logo
Letters to the Editor, August 16th: In defence of the Angelus, SUVs, and worshipping Oasis

Letters to the Editor, August 16th: In defence of the Angelus, SUVs, and worshipping Oasis

Irish Times3 days ago
Sir, – I'd nearly agree with William Burke (Letters, August 14th) about the Angelus. In the multi-faith, no-faith Ireland of 2025, it would seem to be well past its sell-by date, the product of another age. A little historical context around when it was adopted by Radio Éireann may be illuminating.
The year 1950 was a Roman Catholic-designated holy year, with the usual outpourings of piety. Cardinal József Mindszenty had been imprisoned in Hungary. The Korean War was in full swing and the possibility of nuclear exchanges was not discounted.
A godless communism was sensed to be rampant and almost unstoppable. In Ireland, the advance of Marxism was to be countered by ostentatious popular Catholic devotion – the 1940s and 1950s saw a whole range of activities aimed at the conversion of Russia. The Pax Christi crusade of prayer was one of the most prominent – there were special devotions to the Immaculate Heart of Mary and Our Lady of Fatima – and always the ubiquitous rosary crusades.
All this had led to the secretary of the then department of posts and telegraphs, during the late 1940s, discussing the idea of a daily broadcast spoken Angelus with the Catholic archbishop of Dublin, John Charles McQuaid. Charles Kelly, the director of Radio Éireann, was also consulted, but was not in favour of this proposal.
READ MORE
However, after further discussion they concluded that 'the introduction of speech would be a mistake and we should experiment further simply with a bell'.
Archbishop McQuaid suggested that it would be appropriate to commence on the Feast of the Assumption, August 15th, 1950. And so it was done. We have had it ever since; indeed, it has expanded to include a sound and visual version on RTÉ television.
While most of us probably like the comfort of some long-run familiarity in our lives (and, born in 1950, the Angelus has always been with me), on the surface it does seem out of place in Ireland 2025.
But to this Anglican it is not offensive or in your face – given the florid and triumphalist nature of mid-century Irish Catholicism, the surprise is perhaps that the stark simplicity of the bell is almost Buddhist in its economy and spareness.
It can mean what you want it to mean. Similarly, the television version has long moved away from a limited and limiting reference to Catholicism; many of the visuals now celebrate secular activities such as gardening and watchmaking.
That gives it a contemporary relevance that is not tied to any narrow Christian denomination – or indeed to religious belief at all.
It's only a couple of minutes each day. And no-one is obliged to listen to, or watch, it. Let it be. – Yours, etc,
IAN D'ALTON,
Naas,
Co Kildare.
Sir, – I found William Burke's letter suggesting the removal of the Angelus from our air waves to be sad and offensive.
What a joy it is to have a minute of quiet reflection to the sound of the Angelus bells.
The sound of Angelus bells from our churches also encourages us to take a few thoughtful quiet moments in this busy world. Surely this has to be worthwhile?
We should defend our Angelus as it continues to be a wonderful part of our lives today. – Yours, etc,
PAUL GETHINGS,
Dublin.
Sir, – I am writing in response to William Burke's letter where he argues that RTÉ should discontinue its broadcasts of the Angelus.
I must say I don't agree. Yes, the broadcast of the Angelus has it origins in what was then (75 years ago) in effect a Roman Catholic confessional state. But no, it should not be done away with.
It provides a short time for contemplation and reflection whether one is religious or not and is part of our Irish heritage.
What's next – the abolition of Easter and Christmas? – Yours, etc,
KP SMYTH,
Glasnevin,
Dublin 9.
Sir, – In these unsettling times if people of all religions and none could just pause and reflect for a minute every day there might be more tolerance, understanding and less vitriol in the world.
This will not solve the problems of the world, but would surely calm everybody down a bit.
The prompt from RTÉ at 6pm works for me. – Yours, etc,
PATRICK HOWLIN,
Milltown,
Dublin 14.
Making a holy show
Sir, – I enjoy Emer McLysaght's column. I read it regularly.
Reading it today: Well, it read like an account of someone who might have been witness to a sacramental event – the appearance of St Bernadette at the Grotto at Massabielle, France, 1858 ('
I'm going to Oasis both nights, tissues at the ready
,' August 12th). Or more recently, Kerry's 39th All-Ireland accomplishment.
Regarding the pending Oasis concert: 'I can hardly believe that this weekend, it's happening. So, I bought two more (T-shirts) in something of a panic.'
'You'll find me (crying) in a puddle on the floor', etc, and so on.
It surprises and disappoints me that anyone would have this exhausting and hysterical degree of veneration, for an entertainment that is as fleeting and, may I say, unsubstantial as pop music – Taylor Swift is one more example. Of mediocrity. Yes, Really.
Can someone please tell me: what is a superstar?
I have no idea. – Yours, etc,
PADDY FITZPATRICK,
Shandon,
Cork.
School holidays
Sir, – It isn't the duration of school holidays that puzzles me, but the breakdown. Why do we have a short holiday in winter and a long holiday in summer?
If three weeks were taken off the summer holidays and added to the winter holiday the amount of money spent on heating and lighting would decrease hugely, freeing up funds which could then be spent on more worthwhile educational endeavours. – Yours, etc,
JOHN DOYLE,
Cork.
Gaza offensive conclusions
Sir, – It is almost impossible to escape the conclusion that from the beginning of its Gaza offensive Israel's objective was not just defensive, but clearly an exercise in ethnic cleansing. This would be achieved through a three-pronged approach; a large scale and indiscriminate military operation, a blockade of food and medical supplies. and the destruction of the Gaza medical infrastructure.
This strategy was implemented under the cover of seeking to eliminate Hamas, whom we were told populated a complex tunnel system, thus requiring a carpet aerial campaign of destruction.
In addition, we were informed that every medical facility in Gaza housed terrorists and had to be destroyed, while Hamas was supposed to be stealing all the humanitarian aid so this was withheld and the only agency capable of distributing it was banned from doing so.
That is the picture before our eyes and until the international community comes to terms with it, calls it out for what it is and puts a stop to it, this Israeli government will not change its ways. It will kill, starve and oppress until there are no more Palestinians in Gaza. – Yours, etc,
LIAM MEADE,
Ballyneety,
Co Limerick.
Policing the traffic police
Sir, – The recent report on the Garda road traffic division states that some members are unproductive and disinterested in their job. Surely, they should be accountable for not doing the work they are being paid to do and not wasting taxpayers' money?
I travel the M50 on a regular basis and rarely do I see one of the Garda traffic division cars.
I have experienced some hairy moments with cars speeding by or overtaking erratically.
Why can't we have a road traffic force that is visible. It might lead to less careless driving and maybe save lives? – Yours, etc,
BARRY ROONEY,
Co Wicklow.
Sir, – I was going to write a letter to The Irish Times asking why so many truck drivers on our motorways don't bother putting number plates on their trailers. Now I no longer need to. – Yours, etc,
HUGH GALLAGHER,
Naas,
Co Kildare.
In praise of SUVs
Sir, – While a few correspondents have made points in defence of sports utility vehicles (SUVs), nonetheless much of what has appeared recently on the Letters page would suggest that, regarding how cars drive, it's simply 'two wheels good, four wheels bad'.
This is unfair, incorrect and in some cases dangerously inaccurate in the impression it conveys. It's probably fair to say initially that I drive one, largely I would argue for the reasons to do with the safety of others.
This may reflect aspects of my occupation, but is surely not unique.
As a doctor on call from home for various categories of emergency, being able to get in, whatever the conditions is important.
For example, as hurricane Ophelia was hitting some years ago, I was called to deal with a rare and often fatal emergency called an aortic dissection. The patient recovered fully.
During the 'Beast from the East' storm I drove to work picking up two colleagues en route and dropping them home afterward.
The operating lists were full of people with wrist and leg fractures from falls on the snow, inevitably. Staff had to get in to deal with this.
Living on a hill with a 5-10 per cent gradient and no street lights is not ideal and needing to get to work at all hours in all weathers is the simple reason I use such a vehicle.
Its hybrid engine is pretty fuel efficient and road tax therefore quite low. It's a pretty unspectacular car and frankly I'd rather drive the type of sports car that might make me still seem young enough to still have a midlife crisis.
But covering dark slippy roads as quickly as possible a few nights a year is a matter of serious importance to me, and many others. One might ask, to illustrate, how are the people who grit the roads supposed to get to work? I aim to minimise the degree to which I risk my safety, even if travelling during red weather warnings.
The impression given that this is a particular danger to other road users is not correct. As per, for example, the Euro NCAP safety tests, the car I drive scores 70 for pedestrian safety in a crash. This is not the safest for an SUV but exceeds the measures for many perfectly ordinary cars, and is the same as a VW Polo, for example.
Most cars crashes don't involve pedestrians, of course. All involve at least one vehicle and all we can control is the choice of vehicle we are in.
One correspondent noted that the weight distribution pattern of SUVs is a particular risk, imparting an '11-times increased risk of rolling over in an incident' (Letters, August 11th). That may be true but one can easily search online to see what vehicles are most associated with road fatalities. It is not a list of SUVs.
Not surprisingly, high performance cars tend to feature highly.
The other benefits – for older people with hip or back pain, for mothers lifting buggies and car seats and so on – can also be meaningful.
But for safe travel in extreme conditions, as unglamorous as they are, SUVs can be seen as life-savers. – Yours, etc,
BRIAN O'BRIEN,
Co Cork.
Presidential elections timing
Sir, –I would like to propose a practical scheduling idea for the forthcoming presidential election.
Under Article 12(3) of the Constitution, the presidential election must be held no later than the date the current President's term ends, and no more than 60 days before that date.
For the current term, this means the election must take place between September 12th and November 11th, 2025.
In recent years, primary schools have been closed to accommodate voting: in 2023 for the local and European elections, and in 2024 for the general election.
Given that we now know well in advance the precise constitutional window for the presidential election, I suggest that it be scheduled during the schools' mid-term/Halloween break – from October 27th -31st.
This would minimise disruption to students, parents, and teachers, while still falling squarely within the constitutional timeframe. – Yours, etc,
RICHARD JOYCE,
Monkstown,
Co Dublin.
Sir, – Michael O'Leary for president – no baggage. – Yours, etc,
PATRICK DOYLE,
Rathvilly,
Co Carlow .
Sir, – The suggestion from Sadbh Ní Seachnasaigh that you give Michael O'Leary his own column is an excellent idea.
You could call it 'Man bites everything'. – Yours, etc,
GERRY SAVAGE,
Co Galway.
Is this a record?
Sir, – Even as I recounted Pat O'Brien's lively take on the supermarket mouse (Letters, August 14th) to my neighbour over a cup of tea, we were both startled to observe an animated member of the same species canter casually across my kitchen floor.
Almost immediately, my quick-thinking friend flung open the adjacent back door and the tiny creature speedily reduced the rising room temperature by cooperatively exiting the premises.
His means of ingress is still under investigation.
While the coincidental nature of this experience is certainly remarkable, I'm left wondering if my friend's rapid reaction to a minor crises could be termed a record response? – Yours, etc,
KIERAN FLYNN,
Ballinasloe,
Co Galway.
Sir, –It's very appropriate that the Letters page of Ireland's paper of record should record so many records. – Yours, etc,
CIANA CAMPBELL,
Ennis,
Co Clare.
Break time
Sir, – It's holiday time, give yourself a break. Close your eyes, take a deep breath and visualise what the world would be like without Netanyahu, Putin and Trump. – Yours, etc,
MICHAEL DUKE,
Carlow.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘We have no choice': Palestinian women reveal exploitation working in Israeli settlements
‘We have no choice': Palestinian women reveal exploitation working in Israeli settlements

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

‘We have no choice': Palestinian women reveal exploitation working in Israeli settlements

'Did the Irish fall into a vat of Guinness and propose something so stupid that it would be attributed to [an] act of diplomatic intoxication?' wrote US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee on X in July last, referring to Ireland's proposed Occupied Territories Bill . 'It will harm Arabs as much as Israelis. Sober up Ireland!' If entered into law, the Bill could ban all trade with Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories. Its proponents say this is in line with requirements under international law, which deems the settlements to be illegal, while some critics suggest a wider boycott could impact Palestinians, as well as Israelis, because of the loss of economic opportunities. Many Palestinians say their economic reliance on Israel is the result of a long-running tactic to exploit them and seize more land. It means individuals can be denied opportunities if they are identified as troublemakers or complain about the status quo, said one Palestinian West Bank municipality director, adding that even participating in a peaceful demonstration could see a Palestinian blacklisted. Despite the West Bank being controlled by Israel and the Palestinian Authority – not Hamas – Palestinians from there had their permits to work inside Israel cancelled after the attacks of October 7th, 2023. READ MORE Israeli soldiers at a checkpoint in the occupied West Bank. Photograph: Sally Hayden The West Bank suffered a 22 per cent contraction in its GDP within a year afterwards, and a loss of about 306,000 jobs, according to Oxfam. Unemployment nearly tripled, to 32 per cent , according to a UN Trade and Development report. The Palestinian Authority is concurrently facing a severe economic crisis, fuelled by Israel withholding tax revenues. Some Palestinians have continued working for Israelis, either in settlements or illegally in Israel. In a March 2025 briefing paper , Oxfam said approximately 29,000 Palestinians were working in Israeli settlements. This included more than 6,500 Palestinian women, who were primarily employed in agriculture and manufacturing . 'Economic dependency on settlements is not incidental – it is the result of decades of policies that have eroded the Palestinian economy, leaving workers, particularly women, with no viable alternatives,' Oxfam's report said. 'Israeli settlement expansion, land confiscation and restrictions on Palestinian trade, movement and development have systematically created conditions of poverty and unemployment that push more Palestinians into exploitative labour ... [ 'Hanging on by a thread': Two days with activists protecting Palestinians from being forced off their land Opens in new window ] 'The reliance on Israeli-controlled labour markets is a direct consequence of deliberate economic strangulation, reinforcing Palestinian dependency while stripping them of sustainable opportunities within their own economy.' The Irish Times spoke to six current and former settlement workers in Nablus. All of the women's names have been changed, at their request, and the interviews have been edited for length and clarity. Sara (53): 'I'm against the boycott ... only because it could impact the opportunities I get' 'I was a university graduate with a degree in medical analysis. I kept applying to try to get a job with the [Palestinian] ministry of education, but unfortunately I couldn't. My kids scored high grades in school and I needed to send them to university. I wanted a good education for my five children. 'I worked in a Palestinian factory a few days a week. In 2016, a broker who takes women to the settlements called me and said if I'm looking for a job I could go there. So the other days I would go to the settlements. They took four-five busses of women, around 80 women, to the settlements from my village. The bus fits 18 people but sometimes we are 26. The Palestinian brokers encourage it: the more girls and women they get, the more money. So they put in extra chairs. 'We woke up at 3am to start the journey, going through a lot of checkpoints. We had to get there on time, starting at 6am. We worked for eight hours, for 90 shekels (€23) a day. We only had half an hour break at 10am, finish at 2pm, then travel back again. 'They were agricultural plantations – working with grapes, dates and sometimes nuts and dried fruits. Of course we felt they were using Palestinians as cheap labour. 'All they cared about is getting the job done, but there's no health insurance, there's no coverage for accidents so if someone had an accident they wouldn't treat them except maybe first aid. 'There was an accident with a young girl, her foot was run over by a forklift truck and she was treated in a Palestinian hospital. There was no sort of compensation for her. Maybe the Palestinian broker would give her some 100 shekels if he had some decency, but it's nothing. 'If we worked inside Israel itself then we would get paid three times the amount, maybe more. 'I still work in the settlements when there is an opportunity. We always feel the guilt but I was forced to do that because of my children, because I want a better life for them ... We are living in a big village but there's no work opportunities, there's no factories, there's no investments, we need alternative opportunities. [ Exhausted and imprisoned: how life in the West Bank is getting worse for Palestinians Opens in new window ] 'I'm against settlements but, for me, there's no other alternative. Because of that I'm against the boycott of the products coming from the settlements but only for one reason, because it could impact the opportunities I get. I'm doing a big sacrifice. It's a huge suffering but we don't have any other choice. 'It's all about the family. If I didn't do this then what would happen to my children? I don't want them to end up working in settlements like me. They have been offered the opportunity to go to work in settlements but there have been incidents of harassment. It's not a safe environment for my daughters.' A vendor near a checkpoint where Palestinians sometimes wait all day trying to cross in Qalandia, West Bank. Photograph: William Keo/The New York Times Rita (50): 'You are held and detained for hours and they search our bags, going in both directions' 'I am single but I had siblings I was in charge of raising after my father and mother died. Four male siblings are married now, and two of my brothers were killed, assassinated by [Israeli] special forces in 2005 and 2003. I betrayed my brothers by working in the settlements, I only did it for one month. 'I received 90 shekels a day. The Israelis pay 150 shekelsbut the brokers take the rest of money. 'I began before October 7th [2023]. After, things became different. We had some really tough situations. For example, we were not allowed to go to the bathroom. So I protested and they were surprised that someone spoke out. 'When we went there we thought we'd be working in factories but it was grading dates, sorting through them outside on a plantation. They do the sorting in three stages: us women were the first stage. They would take the good stuff to go to the Israeli market or international market and the ruined ones go to the West Bank. 'One day I was at the checkpoint going home and I told the soldiers we were very tired, so I was detained for four hours. 'Even when we go inside the settlements, and they are looking at our IDs, you are held and detained for hours and they search our bags, going in both directions. I wish these settlements were shut down. I was once kicked out because of the inspection. They searched us on the way in and out because they wanted to make sure no one stole anything. I speak a little Hebrew and I heard them calling us 'thieves'. The Israeli guard said 'I don't want her to come back', and I said, 'I don't want to come back'.' 'I am totally against settlements and the expansion of the settlements. New settlements must stop. The settlers are becoming very violent because we are allowing them to become violent. We're not united and we don't stop them. 'I still feel guilty until this day that I worked in a settlement.' Palestinians in their cars waiting to cross a checkpoint near the West Bank city of Nablus. Photograph: EPA Esma (36): 'We have to be at the checkpoints at 2am. Sometimes we sleep in the car ...' 'I have four daughters and one boy. My brother was killed when I was 14. He was wanted by the Israelis and they hunted him with spies. 'I started working there in the Jordan Valley, seven or eight years ago. My husband was against it because he knows about the things that happen in the settlements, especially for young women ... it was shocking for me at the start. 'I went there and started sorting dates. I later went to work in another settlement in a dry cleaners, with much better conditions than working in plantations. I worked for one year and got paid 500 shekels a month. During Covid-19, they let some people go and kept only the good people, but they also started exploiting us, giving them extra hours without getting paid. There was a lot of work pressure. 'At some point they made us sleep in the dry cleaners. In the whole day you get half an hour break for lunch and then go back to work. We wanted to pray but couldn't even get the time to pray. 'In settlements, there's a humiliation in our treatment. There was a gate for Palestinian workers and a gate for Israelis. Once a broker took me to the wrong gate, they checked my ID and found out my brother was in prison and made me stand in the sun for an hour. They released me, but only after the guard asked the Israeli broker to go and get a weapon as the guard said it was dangerous to be around me. 'We have to be at the checkpoints at 2am. Sometimes we sleep in the car and sometimes we can't sleep. Sometimes there's conflict at the checkpoints, they'd shoot gas bombs and sound bombs for no reason. We don't have any alternatives. Our government is not creating the opportunities for us to work. 'The war has destroyed everything. Because of the war, Palestinian workers are unable to go to Israel so they had to shift to working in the settlements if they are allowed to. There used to be Palestinian brokers making 600 shekels a day but now they're making 90 . The business owners, the settlers, say if you don't like it there are a lot of other workers who want this. I am originally from Gaza and they can see that on the system; I was held for three hours at a checkpoint as a result. 'They've brought Chinese and Indian workers and they're paying them more than the Palestinians, but they're not doing a good job. 'There's harassment, humiliation, especially for young girls. One of my employers fired me because there was another lady willing to take the job and go out with him and things could get physical. It depends on the personality of the women and the conditions, some of them are divorced, some are tempted, some are forced. They are pressured into it, especially in the settlements.' A car park at the Barkan industrial estate beside the Israeli settlement of Ariel, in the occupied West Bank. Photograph: Sally Hayden Lama (52): 'My family and relatives ... would prefer me not to go work in Israel or in the settlements' 'I have one boy and one girl, and used to live in Jordan with my family before coming back in 2021. I was surprised to find out that women worked in Israel and in the settlements because before that it was only the men. 'I needed income and had to find a job. There was a Palestinian clothes store near home that paid 20 shekels a day. I consulted my brothers and my sister-in-law who said there's an opportunity in the settlements where they heard you could make 220 shekels a day. 'Actually, it should have been 150 shekels, but the broker takes 60 ). I worked in a factory inside Israel too and got 280 shekels a day, with the broker still taking 60. We would use illegal crossings next to a checkpoint where they cut the fence and smuggled us in. We used to leave at 2am or 3am to get to the crossing. 'The first thing is the challenge of getting there ... We would get to the settlement and wait for the broker to pick us up from a very crowded area with no clean bathrooms. Go to the factory and be standing the whole time. We couldn't sit on chairs on the production line, couldn't talk, couldn't joke, you have to be moving the whole time. Your hands have to keep working. 'Some – especially old women – used to get diseases, like liquid in their feet, and they would go home sick. The buses were crowded because the more women, the more money for the brokers. We worked from 6am-10.30am, then the first and only break. Sometimes it's only 20 minutes. Then you go back to work until 3.30pm. Sometimes they say 'who wants to do some extra work?' and two out of the whole bus would want to stay, and the whole group will be forced to wait for them or work too. They were promised extra money but it wasn't given to them. 'The Israelis were not dealing with us directly, it's definitely a Palestinian operation. I didn't see any Israelis doing the same jobs for the same money. They wouldn't. We hear news from the workers being smuggled now into Israel after the war and they say the Israelis are complaining, they want the Palestinian workers to come back. 'There was a debate the whole time from my family and relatives. They would prefer me not to go work in Israel or in the settlements.' A car park in a settlement in the occupied West Bank. Photograph: Sally Hayden Maha (55): 'I would encourage banning trade with settlements if there's alternatives for Palestinian women' 'I am a mother of two boys and two girls, and I started working in settlements in 2015. I also went inside Israel, where they have industrial zones and big factories. 'Sometimes we'd organise dates and grapes, packing and sorting, avocados, mango, grapefruit, corn. It's exhausting, it's not an easy job. We had to leave at 1am to get to work because of the checkpoints. 'I then worked as a broker, because I was exploited as a worker before. I didn't want women to experience the same thing. I paid them in full. The women were very appreciative of that. I had a group of 45 women and I would get paid a commission just for bringing them. 'I wouldn't encourage working in Israeli settlements if we had the alternatives, our own businesses, our own projects, but this is our only choice. 'This is not something that we like, having these settlements, this is something that we were forced into. I would encourage banning trade with these settlements if there's alternatives for Palestinian women. 'We could invest in our local market, in our local agriculture. For example there are some Palestinian packing houses for grapes. What we really need are exporting opportunities for our products. If we can find these, then people will turn to these sectors. 'If the international community can support us to open channels to export our products then this would be good for us. Then we could control our life and our time. Our lives would become easier.' Nawal (59): 'I witnessed this exploitation of young women in most settlements' 'I started working in the settlements eight years ago. There was a bad economy, no work opportunities, nothing else to do. 'It was the worst kind of circumstances. No bathrooms: sometimes you just do it on the land. No privacy. The main cause of me leaving the job was the bad treatment. The harassment that took place was disgusting. 'There's a lot of harassment. Sometimes the girls are forced to agree to go with the men. They would go to their houses with them. If she wants to keep her job, if she wants more money, she has to ... it's really heartbreaking to talk about. They are 17, 20, they go to college and they come to work because they need to earn some money to pay for their education. The women themselves said this is the only option they have. I witnessed this exploitation of young women in most settlements. 'I got blacklisted when I advised one of the girls not to go out with the Israeli business owner. I said: 'Why are you doing this, you are destroying these young women's lives and future?'. And the settler responded saying: 'I have a lot of bastards in [the Palestinian city of] Tulkarem'. He has the power, he has the money, he has the work opportunity that these young ladies need. 'If a woman got pregnant he would give her nothing. Sometimes they do abortions. If she's a widow, if she's divorced, she would definitely need to do an abortion because she would not survive the community. If their communities found out they could be killed, they would take it out on her because they can't do anything to the Israelis. 'Now, during this war, it has increased because there are no other options. I wouldn't do it, I would die out of hunger not to allow anyone to touch me because of my principles and my religion. 'We need protection, we need income opportunities, health insurance, so that we can quit this life.'

Fine Gael is electrified at prospect of Heather Humphreys running for president
Fine Gael is electrified at prospect of Heather Humphreys running for president

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Fine Gael is electrified at prospect of Heather Humphreys running for president

'It's a fait accompli for Heather,' one Fine Gael Minister said. In advance of Fine Gael reopening its nominations for presidential candidates on Monday night, the support for former minister Heather Humphreys to run for Áras an Uachtaráin among councillors, TDs and Senators was overwhelming. Ireland South MEP Seán Kelly or people close to him have for days, across various media outlets, been coyly breadcrumbing his desire to run. Kelly may be once-bitten, twice shy about making his intentions known, after already ruling himself out in July. But if he were to put himself forward, it is difficult to see his path to nomination, given the need for him to secure the support of at least 20 members of the Fine Gael parliamentary party. READ MORE There was little evidence that Kelly had used the weekend to lobby TDs and Senators, with a number of Leinster House politicians saying they had not yet heard from him. While the party is respectful of the former GAA chief's record as a quota-bursting poll topper in the European elections, the momentum behind Humphreys seems unassailable. 'It's absolutely no disrespect to Seán,' said a TD, 'it just says more about Heather.' Humphreys does not seem to have been actively lobbying TDs or Senators but she doesn't need to. By Monday afternoon, the former Fine Gael deputy leader and Cavan–Monaghan TD was still yet to confirm her intention to run for president. Yet many in Fine Gael kept talking in the future tense about what her campaign 'will' be like. Some confided they had been given the impression that the party had succeeded in changing the former minister's mind about running, while other politicians were more pragmatic. 'I think people are just manifesting,' one said. Fine Gael is electrified at the prospect of having a Border-county Protestant running for the Áras. Particularly given the mounting optimism within the party's ranks that 2025 is its first, best chance to finally win the coveted constitutional role, which carries so much prestige as a symbol of national unity and cultural identity. Fine Gael councillor and former lord mayor of Dublin Emma Blain told The Irish Times she was supporting Humphreys. 'It's the right time for Heather,' said Blain, a former editor of the Church of Ireland Gazette. 'She would be a shared-island candidate, who as president would be beneficial to the whole island'. Though Fine Gael is jealously guarding Mairead McGuinness 's record and reputation out of respect for its erstwhile front-runner, some concede that Humphreys is starting to seem like an overlooked obvious choice. Her island-traversing record as communities minister and her prominent role in the 1916 commemorations all now seem like kismet, for the blooming campaign behind the woman who insisted she didn't want to be president. If it comes to it, Fine Gael remains relatively relaxed about the prospect of a contest between Kelly and Humphreys for the nomination, with party figures making emollient noises about 'healthy competition'. Though there's some anxiety about time, others feel a contest would inject pace into what had been a lethargic slouch towards September. In Kelly's home kingdom of Kerry, there was some disquiet about Fine Gael's presidential candidate being decided by those above in Dublin. 'Remember one thing, Fine Gael headquarters have not a good track record when it comes to nominating presidential candidates,' Kerry councillor Bobby O'Connell said. Fellow Kerry councillor Michael Foley added that 'what's more than that, they got it wrong here in Kerry in the general election too'. O'Connell said a competition between the two would be the best and fairest for the party and the base. 'I think it should go to a convention,' he said. 'And, if you'll pardon the pun, let the best man win.'

Tony Holohan confirms he will not run in Presidential election over family ‘abuse' and ‘further distress' fears
Tony Holohan confirms he will not run in Presidential election over family ‘abuse' and ‘further distress' fears

The Irish Sun

time4 hours ago

  • The Irish Sun

Tony Holohan confirms he will not run in Presidential election over family ‘abuse' and ‘further distress' fears

He said 'personal abuse' is common in Irish politics OUT OF RACE Tony Holohan confirms he will not run in Presidential election over family 'abuse' and 'further distress' fears TONY Holohan has confirmed he will not be running in the Presidential election in order to protect his family. The former chief medical officer had been considering seeking nomination to make the ballot for polling later this year. However, Holohan confirmed today he had ultimately decided against running. The Limerick native has said the decision came amid fears running to replace Michael D Higgins would open his family up to "abuse" while they are "rebuilding" their lives. The dad-of-two said that "personal abuse" is becoming "increasingly normalised in Irish politics". Tony said: 'While a number of different factors have influenced my decision, my overriding consideration has been my wish to protect my family from the kind of personal abuse which is becoming increasingly normalised in Irish politics generally and in presidential elections in particular. 'I understand the very tough nature of modern politics and while I am more than capable of defending my reputation and the decisions which I have taken, over a long career during challenging times in public service my family is not. 'I cannot now expose them to further distress, criticism or abuse at a time when we are all still rebuilding our lives.' Holohan added: "We have been well served by the holders of this high office to date, and I wish the next President – whoever he or she may be – every success in the role. "They will have my full support." It comes just days after Fine Gael's Mairead McGuinness pulled out of the race on health grounds. The former EU Commissioner had been the front-runner to enter the Aras an Uachtarain. 'Sad to see him go' - GAA fans emotional seeing Michael D Higgins attend last men's All-Ireland final as President In a statement she said: 'I have made the very difficult decision to withdraw my name as the Fine Gael nominee for the Presidential election. 'This decision is not lightly taken and follows a stay in hospital last week. 'My priority now is my health. Given that the election is in a short couple of months, I do not believe that I have the strength to give the campaign my all. 'I am taking this decision on medical advice and while it is extremely difficult, it is the right decision for me and my family. 'I appreciate that this will come as a shock and disappointment to party members and colleagues in Fine Gael, but our political family is strong. 'I have spoken with the Tanaiste and Party leader, Simon Harris, and thank him for his support and understanding. 'I also want to thank all of those people who have done so much to support me, now and in the past. 'My focus now is my health and my family, and I ask for privacy in the time ahead.' FINE GAEL STRATEGY SHIFT In a statement, Fine Gael leader Simon Harris said the news had come as an "awful shock". The Tanaiste said: 'It was our clear view in Fine Gael and the view of many people across Ireland that Mairead would make an excellent President of Ireland. 'Mairead's health will not now allow this. This has come as an awful shock to us all. Mairead is a valued member of our Fine Gael family. 'It is absolutely essential that she now prioritises her health and I know I speak for everyone when I wish her all the very best on that journey.' He said Fine Gael will reconsider its strategy for the election. The Tanaiste added: 'But that's for the time ahead, not for today. Today I want to pay tribute to Mairead. "I want to thank her for all she has done. I want to wish her and Tom and their family all the best at this time and she knows we are all sending her our very best.' It means the only candidate now formally in the race is Independent TD Catherine Connolly who has the backing of the Social Democrats, Labour Party and People Before Profit.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store