Russia-Ukraine Talks End With Deal on POWs, No Progress on Peace
Ukraine proposed a summit of the leaders of the two countries by the end of August that should also include US President Donald Trump and Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Ukrainian delegation leader, Security and Defense Council Secretary Rustem Umerov, told reporters after the talks late Wednesday.
There's no point to a summit without first having negotiated a peace deal, Russian presidential aide Vladimir Medinsky, who led Moscow's delegation, told a news conference in response. 'It doesn't make sense to meet in order to discuss it all over again from scratch,' he said.
Medinsky said the two sides had agreed to a new exchange of about 1,200 prisoners, and Russia had also proposed returning the bodies of 3,000 Ukrainian soldiers.
While the Russian and Ukrainian negotiating 'positions are quite distant from each other,' they had agreed to continue contacts, Medinsky said. Russia proposed establishing three working groups on political issues, humanitarian questions and military matters, he said.
Umerov said Ukraine continues to insist on a full and unconditional ceasefire to allow for peace talks. It was up to Russia to demonstrate a constructive and realistic approach, he said.
Umerov and Medinsky met for direct talks ahead of the main group negotiations that lasted for less than 40 minutes.
'The ultimate aim is a ceasefire that will pave the way to peace,' Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said in televised comments at the start of the meeting. 'Turkey is ready, as ever, to support the process.'
The latest discussions took place after Trump issued a 50-day deadline for Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire, and threatened 'very severe' secondary sanctions against countries that buy Russian oil and gas if he fails to comply. Trump also said the US would send additional military aid to Ukraine including Patriot air defense systems that will be paid for by Kyiv's European allies.
Russia has unleashed record drone and missile attacks on Ukrainian cities in recent weeks, prompting Trump to accuse Putin of a lack of sincerity in diplomacy to end the war. 'He talks nice and then he bombs everybody in the evening,' Trump said.
The previous rounds of Istanbul talks between Ukraine and Russia in June and May led to exchanges of prisoners, but no progress in negotiations to end the Russian invasion that began in February 2022.
GLOBAL PREVIEW: Istanbul Talks Unlikely to Yield Ukraine Peace
Russia has rejected calls from Ukraine and its US and European allies for a ceasefire to allow for peace talks. The Kremlin is maintaining hardline demands for Kyiv to accept a neutral status and to withdraw its forces from four regions of eastern and southern Ukraine that Moscow is claiming but doesn't fully occupy.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
10 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Immigrant labour has made outsize economic contributions to the world's wealthiest countries
As anti-immigration rhetoric surges across Europe and the United States, it is vital that we look beyond the fearmongering and analyse what is really going on. While human mobility is often presented as a burden, the truth is quite the opposite. It is an essential driver of economic growth, demographic resilience and cultural cohesion. Ignoring this fact is not just a miscalculation – it flies in the face of both empirical evidence and the democratic principles that modern societies claim to defend. Migration is also not a 21st century anomaly. From the Mediterranean diasporas of antiquity to the mass migrations of the 20th century, human history has been defined by movement. City-states, colonial empires and modern nation-states have been built – and rebuilt – through the movement of people, languages, knowledge and goods. Presenting human mobility as a threat ignores this historical pattern, and tries to turn the exception – isolation – into the rule. Any political discourse that presents migrants as intruders, rather than as potential citizens or economic agents, is a dangerous distortion, not only in moral but also in strategic terms. Migration drives economies In 2016, an analysis by the McKinsey Global Institute drew some compelling conclusions. While migrants accounted for only 3.3% of the global population in 2015, they generated 9.4% of global gross domestic product that year – about $6.7 trillion. In the United States alone, their contribution amounted to about $2 trillion. More recent studies confirm this. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimated in 2024 that net migration flows to the eurozone between 2020 and 2023 – including millions of Ukrainian refugees – may raise the region's potential GDP by an additional 0.5% by 2030. This is not a marginal amount, as it represents roughly half of all expected potential growth. Without migration, Europe's economic horizon would be considerably more limited. Workers, innovation, growth In the US, more than 31 million immigrants were part of the labour market in 2023 – 19% of the total, according to the Council on Foreign Relations. Their participation rate (meaning the percentage of the working-age population that is active in the labour market) was 67%, compared to 62% of native-born workers. This difference signals a disproportionate contribution to tax revenue, domestic consumption and economic dynamism in general. Statistics also show that immigrants do not compete on a level playing field: they tend to work in physically demanding jobs, or in those that are not covered by locals. This reinforces the idea that they complement, rather than substitute, native-born workers. This role becomes even more significant in contexts of full employment or population ageing. Migration and innovation Migration brings not only workers, but also new ideas. According to the World Economic Forum, immigrants to the US are 80% more likely to start new businesses than native-born people, and more than 40% of Fortune 500 companies were founded by migrants or their descendants. This pattern is repeated in academia and technology: a significant proportion of patents filed in the United States have at least one foreign inventor. The country's leading universities also depend on international students to sustain their science, technology, engineering and mathematics programmes. In other words, closing borders means closing the door to innovation. In the European Union, their impact is no less significant. According to the 2024 IMF report, between 2019 and 2023, two thirds of new jobs were filled by non-EU migrants. These statistics refute the idea that migrants 'steal jobs'. On the contrary, they fill structural vacancies that neither automation nor the internal market has been able to fill. Moreover, the OECD warned in 2025 that if more women, older people and immigrants are not brought into the labour market, GDP per capita growth in member countries could fall from 1% per year (2000-2020) to a meagre 0.6% by 2060. Conversely, a more inclusive migration policy could add at least 0.1 percentage point to annual growth. Sending money home The 2024 World Migration Report confirmed that global remittances – immigrants sending money to family members in their country of origin – reached $831 billion in 2022, a growth of more than 650% from 2000. This far exceeds official development assistance and even, in many cases, foreign direct investment. However, they perform a similar function – remittances are mainly invested in health, education and housing. They are, in effect, a global redistribution of wealth that does not pass through any multilateral system. For the people who receive them, their impact is stabilising, and profoundly humane. Looking forwards This is not just a question of economics. When political and social rhetoric starts to exclude those perceived as outsiders, it undermines their capacity to adapt and change. Ignoring the evidence comes at a great cost, which can be summarised in three areas: Economic losses: reduced immigration means giving up a structural source of growth, innovation and fiscal sustainability. Social instability: anti-immigration discourse feeds the stigmas that fracture coexistence and weaken social cohesion. Geopolitical weakness: less immigration means losing influence in a world increasingly defined by intense competition for talent and human capital. The good news is that there are tried and tested solutions. From streamlining professional accreditation processes to regional migration coordination systems, there are already tools available to governments. The challenge is a political and, above all, narrative one. Public opinion – which is shaped by political rhetoric – needs to recognise and embrace the value of human mobility as part of our contemporary social contract. As the World Economic Forum rightly points out, migration is not a problem to be solved, but a strategic asset to be managed intelligently and humanely. To underestimate it is to undermine the foundations of global development in the 21st century.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
10 minutes ago
- First Post
Cancelled flights, blackouts, internet shutdown: The daily problems of being in a state of war
Russian airline Aeroflot cancelled dozens of flights on Tuesday after suffering a major cyberattack a day earlier. Two pro-Ukraine hacker groups claimed responsibility, saying they crippled 7,000 servers and accessed sensitive passenger and employee data. read more Russian airline Aeroflot cancelled dozens more flights on Tuesday but said it had now stabilised its schedule after a major cyberattack a day earlier. Two pro-Ukraine hacking groups claimed on Monday to have carried out a year-long operation to penetrate Aeroflot's network. They said they had crippled 7,000 servers, extracted data on passengers and employees and gained control over the personal computers of staff, including senior managers. The Interfax news agency said Aeroflot had cancelled 59 round-trip flights from Moscow on Monday out of a planned 260. It said that a further 22 flights out of Moscow and 31 into the capital were cancelled on Tuesday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Aeroflot's online timetable showed that all but one of the 22 cancelled flights out of Moscow on Tuesday had been due to leave before 10 a.m. Moscow time (0700 GMT), but the schedule for the rest of the day appeared largely unaffected. 'As of today, 93% of flights from Moscow and back are planned to be operated according to the original schedule (216 return flights out of 233),' the company said. 'Until 10:00, the company carried out selective flight cancellations, after which Aeroflot's own flight program stabilised.' Apart from the many cancellations, Monday's attack caused heavy delays to air travel across the world's biggest country and drew anger from affected passengers. Responsibility was claimed by the Belarusian Cyber Partisans, a long-established group that opposes President Alexander Lukashenko, and by a more shadowy and recent hacking outfit that calls itself Silent Crow. Russian lawmakers said the cyberattack was a wake-up call and that investigators should focus not only on the perpetrators but on those who had allowed it to happen.
NDTV
26 minutes ago
- NDTV
Counter View: A Clarification On Iran's Strategic Path And Historical Resolve
The recently published article "Snapback to Reality: On Iran's 45-Year Slog to Nowhere" presents a perspective that, while rhetorically polished, fundamentally misrepresents Iran's history, identity, and strategic choices. The Islamic Republic of Iran welcomes open discussion and diverse opinions. But narratives built on selective memory, historical erasure, and one-sided judgment do not advance peace or understanding-they reinforce entrenched injustice. The author alleges that Iran's so-called misguided policies and what he describes as "Entrenched Animosity" toward the United States and Israel are the root causes of its challenges. He claims that these policies have brought Iran into a state of crisis and isolation. According to the author, Iran must abandon its confrontational policies and transform into a "normal" actor on the international stage; otherwise, he warns, a bleak future awaits the country. He further asserts that the United States and its Western allies are prepared to invest in Iran and facilitate its transformation into a prosperous and developed nation-provided that Iran relinquishes its nuclear capabilities. Accordingly, this Embassy considers it its legitimate right and responsibility, in the interest of enlightening public opinion, to provide the following clarifications: 1. Iran's Revolution: A Demand for Dignity, Not Just Defiance The 1979 Islamic Revolution was not born out of blind hatred or ideological stubbornness. It was the collective awakening of a nation long subjected to foreign domination, coups, imposed monarchies, and the plundering of national wealth. The slogans heard then-and now-reflect a deep historical memory. They are not simply about America or Israel Per Se, but about resisting colonial arrogance, military aggression, and decades of betrayal. Unlike what the article suggests, Iran does not define itself by enmity. It defines itself by independence, sovereignty, and the pursuit of justice in a region scarred by wars, occupations, and externally backed dictatorships. The question is not why Iran resists, but why others feel entitled to demand its submission. 2. On the JCPOA and Western Commitments Iran negotiated and upheld the JCPOA-a deal verified by the International Atomic Energy Agency as fully implemented. It was the United States, under the Trump administration, that unilaterally withdrew and re-imposed sanctions without cause. Suggesting that Iran retaliated by enriching uranium ignores the timeline and the facts. Iran acted within the framework of the deal, and under the mechanisms allowed by it. Today, Iran remains open to balanced, verifiable, and respectful negotiations-but not to intimidation disguised as diplomacy. The "snapback" mechanism, now being brandished as a threat, is an instrument that was only designed to be used in case of non-compliance. Iran's patience and repeated gestures of goodwill, despite being attacked by Israel and economically strangled by illegal sanctions, are evidence of commitment to peaceful resolution. 3. The Real Choice: Not Capitulation, But Balance The article frames Iran's future as a binary between "stubbornness or survival." But realpolitik has never been that simple. Iran is not demanding war. It is demanding fairness. If the West truly wants reconciliation, it must begin by acknowledging its role in the decades of distrust, ending collective punishment through sanctions, and ceasing to judge Iran through the lens of outdated Cold War ideology. 4. Iran's Regional Role: A Stabilising Force, Not a Spoiler While Iran is criticised for supporting allies in the region, few ask why such alliances exist. Iran's support for movements in Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq, or Yemen is not imperial ambition-it is resistance against occupation, extremism, and Western-backed militarism. At every turn, Iran has called for dialogue, regional security cooperation, and a nuclear-free Middle East - a call still ignored by those shielding Israel's undeclared arsenal. If Israel strikes Iranian scientists and sovereign facilities with impunity, and then plays the victim when met with pushback, who truly undermines regional peace? In Closing: A Call for Mutual Respect Iran always welcomed negotiation, provided to be fair and equal and its rights to be respected and no nation should be expected to trade sovereignty for survival. Iran holds the wire-not because it seeks to detonate anything-but because it refuses to be silenced. The choice before the US is to treat Iran as what it is: a sovereign, ancient, capable nation seeking its rightful place in the international system-with respect, not with coercion. Iran doesn't need to be something else. It will remain what it has always been: Iran-independent, proud, and unafraid to choose its own path.
