Is your data safe? Lawmakers say it's time for a Texas Cyber Command
AUSTIN (KXAN) — In March 2024, an IT team at Texas Retina Associates noticed abnormal activity on one of their company's servers.
The company's anti-virus system detected a lateral movement — a sign that an attacker had gained credentials and was actively infiltrating their systems. The team quickly disabled their accounts and kicked out the intruder. But it was too late.
'Immediately after that, we got notification from the hacker that they had accessed our systems and had potentially removed some of our data,' said Charles Vasquez, the company's chief information officer. 'They claim to have taken a lot of our data, impacting up to 300,000 of our patients.'
Texas Retina Associates, based in Dallas and with 15 locations across the state, was the victim of a cybercrime. Its patients add to the list of over 15 million Texans whose sensitive personal information was compromised in data breaches in 2024, according to Texas Rep. Giovanni Capriglione.
In the current legislative session, Texas could take steps to lead on cybersecurity for the state's critical infrastructure.
House Bill 150 would establish the Texas Cyber Command, a component of the University of Texas System, to safeguard the state's vital infrastructure and government agencies from attacks. The establishment of the Cyber Command was listed as one of Governor Greg Abbott's seven emergency items this session, making it a legislative priority.
'What the FBI told us was, for most organizations, it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when.'
Richardson City Manager Don Magner
According to the Texas Comptroller's Office, two of the most common cyberattacks include phishing and ransomware. In a phishing attack, the attacker gains access to secure systems by leading an unsuspecting target to click a fake link or attachment. Ransomware is software that locks an organization's system, requiring a ransom to be paid before restoring the data.
'It used to be low odds propositions, about 5% of ransomware attacks resulted in the victim paying the money. Now that number is as high as 48% of ransomware victims are paying the terrorists the money,' said David Dunmoyer, Texas Public Policy Foundation's campaign director for Better Tech for Tomorrow.
Countries shore up their digital defenses as global tensions raise the threat of cyberwarfare
These attacks take an increasingly significant financial toll on Texas cities and businesses. The FBI estimated in 2020 that victims of cybercrime in the state lost $313.6 million that year, an increase of 307% since 2016.
The cleanup and verification process after a breach is also time-consuming and resource-intensive.
The City of Richardson, with a population of about 120,000 people, experienced a ransomware attack in September 2024. Though they had a security plan in place and acted quickly, the recovery still took weeks and involved the FBI and investigators.
'We were able to respond almost immediately. Within less than 120 seconds, the breach was identified,' said Don Magner, the city manager for Richardson. 'But even that was still disruptive for weeks because you have to go through and verify that you understand the full extent of the breach.'
Texas is a common target for cyberattacks. As of 2017, Texas ranked third nationally in its number of cyber attack victims, possibly because of its large population. The state also leads in oil and gas production, features 15 major military installations, and is an emerging technology hub — which state leaders said makes Texas attractive for those seeking highly sensitive data.
Along with its major corporations and urban centers, Texas is home to remote rural communities. According to Dunmoyer, this diversity offers foreign adversaries a wide range of potential infiltration points.
'What will happen is, because we have so many of those wonderful small rural cities, that gives foreign adversaries a pattern to learn from,' Dunmoyer said. 'We call it threat detection, and so they can learn, 'Where are the weak points in the system?' And they'll scale that and emulate that across the state.'
Dunmoyer says two-thirds of attacks on Texas's critical infrastructure have been linked to foreign adversaries. Vasquez and Magner both said they suspect their data breaches were the result of a foreign attacker.
What is at stake here for us as Texans? Vasquez put it in the context of healthcare data, which stores information such as social security numbers, birth dates, and insurance information.
'All that information is even more valuable than the financial services information, because that information can be used to promote or conduct identity theft, which can be used to commit fraud,' Vasquez said.
As cyber attacks grow more common and advanced, it's becoming increasingly difficult to escape that reality.
'I think the sad thing about it is we've all been victims of identity breaches,' said Vasquez, referencing an April 2024 AT&T security breach that affected 73 million current and former customers.
'From government, I would think that putting baseline protections in place — baseline recommendations for the type of protection you should be having — providing that instant response for smaller institutions who don't have that to be able to reach out and get advice or assistance,' he added.
For local governments like the city of Richardson, Magner said he encourages investing in actionable plans in preparation for an attack and gathering internal and external partners to be able to respond quickly.
'I had several city managers that reached out after this to say, 'Hey, what can you share, what lessons learned? Because we want to, if this occurs, we want to be ready to go,'' Magner said. 'What the FBI told us was, for most organizations, it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when.'
The aim of the Texas Cyber Command is to be that resource, especially for small municipalities and companies that handle sensitive data, so they aren't left to face threats alone when it happens.
The cyber command bill, HB 150, is authored by Rep. Giovanni Capriglione, R–Southlake. State Sen. Tan Parker, R–Flower Mound filed identical legislation in the Senate. Both lawmakers have promoted technology- and privacy-focused bills throughout their tenures.
State agencies will be eligible to utilize the command's resources, as well as local governments and private companies that house critical infrastructure who enter into contract with the command. The following are considered critical infrastructure under HB 150:
Chemical facilities
Commercial facilities
Communication facilities
Manufacturing facilities
Dams
Defense industrial bases
Emergency services systems
Energy facilities
Financial services systems
Food and agriculture facilities
Government facilities
Health care and public health facilities
Information technology
Nuclear reactors, materials, and waste
Transportation systems
Water and wastewater systems
The command will assume cybersecurity responsibilities currently under the Texas Department of Information Resources, an agency chartered in 1989 to help government agencies adopt modern technology and IT guidelines. While cybersecurity was grouped into their mission, Parker said the 'threat environment has outgrown' the agency's scope.
Lawmakers file bills to create Texas Cyber Command
In addition, it focuses on education, research, and both proactive and reactive strategies for addressing cybersecurity threats. This includes developing cybersecurity best practices to train agencies on, creating a Cybersecurity Incident Response Unit to support agencies under attack, collaborating with federal resources to develop a portal for risk and incident management, and set up a Digital Forensics Laboratory to learn how to prevent attacks.
The command will be managed by a chief who is appointed by the Governor and confirmed with the advice and consent of the Senate.
It will be administratively attached to The University of Texas at San Antonio to make use of their cybersecurity resources. The school is one of the fewer than 10 universities in the country with the National Security Agency's (NSA) cyber defense education, cybersecurity research and cyber operations designations.
'UTSA is already one of the leaders in cybersecurity education in the country, and so having Texas Cyber Command based out of there I think makes a lot of sense,' said Marc Whyte, a San Antonio City Councilman. 'This is Military City USA and it's going to be Cybersecurity USA as well.'
Whyte said the city of San Antonio looks forward to housing the command, especially with its deep-rooted national security presence. This includes the FBI Cyber Squad, the 16th Air Force, NSA's Texas Cryptologic Center, and the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Region 6.
Heading into the last week of Texas' 89th regular session, the Texas Cyber Command bill awaits approval from the Senate Committee on Business and Commerce. The bill passed in the House last month 130-13. Despite its general bipartisan support, it raised some questions in both its house and senate committees.
Where Abbott's emergency priorities stand as session end nears
With the presence of federal agencies and third-party companies that already work to regulate and respond to cyber attacks in the state, members on the House Committee on the Delivery of Government Efficiency questioned the need for a centralized, statewide command.
Vasquez raised similar concerns, questioning if a statewide command would mean more regulation within the private sector. Capriglione addressed these concerns in the context of the state's electrical grid.
'We're definitely not making the claim that there's no cybersecurity protections in the grid or in any of the private companies, for instance, that go and participate on the grid, but this is additional help, responsiveness, training, and other efforts that will go and support those pieces of critical infrastructure,' said Capriglione to the committee.
Furthermore, only agencies under the direct purview of the state are required to follow the command's regulations. Local governments and private industries like Texas Retina Associates can choose to opt-in to the command program, only then subjecting them to mandatory security standards.
In the senate committee, members questioned Parker on the need for the command to be attached to a university rather than being a standalone state function. Chairman Charles Schwertner, R–Georgetown, expressed concern over security lapses at universities nationwide, citing espionage threats and describing them as 'soft targets' for foreign cyber attacks.
'I question our wisdom that for the last 20 years, we've been slowly taking our educational institutions and giving them functions outside of the educational realm,' said Vice Chair Phil King, R–Weatherford, at the committee hearing, sharing Schwertner's sentiments.
'UTSA is really incubating this program. It is really incubating for speed,' said Parker in response. 'We can be up and running in 18 months as opposed to three to five years with some other option trying to have the same level of capability.'
Parker also highlighted that the chain of command for the program would run directly to the Governor, not through the university system. It would also be physically located in an existing, standalone building downtown already equipped with high-tech security measures. Parker said he's open to adding more safeguards to ensure the command is secure at the university level.
Ernie Ferraresso, director of the Florida Center of Cybersecurity, speaks highly of having their cyber center attached to a university.
'We have such a great relationship with our whole university,' Ferraresso said. Similarly, Cyber Florida was established by their state legislature in 2014 and is attached to the University of South Florida.
Unlike the Texas Cyber Command, Ferraresso and his team are technically employees of the university, not the state. While they carry out special projects on behalf of the Florida legislature for the good of the state, a main priority of their center is becoming a leader in cybersecurity academic education and addressing the cyber workforce shortage.
'Because we are a university, people are more inclined to share information with us because we're not a regulatory agency, we're not an enforcement organization,' Ferraresso said.
Ferraresso notes that the goals of the Texas Cyber Command differ in that it aims to be the cyber operations organization for the state. He says carrying out cyber missions at that scope depends on obtaining both high-level permission and resources, requiring a direct line of approval through the governor's office. Regardless, he says the resources of a university have been invaluable to their center's growth.
'You have access to the students, you have access to the faculty membership,' Ferraresso said. 'That's the other part that's always interesting around here is, I get to run into and talk to really, really smart people every day. And that's worth its weight.'
As cyber threats continue to evolve, so too must the state's response. Following an executive order by President Donald Trump that shifted cybersecurity responsibilities to the states, the legislation before Texas lawmakers aims to position the state at the forefront of this critical challenge.
'It is the policy of the United States that State and local governments and individuals play a more active and significant role in national resilience and preparedness…' read the executive order.
Regardless of the outcome of the current bill this session, lawmakers, companies and government entities agree that cybersecurity remains a pressing issue that demands action.
'If we don't take action, I think we put our vulnerability at great risk and I believe that there is a clock that is ticking,' said Parker to the senate committee. 'I would submit that the time is now to take this step to protect the citizens and the livelihoods of 31 million Texans.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
1 dead after shooting in Northtown Mall parking lot
1 dead after shooting in Northtown Mall parking lot originally appeared on Bring Me The News. A man was shot dead in the parking lot of Northtown Mall in Blaine Friday evening. According to the Anoka County Sheriff's Office, the shooting was reported around 5:15 p.m., with first responders arriving to find the victim, who was pronounced dead after lifesaving efforts were unsuccessful. The shooting happened in the parking lot outside the Best Buy retail outlet. Authorities were searching for three males who reportedly ran from the scene. One of them was arrested while the others have yet to be apprehended. The man killed in the shooting has not been identified. Last September, a 21-year-old was charged for firing a gun outside Northtown Mall, with at least one round striking a display case inside the mall. That incident resulted in shoppers and staff inside the mall taking cover. This story was originally reported by Bring Me The News on Jun 7, 2025, where it first appeared.


Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
How CPAs Should Speak To Clients As Crypto Adoption Accelerates
CPAs need to be educated on crypto to better advise clients CPAs have been discussing crypto for years, but given the rapidly (and positively) changing regulatory and policy environment it seems a good time to revisit what might sound like a straight-forward question; how should CPAs approach clients about cryptoassets? While in the past CPAs could have reasonably advised clients to minimize exposure to crypto since the regulatory environment was so uncertain, bankruptcies such as FTX dominated the headlines, and price volatility seemed ingrained into the asset class. Over the last 12-18 months, however, those narratives have changed significantly, with several developments making the crypto conversation between advisors and clients much more nuanced. Positive momentum on the legislative front at the federal and numerous state levels, the proliferation of spot crypto ETFs, the relaxation of previous strict language around including crypto into 401 (k) plans, the comprehensive repayment plans announced by the FTX estate, and the successful IPO of major stablecoin issuer Circle have all contributed to a more optimistic for crypto as 2025 continues to roll forward. Despite these developments, including the actions taken by the OCC and FDIC to allow more institutions to engage with crypto operations, the tax and accounting outlook for crypto has yet to significantly shift. Let's take a look at a few things CPAs need to keep in mind when discussing crypto with clients as positive momentum continues to accelerate. Given the nearly continuous flow of positive headlines around cryptoassets and the increased frequency with which investors of all sizes are allocating funds to said assets CPAs might very well be speaking with clients who fear missing out on these returns. That said, the investing adage that past success does not indicate future performance holds equally as true for crypto as any other asset class. For example, bitcoin has traded as low as $70,000 in 2025 prior to rebounding back about $100,000 beginning in May 2025; volatility remains an embedded part of the crypto ecosystem. For CPA clients seeking to integrate cryptoassets as part of a treasury allocation, accepting cryptoassets for payment purposes, or seeking to advise external clients whether crypto is a good fit for operations the pressure to invest in crypto can be significant. A responsibility of CPAs across the board is to make sure that any and all clients interested in crypto are only investing in these assets if the assets are well understood, and are a good fit for the business model of the firm. Despite the positive changes that have permeated into the cryptoasset sector the tax ramifications of these the fact remains that taxes are an obstacle to wider utilization of crypto for business purposes. Virtually every single transaction, transformation, or exchange that involves cryptoassets will create a tax reporting and potential tax payment obligation, and this has not changed even as the usage and adoption of crypto continues to accelerate. This is especially true for individuals that engage in higher volume trading or business activities, as several changes in particular will impact businesses using crypto. Specifically, changes that are related to IRS code section 6045 and 6050I, including the pivot to a universal wallet tracking methodology, are set to complicate the accounting for crypto transactions and gains. With further changes coming to the marketplace beginning January 2026, and while DeFi broker regulations (with an effective date in 2027) have been sidelined for now, the tax conversation around crypto is far from over. CPAs are already trusted as business and tax advisors, and especially as it is connected to crypto the value that can be added to a client via improved tax information is difficult to overstate. An often repeated issue and statement that can arise with the onboarding of cryptoassets is the perception that internal controls are less important since underlying blockchains are usually perceived as immutable and unhackable. Even if the blockchain itself has proven itself resilient and impervious to hacking attempts the multitude of hacks and data breaches that have occurred in the cryptoasset sector should serve as a reminder that internal controls are always important. Specifically the recent data breach at Coinbase should be illustrative to potential users and investors in crypto; even one of the most highlight regulated and well regarded institutions in the crypto sector suffered a data breach due to social engineering attacks on certain employees. For smaller institutions or entrepreneurs looking to gain exposure to crypto the importance of establishing and improving internal controls around cryptoassets and crypto policies should be an imperative. CPAs are well versed in assisting clients in the establishment and improvement of controls and control frameworks, and the importance of controls around crypto is no different. Crypto continues to make inroads across the economic board, and CPAs need to be well-prepared to discuss these issues with clients now and going forward.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats
US President Donald Trump said he has no desire to repair his relationship with Elon Musk, and warned that his former ally and campaign benefactor could face 'serious consequences' if he tries to help Democrats in upcoming elections. Mr Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker in a phone interview that he has no plans to make up with tech entrepreneur Mr Musk. Asked specifically if he thought his relationship with the mega-billionaire chief executive of Tesla and SpaceX was over, Mr Trump responded: 'I would assume so, yeah.' 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Mr Trump continued. Alarming — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 7, 2025 'You know, I won an election in a landslide. I gave him (Mr Musk) a lot of breaks, long before this happened, I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him.' The US President also issued a warning amid speculation that Mr Musk could back Democratic legislators and candidates in the 2026 mid-term elections. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Mr Trump told NBC, though he declined to share what those consequences would be. Mr Musk's businesses have many lucrative federal contracts. The US President's latest comments suggest Mr Musk is moving from close ally to a potential new target for Mr Trump, who has aggressively wielded the powers of his office to crack down on critics and punish perceived enemies. As a major government contractor, Mr Musk's businesses could be particularly vulnerable to retribution. Mr Trump has already threatened to cut Mr Musk's contracts, calling it an easy way to save money. The dramatic rupture between the President and the world's richest man began this week with Mr Musk's public criticism of Mr Trump's 'big beautiful bill' pending on Capitol Hill. Mr Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination'. Mr Trump criticised Mr Musk in the Oval Office, and before long, he and Mr Musk began trading bitterly personal attacks on social media, sending the White House and Republican congressional leaders scrambling to assess the fallout. As the back-and-forth intensified, Mr Musk suggested Mr Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the President's association with infamous paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Mr Musk appeared by Saturday morning to have deleted his posts about Epstein. In an interview, US vice president JD Vance tried to downplay the feud. He said Mr Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after Mr Trump, but called him an 'emotional guy' who was becoming frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' Mr Vance said. Mr Vance called Mr Musk an 'incredible entrepreneur,' and said that Mr Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which sought to cut US government spending and laid off or pushed out thousands of workers, was 'really good'. Mr Vance made the comments in an interview with 'manosphere' comedian Theo Von, who last month joked about snorting drugs off a mixed-race baby and the sexuality of men in the US Navy when he opened for Mr Trump at a military base in Qatar. The Vance interview was taped on Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X, the social media network the billionaire owns. During the interview, Mr Von showed the vice president Mr Musk's claim that Mr Trump's administration has not released all the records related to Epstein because Mr Trump is mentioned in them. Vice President Vance on what it's like to be Trump's VP: 'It is my job, obviously, to provide the President honest counsel…he talks to everybody. I think it's why he's in touch with normal people.' — Vice President JD Vance (@VP) June 7, 2025 Mr Vance responded to that, saying: 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Mr Vance said in response to another post shared by Mr Musk calling for Mr Trump to be impeached and replaced with Mr Vance. 'It's totally insane. The President is doing a good job.' Vance also defended the bill that has drawn Mr Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Mr Trump's first term. The bill would slash spending and taxes but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by 2.4 trillion dollars (£1.77 trillion) over the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. 'It's a good bill,' Mr Vance said. 'It's not a perfect bill.'