logo
How CPAs Should Speak To Clients As Crypto Adoption Accelerates

How CPAs Should Speak To Clients As Crypto Adoption Accelerates

Forbes6 hours ago

CPAs need to be educated on crypto to better advise clients
CPAs have been discussing crypto for years, but given the rapidly (and positively) changing regulatory and policy environment it seems a good time to revisit what might sound like a straight-forward question; how should CPAs approach clients about cryptoassets? While in the past CPAs could have reasonably advised clients to minimize exposure to crypto since the regulatory environment was so uncertain, bankruptcies such as FTX dominated the headlines, and price volatility seemed ingrained into the asset class. Over the last 12-18 months, however, those narratives have changed significantly, with several developments making the crypto conversation between advisors and clients much more nuanced.
Positive momentum on the legislative front at the federal and numerous state levels, the proliferation of spot crypto ETFs, the relaxation of previous strict language around including crypto into 401 (k) plans, the comprehensive repayment plans announced by the FTX estate, and the successful IPO of major stablecoin issuer Circle have all contributed to a more optimistic for crypto as 2025 continues to roll forward. Despite these developments, including the actions taken by the OCC and FDIC to allow more institutions to engage with crypto operations, the tax and accounting outlook for crypto has yet to significantly shift.
Let's take a look at a few things CPAs need to keep in mind when discussing crypto with clients as positive momentum continues to accelerate.
Given the nearly continuous flow of positive headlines around cryptoassets and the increased frequency with which investors of all sizes are allocating funds to said assets CPAs might very well be speaking with clients who fear missing out on these returns. That said, the investing adage that past success does not indicate future performance holds equally as true for crypto as any other asset class. For example, bitcoin has traded as low as $70,000 in 2025 prior to rebounding back about $100,000 beginning in May 2025; volatility remains an embedded part of the crypto ecosystem.
For CPA clients seeking to integrate cryptoassets as part of a treasury allocation, accepting cryptoassets for payment purposes, or seeking to advise external clients whether crypto is a good fit for operations the pressure to invest in crypto can be significant. A responsibility of CPAs across the board is to make sure that any and all clients interested in crypto are only investing in these assets if the assets are well understood, and are a good fit for the business model of the firm.
Despite the positive changes that have permeated into the cryptoasset sector the tax ramifications of these the fact remains that taxes are an obstacle to wider utilization of crypto for business purposes. Virtually every single transaction, transformation, or exchange that involves cryptoassets will create a tax reporting and potential tax payment obligation, and this has not changed even as the usage and adoption of crypto continues to accelerate. This is especially true for individuals that engage in higher volume trading or business activities, as several changes in particular will impact businesses using crypto.
Specifically, changes that are related to IRS code section 6045 and 6050I, including the pivot to a universal wallet tracking methodology, are set to complicate the accounting for crypto transactions and gains. With further changes coming to the marketplace beginning January 2026, and while DeFi broker regulations (with an effective date in 2027) have been sidelined for now, the tax conversation around crypto is far from over. CPAs are already trusted as business and tax advisors, and especially as it is connected to crypto the value that can be added to a client via improved tax information is difficult to overstate.
An often repeated issue and statement that can arise with the onboarding of cryptoassets is the perception that internal controls are less important since underlying blockchains are usually perceived as immutable and unhackable. Even if the blockchain itself has proven itself resilient and impervious to hacking attempts the multitude of hacks and data breaches that have occurred in the cryptoasset sector should serve as a reminder that internal controls are always important.
Specifically the recent data breach at Coinbase should be illustrative to potential users and investors in crypto; even one of the most highlight regulated and well regarded institutions in the crypto sector suffered a data breach due to social engineering attacks on certain employees. For smaller institutions or entrepreneurs looking to gain exposure to crypto the importance of establishing and improving internal controls around cryptoassets and crypto policies should be an imperative. CPAs are well versed in assisting clients in the establishment and improvement of controls and control frameworks, and the importance of controls around crypto is no different.
Crypto continues to make inroads across the economic board, and CPAs need to be well-prepared to discuss these issues with clients now and going forward.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What It Will Take For A Bitcoin Treasury Company To Become 'The Berkshire Hathaway Of Bitcoin'
What It Will Take For A Bitcoin Treasury Company To Become 'The Berkshire Hathaway Of Bitcoin'

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What It Will Take For A Bitcoin Treasury Company To Become 'The Berkshire Hathaway Of Bitcoin'

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Bitwise strategist Jeff Park has weighed in on what it would take for a company to become 'the Berkshire Hathaway of Bitcoin.' Park has said financial leadership alone would not be enough for any firm to become the ideal Bitcoin treasury company. Public corporations have become the dominant players in the Bitcoin market in recent months. When it comes to shareholder value growth, few firms can hold a candle to Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK, BRK.B)). Between 1965 and 2023, the company delivered a compound annual growth rate of nearly 20% to its shareholders, outperforming the S&P 500 by approximately 10%. So, it makes sense that Strive Asset Management CEO Matt Cole last month cited Berkshire Hathaway when discussing the firm's aspirations in the Bitcoin treasury company space. 'We're going to be one of the major players in the space where I look at us as kind of the Berkshire Hathaway of Bitcoin Treasury companies,' he said at the time. Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . Achieving this goal, however, will be no easy task. "The Berkshire Hathaway of Bitcoin' would have to master three different return on equity strategies, said Top Bitwise strategist Jeff Park on Monday. These strategies include liability management, asset management and operating equity management. According to Park, however, Bitcoin treasury firms in their current form are not taking advantage of more than one approach. He put MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR), The Blockchain Group and Metaplanet's strategies under liability management. Strive and Twenty One's efforts were classified under asset management, while Kindly MD's (NASDAQ:KDLY) efforts were placed under operating equity management. Meanwhile, Park said financial leadership alone would not be enough for a Bitcoin treasury company to become 'the Berkshire Hathaway of Bitcoin.' After all, the Oracle of Omaha's firm is not only recognized for its financial success but also its stabilizing role during times of distress. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. So, in addition to mastering the outlined ROE strategies, Park said the ideal Bitcoin treasury company would need to build its 'spiritual weight' by wholeheartedly supporting Bitcoin development and prioritizing the community over corporate interests. 'Bitcoin companies must embrace the same vision of classical liberalism as individuals, to pursue freedom, decentralization, and unity: principles that only open-source software can truly deliver, not the managerial politicians,' he said, adding that 'the best corporate leaders will see that the real opportunity isn't just in accumulating, but in becoming custodians of a future where individuals, not institutions, hold the keys.' Public corporations have become the dominant players in the Bitcoin market in recent months. Bitwise said in April that these firms purchased 95,000 BTC in Q1 alone, more than half of the approximately 165,000 BTC expected to be mined this year. And with the entry of players like Strive, Twenty One and Kindly MD into the space in recent weeks, the Bitcoin purchases look set to accelerate even more. Many expect that this demand will drive the asset's price significantly higher. Bitwise, for example, has set a year-end price target of $200,000. Fundstrat has set a target of $250,000. VanEck has set a target of $180,000. At last look, the asset is trading at over $106,000, up nearly 2% in the past 24 hours. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Image: Shutterstock This article What It Will Take For A Bitcoin Treasury Company To Become 'The Berkshire Hathaway Of Bitcoin' originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Test Yourself Against These Teen Personal-Finance Whizzes, Round 2
Test Yourself Against These Teen Personal-Finance Whizzes, Round 2

Wall Street Journal

time26 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Test Yourself Against These Teen Personal-Finance Whizzes, Round 2

We recently published a quiz using questions from a high school personal-finance competition. Readers gave us feedback loud and clear: More questions, please. Now, we are publishing the rest of the questions from the final round of the Council for Economic Education's National Personal Finance Challenge. The event brought together the top four-person teams among some 18,000 state-level competitors.

Walmart Shareholders Fail Racial Equity Audit Proposal for a Third Time
Walmart Shareholders Fail Racial Equity Audit Proposal for a Third Time

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Walmart Shareholders Fail Racial Equity Audit Proposal for a Third Time

The third time was not the charm for United for Respect Education Fund. The non-profit filed a shareholder proposal asking Walmart to undergo a third-party, independent racial equity audit focused on analyzing the company's impact on Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) communities. Per the proposal, once completed, Walmart should share the results publicly on its website. More from Sourcing Journal Walmart to Bring Drone Delivery to Five Additional Cities Trump Lashes Out at Walmart, Says Retailer Should 'Eat the Tariffs' Walmart US Nearly Doubled Deliveries Made in Three Hours or Less 'Given its worker demographics and scale, we request Walmart assess its behavior through a racial equity lens to obtain a complete picture of how it contributes to, and could help dismantle, social and economic inequality,' the filers wrote in their proposal. 'A racial equity audit would help Walmart identify, remedy and avoid adverse impacts on nonwhite stakeholders, communities of color and long-term diversified shareholders. Failure to effectively address inequities in its operations exposes stakeholders, including employees, to unacceptable abuses and exposes Walmart to risks that may ultimately affect shareholder long-term value.' According to Walmart's 2024 Mid-Year Belonging Report, people of color make up 51 percent of its U.S. workforce. United for Respect Education Fund filed similar proposals in 2023 and 2024. But this time around, part of the importance for the group and its co-filers was the fact that Walmart, like several other major companies, announced late last year that it would roll back some of its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts in favor of a theme of 'belonging.' Ultimately, the filers' argument proved unsuccessful in swaying shareholders' minds. In 2023, the proposal garnered 18.1 percent of shareholder votes; in 2024, that proportion declined to 15.4 percent. This year, the proposal received 6.9 percent of shareholder votes, according to a vote result announcement from Walmart's Thursday shareholder meeting. That's down 8.5 percentage points from last year. Like in previous years, Walmart recommended shareholders vote against the proposal. 'The Board recommends shareholders vote against these proposals because we already disclose substantial information on our people strategies, providing information about our business rationale, key metrics, progress, Board oversight and approach to continuous improvement based on stakeholder feedback and results,' the company published in its 2025 proxy statement. Ahead of the vote, Bianca Agustin, co-executive director of United for Respect, told Sourcing Journal that the organization had hoped to see at least the same percentage of shareholder votes headed their way as last year. She had also hoped that the proposal would garner one-fifth of all shareholder votes, since many proxy advisers recommend a company open formal dialogue with shareholders proposing a change if their proposition receives at least 20 percent of the total vote. Ultimately, the filers saw neither of those outcomes come to fruition this year. Nonetheless, Agustin said she hoped the proposal would bring attention to Walmart's DEI-related decisioning in recent months. 'We [wanted] to basically give a referendum on Walmart's really, really opaque decision to roll back the DEI initiatives,' she told Sourcing Journal. 'We [wanted] to send a strong message to the company that stakeholders do not agree with their decision, and that…they have a responsibility to lead in this moment of political turmoil and division. Given the demographic of their workforce and the communities they operate in, that responsibility is enhanced for Walmart.' TaNeka Hightower, a Tennessee resident who is currently on medical leave from her role at Walmart, supported the non-profit and its co-filers in re-filing the proposal this year. She said she believes a racial equity audit would help answer questions about pay equity and would provide insight into broader employee concerns about their ability to move up within the company, the treatment they receive from upper management and more. 'If we were to do a racial equity audit, it would really give an insight as to the disparity between Black and Brown workers in comparison to others,' Hightower told Sourcing Journal. 'The people up top that are the ones benefiting from all the profits, while the people that are actually doing the work to get the profits in the store aren't able to live.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store