Ted Cruz defends National Weather Service alerts in Texas floods, decries ‘partisan finger pointing'
At a Monday morning media conference in Kerr County, Cruz was asked about the reliability of alerts issued by the Weather Service. Cruz said the Weather Service did its job, and that allegations of understaffing contributing to the loss of life 'contradict the facts.'
MAP: Where have flash flooding fatalities been confirmed in Texas?
'If you look at the facts in particular, number one, that these warnings went out hours before the flood became a true emergency level. But number two, the National Weather Service here in New Braunfels is where they were headquartered,' Cruz said. 'They had three additional people working that night, anticipating that it was going to be a very dangerous weather situation.'
President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, cut staffing for the Weather Service as well as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, leading to criticism that staffing issues there could have prevented those organizations from issuing effective warnings ahead of the Texas flooding.
While the Weather Service Austin/San Antonio did have some staffing vacancies, it is unclear whether those are due to DOGE cuts directly. A representative for the Weather Service's union told KXAN that staffing was adequate to handle the flash flooding.
Cruz said it is reasonable to question how this could have been prevented, but that partisan blaming is not the answer.
'I think just immediately trying to use it for either side to attack their political opponents,' Cruz said. 'I think that's cynical and not the right approach, particularly at a time when we're dealing with a crisis and we're dealing with grief.'
A timeline of alerts issued by the Weather Service compiled by NewsNation corroborated Cruz's remarks. The first alert of a life-threatening, Flash Flood warning for Kerr County was issued at 1:14 a.m. on Friday, with a second alert of a Flash Flood emergency sent to residents' phones at 4:03 a.m.
Despite cuts to staffing, Kristi Noem, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, said President Trump will make it a priority to upgrade warning systems for the Weather Service. Recent reports have pointed out that Kerr County applied for a $1 million grant to fund a warning system, but was not selected.
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick told NBC's Ryan Chandler that Texas should have had better warning systems.
'We should have sirens up and down these streams, like the ones they have in Israel for rocket attacks,' Patrick said. 'That might have saved lives.'
He echoed Cruz's remarks that blame is not the answer, preferring to look forward to how to prevent future disasters. Gov. Greg Abbott has already called a special session of the legislature, beginning July 21, to address issues like THC regulation. Some are now calling for Abbott to add flood management to the agenda, as bills can not be introduced in special session without the governor's declaration.
Patrick suggested that legislation should be taken up in special session, specifically regarding flood siren systems, as well as evaluating the performance of the Weather Service to identify any potential shortcomings.
'We'll have interim hearings on this before the next session to look at all of these things, because that's what we needed. We need to go back step-by-step and look at what happened and why it happened,' Patrick said.
He said if the legislature can fund these systems for cities, it will.
State Sen. Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, said he would be drafting a bill to install warning sirens in high-flood risk areas at the 'earliest opportunity.'
Still, the disaster is not yet over, as flooding continues and many are still unaccounted for. Cruz said he favors compassion over politics, thanking the first responders and Americans who are keeping Texas in their prayers.
'Thank you to the millions of Texans, to the millions of Americans, to the millions of people all over the world right now who are praying, praying for Texas and praying for those parents going through this grief,' Cruz said. 'It is going to take love. It is going to take friends and family embracing and hugging and holding them while they weep, and it's going to take the church.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump gives FEMA funds for catastrophic flooding as agency's future is up in the air
Tampa, Fla. (WFLA) — President Donald Trump has repeatedly said that he planned to start 'phasing out' the Federal Emergency Management Agency after the hurricane in Texas on Friday and meeting with first responders and grieving families, the president was questioned on the federal response to last week's deadly flooding and the future of FEMA. President Trump did not address the agency's future. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now A White House official told NewsNation that a FEMA review council now plans to 'reform' the agency. Trump surveyed the aftermath of last week's catastrophic flooding that left more than 100 people dead.'I have never seen anything like this,' he comes amid the administration facing scrutiny over FEMA's future. Since the start of his second term, the president has made this promise. 'We want to wean off of FEMA, and we want to bring it down from the state level,' he previously has an annual budget of around $30 billion and, prior to layoffs, employed more than 20,000 people. On Sunday, Trump signed a major declaration for Texas, making federal funding available for Kerr County and expanding to now cover five surrounding counties.'My administration is doing everything in its power to help Texas,' Trump said.'Immediately when I made a request for a disaster declaration, you and your administration granted that,' Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said. 'This is the fastest that I am aware of any administration responding.'Abbott said this declaration will allow his state to more effectively respond and rebuild. Florida Democratic Rep. Jared Moskowitz said he's alarmed by how Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem handled last week's tragedy. 'Emergencies and disasters are always locally executed, the state manages them, and the federal government comes in and supports that what we are doing here, sir, empowering the state and the local officials to make the best decision for their people because they know their people and their community,' Noem said. 'When they come in and ask, we support people.' Moskowitz is calling for an investigation into what he said is FEMA's delayed response. With the administration's previous pledge to get rid of FEMA and 'bring it down to the state level,' Pinellas County residents, who repeatedly experienced flooding, fear that if FEMA funds aren't available, how will they get help and from whom?'It's probably going to come in some form of tax, it always does right?' questioned Cody McGehe, Shore Acres Resident. 'I don't know if property insurance will go up or homeowners' insurance will just increase to offset that, but certainly it will come back to us. It always does, like there's no way it doesn't.' President Trump created a 12-member FEMA review council to determine the agency's future role. The council is expected to release a report in November on how to improve federal disaster response. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
National Weather Service issues extreme heat watch for Oregon's Willamette Valley
The National Weather Service has issued an extreme heat watch for the Willamette Valley from July 15-16. Dangerously hot conditions with temperatures between 95 and 105 degrees are possible across much of northwest Oregon, including the northern and central Willamette Valley. The highest chances are in the Portland/Vancouver metro area and Columbia River Gorge. Low temperatures between 65 to 70 degrees may occur in the evening of July 15, which would limit overnight relief. Both daily high and nightly low temperatures are considered when determining an extreme heat watch should be issued, according to Lee Picard, lead meteorologist at the National Weather Service in Portland. "(A low of) 65 is an important threshold for us," he said. "If it doesn't go below that, it's difficult for people to cool down overnight." An extreme heat watch doesn't mean extreme heat will definitely occur, Picard said. It is issued ahead of time, in this case six days in advance, to allow people to prepare for a potentially dangerous event. High and low temperatures factor into an index known as HeatRisk, which provides a forecast of heat-related impacts in a 24-hour period. The formula accounts for climatic factors as well, like how unusual extreme heat is during a particular time of years. If the HeatRisk in an area falls into the two highest categories, major or extreme, it meets the criteria for a hazardous event. "A watch is when a hazardous event is possible. We usually say about 50% likely that it will occur," Picard said. Heat related illnesses increase significantly during extreme heat events, the National Weather Service said. The agency advised people to drink plenty of fluids and to stay out of the sun in a cool place during the heat of the day and check up on relatives and neighbors. For those without air conditioning, people should use fans to keep air moving and keep windows closed during the day and open at night, unless air quality is degraded due to wildfire smoke. "Do not leave young children and pets in unattended vehicles," the alert from NWS said. "Car interiors will reach lethal temperatures in a matter of minutes." Rose Shimberg is an outdoors journalism intern at the Statesman Journal. Reach her at rshimberg@ This article originally appeared on Salem Statesman Journal: NWS issues extreme heat watch for Oregon's Willamette Valley
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Floods Are Inevitable. Catastrophe Is Not.
Images and stories of the devastation wrought by the July 4 flood of the Guadalupe River in Texas will stay with many of us for a long time. There has been an outpouring of compassion and sorrow for those who have died, remain missing or have lost their homes and possessions. There has also been a healthy dose of scrutiny of the shortcomings in early warning systems, government response and evacuation efforts — some of which have been blamed on the Trump administration's bludgeon of cuts across emergency services, weather reporting and scientific agencies. But even with a flawless response, the storm that roared through that night would most likely have claimed many lives. The rest of us might now do well to look past the astonishment, sympathy or blame, and consider how to avoid or minimize similar hazards in the future. What happened in Central Texas is only the latest in a long series of horrific floods, and they're getting worse. In Ellicott City, Md., a flood level expected only once in 1,000 years occurred twice in a three-year span, in 2016 and 2018. In 2022, flash floods in Kentucky displaced thousands of people who had no flood insurance. In February of this year, devastating floods occurred in Kentucky, West Virginia and Tennessee. We should no longer be surprised by the inevitable. We are living in a new age of flooding. We can no longer deny the increasing danger posed by these floods. Nor can we afford to continue believing we have the solutions to stop or contain the rise of water. The best option to save American lives is reducing our vulnerability and exposure to these floods. That means preventing unnecessary new development on floodplains, and amping up efforts to help people move their homes from high-risk areas to safe territory. This starts with the protection of floodplains, the natural areas that have been shaped over time to absorb floods when they occur. Human development on these spaces destroys their ability to absorb excess water. To prevent it, we must implement adequate zoning policies that limit construction there. This is the least costly option for preventing flood damages from getting worse. Likewise, relocation of flood-prone homes to higher ground has been an important strategy for decades. But there is still a huge investment poured into trying to prevent flooding damage from occurring, building levees to try to keep floods away from our homes and using emergency relief checks and insurance subsidies to pay victims for losses after they occur. Billions of dollars are spent to protect those who have homes and businesses in flood zones — and then billions more are spent on recovery efforts when those protections fail. The Natural Resources Defense Council analyzed thousands of data points and determined that for every $1.72 FEMA spends helping people move away from the paths of floods, $100 is spent to rebuild properties. We are essentially paying people to stay. Our response to floods has been inadequate, if not misdirected. And now, owing to the heating climate, floods will be growing irrevocably worse, more widespread and longer in duration. We've failed to halt the losses and the threats of the past. Lacking a major course correction, we're destined to fail worse in the future. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
