Blow by blow, how Elon Musk tore apart friendship with Trump with one bombshell post after another on X, from endorsing his impeachment to wild claims about Jeffrey Epstein
The public feud that unfolded last night between Donald Trump and Elon Musk closely resembles a dispute between two children in the playground.
For the first term, they were inseparable. Donald invited Elon to play in his castle with all his classmates, and together they ruled the yard.
But after a while, Donald decided he didn't want Elon to stay. Last week, he asked him to leave the castle and hang out with other people for a while.
Elon sulked all weekend. When he came back, he told the whole school how stupid Donald and his friends were.
He also claimed the only reason Donald got into the castle instead of that older kid in the first place was because of him.
Before long, they were both yelling nasty insults and accusing one another of being naughty. Elon agreed with one pupil who said Donald should be kicked out of his castle.
Unfortunately, the two participants in this argument are grown men. One is the leader of the free world, and the other is the world's richest man.
They wrote their insults on separate social media platforms that they own.
And one of the statements made amid the war of words alleged that the President of the United States was covering up his links to a convicted paedophile and sex offender.
Here's a blow-by-blow account of how the bromance between two titans of American politics and popular culture unfolded.
One of the accusations made amid the war of words alleged that the President of the United States was covering up his links to a convicted paedophile and sex offender
The Trump-Musk relationship at its height was unprecedented in Washington - a sitting president granting a billionaire tech CEO access and influence inside the White House and throughout his government.
Musk spent nearly $300 million backing Trump's presidential campaign and other Republicans last year, and was made a special adviser once Trump returned to the Oval Office.
For months, the tech mogul used social media platform X to amplify Trump's messages while attacking the bureaucracy and federal spending through his self-styled Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Now, not only has the tech giant left the Trump White House - he became its harshest and perhaps most consequential critic overnight
The public feud was seemingly initiated by Musk just days after he departed DOGE, with the X CEO taking aim at the GOP's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' - a tax and spend bill tabled by the Republicans that will also increase the government's debt ceiling.
The controversial bill was passed by the House of Representatives last month and is now being scrutinised in the Senate.
On Tuesday, Musk posted on his social media platform that the bill was an 'abomination' and went on to urge Senators to 'kill the bill' on Wednesday.
'This spending bill contains the largest increase in the debt ceiling in US history! It is the Debt Slavery Bill,' he wrote. 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL.'
Musk also declared that the planned additional spending and the debt ceiling hike included in the bill 'more than defeats all the cost savings achieved by the DOGE team '.
The blatant attack on the bill raised eyebrows given Musk's deep connections with the Republican party and personal friendship with Trump.
Yet, when the US President met privately with White House officials on Wednesday, there was little to suggest that a public spat was in the offing with Musk, whose financial backing and support on social media were instrumental in sealing his second term in the Oval Office.
Two White House officials familiar with the matter told a Reuters reporter that Trump expressed confusion and frustration in the meeting about Musk's attacks on his sweeping tax and spending bill.
But he held back, the officials said, because he wanted to preserve Musk's political and financial support ahead of the midterm elections.
By Thursday afternoon, however, Trump's mood had shifted.
He told his team it was time to take the gloves off - and so began a public squabble that caught the world's attention.
Trump took to Truth Social to hit back at Musk following criticism of the One Big Beautiful Bill
Sitting next to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters he was 'very disappointed' in his former adviser's criticism of the bill.
'I'm very disappointed with Elon. I've helped him a lot. He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it,' he said.
'All of a sudden he had a problem & he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut EV mandate,' Trump claimed, in reference to a phasing out of tax credits for purchases of electric vehicles.
Musk quickly hit back on social media. 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' he said.
Trump went on to say during his meeting with Merz: 'Musk hasn't said bad about me personally, but I´m sure that will be next.'
He was quickly proven right.
Musk vented his anger directly at Trump, saying his tariffs 'will cause a recession in the second half of this year' and accusing him of lying. He also said it was 'very unfair' that the legislation would eliminate tax incentives for electric vehicles.
The back-and-forth devolved from there.
Trump posted again on Truth Social, writing: 'Elon was 'wearing thin', I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!'
Musk immediately retorted on X: 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.'
Within minutes, he went on to say that it might be time to create a new political party and shared a poll to his followers asking for their opinion.
With each post, the spat became yet more virulent - until Musk dropped a new allegation which could one day prove to be the catalyst leading to the downfall of one - if not both - participants.
'Time to drop the really big bomb: (Donald Trump) is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!
'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out!'
Trump's commitment to greater transparency in the run up to November's election had many Americans hoping that he would shed light on the deplorable activities of sex offender and disgraced financier Epstein - and the litany of rich and famous figures thought to have been involved with him.
Epstein died by suicide in 2019 in a Manhattan jail - though there is widespread speculation he may have been murdered.
Before he was elected, Trump said he would have 'no problem' releasing files related to Epstein, but almost six months into his presidency, no more information has been revealed.
Following the wild allegation, Musk endorsed a post on X from Ian Miles Cheong, a right-wing activist and prominent supporter of the tech mogul, calling for Trump's impeachment.
Musk endorsed a post on X from Ian Miles Cheong, a right-wing activist and prominent supporter of the tech mogul, calling for Trump's impeachment.
Trump retorted on Truth Social by threatening to cut off Elon's companies from various lucrative government contracts.
'The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's government subsidies and contracts,' Trump posted.
Musk promptly fired back, with the SpaceX chief saying he would begin 'decommissioning' his company's Dragon spacecraft in response.
The spacecraft is vital for ferrying NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station.
By Friday morning, it appeared the spat was over.
In a statement, the White House played down the war of words, calling it an 'unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.'
Musk late last night appeared to extend an olive branch on social media, replying: 'You're not wrong' to a post from hedge fund manager Bill Ackman that called on the pair to reconcile and urged: 'We're much stronger together than apart'.
Trump's aides are reportedly looking to organise a call between the president and his former 'First Buddy' later today to smooth over the fallout.
Musk also walked back his statement about decommissioning the Dragon rocket.
But the consequences of the spat were immediate.
Musk yesterday said he would begin 'decommissioning' his company's Dragon spacecraft use to take astronauts to and from the International Space Station after Trump threatened to terminate government contracts with the tech mogul's companies
Tesla's stock price plunged 14% on Thursday - wiping hundreds of billions of dollars off Musk's EV company's valuation.
It also drove uncertainty among Trump's allies in Congress, who are working to pass the monumental spending package that Democrats and a small number of vocal Republicans oppose.
The breakup could go on to drastically reshape both men's futures.
For Trump, losing Musk's backing threatens his growing influence among tech donors, social media audiences and younger male voters - key groups that may now be harder to reach.
It could also prove a damaging blow to Republican fundraising efforts ahead of next year's midterm elections.
For Musk, however, the stakes are potentially even higher.
The spat risks intensified scrutiny of his business practices that could jeopardise government contracts and invite regulatory probes, which might seriously threaten his companies' profits.
A termination of government contracts, including for launching rockets and for the use of the Starlink satellite service, would prove devastating.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
White House tries to water down Russia sanctions
Donald Trump is pressuring a US senator to weaken a Bill that would impose sweeping sanctions on Russia. White House officials hoping to mend relations with Moscow have been quietly contacting senator Lindsey Graham's office urging him to water down his Bill, which aims to cripple Vladimir Putin with huge sanctions. The Bill, backed by nearly the entire Senate, would impose 500 per cent tariffs on countries that continue to buy Russian oil and gas, which bankrolls Putin's war effort. Officials have been demanding the Bill include waivers that would allow Mr Trump to choose who or what was sanctioned, congressional aides told the Wall Street Journal. Other attempts to weaken the legislation include softening the language, replacing 'shall' with 'may' to avoid making the reprimands mandatory. Removing the mandatory nature of the sanctions would render the Bill effectively toothless and do little to hamper Putin's war machine, aides fear. 'We're moving ahead and the White House is included in our conversations,' Richard Blumenthal, senator and lead Democratic co-sponsor of the Bill, told the paper. Russia's war effort is funded by fossil-fuel exports. Moscow has adapted to existing sanctions with relative ease, turning to North Korea and China for support. Fearing the impact on pump prices, Joe Biden, former president, was unwilling to crack down on Russian energy exports. Mr Trump, has threatened to impose sanctions on Ukraine, as well as Russia, if the two sides fail to reach a peace agreement. 'Any sanction package must provide complete flexibility for the president to continue to pursue his desired foreign policy,' a White House official said. They added that the constitution 'vests the president with the authority to conduct diplomacy with foreign nations'. Speaking in the Oval Office alongside Friedrich Merz, German chancellor, on Thursday, the US president said that the Bill should not move forward without his express approval. 'They'll be guided by me. That's how it's supposed to be,' he told reporters. 'They're waiting for me to decide on what to do.' Last week, Mr Graham and Mr Blumenthal visited Ukraine where they applauded the country's drone attack that destroyed 40 aircraft deep inside Russian territory. However, they were ridiculed and accused of 'stirring up' the conflict by key allies of Mr Trump, including Steve Bannon. 'By trying to engage Putin – by being friendly and enticing – it's become painfully clear [Putin's] not interested in ending this war,' Mr Graham said earlier this week. '[Putin] needs to see and hear that message as well from us, from the American people,' said Mr Blumenthal. Both said that failing to act now could pull the US deeper into the conflict later. If Putin isn't stopped in Ukraine, Mr Blumenthal said, Nato treaty obligations could compel US troops into battle. Earlier this week, Russian negotiators tabled a long memorandum, resembling a complete capitulation for Ukraine, in a second round of direct talks with Kyiv in Istanbul. They demanded Ukraine must withdraw its troops from four eastern regions that Russia only partially occupies and that international recognition of Russian sovereignty over them and Crimea must be granted.
Sky News
19 minutes ago
- Sky News
Kilmar Abrego Garcia: Man wrongly deported from US to El Salvador has been returned to face criminal charges
A man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador by the Trump administration has been returned to the US to face criminal charges. Kilmar Abrego Garcia was charged in an indictment filed in federal court in Tennessee with conspiring to transport illegal immigrants into the US, Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Friday. The indictment was filed on 21 May, more than two months after he was deported from the US, court records have shown. In a statement, Abrego Garcia's lawyer Andrew Rossman said it would now be up to the US judicial system to ensure he received due process. "Today's action proves what we've known all along - that the administration had the ability to bring him back and just refused to do so," he said. Abrego Garcia was deported from Maryland despite an immigration judge's 2019 order granting him protection after finding he was likely to be persecuted by gangs if he was returned there. The indictment alleges that Mr Garcia worked with at least five co-conspirators to bring immigrants to the US illegally and transport them from the border to other destinations in the country. On Friday, Ms Bondi outlined the charges at a news conference: "The grand jury found that over the past nine years, Abrego Garcia has played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring. "He made over 100 trips the grand jury found - smuggling people throughout our country... MS-13 [international criminal gang] members, violent gang terrorist organisation members... throughout our country. "He will be prosecuted in our country, sentenced in our country if convicted and then returned after completion of his sentence." Ms Bondi said Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele agreed to return Mr Garcia to the US after American officials presented his government with an arrest warrant. Critics of Donald Trump have pointed to the deportation of Mr Garcia as an example of the excesses of the Republican president's aggressive immigration policies. US District Judge Paula Xinis has opened a probe into what, if anything, Mr Trump's administration has done to secure his return, after his lawyers accused officials of stonewalling their requests for information. Officials responded by alleging that Mr Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang - something his lawyers have strongly denied. In a separate statement, Pam Bondi also attacked what she called the "Fake News Media" and repeated the - yet unproven - allegations against Mr Garcia. "The Justice Department's Grand Jury Indictment against Abrego Garcia proves the unhinged Democrat Party was wrong, and their stenographers in the Fake News Media were once again played like fools. "Abrego Garcia was never an innocent 'Maryland Man'- Abrego Garcia is an illegal alien terrorist, gang member, and human trafficker who has spent his entire life abusing innocent people, especially women and the most vulnerable."
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Mystery will surfaces in battle over tech mogul's $500million fortune
A mysterious will said to be the final wishes of Zappos founder Tony Hsieh has emerged five years after his death. The tech giant, worth over $500 million, died after a fire engulfed his friend's Connecticut home in 2020, having only retired three-months earlier from the billion-dollar firm. His family had until recently believed he left no final will, with a new report from the Wall Street Journal saying the document mysteriously appeared this spring. According to the outlet the document has Hsieh's signature on it and is dated 2015, five years before the 46-year-old died. In the months leading up to his death he had been battling severe drug and alcohol abuse. The will was delivered to the office of Nevada based estate attorney Robert Armstrong, who had never met Hsieh before or worked with him. He was named as an executor. The discovery has thrown his probate case into turmoil. Armstrong said in court filing seen by the outlet, that he was shocked to have received the document. The will is said to transfer over $50 million and several Las Vegas properties to a series of trusts with as yet unknown beneficiaries. It is also said to include several charitable donations including $3 million to his alma mater Harvard University. The rest would go to his family. Hsieh was inside a shed near the property in New London when he was caught in the fire At a hearing on Thursday there was no further clues as to how legitimate the document is, or where it came from. The court heard that after Armstrong received the will he got a phone call from a man named Kashif Singh. Singh told the lawyer that the will had been passed to him by his late grandfather, Pir Muhammad, who was named as a co-executor. The revelation has stumped those involved in Hsieh's estate and the court, with both sides unsure how to proceed. Armstrong, alongside attorney and co-executor Mark Ferrario, have claimed that Hsieh's family's legal team have been aggressive in their approach. In a filing, they said the family's lawyers had adopted a 'scorched earth approach' and made over 70 requests for documents to 'invalidate the will'. Dara Goldsmith, a lawyer representing the family, told the Journal: 'There is nothing 'scorched earth' about thoroughly examining a document that comes out of nowhere, more than four years after Tony Hsieh's death.' She added that Richard Hsieh, his father, 'has faithfully administered his son Tony's estate and guarded Tony's legacy.' Goldsmith told the court on Thursday that the family hadn't decided on whether to challenge the will. Prior to his death, Hsieh had gone on a massive buying spree, buying up at least seven multi-millionaire dollars homes, a private club and a vacant lot. He spent at least $50 million as part of his plan to relocate to the millionaires' playground of Park City, Utah. Hsieh, who was born in Illinois and was the son of Taiwanese immigrants, studied at Harvard University before he joined Zappos - then called - in 1999. As CEO, he helped transform the fledgling internet start-up into a billion-dollar business. Zappos was sold to Amazon for $1.2 billion in 2009, but Hsieh remained with the company until his retirement in 2020. For years, Hsieh also worked to revitalize downtown Las Vegas, pledging $350 million in 2013 for redevelopment. The same year he moved Zappos' headquarters into the former Las Vegas City Hall building.
