Sean 'Diddy' Combs jurors reach verdicts on four out of five charges in sex trafficking and racketeering trial
In tense scenes towards the end of the court day on Tuesday, jurors sent a note to say they had reached verdicts on two charges of sex trafficking and two charges of transportation for prostitution, but had been unable to reach a unanimous decision on the charge of racketeering conspiracy.
Combs 's lawyers surrounded him at the defence table after the note was sent to the court, and at one point he held his head in his hands.
After discussions with prosecution and defence lawyers, Judge Arun Subramanian told jurors to continue deliberating on Wednesday rather than deliver a partial verdict.
The jury has testimony from more than 30 witnesses to consider - including Combs's former long-term partner Casandra "Cassie" Ventura and another former girlfriend called "Jane", who testified under a pseudonym to protect her identity.
Prosecutors allege the 55-year-old rapper used his fame and power to force Cassie and "Jane" into drug-fuelled sex sessions with male sex workers, which were referred to as "freak-offs", "wild king nights", or "hotel nights".
He was also physically violent and blackmailed them with footage, jurors were told.
They also heard from "Mia", a former employee who alleged she was sexually assaulted by the rapper on several occasions during her career. She also testified using a pseudonym.
Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges and his defence team has argued that prosecutors are attempting to criminalise what they say was a consensual "swingers lifestyle".
The rapper chose not to testify and his lawyers did not call any witnesses, building their arguments instead through lengthy cross-examinations of the witnesses called by the prosecution.
The charges against Diddy - and potential sentences
Count 1: Racketeering conspiracy - up to life in prison
Count 2: Sex-trafficking of Cassie Ventura - a minimum of 15 years and maximum of life in prison
Count 3: Transporting individuals including but not limited to Cassie Ventura to engage in prostitution - a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison
Count 4: Sex-trafficking of Jane* - a minimum of 15 years and maximum of life in prison
Count 5: Transporting individuals including but not limited to Jane to engage in prostitution - a maximum of 10 years in prison
What is racketeering conspiracy?
Racketeering conspiracy, which is count one on the verdict sheet, is the most complicated of the charges against Combs.
Jurors need to decide not only whether the rapper created a "racketeering enterprise", but also if he was involved in various offences as part of this, including kidnapping, arson and bribery.
The charge falls under the US's RICO laws (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations Act), which is best known for being used in relation to organised crime and drug cartel cases.
After closing arguments last week, jurors began deliberation on Monday and had spent about 13 hours discussing in total by the time they sent their note.
Before reaching the verdict on the four counts, they had requested to review crucial testimony from Cassie about her account of an assault in a hotel in Los Angeles in 2016.
Captured on CCTV, the footage was played in court several times - showing Combs, wearing only a towel and socks, beating, kicking and dragging Cassie in a hallway.
His defence team admitted in their opening statement that this was domestic violence, and said the music star regretted these actions - but that they did not amount to any of the federal charges against him.
As well as Cassie's evidence on that assault, they asked to see her testimony on an incident at the Cannes Film Festival in 2013 - when she said Combs accused her of taking drugs from him and kicked her off of his yacht.
On their way back to the US, she told the court, he threatened to release explicit videos of her having sex with an escort.
Jurors also wanted to review testimony given by a male sex worker at the start of the trial.
Combs could face 15 years to life in prison if he is convicted of all charges.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Romanian 14-year-old teenagers appear in court on attempted rape charges of girl that sparked Ballymena riots
Two Romanian teenagers aged 14 have appeared in court charged with attempted rape that prompted riots in the Northern Irish town of Ballymena. The defendants, appearing at Ballymena Youth Court by video link from custody, heard that because of their age and that of their alleged victim the case should be speeded up. The two teenagers, who cannot be identified because of their ages, are jointly charged with attempted oral rape of the girl on June 7 this year in Northern Ireland. According to a police statement at the time, the alleged victim was subjected to a 'serious sexual assault' in the Clonavon Terrace area of Ballymena, Co Antrim, some time between 7.30pm and 10.30pm that Saturday evening. Hours after the pair first appeared in court on June 9, serious rioting and public disorder erupted in Ballymena - and Romanian families fled their homes on Clonavon Terrace. Three nights of disturbances included houses being attacked and cars burned - with Police Service of Northern Ireland riot squads facing angry mobs hurling missiles, including petrol bombs, fireworks, masonry and bottles. During the brief hearing this morning, the teenagers' defence solicitor confirmed the defendants' parents were watching proceedings online. A prosecuting lawyer told District Judge Nigel Broderick that while the full file was requested last month, 'this will be a serious crime unit file'. She said that while there was 'a target date', she suggested it was not realistic and that one would be supplied on the next occasion. The lawyer also told the judge a video interview with the alleged victim was not yet on the file, adding: 'That's something the PPS will look at.' It was heard that the next Youth Court is in five weeks - and yet when a defendant is in custody, they can only be remanded for a maximum of four weeks at a time. Judge Broderick adjourned the case for two weeks to July 16 for further review. He warned that, given the ages of the parties concerned including the defendants and the complainant, the proceedings should be prioritised as a 'purple file case'. In response to last month's riots, the official spoesman for Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said on June 10: 'The disorder we saw in Ballymena is very concerning. 'Reports of sexual assault in the area are extremely distressing but there is no justification for attacks on police officers while they continue to protect local communities. 'The PSNI and the justice system must be allowed to carry out their jobs. Social media footage showed a fire raging inside one house. Masked youths were seen smashing windows and setting curtains alight Firefighters attempt to put out fires in streets and houses in the Northern Irish town on June 9 'Our thoughts are with the victims of the assault as well as the police officers who were injured.' He added: 'Ministers and colleagues are in touch with counterparts.' Assistant Chief Constable Ryan Henderson said at the time: 'The shocking scenes of disorder on the streets of Ballymena have to be condemned in the strongest terms. 'This is not the way. People have been injured and public property damaged. 'We are engaging with groups that have been affected by this disorder and we are gathering evidence, CCTV and other footage to progress criminal investigations. 'I want to put on record my appreciation and gratitude to our officers who were determined to restore order to the town in the most challenging of circumstances with bricks, furniture and petrol bombs all thrown in their direction. 'They worked fearlessly to try to bring calm to the most volatile of situations. 'I'm also grateful to our partners in the Northern Ireland Fire and Rescue Service and Northern Ireland Ambulance Service for their support through-out. One of four properties set alight and attacked in Ballymena on June 9 after the alleged attempted rape of a local girl sparked protests in Northern Ireland 'I would strongly urge anyone who was involved in yesterday's rioting and disorder to think long and hard about their actions. 'Violence and disorder will only place people at greater risk. Our priority is to keep the community safe and we need everyone to work with us. 'We want better for Ballymena and Northern Ireland. 'Anyone who has information or who can help identify those responsible is asked to contact police on 101.'
Daily Record
28 minutes ago
- Daily Record
What happens next in Diddy trial as jurors fail to agree on racketeering charge?
The fate of Sean 'Diddy' Combs is expected to be revealed this week as the 12 jurors in his sex-trafficking trial continue their deliberations in court. The 55-year-old is charged with sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transportation to engage in prostitution. Combs, who denies all charges, could spend the rest of his life behind bars if he is found guilty. During the trial at the Federal District Court in Lower Manhattan, New York, which began almost two months ago on May 5, the jury heard from 34 witnesses - including celebrities like Kid Cudi and Combs' ex-girlfriend Cassie. Deliberations began on Monday, June 30, and the trial appears to be nearing its conclusion after the jury reached a partial verdict on the celebrity rapper. On Tuesday, July 1, the jury made their decision on four of the five counts. This led to a partial verdict, and a final decision is expected within the coming days. The jury managed to decide on four of the five charges – counts two, three, four, and five, but is unable to decide on count one. The counts against Diddy are: Count 1 - Racketeering conspiracy Count 2 - Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion – pertains to Victim 1 (Cassie) Count 3 - Transportation to engage in prostitution relating to Victim 1 (Cassie) and commercial sex workers Count 4 - Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion(relating to Jane Doe – Victim 2) Count 5 - Transportation to engage in prostitution, relating to Victim 2 (Jane Doe) and commercial sex workers Count one carries the biggest sentence, life in prison. Meanwhile, counts two and four have a minimum sentence of 15 years and a maximum of life. Counts three and five carry a maximum sentence of ten years. What does Diddy's racketeering charge mean? Racketeering conspiracy is a charge under the US Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The US government introduced this law in 1970 to take down crime gangs. The aim was to tie crime bosses to the offences of those working under them. In the context of US law, 'racketeering' generally refers to the illegal activity of a criminal organisation. But the RICO act defines "racketeering activity" as any act or threat that involves an array of different crimes like bribery, arson, extortion, kidnapping and murder. 'Conspiracy' is when two or more people agree to commit a crime and then take steps to further the plan, according to the US Department of Justice website. Why was Diddy charged with racketeering conspiracy? The prosecution accused Mr Combs of using his business, the Combs Enterprise, to violently coerce and blackmail women to perform sex acts, among other criminal acts. The law allows prosecutors to combine related offences that otherwise would have had to be prosecuted separately in different states, the US Department of Justice website explains. It also provides a way for prosecutors to ensure their case "adequately reflects the nature and extent of the criminal conduct involved in a way that prosecution only on the underlying charges would not". In this case, it allowed the prosecutors to use evidence they would not have been able to use if Mr Combs was charged only with sex trafficking. To secure a guilty verdict on a RICO charge, prosecutors must show that: Members of a so-called enterprise, or group of people engaged in a common purpose, committed or planned to commit two other crimes in connection with the enterprise within a 10-year period. What happens next in the trial? A unanimous decision is required for a conviction. Both prosecution and defence lawyers wanted the judge to encourage the jury to continue deliberating and reach a verdict. Marc Agnifilo, representing Diddy, said the defence would like the judge to bring out the jury and instruct them to continue their deliberation. They are currently working on the wording of the instruction. Significantly, two notes were passed to the presiding judge from the jury. The first note expressed a juror's difficulty in understanding the 61-page instructions which were given by the judge before deliberations began. The jury's note-passing could actually be a positive sign for Combs, suggests Mitch Epner, a New York-based lawyer and former prosecutor. He told the BBC: "First, it is unusual for the jurors to send a note to the judge this early, other than asking for logistical help. Second, this note indicates that there may already be a breakdown in the deliberative process." Alternatively, the jury may be allowed to deliver a partial verdict. This means a jury giving a verdict on the charges they did agree on - while a mistrial may be declared for the other charges they didn't agree on. The prosecution would have the option of running a retrial on the charge they couldn't agree on, the Legal Information Institute's website says. If the jury finds Mr Combs not guilty on the other charges, the prosecution might be more inclined to push ahead with a retrial on the racketeering charge, according to ABC News. But if the jury finds Mr Combs guilty and the prosecution is satisfied with the length of his jail sentence, it might be less inclined to go for a retrial. The prospect of a retrial would likely be highly distressing to prosecution witnesses. If you've been the victim of sexual assault, you can access help and resources via or calling the national telephone helpline on 0808 802 9999. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
BreakingNews.ie
32 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Teenage boys accused of Ballymena sex assault appear before court again
Two 14-year-old boys charged with the attempted rape of a girl in Ballymena have appeared before a judge again. The boys have been charged in connection with an alleged serious sexual assault on a teenage girl in the Clonavon Terrace area of the Co Antrim town last month. Advertisement The incident sparked days of race-related anti-immigration rioting in Ballymena, with linked sporadic outbreaks of violence in other parts of the North. The case was mentioned at a youth court sitting in Ballymena on Wednesday morning. The two teenagers, who interacted with court through a Romanian interpreter, appeared together via video-link from a juvenile justice centre. They were originally remanded into custody at their first court appearance two days after the alleged attack in June. Advertisement During Wednesday's brief hearing before district judge Nigel Broderick a prosecution lawyer said a file on the case was still being prepared. The prosecutor said she would confirm to the court at the next sitting whether an achieving best evidence (ABE) interview had been completed with the alleged victim. Both boys are accused of attempting to orally rape the girl. At their first court appearance last month, a judge was told both accused denied the alleged offence during interview with police. Advertisement The teenagers spoke briefly during Wednesday's hearing to confirm they understood what was being discussed in court. Ireland Facebook being used to coordinate racist attacks i... Read More The boys were further remanded in custody as the case was listed again for a further review hearing on July 16th. Legal representatives for both accused did not raise any objections to their further remand into custody. If you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this article, you can call the national 24-hour Rape Crisis Helpline at 1800 77 8888 , access text service and webchat options at or visit Rape Crisis Help
