‘Deport now, appeal later' scheme expanded in drive to remove foreign criminals
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said foreign criminals had been 'exploiting' the immigration system by 'remaining in the UK for months or even years while their appeals drag on'.
She said: 'That has to end. Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system, which is why we are restoring control and sending a clear message that our laws must be respected and will be enforced.'
The Home Secretary said expanding the 'deport now, appeal later' scheme would prevent more people from 'exploiting' the immigration system (Jacob King/PA)
The other countries now in the scheme are Angola, Botswana, Brunei, Canada, Guyana, Indonesia, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Uganda and Zambia.
The Home Office said the expansion of 'deport now, appeal later' would help 'scale up' the country's ability to remove foreign criminals, alongside measures announced on Sunday to deport offenders as soon as they are sentenced.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the move, which requires parliamentary approval, would save £54,000 a year per prison place.
Since Labour came to power last year, almost 5,200 foreign offenders have been deported, representing a 14% increase on the previous 12 months.
Officials have said increasing deportations will help ease pressure on overcrowded prisons.
But figures from the Ministry of Justice from the end of June suggest there are currently just 772 prisoners from the 15 new countries covered by 'deport now, appeal later'.
Of the new countries, only Indians are in the top nationalities among current prisoners, while there are no offenders from Botswana or Brunei currently behind bars.
The 'deport now, appeal later' scheme for human rights claims was introduced in 2014 but was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court three years later in cases where deportation would prevent the offender from giving live evidence in their appeal.
But the court noted that giving evidence over a video link could be sufficient, provided it was financially and logistically possible, in effect limiting the policy to countries where video appeal facilities were realistically available.
The UK currently has arrangements for video appeals with eight countries, including Tanzania, Belize, Finland and Estonia.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'We are leading diplomatic efforts to increase the number of countries where foreign criminals can be swiftly returned, and if they want to appeal, they can do so safely from their home country.
'Under this scheme, we're investing in international partnerships that uphold our security and make our streets safer.'
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'We welcome Keir Starmer's step in the right direction of Conservative Party deportations policy. But with record numbers of illegal arrivals, this is only a drop in the ocean.
'But even with this U-turn, only the Conservative Party is committed to deporting all foreign criminals.
'Until Keir Starmer either commits to deporting all foreign criminals or stops rolling out the red carpet for migrants the world over, this problem is not going away.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Peter Hain says UK government ‘digging itself into hole' over Palestine Action
A former cabinet minister has said the UK government is 'digging itself into a hole' over Palestine Action and fellow Labour peers and MPs were regretting voting to ban the group. The warning by Peter Hain, who opposed proscription, came as a Labour backbencher who supported it said the issue would arise again when parliament returned in September. Lord Hain, who was a leader of the anti-apartheid movement and the Anti-Nazi League in Britain during the 1970s and 1980s, was lacerating about the response to recent protests in support of Palestine Action. 'It will end in tears for the government,' he said. 'We are seeing retired magistrates, retired and serving doctors and all sorts of people being arrested and now effectively being equated with terrorists such as al-Qaida, which is absolutely wrong.' He said if a legal challenge to the proscription was successful, it 'would be a mercy to all concerned, including the government'. The peer was one of three Labour members of the Lords to vote against banning the group in July. Lord John Hendy, the barrister and employment law expert, and Frances O'Grady, the former TUC general secretary, also opposed the move, as did 10 Labour MPs. 'It's going to get worse [for the government] because I don't see people from that 'middle Britain' background who have joined these protests in such large numbers to suddenly decide that all is OK,' he said. 'In fact, I think more are going to come out and face arrest because the approach to Palestine Action is contrary to every form of peaceful protest in British history, whether that's the chartists and suffragettes or anti-apartheid and anti-fascist protesters.' The government has come under pressure to justify the detention of 532 people arrested over the weekend under the Terrorism Act – half of whom were 60 or older – on suspicion of showing support for Palestine Action. He cited his experience as a secretary of state for Northern Ireland and cabinet minister to challenge the equation of the group with terrorists. 'There is a battery of other crimes that could be applied to Palestine Action but terrorism is not one of them, while you also devalue the charge of terrorism by equating it with the protests we have seen,' Hain said. 'I … worked with the intelligence services and others to stop dissident IRA groups from killing. I have signed warrants to stop other real terrorists, Islamist terrorists, bombing London. So I am not soft on terrorism. But I am a strong believer that you have to know what it looks like.' Hain said that a lot of Labour MPs and peers were now having 'second thoughts' about proscribing Palestine Action. On Monday, a Downing Street spokesperson said the group was 'a violent organisation that has committed violence, significant injury, extensive criminal damage'. The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, told the BBC that Palestine Action 'is not a non-violent organisation' and claimed that court restrictions meant people 'don't know the full nature of this organisation'. Labour backbencher Stella Creasy said in a video posted on Instagram on Tuesday that MPs who had voted for proscription 'need to be clearer about the basis for that'. But she said this was more complicated than it should be because the evidence presented to MPs about the alleged use of violence was part and parcel of court cases and could not be used in parliamentary debates. 'The presence of violence in our politics can't be ignored and it needs legislation that can balance the danger this presents with defending debate for all concerned so clear we need to work on this further when parliament returns,' she said. Creasy also called for more 'consistency' about tackling violence and intimidation, which she said was on the rise and should cause the government to consider extending bans to some far-right groups seeking to exploit protests against hotels housing asylum seekers.
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Two thirds of Britons back removal of Duke of York's titles
Research by YouGov found that 67% of the public would back the removal of Andrew's York dukedom, as well as his princely title. An unflattering biography of the disgraced duke by Andrew Lownie this month delved into the private life of the late Queen's son, depicting him as sex obsessed, a 'useful idiot' and easy prey for Jeffrey Epstein. Two thirds of Britons support stripping Prince Andrew of his remaining royal titles, a move Prince William is reportedly considering for when he becomes king Support: 67%Oppose: 13% Results link in following tweet — YouGov (@YouGov) August 11, 2025 Some 13% opposed the removal of his titles and 21% were unsure, the survey showed. Three years ago, 62% believed Andrew should have his York title removed, with the current 67% in-favour figure seeing a jump of five percentage points. Another YouGov survey found that just 5% have a positive view of the King's brother, with Andrew languishing at the bottom of the royal favourability tables, beneath the Duchess of Sussex who has a 20% positive rating and the Duke of Sussex at 28%. Legislation would be required for Parliament to prevent Andrew continuing as the Duke of York, while his birthright to be a prince, as the son of a monarch, could be changed if a Letters Patent were issued by the King. The Duke of York at the King's coronation ceremony (Kirsty Wigglesworth/PA) The duke stopped using his style of His Royal Highness following his disastrous Newsnight interview, but it could be removed entirely by a Letters Patent. Andrew stepped away from his public role in 2019 amid the furore over his friendship with convicted billionaire paedophile Epstein. He later paid millions to settle a civil sexual assault case with Virginia Giuffre, who was trafficked by Epstein as a teenager and who Andrew claimed never to have met.
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Live facial recognition to be widened in neighbourhood policing drive
The technology will be deployed to catch 'high-harm' offenders, with new rules drawn up to support its use and ensure 'safeguards and oversight', the Home Office said. Some 10 vans equipped with cameras will be rolled out across seven police forces – Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley and Hampshire – over the coming weeks. Existing rules require checks only to be done against police watchlists of wanted criminals, suspects and those subject to bail or court order conditions like sex offenders. But a Government consultation will launch in the autumn to help 'shape a new legal framework' on its use, taking views on when and how the technology should be deployed. Privacy campaigners have previously voiced concerns about a potential lack of regulation and transparency over the expansion of the technology. The vans will be manned by trained officers and it will be for individual forces to decide how and when they are deployed in their areas, operating within the College of Policing guidance. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said they would be focused on identifying sex offenders or 'people wanted for the most serious crimes who the police have not been able to find'. 'The algorithm being used in the vans has been independently tested and will only be operated in specific circumstances and with robust oversight,' the Home Office said. Chief Superintendent Tim Morgan of South Wales Police, which is co-ordinating the rollout alongside the National Police Chiefs' Council, sought to reassure the public that the technology would be used 'ethically'. 'We understand the concerns which are raised about the use of live facial recognition technology and we use any new technology ethically and spend time and effort making sure it's deployed in line with all legislation and guidance,' he said. 'It is important to remember that use of this has never resulted in a wrongful arrest in South Wales and there have been no false alerts for several years as the technology and our understanding has evolved.' Lindsey Chiswick, NPCC lead for facial recognition, said live facial recognition had already been used 'to great success, locating thousands of wanted offenders, or others breaching their bail conditions.' 'I am confident that the increased use of this technology will continue to support the safety of communities across the country moving forward,' she said. Forces already deploying live facial recognition have used it to arrest rape, domestic abuse, knife crime and robbery suspects as well as sex offenders breaching their conditions. Meanwhile, the Home Office said every community across England and Wales has now been assigned a 'named, contactable' officer to handle reports of crimes like anti-social behaviour. Their details will be made available for residents on their local force's website, it is understood. The pledge was made as part of the Government's previously announced Neighbourhood Policing Guarantee, under which forces have signed up to a commitment to respond to neighbourhood queries within 72 hours. The Government said the move would help ensure 'the public will have consistent direct links to their local force, with dedicated anti-social behaviour leads and new visible patrols in town centres'. Ms Cooper said: 'Neighbourhood policing has been decimated over the last 15 years, but through our Plan for Change we are turning the corner, starting with town and city centres. 'Within the next year, we will have 3,000 new neighbourhood officers and PCSOs in place, which is a big shift. 'We also want them to have more powers to tackle off-road bikes, shop theft, street theft and other crimes that have blighted some of our town and city centres, so everyone can feel safe in their own town.'
