logo
Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) Is a Trending Stock: Facts to Know Before Betting on It

Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) Is a Trending Stock: Facts to Know Before Betting on It

Yahoo3 days ago

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) has been one of the most searched-for stocks on Zacks.com lately. So, you might want to look at some of the facts that could shape the stock's performance in the near term.
Shares of this operator of digital commerce platform have returned +1.6% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +4.6% change. The Zacks Internet - Software industry, to which Affirm Holdings belongs, has gained 10.5% over this period. Now the key question is: Where could the stock be headed in the near term?
Although media reports or rumors about a significant change in a company's business prospects usually cause its stock to trend and lead to an immediate price change, there are always certain fundamental factors that ultimately drive the buy-and-hold decision.
Here at Zacks, we prioritize appraising the change in the projection of a company's future earnings over anything else. That's because we believe the present value of its future stream of earnings is what determines the fair value for its stock.
Our analysis is essentially based on how sell-side analysts covering the stock are revising their earnings estimates to take the latest business trends into account. When earnings estimates for a company go up, the fair value for its stock goes up as well. And when a stock's fair value is higher than its current market price, investors tend to buy the stock, resulting in its price moving upward. Because of this, empirical studies indicate a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and short-term stock price movements.
Affirm Holdings is expected to post earnings of $0.11 per share for the current quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +178.6%. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate has changed +15.3%.
The consensus earnings estimate of $0.01 for the current fiscal year indicates a year-over-year change of +100.6%. This estimate has changed +113.9% over the last 30 days.
For the next fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $0.70 indicates a change of +6,900% from what Affirm Holdings is expected to report a year ago. Over the past month, the estimate has changed +14.8%.
Having a strong externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, offers a more conclusive picture of a stock's price direction in the near term, since it effectively harnesses the power of earnings estimate revisions. Due to the size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, Affirm Holdings is rated Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
The chart below shows the evolution of the company's forward 12-month consensus EPS estimate:
While earnings growth is arguably the most superior indicator of a company's financial health, nothing happens as such if a business isn't able to grow its revenues. After all, it's nearly impossible for a company to increase its earnings for an extended period without increasing its revenues. So, it's important to know a company's potential revenue growth.
In the case of Affirm Holdings, the consensus sales estimate of $833.89 million for the current quarter points to a year-over-year change of +26.5%. The $3.18 billion and $3.94 billion estimates for the current and next fiscal years indicate changes of +37% and +23.7%, respectively.
Affirm Holdings reported revenues of $783.14 million in the last reported quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +35.9%. EPS of $0.01 for the same period compares with -$0.43 a year ago.
Compared to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $783.85 million, the reported revenues represent a surprise of -0.09%. The EPS surprise was +111.11%.
The company beat consensus EPS estimates in each of the trailing four quarters. The company topped consensus revenue estimates three times over this period.
No investment decision can be efficient without considering a stock's valuation. Whether a stock's current price rightly reflects the intrinsic value of the underlying business and the company's growth prospects is an essential determinant of its future price performance.
While comparing the current values of a company's valuation multiples, such as price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-sales (P/S) and price-to-cash flow (P/CF), with its own historical values helps determine whether its stock is fairly valued, overvalued, or undervalued, comparing the company relative to its peers on these parameters gives a good sense of the reasonability of the stock's price.
As part of the Zacks Style Scores system, the Zacks Value Style Score (which evaluates both traditional and unconventional valuation metrics) organizes stocks into five groups ranging from A to F (A is better than B; B is better than C; and so on), making it helpful in identifying whether a stock is overvalued, rightly valued, or temporarily undervalued.
Affirm Holdings is graded F on this front, indicating that it is trading at a premium to its peers. Click here to see the values of some of the valuation metrics that have driven this grade.
The facts discussed here and much other information on Zacks.com might help determine whether or not it's worthwhile paying attention to the market buzz about Affirm Holdings. However, its Zacks Rank #3 does suggest that it may perform in line with the broader market in the near term.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AudioEye (AEYE) Beats Stock Market Upswing: What Investors Need to Know
AudioEye (AEYE) Beats Stock Market Upswing: What Investors Need to Know

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

AudioEye (AEYE) Beats Stock Market Upswing: What Investors Need to Know

The latest trading session saw AudioEye (AEYE) ending at $12.67, denoting a +2.84% adjustment from its last day's close. The stock exceeded the S&P 500, which registered a gain of 1.03% for the day. Elsewhere, the Dow saw an upswing of 1.05%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq appreciated by 1.2%. The the stock of company has risen by 3.36% in the past month, lagging the Computer and Technology sector's gain of 9.02% and the S&P 500's gain of 5.27%. The investment community will be paying close attention to the earnings performance of AudioEye in its upcoming release. The company's earnings per share (EPS) are projected to be $0.16, reflecting a 33.33% increase from the same quarter last year. Alongside, our most recent consensus estimate is anticipating revenue of $9.94 million, indicating a 17.31% upward movement from the same quarter last year. In terms of the entire fiscal year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates predict earnings of $0.71 per share and a revenue of $41.51 million, indicating changes of +29.09% and +17.91%, respectively, from the former year. Investors might also notice recent changes to analyst estimates for AudioEye. These revisions help to show the ever-changing nature of near-term business trends. As such, positive estimate revisions reflect analyst optimism about the company's business and profitability. Empirical research indicates that these revisions in estimates have a direct correlation with impending stock price performance. To take advantage of this, we've established the Zacks Rank, an exclusive model that considers these estimated changes and delivers an operational rating system. The Zacks Rank system ranges from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell). It has a remarkable, outside-audited track record of success, with #1 stocks delivering an average annual return of +25% since 1988. The Zacks Consensus EPS estimate remained stagnant within the past month. AudioEye is currently sporting a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy). Valuation is also important, so investors should note that AudioEye has a Forward P/E ratio of 17.48 right now. This expresses a discount compared to the average Forward P/E of 29.63 of its industry. We can also see that AEYE currently has a PEG ratio of 0.7. This popular metric is similar to the widely-known P/E ratio, with the difference being that the PEG ratio also takes into account the company's expected earnings growth rate. The Internet - Software industry currently had an average PEG ratio of 2.35 as of yesterday's close. The Internet - Software industry is part of the Computer and Technology sector. Currently, this industry holds a Zacks Industry Rank of 55, positioning it in the top 23% of all 250+ industries. The strength of our individual industry groups is measured by the Zacks Industry Rank, which is calculated based on the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks within these groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1. Be sure to follow all of these stock-moving metrics, and many more, on Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Audioeye, Inc. (AEYE) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio

Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster
Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster

There is a statistic in my colleague Laurence Iliff's story on the failure of full-size electric pickups that, pardon the pun, shocked me. The combustion and hybrid Toyota Tundra had more new-vehicle registrations during the first quarter than the entire industry's collection of full-size electric pickups — by a lot. That statistic is in no way a brag on the Tundra, which remains a distant No. 5 in what is now a five-horse segment since the death of the even slower-selling Nissan Titan. According to S&P Global Mobility, the Tundra recorded a meager 36,895 new registrations in the U.S. in the first quarter, while the Ford F-150 Lightning, Tesla Cybertruck, Chevrolet Silverado EV, GMC Hummer, Rivian R1T and GMC Sierra EV collectively posted about 22,000 registrations. By comparison, combustion-powered pickups from Ford, Chevrolet, GMC and Ram reached 478,823 registrations in the first quarter, S&P said. Were it not for investments and expectations that rival the size of the immense front fascias on virtually all of the aforementioned full-size behemoths, this failed experiment would already be over. The score: Newtonian Physics ∞, Hype & Hope 0. Sign up for Automotive Views, Automotive News' weekly showcase of opinions, insights, ideas and thought leadership. I can't begin to fathom how many tens of billions of dollars were spent by automakers and their suppliers developing and building those full-size electric pickups over the last decade. You can, however, get some sense of how bad the miss was when you look at the sales/production volumes auto executives anticipated, including Elon Musk's quarter- to half-million annual sales estimate for the Cybertruck, or Ford's initial F-150 Lightning estimate of up to 150,000 sales annually. So why did full-size electric pickups fail so badly? I would argue that it wasn't just physics — though the need for a bigger, more expensive battery to push these bigger vehicles farther as long as they are not towing anything shouldn't be minimized. But I think a share of the responsibility for this collective flop also lies with the companies' product planning departments. While all vehicles are compromised in some form or fashion by the time they reach consumers, full-size electric pickups lack a fundamental quality that has made their combustion-powered counterparts the U.S. sales champs for decades: Uncompromised utility. The legacy pickups are renowned for accomplishing whatever task their owners set them to. That unstoppable capability is what gave rise to the 'lifestyle' pickup in the first place, as consumers desired at least a taste of that confidence, even if they rarely, if ever, actually needed that power. Product planners and their auto executive bosses failed to account in their sales projections for just how much compromise an electric-pickup owner would face in everyday life. Sure, the trucks have some excellent features, including loads and loads of torque, but so do their combustion counterparts. And while it may cost extra fuel to tow a trailer with those combustion-powered vehicles, a heavy trailer sucks up a battery pack's juice quickly — and recharging is not nearly as quick and convenient as a gas station fill-up. It's the same reason that battery-electric semis are probably doomed to failure: It's just the wrong technology for that use case. Sorry. In a world ruled by logic and not emotion, society would consign new technologies to the areas where they have the greatest advantage. Battery-electric powertrains make the greatest sense in vehicles with limited mass and with limited demands, while hydrogen (and diesel) is more efficient in larger, demand-dependent vehicles where towing capability is paramount. We don't live in that world, unfortunately, which is why full-size electric pickups are failing. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Tesla's China-Made EV Sales Drop Y/Y in May: Is Price War a Suspect?
Tesla's China-Made EV Sales Drop Y/Y in May: Is Price War a Suspect?

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla's China-Made EV Sales Drop Y/Y in May: Is Price War a Suspect?

Tesla's TSLA sales of China-made EVs continued to decline for the eighth consecutive month in May due to intensifying price wars in the world's largest auto market. Per the China Passenger Car Association data, combined domestic and export deliveries to Europe and other markets of the Model 3 and Model Y dropped 15% year over year in May to 61,662 units, following a drop of 6% in April. Tesla's EV sales slump persisted across much of Europe last month, primarily due to its aging lineup and the negative impact of CEO Elon Musk's political involvement on consumer boost demand in China, its largest market in the first quarter, Tesla allowed smart-assisted driving features to be transferred to new vehicles in China starting in late May and continuing through the end of June. Additionally, the Model 3 and Model Y were included in a government initiative promoting EV adoption in rural areas for the first time this year. TSLA carries a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) at present. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks which triggered a price war in 2023 that now involves more than 40 brands and shows no signs of easing, is under pressure from new, competitively priced EVs offering strong performance. China has called for an end to aggressive price wars, especially after BYD Company Limited BYDDY introduced new incentives on more than 20 models in late May, leading Geely Automobile Holdings Limited GELYY and Chery to adopt similar measures. BYD, Tesla's key contender, slashed the price of its cheapest model, the pure battery-powered Seagull EV, to 55,800 yuan. BYD's global passenger car sales rose 14.1% year over year in May, but the growth slowed from April's 19.4%.Geely Auto, an auto manufacturer based in Hangzhou, China, also reduced prices, offering discounts between 9,000 yuan and 16,000 yuan on selected models, such as the Xingyuan EV and entry-level Galaxy E8 sedan. Through these limited-time promotions, which ended June 1, Geely Auto aimed to stimulate sales, reduce inventory and benefit from government incentives intended to support EV transitions. Tesla has underperformed the Zacks Automotive-Domestic industry year to date. TSLA shares have lost 17.8% compared with the industry's decline of 14.8%. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research From a valuation perspective, Tesla appears overvalued. Going by its price/sales ratio, the company is trading at a forward sales multiple of 10.23, higher than its industry's 2.75. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2025 and 2026 EPS has moved down 13 cents and 16 cents, respectively, in the past 30 days. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) : Free Stock Analysis Report Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. (GELYY) : Free Stock Analysis Report Byd Co., Ltd. (BYDDY) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store