Fort Bliss army base on US southern border to take 1,000 Ice detainees
The facility, named Camp East Montana, is set to begin operations on 17 August at the US army post near El Paso. Ice (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) said in a statement that the facility will initially house up to 1,000 detainees, with plans to expand to a capacity of 5,000 beds.
If the center reaches full capacity, the El Paso Times reports that it would become the largest immigration detention facility in the US.
An Ice spokesperson said the agency is using the facility to help 'decompress Ice detention facilities in other regions' and will serve as a short-term processing center. The statement adds that deportations carried out via 'Ice air operations' will also take place at the facility.
According to Ice, facility will house undocumented immigrants who 'are in removal proceedings or who have final orders of removal'.
The site is being constructed under a Department of Defense contract, Ice said, and is funded 'as part of the essential whole-of-government approach to protecting public safety and preserving national security.'
In July, administration officials announced that Acquisition Logistics LLC, a Virginia-based contractor, was awarded a $231.8m firm-fixed-price contract to 'establish and operate' the '5,000 capacity, single adult, short-term detention facility'.
Bloomberg reported that Acquisition Logistics has no prior experience operating detention facilities.
In the statement from Ice, the agency said that Ice personnel 'will be responsible for the management and operational authority' at the facility, and that the establishment of the center is being 'carried out with contracted support and according to Icedetention standards'.
The agency described the facility as 'soft-sided' and said that it will offer 'everything a traditional Ice detention facility offers,' which Ice said includes access to legal representation, a law library and space for visitation, recreation and medical treatment, as well as 'necessary accommodations for disabilities, diet, and religious belief'.
In a statement to the Guardian, DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin also confirmed the use of Fort Bliss to house immigration detainees.
'Ice is indeed pursuing all available options to expand bedspace capacity' McLaughlin said. 'This process does include housing detainees at certain military bases, including Fort Bliss.'
In March, the Guardian reported that Fort Bliss has been used under multiple administrations for immigration-related operations.
Under this Trump administration, the base has reportedly already been used to fly deportees on military aircraft to Guantánamo Bay and Central and South America.
Under Joe Biden, it was used as an emergency shelter to for thousands of unaccompanied migrant children. In 2021, Fort Bliss also reportedly played a key role in resettling Afghan refugees brought to the US after the US withdrawal from Afghanistan. And in 2016, under the Obama administration, Fort Bliss housed several hundred unaccompanied migrant children.
The new facility being established at Fort Bliss comes as the Trump administration has sought to use several US military bases around the country as immigration detention facilities.
The expansion has faced some criticism from Democrats. Texas representative Veronica Escobar, whose district includes Fort Bliss, warned that using military facilities as immigration detention centers could hurt the effectiveness of US military forces.
'It's not good for our readiness, and it degrades our military' she said.
Last month, the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, announced that both Camp Atterbury base in Indiana and Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey could now house detained immigrants.
Democrats from both states condemned the move, with New Jersey's Democratic delegation warning that 'using our country's military to detain and hold undocumented immigrants jeopardizes military preparedness and paves the way for Ice immigration raids in every New Jersey community'.
The planned opening of the new immigration detention facility near El Paso also comes as a new report released this week by the office of US Senator Jon Ossoff, a Democrat representing Georgia, found and documented hundreds of alleged human rights abuses at immigration detention centers in the US since 20 January 2025.
The report cites deaths in custody, physical and sexual abuse of detainees, mistreatment of pregnant women and children, overcrowding and unsanitary living conditions, exposure to extreme temperatures, denial of access to attorneys, child separation, and more.
In a statement about the report's allegations, a spokesperson for DHS told NBC News 'any claim that there are subprime conditions at Ice detention centers are false'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Is there a Trump side deal or not? New Paramount chief doesn't want to talk about it
David Ellison made one thing abundantly clear on his first official day as the owner of the new Paramount – he did not want to get into whether a side deal was reached as part of the pre-merger $16 million lawsuit settlement paid to Donald Trump. After a grueling and politically tainted 13-month process, Skydance Media's $8.4 billion merger with Paramount Global officially closed Thursday. Weeks before Trump's Federal Communications Commission finally approved the deal, however, Paramount – then led by Shari Redstone – agreed to settle with the president in his 'meritless' complaint about a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. Settling with Trump, which has long been a fraught topic in CBS hallways and sparked the resignations of several news leaders, prompted accusations of 'bribery' from lawmakers and free press advocates. Those allegations only grew louder after the president boasted just before the merger was approved that he had reached a separate agreement with Ellison to air up to $20 million of pro-Trump advertisements on CBS programming once Skydance took over. While the previous leadership of Paramount denied any knowledge of a secret handshake deal, Ellison – whose dad is pro-Trump Oracle founder Larry Ellison – had remained mum on the matter. However, with Thursday marking his first day as head of the newly minted Paramount Skydance, Ellison found himself pressed repeatedly on the issue at a press event heralding the merger. Having spent his morning making a symbolic first stop at the CBS News offices, where he 'said all the right things' while assuring the staff of his commitment to the news division, Ellison and his senior leadership team held a Q&A session at the company's headquarters in Times Square. While he was there to put forward his vision for the new Paramount's future, a number of media reporters were more interested in the recent past. 'We were not involved in the settlement in any way,' Ellison said when asked about the Trump payoff, adding that 'we complied with all laws including anti-bribery laws.' He then cited a recent letter sent to Democratic senators who inquired about the side deal and Paramount's cancellation of the longtime CBS late-night show hosted by Trump critic Stephen Colbert, which occurred just days before the administration approved the merger. That letter, which was from Skydance's general counsel, said the company was 'not involved' in the Colbert decision but didn't directly address the 'side deal' question. 'Skydance was neither a party to the lawsuit nor to Paramount's settlement of its litigation with the President,' the Skydance lawyer wrote. 'We're focused on the future… We are not going to politicize anything today,' Ellison responded when asked another time about the president's claims about free advertising. 'We want to entertain first.' Ellison would continue to double down on that message, specifically when asked about FCC chair Brendan Carr saying that Skydance had promised to 'root out the bias that has undermined the trust in national news media' once it took over Paramount. 'I do not want to politicize our company in any way shape or form, we want to obviously speak to the biggest audience possible,' he declared when pressed about any examples of bias he would intend to fix. Shortly before the merger's approval, Skydance told the FCC that it would hire an ombudsman to address 'complaints of bias' at CBS News once it took over Paramount. Asked whether he was concerned that the FCC could take action based on the ombudsman's findings, Ellison shrugged it off. 'I don't think it'll get to that,' he said. 'We want to be a path-based and truth-based news organization. That's what we're about. That's the legacy of CBS.' With Ellison also declining to answer questions about reports that he's in talks with Bari Weiss to possibly purchase her anti-woke outlet, The Free Press ,and install her in a senior role at CBS News, saying he doesn't want to address rumors, he continued down the same path time and time again. 'We're ready to move past the noise,' he proclaimed.
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump targets banks with order barring discriminatory 'debanking'
WASHINGTON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump stepped up pressure on large banks and their regulators on Thursday, signing an executive order requiring the banking industry to ensure it is not refusing financial services to anyone based on political or religious beliefs, a practice frequently described as "debanking." The order directed regulators to review all banks they supervise for any current or past practices that would effectively bar customers based on political or religious beliefs, and levy fines or other disciplinary measures as needed. It said regulators may refer certain cases to the Justice Department for potential civil action and also directed regulators themselves to purge any policies or practices that may discourage banks from providing services based on non-financial reasons. The executive order is the latest in a growing pressure campaign against the financial sector by U.S. conservatives, who argue they have been unfairly deprived of services on the basis of their political beliefs. Trump claimed in a CNBC interview on Tuesday that he personally was discriminated against by banks, asserting without evidence that JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America refused to take his deposits following his first term in office. JPMorgan said on Tuesday it does not close accounts for political reasons. Bank of America said it does not comment on client matters, and would welcome clearer rules from bank regulators on how to conduct its activities. The executive order said some financial institutions participated in "government-directed surveillance programs" against conservatives following the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, by Trump supporters. "Such practices are incompatible with a free society and the principle that the provision of banking services should be based on material, measurable, and justifiable risks," the executive order said. Large banks have consistently said they do not reject customers on political or other belief-based grounds. Instead, they have argued that overzealous bank regulators and supervisors have discouraged them from engaging with certain sectors and have called for clearer guidelines. In a joint statement, major banking groups thanked the Trump administration for efforts to rein in "runaway regulations" and said the new order may provide sought-after clarity for lenders. "It's in banks' best interest to take deposits, lend to and support as many customers as possible. Unfortunately, regulatory overreach, supervisory discretion and a maze of obscure rules have stood in the way," said a joint statement from the Bank Policy Institute, American Bankers Association, Consumer Bankers Association and Financial Services Forum. Trump-led regulators have already taken steps to loosen regulations, with all three federal bank regulators announcing this year they would no longer police banks on so-called "reputational risk," wherein supervisors could sanction institutions for activities that are not strictly prohibited but could expose the bank to negative publicity or costly litigation. The executive order directed all regulators to stop using that standard within 180 days. Banks increasingly complained the reputational risk standard was too subjective and vague, allowing bank supervisors to effectively bar firms from providing services to some people or sectors. The industry has also argued regulators need to update anti-money laundering rules, which frequently can force banks to shut down suspicious accounts without providing a reason.
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump names chair of White House economic council as Federal Reserve governor
Donald Trump said Thursday he will nominate a top economic adviser to the Federal Reserve's board of governors for four months, temporarily filling a vacancy while continuing his search for a longer-term appointment. Trump said he has named Stephen Miran, the chair of the White House's council of economic advisers, to fill a seat vacated by Adriana Kugler, a Biden appointee who is stepping down Friday as governor. Miran, if approved by the Senate, will serve until 31 January 2026. The appointment is Trump's first opportunity to exert more control over the Fed, one of the few remaining independent federal agencies. Trump has relentlessly criticized the current chair, Jerome Powell, for keeping short-term interest rates unchanged, calling him 'a stubborn MORON' last week on social media. Miran has been a strong defender of Trump's income tax cuts and tariff hikes, arguing that the combination will generate enough economic growth to reduce budget deficits. He also has played down the risk of Trump's tariffs generating higher inflation, a major source of concern for Powell. The choice of Miran may heighten concerns about political influence over the Fed, which has traditionally been insulated from day-to-day politics. Fed independence is generally seen as key to ensuring that it can take difficult steps to combat inflation, such as raising interest rates, which politicians might be unwilling to take. Federal Reserve governors vote on all the central bank's interest-rate decisions, as well as its financial regulatory policies. Miran's nomination, if approved, would add a near-certain vote in support of lower interest rates. Kugler had echoed Powell's view that the Fed should keep rates unchanged and further evaluate the impact of tariffs on the economy before making any moves. At its most recent meeting last week Fed officials kept their key rate unchanged at 4.3%, where it has stood after three rate cuts late last year. But two Fed governors – Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman – dissented from that decision. Both were appointed by Trump in his first term. Still, even with Miran on the board, many of the 12 Fed officials who vote on interest rate policy remain concerned that Trump's sweeping tariffs could push inflation higher in the coming months. After the July jobs report was released last Friday, Miran criticized the Fed chair for not cutting benchmark interest rates, saying that Trump had been proven correct on inflation during his first term and would be again. The president has pressured Powell to cut short-term interest rates under the belief that his tariffs will not fuel higher inflationary pressures. 'What we're seeing now in real time is a repetition once again of this pattern where the president will end up having been proven right,' Miran said on MSNBC. 'And the Fed will, with a lag and probably quite too late, eventually catch up to the president's view.'
