logo
Montana Farmers Union seeks to join lawsuit against tariffs on Canada

Montana Farmers Union seeks to join lawsuit against tariffs on Canada

Yahoo24-04-2025
An aerial view from a drone shows a combine being used to harvest the soybeans. (Photo by Joe Raedle | Getty Images)
The Montana Farmers Union on Monday filed a motion to intervene in a lawsuit brought by four Blackfeet Nation tribal members seeking an injunction against the Trump administration's tariffs on Canada.
The organization, which has been around since 1912, said that joining the case was a way to continue fighting 'on behalf of family farmers and ranchers.'
'The executive branch has overstepped its constitutional and statutory authority on these tariffs. Montana farmers and ranchers can't afford any more uncertainty or any more financial stressors – especially not random tariffs,' MFU President Walter Schweitzer said in a press release.
Plaintiffs State Sen. Susan Webber and Jonathan St. Goddard, both enrolled members of the Blackfeet Nation, originally filed the lawsuit in federal court earlier this month against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the United States of America, and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, arguing that the tariffs levied by the administration against Canada violates Indigenous treaty rights and exceeds presidential authority.
The suit claims the tariffs violate a 1794 treaty exempting tribes along the United States-Canadian border from being taxed or levied on goods between the nation. It also challenges the Trump administration's ability to use emergency powers to bypass Congress to impose tariffs. Trump has declared that the fentanyl drug crisis at America's borders constitute a national emergency, though Customs and Border Patrol have only seized 19 kilograms of fentanyl coming from Canada compared to 9,600 kilograms coming from Mexico.
Monday's step to intervene was taking action for Montana family farmers and ranchers who 'are facing dire financial and mental impacts if the tariffs remain in effect,' according to the release.
'MFU's members rely on a predictable and stable trade market and the tariffs imposed by the President not only exceed the President's constitutional and statutory authority, they've 'wallop[ed]' the agricultural community in Montana, as no one can 'plan or prepare,'' the proposed complaint states.
'Because of the President's tariffs, their goods will be more expensive to export, which will result in reduced profits and lost customers. Even worse, farms and ranches that have been in families for generations must be sold simply because the President's isolationist and unlawful approach is incongruous with the international market with which these farmers and ranchers have been dealing and relying upon for decades. MFU's members do not have robust markets in the United States for the crops they grow and those markets cannot be developed overnight,' according to court filings.
According to the Office of United States Trade Representative, Montana's largest market is Canada, with $869 million in goods exported to the state's northern neighbor in 2024 — 37% of total exports.
The top agricultural exports to Canada in 2024 included $113 million in live cattle; $106 million in dried legumes, $25 million in brewing and distilling dregs, $10.2 million in barley, and $10.1 million in cigarettes, according to Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
The complaint from MFU mentions several members who have been impacted by the tariffs.
One member, John Wicks, a fourth generation farmer from Liberty County, said he was in contractual discussions with a cross-border trading partner for his organic lentils, but was told they could not enter into a contract due to the instability of the trade market before the tariffs were imposed. Specifically, 'if American tariffs were going to be implemented, the partner would not take the crops,' harming Wicks financially, according to court filings
'Our Canadian partners either won't buy our crops or are offering significantly lower prices than our partners in the United States. Our partners in the United States know that our Canadian partners are doing this and are capitalizing on it by offering lower prices, so we're getting squeezed,' Wicks wrote in a declaration of support for MFU's filing.
As of Wednesday afternoon, District Court Judge Dana Christensen had not issued a ruling on whether he would allow Montana Farmers Union to intervene. A hearing for the preliminary injunction will be held next Thursday at the Missouri River Federal Courthouse in Great Falls. Attorneys for the federal government have filed a motion to move the case to the Court of International Trade in New York, arguing the District Court doesn't have jurisdiction over tariffs, but attorneys for the plaintiffs responded that case can be rightfully heard at the District Court as the lawsuit is over the constitutionality of executive orders.
'Farmers and ranchers have invested decades in developing reliable markets for our products,' Schweitzer said in the press release. 'Overnight, these random tariffs have destroyed markets that will take decades to rebuild. This is why the authority to impose tariffs resides in Congress because it provides a forum for public debate and input and ensures the benefit outweighs the harm.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Harvard and the Trump administration are nearing a settlement including a $500 million payment
Harvard and the Trump administration are nearing a settlement including a $500 million payment

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Harvard and the Trump administration are nearing a settlement including a $500 million payment

WASHINGTON (AP) — Harvard University and the Trump administration are getting close to an agreement that would require the Ivy League university to pay $500 million to regain access to federal funding and to end investigations, according to a person familiar with the matter. The framework is still being sorted out with significant gaps to close, but both sides have agreed on the financial figure and a settlement could be finalized in coming weeks, according to the person who spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. Harvard declined to comment. The agreement would end a monthslong battle that has tested the boundaries of the government's authority over America's universities. What began as an investigation into campus antisemitism escalated into an all-out feud as the Trump administration slashed more than $2.6 billion in research funding, ended federal contracts and attempted to block Harvard from hosting international students. The university responded with a pair of lawsuits alleging illegal retaliation by the administration after Harvard rejected a set of demands that campus leaders viewed as a threat to academic freedom. Details of the proposed framework were first reported by The New York Times. A $500 million payment would be the largest sum yet as the administration pushes for financial penalties in its settlements with elite universities. Columbia University agreed to pay the government $200 million as part of an agreement restoring access to federal funding, while Brown University separately agreed to pay $50 million to Rhode Island workforce development organizations. Details have not been finalized on where Harvard's potential payment would go, the person said. The Republican president has been pushing to reform prestigious universities that he decries as bastions of liberal ideology. His administration has cut funding to several Ivy League schools while pressing demands in line with his political campaign. None has been targeted as frequently or as heavily as Harvard, the richest U.S. university with an endowment valued at $53 billion. More than a dozen Democrats in Congress who attended Harvard cautioned against a settlement on Aug. 1, warning the university it may warrant 'rigorous Congressional oversight and inquiry.' Capitulating to political demands, they said, would set a dangerous precedent across all of higher education. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

Setting the stage for the Trump-Putin summit
Setting the stage for the Trump-Putin summit

USA Today

time11 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Setting the stage for the Trump-Putin summit

Hello! Rebecca Morin here. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-New York, was just in Puerto Rico to see Bad Bunny this past weekend. Now, I'm counting down the days until I'm on the island later this month! Where Trump and Putin will meet in Alaska President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin's high stakes summit on Friday will take place at a sprawling U.S. military base in Anchorage, Alaska. The face-to-face meeting, billed as a 'listening exercise' by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, will be held at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, spread over 13,000 square acres, to discuss Russia's three-year war on Ukraine. The meeting, which was announced last week, will be the first time in four years that a U.S. president has met Putin since the war began. What to know about the base. A call with Zelenskyy: Trump met virtually with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders on Wednesday. Trump later spoke to reporters about the call, saying 'I would rate it a 10.' Trump is meeting with Putin without the presence of Zelenskyy. Russian troops advance in Ukraine: Small bands of Russian soldiers thrust deeper into eastern Ukraine on Tuesday ahead of the Trump-Putin summit this week. Russian troops advanced near the coal-mining town of Dobropillia, part of Putin's campaign to take full control of Ukraine's Donetsk region. Ukraine's military dispatched reserve troops, saying they were in difficult combat against small groups of advancing Russian soldiers. How the move could impact the summit. A politics pit stop Has the immigrant population plummeted? The United States' immigrant population may have dropped by roughly 2 million people in the first six months of the year, according to new government data. The new data offer an early – if imperfect – signal that President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown may already be showing an impact. The new data, which comes from a survey of 60,000 households every month, could occasionally overstate or understate population shifts, and demographers say it could be years before a full picture emerges. In addition, due to Trump's sprawling crackdown on illegal immigration, some survey respondents may now be too scared to tell the government whether they or members of their household are immigrants. Why data shows the immigrant population is dropping. Trump reveals Kennedy Center honorees Donald Trump: president, Kennedy Center chairman, and now emcee. While announcing the nominees for the Kennedy Center Honors, Trump revealed that he had agreed to emcee the event after organizers allegedly begged him to fill the role, arguing he would bring better ratings. The show will air later this year on CBS. Country music legend George Strait, Michael Crawford, who originated the role of the phantom in Broadway's "Phantom of the Opera," Sylvester Stallone, disco star Gloria Gaynor and rock band KISS were all nominated. Trump said he was '98% involved' with deciding the nominees. Got a burning question, or comment, for On Politics? You can submit them here or send me an email at rdmorin@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store