logo
Striking down tariffs for good would be a gift to Trump and Republicans

Striking down tariffs for good would be a gift to Trump and Republicans

The Hill02-06-2025

The Court of International Trade, a little-known federal court, may have just given President Trump and Republicans the greatest gift imaginable, just as both parties begin focusing on the 2026 midterms.
Late Wednesday, the three-judge panel, including a Trump appointee, unanimously struck down Trump's sweeping global tariffs, potentially removing a significant challenge for Republicans as they try to hold on to both chambers of Congress.
That said, the administration is risking squandering this gift.
The White House is appealing the court's ruling, and was granted a temporary reprieve when a federal appeals court allowed the tariffs to remain in place during the appeals process.
And the administration is working on 'Plan B' scenarios to keep the tariffs in effect via other legal routes, should they lose the appeal.
However, Trump would be doing congressional Republicans and himself a tremendous favor if he were just to accept the ruling and move on to other parts of his economic agenda.
To be sure, the court did leave some tariffs in place, such as those on steel, and it left the door open for Trump to use other avenues to impose new tariffs.
But by ruling that Trump had no power to introduce his broad 'reciprocal tariffs' on virtually every country in the world, the court potentially removed the levies with the greatest impact.
Indeed, Trump's tariffs and the chaos they've caused for financial markets, businesses and consumers pose a serious threat to Republicans in the midterms, a point polling data makes abundantly clear.
Less than four in 10 (37 percent) Americans approved of the tariffs, while nearly two-thirds (63 percent) disapproved, per Marquette University polling.
Likewise, by a roughly three-to-one ratio, independents, critical in midterm elections, were even more opposed, with only 26 percent approving of Trump's tariff policies and 74 percent disapproving.
Moreover, the same poll showed that 58 percent of Americans, including 70 percent of independents, believe tariffs hurt the U.S. economy, with only 32 percent saying tariffs would benefit the economy.
Similarly, 74 percent of Americans broadly felt tariffs would increase prices, whereas only 8 percent thought they would decrease prices, according to Economist/YouGov polling.
In that same vein, pessimism over the impact of tariffs on the wider economy explains the considerable delta between Trump's overall approval rating and how Americans feel about his handling of the economy.
According to the RealClearPolitics polling aggregator, Trump's job approval is only slightly negative (48 percent approve vs. 50 percent disapprove), but on the economy, a former strength for the president, he is 11 points underwater (42 percent approve vs. 53 percent disapprove).
In fact, the unpopularity of tariffs has already begun impacting the GOP's midterm chances.
A recent Fox News poll shows Democrats with a 7-point lead (49 percent to 42 percent) in the generic congressional vote, and a NewsNation survey shows a similar 5-point lead (45 percent to 40 percent).
This is despite Democrats struggling to unify around strong messaging or a viable alternative to Trump and the GOP.
For his part, Trump has done nothing to convince Americans about the potential benefits of tariffs. In fact, he often does the opposite, confirming the worst fears over rising prices and contradicting his own past statements on who actually pays for the tariffs.
Last month, Trump told reporters that Americans should content themselves with 'two dolls instead of 30' and that those dolls may 'cost a couple of bucks more.'
Further, when Walmart said they have to raise prices due to the import duties, Trump lashed out and demanded that the company 'EAT THE TARIFFS,' a direct contradiction to his never-accurate claims that foreign companies pay the tariffs, not Americans.
Trump should heed the warnings of former President Jimmy Carter, who was widely ridiculed — and still is — for telling Americans to accept less for the sake of the greater good.
What's more is that if the ruling stands, it would put an end to the constant whipsaw-like trade announcements coming out of the White House.
Aside from roiling financial markets, the on-again, off-again tariffs make it impossible for businesses to plan and invest, leading to slower economic growth and denting consumer confidence.
Within the span of just a few days last week, Trump announced 50 percent tariffs on the European Union and 25 percent on Apple, just to walk them back days later.
The erratic back-and-forth even gave rise to the 'TACO trade' — short for 'Trump Always Chickens Out' — hardly a positive for a president elected to provide strength and stability.
Not only has this made the administration look chaotic and rudderless, but it also makes Trump and Republicans as a whole look bad.
Plainly, if the tariffs are allowed to remain in effect, Democrats will have little difficulty tying Republicans to the turmoil and economy-suffocating policies coming out of the White House.
Or, as Karl Rove put it in the Wall Street Journal, 'the president's chaotic trade talk will badly damage Republicans in the midterms…Voters won't blame foreign countries for higher prices. They'll blame Donald Trump and his Republican Party.'
And yet, as happens so often, Trump may prove to be his own worst enemy by doubling down on efforts to radically remake the global economy.
In no uncertain terms, the White House should see this as a blessing in disguise and take the court's ruling as a chance to recalibrate its approach.
Put another way, Trump would be wise not to look this gift horse in the mouth, lest he want a Democratic-controlled Congress for the final two years of his term.
Douglas E. Schoen and Carly Cooperman are pollsters and partners with the public opinion company Schoen Cooperman Research based in New York. They are co-authors of the book, 'America: Unite or Die.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil prices ease but hover near two-month highs as Middle East tensions escalate
Oil prices ease but hover near two-month highs as Middle East tensions escalate

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oil prices ease but hover near two-month highs as Middle East tensions escalate

Oil prices fell on Thursday morning, easing back after rallying but hovered around their highest point in two months, as investors eyed escalating tensions in the Middle East and a potential disruption to supply. Brent crude futures (BZ=F) fell 0.9% to $68.31 a barrel, at the time of writing, while West Texas Intermediate futures (CL=F) declined 0.9% at $67.56 a barrel. US president Donald Trump said on Wednesday that some of US personnel were being moved out of the Middle East because "it could be a dangerous place to be". This came following reports earlier in the day that the US was preparing a partial evacuation of its embassy in Baghdad, Iraq. CBS News reported that US officials had been told Israel was ready to launch an operation into Iran and that the US anticipated Iran could retaliate on certain American sites in Iraq. Read more: FTSE 100 LIVE: Stocks slump as UK GDP contracts in blow to Rachel Reeves Trump said in an interview with the New York Post, released earlier on Wednesday, that he was "less confident" about getting Iran to agree to halt its nuclear programme. In a press briefing on Wednesday, Iran's defence minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said: "Some officials on the other side threaten conflict if negotiations don't come to fruition. If a conflict is imposed on us ... all US bases are within our reach and we will boldly target them in host countries." Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said that oil prices remain near a two-month high "driven by rising US-Iran tensions and fears of supply disruptions. At the same time, optimism about energy demand grew after the US and China reached a trade framework, and US crude stockpiles fell more than expected, signalling strong consumption." Gold prices jumped on Thursday morning, as Middle East tensions buoyed demand for the safe-haven asset. Gold futures (GC=F) surged nearly 1% to $3,376 per ounce at the time of writing, while the spot gold price advanced 0.1% to $3,359.49 per ounce. The precious metal is considered to be a safe haven asset, in acting as a hedge amid political and economic uncertainty. Britzman said: "Gold was another winner, with its safe-haven appeal gaining traction amid rising Middle East tensions and softer US inflation data, which gave a modest boost to expectations for rate cuts." Read more: UK economy shrinks by 0.3% in April Data released on Wednesday showed that the US consumer prices index (CPI) rose by 0.1% month-on-month, which was below April's 0.2% rise and lower than economists' estimates of a 0.2% monthly gain in prices. On an annual basis, CPI rose 2.4% in May, a slight uptick from April's 2.3% gain, which marked the lowest yearly increase since February 2021. Investors were also monitoring the latest trade developments, after Trump said in a social media post on Wednesday afternoon that Washington's deal with China is "DONE, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL WITH PRESIDENT XI AND ME". The pound rose slightly against the dollar (GBPUSD=X) on Thursday morning, up 0.2% to $1,3571, despite a bigger than expected contraction in UK economic growth. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said that the UK's gross domestic product (GDP) — the standard measure of an economy's value — shrank by 0.3% in April, which was more than the 0.1% contraction expected by economists. The fall followed growth of 0.2% in March and a 0.7% rise in GDP in the first quarter. This latest economic data comes a day after chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered the UK spending review, sharing details of governmental department budgets for the next few years. Key announcements included a £29bn per year increase in funding for the NHS, while the government's defence budget is set to increase from 2.3% to 2.6% of the country's gross domestic product (GDP) from 2027. Reeves also shared details of a £39bn boost to funding for affordable housing and £15.6bn for transport projects in England's largest city regions outside of London. Stocks: Create your watchlist and portfolio Danni Hewson, head of financial analysis at AJ Bell, said: "It's hard not to look at today's headline fall in economic growth as anything other than inevitable. Company after company had warned the chancellor that the decisions taken during last year's budget would impact business growth and create huge uncertainty about existing staffing levels." "Rachel Reeves has said she is determined to deliver growth, and her spending plans have been given a cautious welcome by business groups up and down the country — but the caution speaks volumes," she said. "Can the government's trade policies and spending plans deliver the promised growth or was the energy demonstrated by the UK economy at the start of the year merely a tease?" In other currency moves, the pound fell 0.4% against the euro (GBPEUR=X), trading at €1.1743 at the time of writing. More broadly, the the FTSE 100 (^FTSE) was little changed, trading at 8,863 points at the time writing. For more details, on broader market movements check our live coverage here. Read more: Bitcoin price dips as markets cool after US-China tariff talks What you need to know about UK's private stock market Pisces UK house prices remain flat as buyer demand and sales steadyError in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Live Updates: Court Will Consider Trump's Use of Troops as Immigration Protests Spread
Live Updates: Court Will Consider Trump's Use of Troops as Immigration Protests Spread

New York Times

time8 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Live Updates: Court Will Consider Trump's Use of Troops as Immigration Protests Spread

California liberals welcomed Gov. Gavin Newsom's speech condemning President Trump, but some remained skeptical of the governor. Republicans, meanwhile, saw his address as opportunistic and blamed him for the state's turmoil. For months, Californians weren't sure what to make of Gov. Gavin Newsom. There was the new podcast on which he interviewed right-wing influencers and said he felt trans athletes shouldn't participate in women's sports. There was the meeting in February with President Trump in the White House. And there were occasional snipes at Republicans, but nothing like those Mr. Newsom had dished out in years past. Then came a blistering nine-minute speech on Tuesday in which Mr. Newsom warned Americans that Mr. Trump was destroying democracy and acting as an authoritarian who would eventually send the military to states across the country. Many liberals in California cheered Mr. Newsom, finally seeing in him the leader of the resistance that they had been missing. Those feeling confused and fearful since Mr. Trump started his second term were looking for someone to stick up for them and said they appreciated Mr. Newsom's forcefulness. 'In a time of rising fear and growing threats to democracy, he spoke not just as a governor, but as a moral leader,' said Representative Lateefah Simon, Democrat of California. 'He named the danger plainly.' But others, while supportive of his message, were not entirely convinced. They said testing the political climate ahead of a potential run for president. 'Even if you're late to the party, you know, welcome to the fight,' said Hugo Soto-Martinez, a progressive City Council member in Los Angeles, who appreciated what Mr. Newsom said but wished the governor had stood up to the president sooner. Adrian Tirtanadi, executive director of Open Door Legal, a nonprofit which provides free legal representation for immigrants and others, said he liked all of the words in Mr. Newsom's speech. But, he said, he wondered why the governor was not backing up the rhetoric with more financial support for immigration lawyers who could fight deportation. Big talk without much action, Mr. Tirtanadi said, is often the California way. Still, others appreciated that Mr. Newsom had demanded that Mr. Trump stop workplace raids and filed lawsuits seeking to block the deployment of National Guard troops and Marines in Southern California. That has given some hope to immigrants who have felt powerless. When David Campos was 14, he and his family traveled by foot and by bus, across deserts and over mountains, to California from their home in Guatemala. They scurried under a border fence and settled in South Central Los Angeles without legal papers. The family eventually obtained citizenship through his father's carpentry job. Mr. Campos went on to Stanford University and Harvard Law School, served on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and is now the vice chairman of the California Democratic Party. Mr. Campos said he was glad that Mr. Newsom, the former San Francisco mayor with whom he sometimes clashed, took a defiant stance toward Mr. Trump. 'I'm glad he's rising to this moment,' Mr. Campos, 54, said in an interview. 'The governor reminded us that if the president can do this in California, he can do it anywhere in this country. That's how a democracy can die.' Republicans in California, many of whom have aligned with President Trump, said they were decidedly unimpressed with the governor's speech. Senator Brian Jones, the State Senate minority leader, said that the governor seemed to have been filming an early campaign commercial with his speech, from the way the flags were set in his backdrop to the suit he was wearing. 'It doesn't do anything to lower tensions in L.A.,' Mr. Jones said. 'When he says we all need to stand up, is he encouraging more people to show up to the riots and participate?' James Gallagher, the Republican leader of the California State Assembly, called the governor's address 'self-righteous political posturing.' Mr. Gallagher said California's policy of preventing local law enforcement from working with federal immigration officials created the current tension. He said he found it funny that Mr. Newsom was accusing Mr. Trump of being authoritarian when the governor ordered Californians to close their businesses, stay home from church, attend school on Zoom, wear masks and get vaccinated during the Covid-19 pandemic. 'He was a total tyrant, and he has no business talking about authoritarianism because he is exhibit A,' Mr. Gallagher said. Mr. Newsom's speech, as well as his sharp-tongued retorts to Republicans on social media this week, won some plaudits from younger influencers. Dwayne Murphy, Jr., a 34-year-old content creator who lives in Downey, Calif., and said he votes Democrat, said he appreciated that the governor 'seems to be hyper-focused on standing up for this state at a time like this, and I feel like that's what people are very encouraged by.' Inkiad Kabir, 20, a pop culture content creator who lives in the Inland Empire region of California, said that Mr. Newsom was the rare Democrat willing to go on the attack, calling him 'basically liberal Trump, in a way.' Mr. Kabir created a popular TikTok video this week in which he called the governor 'Daddy Newsom' and likened the governor to a 'toxic ex that you promise you're not going to go back to, but you always go back to.' For now, it seems, Mr. Kabir has gone back.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store