electric vehicles, DHS chief Kristi Noem's cosplay theatrics or FBI Director Kash Patel posting a perp walk photo of a judge he had arrested.
Is this White House's press strategy nothing more than an offshoot of the conservative media entertainment complex? Are they just trying to 'own the libs' and provoke 'liberal tears'? Or is there a greater mission in place here with the propagandist-style stunts and toxic social media posts?
'I think it's all of the above,' author Eoin Higgins, whose new book Owned examines how right-wing tech-billionaires have reshaped the media landscape, told The Independent. 'They're trying to appeal to the ultra-online far right, of course, but they're also doing the 'flood the zone' thing that Stephen Bannon wants them to do. I'd hesitate to call it a strategy; it seems to me more that it's a number of competing efforts.'
Amid the fallout from ICE illegally deporting a Maryland man to El Salvador, which has seen the administration essentially ignore a Supreme Court order to facilitate his return, the White House has doubled down and accused the man of being an MS-13 gang member involved in human trafficking.
In one instance, they even employed the well-known Counternarratives style created by artist Alexandra Bell, who began reworking New York Times headlines and articles to challenge racial and gender biases she saw in legacy media. Some of her most famous examples centered around the shooting of Michael Brown and the Ferguson protests.
Following another social media trend, the White House has also posted deportation cartoons modeled after the animated films produced by the Japanese film studio Ghibli, after ChatGPT made this option available last month. The most notorious example of this meme came on March 27 when the White House's official X (formerly Twitter) account posted a Ghibilifed image of a Dominican woman weeping after she was arrested by ICE agents.
The White House and Trump's acolytes in the MAGA media world believe the president has been given a mandate to take down the 'woke' liberal agenda while installing the blueprint laid out by Project 2025, and they're pushing that message with their whole chest.
'When times get tough, you don't take a step back; you double down. And if that doesn't work, you triple down,' the White House communications director Steven Cheung told The Atlantic when asked if Trump ever goes too far with his aggressive rhetoric and self-created reality in his interviews and Truth Social posts.
This quote from Cheung – the combative former UFC flack who now steers the Trump administration's press and social media strategy – encapsulates how this latest iteration of a Trump White House is reshaping the way a presidential administration communicates with the press and public.
Michael Edison Hayden, an author and expert on far-right extremism, noted that MAGA has grown so big as a cultural phenomenon 'that they no longer need to integrate with what we would consider mainstream culture in order to thrive.' According to Hayden, the White House has 'bet big on MAGA as a completely separate cultural bubble' in hopes that it can completely replace the legacy media altogether.
'It's a bold play and we will find out whether or not it was completely hubristic in time,' he added. 'But that's why they feel like they can mock immigrants so sadistically and openly try to humiliate the press. They think MAGA will supplant the non-MAGA world and this is how they try to assert dominance.'
Still, is this approach working? As we turn the corner on Trump's first 100 days in office, the president's approval rating is already at historic lows – and Trump's chaotic strategy of overwhelming the public isn't calming fears about his ability to competently run the country.
On the contrary, picking fights with the legacy media and dehumanizing immigrants while suggesting that U.S. citizens may soon be next in line to be sent to a foreign gulag has made independent voters – the ones who helped put Trump back in the White House – turn their backs on him.
According to the latest ABC News poll, only 39 percent of Americans approve of Trump's job in office – the lowest ever for a president in his first 100 days. The president is underwater on pretty much every issue, including immigration – the central tenet of his campaign platform. Vast majorities believe that his tariff and economic policies will lead to a recession, that he is going too far in trying to expand presidential powers, and that he is crossing the line by targeting his political opponents. In fact, 62 percent of independent voters feel Trump is out of touch with most people's concerns.
Therefore, is the administration's combative and polarizing PR strategy effectively turning off most Americans?
'I think that's part of it, and the repellent agenda that they have,' Higgins, the Owned author, said. 'Trump's largely dispensed with even pretending to fix anything, it's all vengeance and cruelty.'
Far-right expert Hayden, meanwhile, urged a 'strong word of warning' on polls due to Trump regularly outperforming them throughout his decade in politics. At the same time, he noted that 'the White House has decided to reach out only to the MAGA base with their propaganda, and the risks of doing that are fairly obvious,' meaning it could potentially spell doom for the movement down the road.
'People have to find the MAGA movement — or cult, as many have called it — attractive enough to join it,' he stated. 'If independent-minded people aren't turned on by what they see, it's a potential recipe for movement collapse. They can't risk losing any supporters.'
And it isn't just independent centrists or left-leaning Democrats who have expressed disapproval with some of the stunts pulled off by this administration in an effort to pander to the right-wing fever swamp crowd.
Even the president's most fervent supporters lashed out at Attorney General Pam Bondi in late February for failing to deliver on the promised bombshell release of FBI documents related to the deceased sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein, a subject much of the right has been obsessed with for years. Bondi made a huge show of handing over binders of already public information to pro-Trump influencers, sparking intense backlash among the MAGA faithful.
'I hate to say it, but the American people can't trust the validity of the Epstein files released today,' far-right extremist Laura Loomer tweeted about the 'Epstein Files' fiasco. 'It was released in an unprofessional manner with paid, partisan social media influencers to curate their binders for us. I can't trust anything in the binder. Neither should you.'
Additionally, conservatives have grown increasingly exasperated with Noem, who has play-acted as an ICE agent, firefighter, pilot and Customs and Border Protection officer for social media clips. Having already faced heat for her El Salvador trip to the infamous CECOT prison, where she filmed an Instagram video in front of shirtless prisoners while wearing a $60,000 Rolex, the Homeland Security director was roundly criticized for posting about an ICE raid in Arizona.
Not only was Noem mocked for failing gun safety standards during her latest cosplay performance, she was also blasted for taking Libs of TikTok creator Chaya Raichik, a far-right influencer who has been criticized for her Twitter pile-ons, for the 'ride-along.' Afterwards, Raichik promoted 'exclusive footage' of migrant arrests for her online fans.
'Can we talk about Kristi Noem and these ridiculous photo ops? Why does she have to keep doing this?' former Fox News host turned independent MAGA influencer Megyn Kelly grumbled this month. 'Stop with the glam! I mean, she looks like I look right now, but she's out in the field with her gun, being like we're gonna go kick some a**! No one wants you there.'
Should we expect criticism from the right to continue over these performative tactics? And are these critiques about the PR strategy itself or the feeling that the administration isn't following through on some of Trump's campaign promises?
'If Trump's polls continue to tick down, the sociopaths and narcissists that populate the MAGA influencer realm will start planning for an exit and a rebrand,' Hayden observed. 'I don't think campaign promises will factor much into it, unless the influencer's branding has a lane of criticism built into it, like a Nick Fuentes. If Trumpism starts to collapse, and it's palpable, see how they run.'
Even with the White House facing some blowback from the right, the administration hasn't slowed down when it comes to its 4chan-level trolling tactics.
Patel, meanwhile, may have even violated the Department of Justice's policies when he posted a photo of Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan – who was arrested last week for allegedly obstructing immigration agents – being escorted by federal law enforcement officers in a perp walk.
This also raises another question – who among the MAGA media sphere is the administration taking its cues from and who are they looking to emulate most?
'The White House X account sometimes plays like some of the content you would find on 4chan, 8chan or Gab during the first Trump administration,' Hayden explained. 'These were the places where pseudonymous fascists would go to post their sadistic fantasies about non-white people. And what I think we can take away from that is that Trump supporters have been isolated in their own bubble and cooking in propaganda for so long that they don't understand how extreme they've actually become.'
He continued: 'Either that or they know and don't care because they've become so resentful. I mention that because those websites were always regarded as fringe, even if many Trump supporters saw content from them during their online MAGA voyage.'
In the end, one has to wonder if the White House's trolling tactics are 'too online' for even the average Trump supporter.
'By choosing 4chan as their voice, the Trump White House has put themselves in a position where they can't pivot into something softer or more compassionate,' Hayden pointed out. 'And that is a problem if Trump's poll numbers continue to fade. If they try to pivot to a softer tone, they will look weak.'
Referencing the administration's social media posts of migrants being deported alongside pop music soundtracks, he said that the White House 'has boxed themselves into a position where they must perpetually double down' because they're 'on a sort of death drive where they either supplant liberal culture and destroy it or fail and suffer MAGA movement collapse.'
Higgins, for his part, asserted that the average American is likely not paying attention to this stuff. 'They want to know why things are getting more expensive and why the big positive changes haven't come yet,' he added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla shares rebound on news of Musk and Trump talks after explosive feud cost firm $99bn in a day
Tesla shares rebound on news of Musk and Trump talks after explosive feud cost firm $99bn in a day

The Independent

time34 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Tesla shares rebound on news of Musk and Trump talks after explosive feud cost firm $99bn in a day

Tesla shares are poised to jump as much as 5.7 per cent when stock markets open in the US later today after the business took a $99bn (£73bn) hit following an explosive feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. The share price of the electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer tanked from more than $322 at the start of Thursday's trading to $284 at the end of the day, more than a 14 per cent drop as a result of a back-and-forth argument between the pair, which covered everything from government contracts to the Epstein files. However, a ceasefire of sorts appears to have been brokered, and the two are due to meet on Friday - resulting in some investors surging back into Tesla stock. Even so, with futures markets showing around a 5.7 per cent rise in pre-trading just before 9am BST, that still means the market capitalisation of Tesla - the measure of its overall value by share price - will have dropped a full $99bn in a day. After-hours trading shows the buying and selling of shares outside of regular stock market opening hours, mostly dominated by big corporate investors. That is reflected in the futures price, which shows the stock price that a company will 'open' at. The large sell-off means Tesla has again lost its status as a $1tn company, though it still ranks in the top ten largest American companies. The one-day cost to Mr Musk's net worth personally was around $34bn (£25bn), according to Bloomberg's Billionaires Index, at the time stock markets closed in the US. He remains the richest person on the planet by a distance. Separate from share price woes, Mr Trump's tax and spending Bill could be set to cost Tesla. Eliminating tax incentives for US buyers purchasing EVs, in addition to a similar scheme in California, could cost Tesla more than $3bn, analysts estimate. Outside of Tesla, Mr Musk's other business interests could be hard-hit too if the US president presses ahead with his threats to cancel government contracts with SpaceX. Other car manufacturers across the UK and Europe have not reacted with notable share price changes after the feud took place outside their trading hours on Thursday. German-listed Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes were largely flat in early trading, with the UK's Aston Martin Lagonda up 2 per cent. Ferrari is listed in New York and is up 0.4 per cent in pre-trading, with General Motors at 0.5 per cent and Toyota's US listing set to open 0.3 per cent up.

U.S. hits International Criminal Court judges with sanctions over investigation into Israel
U.S. hits International Criminal Court judges with sanctions over investigation into Israel

NBC News

time35 minutes ago

  • NBC News

U.S. hits International Criminal Court judges with sanctions over investigation into Israel

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is slapping sanctions on four judges at the International Criminal Court over the tribunal's investigation into alleged war crimes by Israel in its war against Hamas in Gaza and in the West Bank. The State Department said Thursday that it would freeze any assets that the ICC judges, who come from Benin, Peru, Slovenia and Uganda, have in U.S. jurisdictions. The move is just the latest step that the administration has taken to punish the ICC and its officials for investigations undertaken against Israel and the United States. 'As ICC judges, these four individuals have actively engaged in the ICC's illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America or our close ally, Israel,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. 'The ICC is politicized and falsely claims unfettered discretion to investigate, charge, and prosecute nationals of the United States and our allies,' Rubio said. 'This dangerous assertion and abuse of power infringes upon the sovereignty and national security of the United States and our allies, including Israel.' In February, The Hague-based court's chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, was placed on Washington's list of 'Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons,' barring him from doing business with Americans and placing restrictions on his entry into the U.S. Khan stepped aside last month pending an investigation into alleged sexual misconduct. Within minutes of the administration's announcement, the court condemned its actions. 'These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution,' ICC spokesperson Fadi El Abdallah said in a statement. The new sanctions target ICC Judge Reine Alapini-Gansou, who is from the West African country of Benin and was part of the pre-trial chamber of judges who issued the arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last year. She also served on the bench that originally greenlit the investigation into alleged Israeli crimes in the Palestinian territories in 2021. The 69-year-old was also part of the panel of judges who issued the arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2023. Last year, a court in Moscow issued a warrant for her arrest. From Slovenia, Beti Hohler was elected as a judge in 2023. She previously worked in the prosecutor's office at the court, leading Israel to object to her participation in the proceedings involving Israeli officials. Hohler said in a statement last year that she had never worked on the Palestinian territories investigation during her eight years as a prosecutor. Bouth Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza, from Peru, and Solomy Balungi Bossa, from Uganda, are appeals judges at the ICC. Each woman has worked on cases involving Israel. Neither the U.S. nor Israel is a member of and neither recognizes the legitimacy of the court, which has issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu for alleged war crimes over his military response in Gaza after the Hamas attack against Israel in October 2023. Israel strongly denies the allegations. During his first term in office, Trump targeted the ICC with sanctions, voicing displeasure with investigations into Israel and complaints about alleged war crimes said to have been committed by U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Those sanctions were rescinded by President Joe Biden 's administration in early 2021. Rubio said the U.S. would continue to take action to protect its and Israel's interests at the court. 'The United States will take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our sovereignty, that of Israel, and any other U.S. ally from illegitimate actions by the ICC,' he said. Liz Evenson, international justice director at Human Rights Watch, said the Trump administration's sanctions 'aim to deter the ICC from seeking accountability amid grave crimes committed in Israel and Palestine, and as Israeli atrocities mount in Gaza, including with U.S. complicity.' 'U.S. sanctions on ICC judges are a flagrant attack on the rule of law at the same time as President Trump is working to undercut it at home,' Evenson said in a statement. 'Sanctions are meant to put a stop to human rights violations, not to punish those seeking justice for the worst crimes.'

Blow by blow, how Elon Musk tore apart friendship with Trump with one bombshell post after another on X, from endorsing his impeachment to wild claims about Jeffrey Epstein
Blow by blow, how Elon Musk tore apart friendship with Trump with one bombshell post after another on X, from endorsing his impeachment to wild claims about Jeffrey Epstein

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Blow by blow, how Elon Musk tore apart friendship with Trump with one bombshell post after another on X, from endorsing his impeachment to wild claims about Jeffrey Epstein

The public feud that unfolded last night between Donald Trump and Elon Musk closely resembles a dispute between two children in the playground. For the first term, they were inseparable. Donald invited Elon to play in his castle with all his classmates, and together they ruled the yard. But after a while, Donald decided he didn't want Elon to stay. Last week, he asked him to leave the castle and hang out with other people for a while. Elon sulked all weekend. When he came back, he told the whole school how stupid Donald and his friends were. He also claimed the only reason Donald got into the castle instead of that older kid in the first place was because of him. Before long, they were both yelling nasty insults and accusing one another of being naughty. Elon agreed with one pupil who said Donald should be kicked out of his castle. Unfortunately, the two participants in this argument are grown men. One is the leader of the free world, and the other is the world's richest man. They wrote their insults on separate social media platforms that they own. And one of the statements made amid the war of words alleged that the President of the United States was covering up his links to a convicted paedophile and sex offender. Here's a blow-by-blow account of how the bromance between two titans of American politics and popular culture unfolded. One of the accusations made amid the war of words alleged that the President of the United States was covering up his links to a convicted paedophile and sex offender The Trump-Musk relationship at its height was unprecedented in Washington - a sitting president granting a billionaire tech CEO access and influence inside the White House and throughout his government. Musk spent nearly $300 million backing Trump's presidential campaign and other Republicans last year, and was made a special adviser once Trump returned to the Oval Office. For months, the tech mogul used social media platform X to amplify Trump's messages while attacking the bureaucracy and federal spending through his self-styled Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Now, not only has the tech giant left the Trump White House - he became its harshest and perhaps most consequential critic overnight The public feud was seemingly initiated by Musk just days after he departed DOGE, with the X CEO taking aim at the GOP's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' - a tax and spend bill tabled by the Republicans that will also increase the government's debt ceiling. The controversial bill was passed by the House of Representatives last month and is now being scrutinised in the Senate. On Tuesday, Musk posted on his social media platform that the bill was an 'abomination' and went on to urge Senators to 'kill the bill' on Wednesday. 'This spending bill contains the largest increase in the debt ceiling in US history! It is the Debt Slavery Bill,' he wrote. 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL.' Musk also declared that the planned additional spending and the debt ceiling hike included in the bill 'more than defeats all the cost savings achieved by the DOGE team '. The blatant attack on the bill raised eyebrows given Musk's deep connections with the Republican party and personal friendship with Trump. Yet, when the US President met privately with White House officials on Wednesday, there was little to suggest that a public spat was in the offing with Musk, whose financial backing and support on social media were instrumental in sealing his second term in the Oval Office. Two White House officials familiar with the matter told a Reuters reporter that Trump expressed confusion and frustration in the meeting about Musk's attacks on his sweeping tax and spending bill. But he held back, the officials said, because he wanted to preserve Musk's political and financial support ahead of the midterm elections. By Thursday afternoon, however, Trump's mood had shifted. He told his team it was time to take the gloves off - and so began a public squabble that caught the world's attention. Trump took to Truth Social to hit back at Musk following criticism of the One Big Beautiful Bill Sitting next to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters he was 'very disappointed' in his former adviser's criticism of the bill. 'I'm very disappointed with Elon. I've helped him a lot. He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it,' he said. 'All of a sudden he had a problem & he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut EV mandate,' Trump claimed, in reference to a phasing out of tax credits for purchases of electric vehicles. Musk quickly hit back on social media. 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' he said. Trump went on to say during his meeting with Merz: 'Musk hasn't said bad about me personally, but I´m sure that will be next.' He was quickly proven right. Musk vented his anger directly at Trump, saying his tariffs 'will cause a recession in the second half of this year' and accusing him of lying. He also said it was 'very unfair' that the legislation would eliminate tax incentives for electric vehicles. The back-and-forth devolved from there. Trump posted again on Truth Social, writing: 'Elon was 'wearing thin', I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Musk immediately retorted on X: 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.' Within minutes, he went on to say that it might be time to create a new political party and shared a poll to his followers asking for their opinion. With each post, the spat became yet more virulent - until Musk dropped a new allegation which could one day prove to be the catalyst leading to the downfall of one - if not both - participants. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: (Donald Trump) is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT! 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out!' Trump's commitment to greater transparency in the run up to November's election had many Americans hoping that he would shed light on the deplorable activities of sex offender and disgraced financier Epstein - and the litany of rich and famous figures thought to have been involved with him. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 in a Manhattan jail - though there is widespread speculation he may have been murdered. Before he was elected, Trump said he would have 'no problem' releasing files related to Epstein, but almost six months into his presidency, no more information has been revealed. Following the wild allegation, Musk endorsed a post on X from Ian Miles Cheong, a right-wing activist and prominent supporter of the tech mogul, calling for Trump's impeachment. Musk endorsed a post on X from Ian Miles Cheong, a right-wing activist and prominent supporter of the tech mogul, calling for Trump's impeachment. Trump retorted on Truth Social by threatening to cut off Elon's companies from various lucrative government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's government subsidies and contracts,' Trump posted. Musk promptly fired back, with the SpaceX chief saying he would begin 'decommissioning' his company's Dragon spacecraft in response. The spacecraft is vital for ferrying NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station. By Friday morning, it appeared the spat was over. In a statement, the White House played down the war of words, calling it an 'unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' Musk late last night appeared to extend an olive branch on social media, replying: 'You're not wrong' to a post from hedge fund manager Bill Ackman that called on the pair to reconcile and urged: 'We're much stronger together than apart'. Trump's aides are reportedly looking to organise a call between the president and his former 'First Buddy' later today to smooth over the fallout. Musk also walked back his statement about decommissioning the Dragon rocket. But the consequences of the spat were immediate. Musk yesterday said he would begin 'decommissioning' his company's Dragon spacecraft use to take astronauts to and from the International Space Station after Trump threatened to terminate government contracts with the tech mogul's companies Tesla's stock price plunged 14% on Thursday - wiping hundreds of billions of dollars off Musk's EV company's valuation. It also drove uncertainty among Trump's allies in Congress, who are working to pass the monumental spending package that Democrats and a small number of vocal Republicans oppose. The breakup could go on to drastically reshape both men's futures. For Trump, losing Musk's backing threatens his growing influence among tech donors, social media audiences and younger male voters - key groups that may now be harder to reach. It could also prove a damaging blow to Republican fundraising efforts ahead of next year's midterm elections. For Musk, however, the stakes are potentially even higher. The spat risks intensified scrutiny of his business practices that could jeopardise government contracts and invite regulatory probes, which might seriously threaten his companies' profits. A termination of government contracts, including for launching rockets and for the use of the Starlink satellite service, would prove devastating.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store