Las Vegas cybersecurity expert offers tips to avoid Real ID scams as deadline approaches
A cybersecurity strategist shared with 8 News Now all the ways scammers are using the Real ID enforcement deadline to their benefit.
'They're trying to create a pressure campaign, and taking advantage of the fact a lot of people don't really understand what it is and why they need it,' Las Vegas Cybersecurity strategist with Guidepoint Paul Keener said.
They're after social security numbers, date of birth, addresses – the trifecta to create a false identity to open an account. From posing as government agencies to offering online services, requesting personal information, and using fear tactics.
Keener also went on to add that using AI to make their texts and calls sound more believable.
'There's also deepfakes to sound like someone is calling from Nevada DMV, it's a little bit more scary,' he said.
Keep in mind that the DMV will never ask for personal information through email or text.Real ID applications cannot be done online.
Be wary of unsolicited communications – hang up on callers, and block the number.Avoid clicking on links that don't look right. If you get a text or email, delete it without clicking on it, verify the source, and report suspicious activity.
If you feel you've been scammed, there is a website to report it to CLICK HERE for more information. It's also important to report it to the IRS, so they can flag your Social Security number.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Drunk driver gets near-max sentence for killing Las Vegas airman, 23
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — A drunk driver who killed an airman on a Las Vegas-area freeway will serve nearly the maximum sentence allowed by Nevada law, a judge ruled Tuesday. On April 13, 2024, Hetsel Campos killed Airman Natalie Villegas, 23, as Villegas was driving to work at Creech Air Force Base on U.S. 95. Villegas joined the United States Air Force when she was 18, her family said during Campos' sentencing Tuesday. Earlier this year, Campos took a plea deal, avoiding a trial and sending him to prison for at least two years. Nevada state law requires a judge to sentence drunk drivers who kill to 2-20 years. State law limits the maximum amount of time a defendant can serve in prison before becoming parole eligible to eight years, making 8-20 years the maximum sentence. Campos' blood-alcohol level was about twice the legal limit when police tested it in the hours after the crash, documents said. In court Tuesday, Clark County District Court Judge Tara Clark Newberry sentenced Campos to nearly the maximum penalty: 6-20 years. 'I should be the one that's gone — and not her,' Campos said before Clark Newberry sentenced him. 'I should be the one that's not here.' Campos' attorney, Josh Tomsheck, argued his client had a clean record. Villegas' family pressed the judge for the maximum possible sentence. 'My daughter was taken from us all by an irresponsible decision,' Carol Vanessa Serrano, Natalie's mother, said. 'My daughter had no chance. She was simply on her way to do what she loved, and that was to serve this country.' The crash happened around sunrise near mile marker 99. Villegas was driving northbound toward Creech when Campos rear-ended her at 117 miles per hour, police said after his arrest. In the hours before the crash, surveillance showed Campos drinking at Downtown Las Vegas casinos. For reasons unknown, Campos was driving north, miles away from the Las Vegas valley and his home, police said. 'While on her way to serve our country, you irresponsibly and selfishly came along and took all that away from my daughter,' said Natalie's father, Juan Villegas. 'My charge and my oath is to uphold justice and to hold people accountable for the choices that they make. And unfortunately, Mr. Campos, you made the worst possible choice you could have probably made in your life that night.' Clark Newberry's sentence means Campos will be parole eligible in 2031. A proposal earlier this year from Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo to change the law to allow prosecutors to charge a DUI driver who kills with second-degree murder failed. The amended version would have carried a similar maximum sentence as the state's second-degree murder statute. A second proposal focusing on Nevada's vehicular homicide law also failed. Lawmakers will not reconvene, except for special circumstances at the request of the governor, until February 2027. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Attorney for father of Abundant Life school shooter asks to dismiss case, citing 'disregard of truth'
MADISON – The father of the Abundant Life Christian School student who shot and killed two people at the school is asking a Dane County judge to dismiss the charges against him, citing a "reckless disregard of the truth" in the complaint filed against him. Jeffrey Rupnow and his attorney, Lisa Goldman, in an Aug. 18 motion, argued that the fact his daughter, Natalie Rupnow, was able to access the family's gun safe didn't mean her father allowed her to. The motion acknowledged that Jeffrey Rupnow told his daughter the combination to the safe was his Social Security number in reverse, but argued he never gave her the numbers or any other clues. More: Father of Abundant Life school shooter will stand trial for providing guns used in attack The document also points to text messages sent by Rupnow in the days before the shooting, in which he tells friends that "my kid would shoot me" if he left the safe open, which alluded to him believing that Natalie could not access the guns inside. "There are no facts in the Complaint or elicited at the Preliminary Hearing that assert Rupnow thought or knew his daughter could access the gun safe on December 16, 2024," the document says. By alleging that Rupnow owning guns led to his daughter's actions at the school, the state is violating his Second Amendment rights to bear arms, the motion says. The motion also argues that Rupnow did not know how his daughter was planning a school shooting online with older friends. The documents says Rupnow was not allowed access to Natalie's laptop or her room, which she had deemed a "safe space." It also states that Rupnow did not know his daughter to be suicidal or a danger to others. "The State's inference that Rupnow knew (Natalie Rupnow) was suicidal and contributed to her delinquency by joining a gun club, facilitating her participation in a gun class which she passed, encouraging her to participate in Rimfire at the gun club, is an impermissible inference given nobody believed N.R. was suicidal or homicidal since October 2021," the document says. More: Mother of Abundant Life Christian School shooter dies by apparent suicide Natalie Rupnow died by suicide after opening fire inside a study hall at Abundant Life in December, killing Teacher Erin West, 42, and freshman Rubi Vergara, 14. That morning, she arrived at the school carrying a .22-caliber Sig Sauer and a Glock handgun, both of which had been purchased by Jeffrey Rupnow and stored in a gun safe at his home. In an interview with authorities cited in the criminal complaint, Jeffrey Rupnow said the day before the shooting, he had retrieved his daughter's handgun from his gun safe for cleaning. He was uncertain whether she returned it to the safe. That gun and another handgun were used in the shooting. Her father told police she must have retrieved the second gun from the safe. Documents found in Natalie Rupnow's room after her death include statements describing humanity as "filth" and saying she lived in a "population of scum." She used a racial slur before saying, "Some of you guys deserve to be dead." She believed, according to the court record, that humanity had forced her into a hole. She also appeared to idolize mass shooters, according to the complaint. She also wrote she was able to obtain the firearms she would use in the Abundant Life shooting as a result of "lies and manipulation, and my father's stupidity," according to the complaint. Other notebooks showed maps of the school, how to best damage a body with a bullet and apparent timelines for when she would begin her attack, according to the complaint. Authorities also found a cardboard model that resembled the school in her room. Rupnow is scheduled to appear in court later this month for a bail hearing, and a pre-trial conference is scheduled for late September. No hearings have yet been scheduled on the motion to dismiss. If you or someone you know is dealing with suicidal thoughts, call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 988 or text "Hopeline" to the National Crisis Text Line at 741-741 Laura Schulte can be reached at leschulte@ and on X @SchulteLaura. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Lawyer for father of Abundant Life school shooter asks to dismiss case
Time Magazine
a day ago
- Time Magazine
How AT&T Customers Can File Claim in Data Breach Settlement
AT&T customers in the United States could be entitled to up to $7,500 after the telecommunications company reached a $177 million settlement over two major data breaches. The settlement is still awaiting a final green light, following the initial ruling from a federal judge in June, with an approval hearing set for Dec. 3. But eligible customers need to submit any claims ahead of that date. Here is everything you need to know about the breaches and the settlement, plus how you can file a claim. When did the AT&T data breaches occur? One breach occurred in March 2024, during which the personal information—including Social Security numbers—of around 7.6 million current account holders and 65.4 million former customers was leaked onto the dark web. Another breach was confirmed in July 2024, when AT&T said that it had become aware that hackers illegally downloaded customer data from a third-party cloud platform. The telecommunications firm said that calls and text message records that took place between May 1 and Oct. 31, 2022 were compromised for 'nearly all' cellular customers. Additionally, records from Jan. 2 2023 were compromised for a 'very small number of customers.' Regarding the breach dating back to 2022 and 2023, 'the data does not contain the content of calls or texts, personal information such as Social Security numbers, dates of birth, or other personally identifiable information,' according to AT&T. However, it's thought phone numbers could be linked to customers based on public information. Who is eligible to make a claim for a portion of the AT&T settlement? Those eligible to make a claim for one or both of the data breaches should receive an email from the address 'attsettlement@ with details on claimants' rights and options, according to Kroll Settlement Administration, the handlers of the settlement. AT&T has said that customers can claim compensation in relation to the March 2024 breach if they are a United States citizen and their personal information, including 'names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, account passcodes, billing account numbers, and Social Security numbers,' was leaked. Claimants should receive notice that they could be entitled to a settlement payment, however, if people have not been contacted but think they may still be eligible, they can call Kroll—(833) 890-4930—for further assistance. Regarding the 2022 and 2023 breach, claimants are eligible if they were an 'AT&T account owner or line/end user.' Compensation could also be available to those with 'telephone numbers with which those customers interacted.' Some claimants may also be eligible to claim against both data breaches, this is known as 'overlap settlement class members.' How you can make a claim for a portion of the AT&T settlement Claimants must submit a form via the settlement website or by mail to AT&T, whose address is available on the aforementioned website. Submissions must be made by Nov. 18, 2025. Those eligible for compensation that want to be exempt from the settlement must send a letter to Kroll requesting exclusion by Oct. 17, 2025. Details for the postal address can be found on the website's FAQ page under the section 'How do I exclude myself from the settlement?' Claimants can also file an objection if they object to the settlement and or 'the application/s for attorneys' fees, costs, and service awards' relating to the settlement. This must also be done by Oct. 17. Contact details are available on the FAQ page under the title 'How do I object to the Settlement?' When can claimants expect to receive compensation from AT&T and how much could they receive? The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for Dec. 3, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time. If approved, there could still be appeals from AT&T or other parties, which would likely delay the payment process. The roll-out of settlement payments will begin once the amounts have been approved and all appeal deadlines have expired. Claimants for the March 2024 data breach are entitled to up to $5,000. Meanwhile, up to $2,500 is available for those impacted by the data breach that took place in 2022 and 2023. Some claimants are entitled to both, and could receive up to $7,500 if their data was compromised in both breaches.
