DA to fight employment equity law in court
(Photo by Ihsaan Haffejee/Anadolu via Getty Images)
The Democratic Alliance (DA) has filed an application in the Pretoria high court challenging the employment equity quotas in the Employment Equity Amendment Act which it says are merely 'racial exclusion under a new name'.
It sets hiring quotas for 18 economic sectors, from mining and transport to construction and agriculture, in a bid to increase employment opportunities for 'designated groups' including blacks, women and people living with disabilities.
Companies with 50 or more employees must align their employment equity plans with the new sector-specific targets and these must be implemented between 1 September 2025 and 31 August 2030.
Bagraim said his party had launched a 'constitutional challenge' to Section 15A of the Act, which introduces 'rigid national race quotas' in
The law is one of several pieces of legislation and policies the government has implemented since the fall of apartheid in 1994 in what it says is a drive to reverse the racial inequalities which favoured white people.
'We are taking the minister of employment and labour to court because Section 15A represents a radical and harmful departure from previous employment equity law. These quotas will destroy jobs, undermine the economy and violate the constitutional rights of all South Africans,' Bagraim said.
Section 15A represented a 'radical and harmful' departure from previous employment
'Where companies once set their own equity goals, based on context and the available labour force, they are now compelled to meet government-imposed demographic targets, regardless of skills, local realities or business viability,' Bagraim said.
'It is about protecting people's rights under the Constitution, the rule of law and the livelihoods of South Africans. The DA believes that real redress does not mean implementing policies that bring more division. We believe that true transformation can only be achieved by focusing on inclusive economic growth that creates opportunity for all.'
He said the legal argument against the amendment was two-fold, focusing on 'constitutional invalidity' and 'abuse of state power'.
'Section 15A violates Section 9 of the Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law and prohibits unfair discrimination. A law that forces employers to fire or refuse to hire people based on race, whether they are black, coloured, Indian or white, is not redress. It is unconstitutional discrimination,' Bagraim said.
He added that the minister's powers under Section 15A were 'vague, unchecked and dangerously broad'.
'The so-called 'targets' are not guidelines — they are
'This is not just a theoretical concern. The final quotas, published last week, make it virtually impossible for some communities, particularly coloured workers in the Western Cape and Indian workers in
'This isn't transformation. It is
Bagraim said the government had 'tacitly' admitted that the quotas were damaging by exempting businesses with fewer than 50 employees.
'Our court action will expose the real issue — the problem is not the quotas themselves but the law that enables them. That is why we are challenging Section 15A directly, not just quotas that flow from it. Every law must be judged on whether it grows the economy and creates jobs. These quotas fail that test spectacularly.
'We are standing up for the right of every South African to be employed on the basis of their skill, character and contribution — not the colour of their skin. And we will not stop until this unconstitutional law is overturned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The watchdogs of democracy – the vital role of SA's state institutions
The brilliance of South Africa's Constitution lies not in its articulation of values – dignity, equality and freedom – but in its creation of mechanisms to guard them, the Chapter Nine institutions. In the global sweep of constitutional democracies, South Africa stands apart. Not only because of our painful past or our extraordinary democratic transition, but because of the bold institutional imagination embedded in the very structure of our Constitution. Few understand this better than distinguished former Constitutional Court Justice Albie Sachs, who not only helped shape our legal framework but also carries lived experience of how fragile democracy can be and how dependent it is on the strength of its institutions. In his reflections, Sachs draws attention to an essential, but often underappreciated truth, namely that without independent, resilient and properly empowered state institutions, the lofty ideals of constitutional democracy remain little more than words on a page. Sachs' own journey sharpened his insights: after surviving a car bomb in exile that cost him an arm and an eye, he emerged not bitter, but determined, driven by one question – how could South Africa build a constitution strong enough to resist the abuse of power, yet open enough to protect dignity, freedom and justice for all? His search for constitutional models led him to Europe, where he found that in monarchies, constitutions played a minor daily role, while in republics like France and the US, they became essential tools to channel new, people-centred sovereignty. What Sachs took from this was not a romantic fascination with documents, but a practical appreciation for the 'technology' of democracy: the institutions that give a constitution life. The birth of Chapter Nine The brilliance of South Africa's Constitution, Sachs argues, lies not in its articulation of values – dignity, equality and freedom – but in its creation of mechanisms to guard them. Enter Chapter Nine institutions, or as Sachs calls them, the 'watchdogs of democracy'. Unlike many countries, South Africa did not stop at defining the three classic arms of state: the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. The drafters went further, carving out an entire constitutional chapter for a set of independent bodies whose role is to protect democracy itself. These include the Public Protector, the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC), the Human Rights Commission, the Commission for Gender Equality, the Auditor-General and several others. Why are these bodies critical? Because they serve as circuit breakers when traditional political channels fail. They are there to ensure that the abuse of power, misuse of funds or erosion of human rights does not go unchecked, even when those in power might prefer silence. The power of the Public Protector The Public Protector's journey, as Sachs recounts, is a telling example. Once seen as a non-binding investigator, it evolved into a powerful accountability tool after constitutional refinements and key Constitutional Court rulings made its recommendations binding. But here, Sachs offers a cautionary insight: institutions matter, but so do the people who lead them. Under Thuli Madonsela, the Public Protector became a symbol of fearless oversight, standing up to the highest offices in the land. Yet under other leaders, the same institution, with the same legal powers, has sometimes faltered, becoming mired in litigation and political controversy. This is not a defect of the constitutional design, but a reminder that constitutional democracy depends not only on rules but on integrity, leadership and public vigilance. The IEC and the culture of credible elections Another institution Sachs highlights is the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC), where South Africa, guided by Indian experts, learnt to navigate the complex task of running inclusive, credible elections. Sachs recounts how, even in the turbulent first elections of 1994, where irregularities were acknowledged, the major parties chose to prioritise the democratic breakthrough over narrow electoral disputes. That spirit, combined with the IEC's institutional strength, helped lay the tracks for the democratic train to move forward. Judicial independence and the Judicial Service Commission Perhaps the most critical piece of the institutional puzzle is the judiciary. Sachs recalls the fierce debates in Kempton Park where negotiators grappled with how to appoint judges in a way that balanced independence with public legitimacy. The compromise was a Judicial Service Commission (JSC) made up of legal professionals, political representatives, and presidential appointees. It ensured that the judiciary would not become an isolated elite, appointing itself without accountability, but neither would it be captured by the ruling party. This design gave South Africa one of the most powerful Constitutional Courts in the world, with the authority to strike down laws, hold Parliament and the executive to account, and even, famously, to declare aspects of the Constitution itself unconstitutional when they failed to meet the negotiated principles. The unsung hero If there is one institution Sachs singles out as an unsung hero, it is the Auditor-General (AG). Next to the courts, Sachs suggests, no body has done more to safeguard South Africa's democratic health. Why? Without rigorous oversight of public finances, democracy withers. The AG's work ensures that taxpayers' money is properly accounted for, that secret funds are subject to control, and that corruption can be exposed. Remarkably, South Africa has had a strong track record here, with successive AGs maintaining independence and credibility. The limits It would be naïve to suggest that state institutions alone can solve South Africa's challenges. Sachs is the first to acknowledge that the country remains deeply unequal, unsafe and haunted by social injustice. But crucially, he argues, we are also an open society – one with noisy, vibrant and contested democratic spaces. And much of that openness is safeguarded by the institutional architecture envisioned in Chapter Nine. These bodies are not flawless. They rely on leadership, public awareness and political will. But they offer a structural safeguard against the concentration and abuse of power, and they embody a key insight: democracy is not a once-off achievement; it is a living, breathing practice that must be nurtured, protected and constantly renewed. Hats off to the drafters As Sachs puts it, hats off to the drafters of our Constitution. In a world where many democracies are backsliding, South Africa's institutional framework remains a remarkable experiment in how to design for resilience. Yes, institutions can falter, and leaders can fail, but the genius of the constitutional arrangement is that it anticipates human fallibility and provides mechanisms to correct course. In the end, as Sachs reminds us, it is not just about watching; it is about creating. These institutions are not passive observers; they actively shape the democratic landscape, holding power to account and keeping the promises of our Constitution alive. That is the true role of state institutions in supporting constitutional democracy: they are the quiet architects of freedom, the steady hands that hold the democracy project together, even when the political winds blow hard. As South Africans, it is our job not just to defend them, but to demand they live up to their mandate. After all, as Sachs's own life has shown, the good that can come out of bad depends on what we choose to build and the institutions we choose to uphold. DM This article draws on the Inclusive Society Institute's Constitutional Insights: A Series of Talks with Judge Albie Sachs. The series is being promoted in collaboration with the Daily Maverick. Nicola Bergsteedt is a research associate of the Inclusive Society Institute. The Inclusive Society Institute is an independent non-profit institution which has as its objective the promotion of a more inclusive, just and equitable South African society.
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Top 10 stories of the day: KT Molefe denied bail
Here's your daily news update for Wednesday, 20 August 2025: An easy-to-read selection of our top stories. News today includes controversial businessman Katiso 'KT' Molefe will remain behind bars after his bid for bail failed on Wednesday. Meanwhile, Parliament's Police Portfolio Committee Chairperson Ian Cameron and two other DA members fell victim to an attempted hijacking in Cape Town. Furthermore, Kaya FM has suspended broadcaster Sol Phenduka with immediate effect. Weather tomorrow: 21 August 2025 Extremely high fire danger conditions are expected in all provinces except Gauteng and the Western Cape. There will be rough seas between the Western Cape and the Northern Cape, but conditions will be mostly warm nationwide. Full weather forecast here. Stay up to date with The Citizen – More News, Your Way. DJ Sumbody murder: Katiso 'KT' Molefe remains behind bars as bail denied Controversial businessman Katiso 'KT' Molefe will remain behind bars after his bid for bail failed on Wednesday. Molefe appeared in the Alexandra Magistrate's Court to hear the outcome of his bail application. Controversial businessman Katiso Molefe appears for bail application at the Alexandra Magistrate's Court in Johannesburg on 6 August 2025. Picture: Nigel Sibanda /The Citizen The alleged mastermind was arrested alongside three hitmen in connection with the murder of South African artist Oupa John Sefoka, widely known as DJ Sumbody. CONTINUE READING: DJ Sumbody murder: Katiso 'KT' Molefe remains behind bars as bail denied De Lille dissolves SA Tourism board – but Outa calls her decision 'disgraceful' Tourism Minister Patricia de Lille has dissolved the SA Tourism board with immediate effect over what she called unlawful decisions. De Lille informed the board of her decision on 19 August, following consideration of their written representations as to why the board should not be dissolved. Minister of Tourism, Patricia de Lille. Picture: Neil McCartney / The Citizen The minister said the board members neglected to address the crucial question of the legality of the process the board used when calling a special board meeting on 1 August, when the unlawful resolution was taken. CONTINUE READING: De Lille dissolves SA Tourism board – but Outa calls her decision 'disgraceful' Ian Cameron, DA colleagues escape hijack attempt in Philippi after police academy visit Parliament's Police Portfolio Committee Chairperson Ian Cameron and two other DA members fell victim to an attempted hijacking in Cape Town. It is understood that Cameron and his fellow DA colleagues Nicholas Gotsell and Lisa-Maré Schickerling were in one car when three unknown men attacked their vehicle with bricks, smashing at least three windows, on the corner of Eisleben and Govan Mbeki Road on Tuesday afternoon. Chairperson of the portfolio committee on police Ian Cameron. Picture: X / @ParliamentZA They were returning from an oversight visit to the police training college in Philippi East when the incident occurred. CONTINUE READING: Ian Cameron, DA colleagues escape hijack attempt in Philippi after police academy visit Increase in inflation of 0.5% expected, but could drift higher The inflation rate increased by 0.5% from 3% in June to 3.5% in July. Economists expected an increase and say it could drift higher towards the end of the year, although not much. However, they are divided about whether the Reserve Bank will cut the repo rate again this year. Jee-A van der Linde, senior economist at Oxford Economics Africa, says the sharp increase of 0.5% is due to municipal tariff increases but the overall inflation outlook remains favourable. He expects that headline inflation will drift to slightly above 4% by the end of the year. Picture: iStock 'There was a risk of an upside inflation surprise, as July is a high-survey month, with municipal tariff increases typically coming in higher than the headline rate. However, the latest outturn does not change our view of inflation, with the benign outlook still intact.' CONTINUE READING: Increase in inflation of 0.5% expected, but could drift higher Kaya FM suspends Sol Phenduka pending an internal investigation Kaya FM has suspended broadcaster Sol Phenduka with immediate effect. 'Kaya 959 confirms that presenter Sol Phenduka has been placed on suspension with immediate effect. This step has been taken pending the outcome of an internal process currently underway,' read a statement shared with The Citizen by Ian Bredenkamp, who handles PR for the station. Sol Phenduka has been suspended by Kaya FM pending an investigation. Picture: solphenduka/Instagram When asked about the reason behind the suspension and its duration, Bredenkamp said they would release a follow-up statement 'once the internal process is concluded'. CONTINUE READING: Kaya FM suspends Sol Phenduka pending an internal investigation Here are five more stories of the day: Yesterday's News recap READ HERE: Rand manipulation saga in ConCourt | Eldos' Nikita laid to rest | RIP Tendai Ndoro
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Experts advocate for robust data sharing in SA to crack down on economic crime
Financial crime on the continent isn't just growing — it is mutating. With billions of rands lost annually and corrupt structures entrenched, it's clear that breaking down silos and boosting private-public information sharing is no longer optional; it's now essential. This was the scary picture that emerged at a recent Institute of Commercial Forensic Practitioners conference. Experts from both the private and public sectors hammered home the message that the future of economic crime prevention in Africa hinges on smashing information silos and building airtight data-sharing frameworks. 'Economic crime remains a significant issue in South Africa, with South Africans losing millions due to economic crime,' said Elzé Matthee, researcher and academic trainee at North-West University. According to the SA Banking Risk Information Centre's 2023 annual crime statistics, an actual loss of R3.35-billion was recorded due to economic crime — on the back of 1.5-million separate criminal incidents. Meanwhile, the 2024 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index indicates that South Africa's score has further dropped by three points since 2019 to a score of 41 out of 100. South Africa shares the same ranking as Burkina Faso, Kosovo and Vietnam, followed by Colombia at 87th. The problem is complex, expensive to investigate, and worsened by outdated frameworks that keep private-sector intelligence locked away from those who need it most — the authorities. Matthee said that one measure to enhance the prevention and detection of economic crime was through information-sharing frameworks in the form of private and public sectors. What this means going forward Effective information sharing between the private and public sectors is a critical, yet underutilised, weapon in combating economic crime. Key benefits include: The private sector holds an extensive pool of information that is often inaccessible to public authorities. This data supports identifying beneficial owners of corporate structures, verifying customers, monitoring transactions and conducting intelligence-driven enquiries. Enhanced information sharing strengthens anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism efforts through targeted and timely actions. It enables faster, more pertinent reporting during ongoing investigations and live incidents, improving responsiveness. When prioritised within specific private-public information sharing frameworks, it significantly increases the detection and disruption of suspicious activities. From theory to action Matthee said that between 4 October and 15 October 2024, South Africa ran 14 coordinated operations targeting corruption, illegal wildlife trafficking and illicit financial flows. More than R189-million was recovered, and the Financial Recovery Committee issued Section 34 directives against 30 individuals linked to money laundering in state-owned enterprises. These wins, though impressive, represent just the tip of the iceberg — but are proof that strategic data pooling between sectors works. Significant step forward The broader institutional landscape has also taken notice. The National Treasury also recently announced that the Financial Action Task Force confirmed that 'South Africa has substantially completed all 22 action items' that were contained in the action plan adopted when South Africa was greylisted in February 2023. DM
