Reddit sues AI startup Anthropic for allegedly using data without permission
June 4 (Reuters) - Reddit (RDDT.N), opens new tab sued the artificial intelligence startup Anthropic on Wednesday, accusing it of stealing data from the social media discussion website to train its AI models despite publicly assuring it wouldn't.
The complaint filed in San Francisco Superior Court is the latest battle over AI companies' alleged unauthorized use of third-party content. Anthropic's backers include Amazon.com (AMZN.O), opens new tab and Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab.
"We disagree with Reddit's claims and will defend ourselves vigorously," an Anthropic spokesperson said.
According to the complaint, Anthropic has resisted entering a licensing agreement even as it trained its Claude chatbot on Reddit content, despite assuring last July it had blocked its bots from accessing Reddit's platform.
Reddit quoted Claude admitting it was "trained on at least some Reddit data" and did not know if that content was deleted.
It also said Anthropic's bots have accessed or tried to access Reddit content more than 100,000 times, undermining the company's allegedly styling itself as an AI "white knight" committed to trust and honesty.
"Anthropic refuses to respect Reddit's guardrails and enter into a license agreement," unlike Google and OpenAI, the complaint said.
By scraping content and using it for commercial purposes, Anthropic violated Reddit's user policy and "enriched itself to the tune of tens of billions of dollars," the complaint added.
In a statement, Reddit Chief Legal Officer Ben Lee said "we believe in an open internet," but AI companies need "clear limitations" on how they use content they scrape.
Reddit and Anthropic are based in San Francisco, about a 10-minute walk from each other.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified restitution and punitive damages, and an injunction prohibiting Anthropic from using Reddit content for commercial purposes.
Anthropic introduced its newest Claude models, Opus 4 and Sonnet 4, on May 22. Overall annualized revenue has reached $3 billion, two people familiar with the matter said last week.
The case is Reddit Inc v Anthropic PBC, California Superior Court, San Francisco County, No. CGC-25-524892.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
17 minutes ago
- Sky News
Kilmar Abrego Garcia: Man wrongly deported to El Salvador returning to the US to face criminal charges
A man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador by the Trump administration is returning to the US to face criminal charges. Kilmar Abrego Garcia was charged in an indictment filed in federal court in Tennessee with conspiring to transport illegal immigrants into the US, Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Friday. The indictment was filed on 21 May, more than two months after he was deported from the US, court records have shown. In a statement, Abrego Garcia's lawyer Andrew Rossman said: "Today's action proves what we've known all along - that the administration had the ability to bring him back and just refused to do so." Abrego Garcia was deported from Maryland despite an immigration judge's 2019 order granting him protection after finding he was likely to be persecuted by gangs if he was returned there. Please refresh the page for the latest version.
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Southern California air regulators weigh a plan to phase out gas furnaces and water heaters
Air quality regulators in Southern California heard impassioned public comments Friday before an anticipated vote on proposed rules that would curb harmful emissions from gas-powered furnaces and water heaters. The rules aim to reduce emissions of smog-contributing nitrogen oxides, also called NOx, a group of pollutants linked to respiratory issues, asthma attacks, worse allergies, decreased lung function in children, premature death and more. Burning natural gas is also one of the primary drivers of climate change. The South Coast Air Quality Management District estimates that the rules, if passed, will lower NOx emissions from gas-fired furnaces, preventing about 2,490 premature deaths and 10,200 new asthma cases over a 26-year period in the region. The district regulates air quality for 16.8 million people in Southern California, including all of Orange County and large areas of Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino counties — one of the smoggiest areas in the U.S. The proposals come as California moves aggressively to reduce the state's reliance on planet-warming fossil fuels and ahead of a 2045 mandate for the state to have net-zero carbon emissions. The rules would set targets that aim to phase out the sale of gas-powered furnaces and water heaters starting in 2027. It does not apply to gas stoves. The sales target would start at 30%, then grow to 50% in 2029 and end at 90% in 2039. The rules would not be mandated, but manufacturers would have to pay fees ranging from $50 to $500 if they sell gas-powered appliances. That's a significant rollback from the original proposal, which would have required residential buildings to meet zero-emissions standards beginning in 2029 when appliances need to be replaced. The agency amended the rules after strong opposition from Southern California Gas and other businesses. The regulations would impact more than 10 million appliances in an estimated 5 million buildings, most of them residential. Officials and supporters say the rules would reduce air pollution and substantially improve public health. But opponents — including property owners, industry professionals and natural gas companies — fear they could raise costs for consumers and businesses, and strain the power grid by adding more electric appliances. During a packed board meeting Friday, clean air advocates held signs reading 'Clean Air Now," 'Vote 4 Clean Air, Vote 4 Justice" and 'Let SoCal Breath!' Before public comments, board chair Vanessa Delgado thanked the more than 200 people who signed up to speak about the rules, which took more than two years to craft. 'I don't believe that there's necessarily a good or right answer about these rules. I believe that it is very complicated and I know that every single one of these board members are doing what is right to move forward air quality goals in our region," she said. Lynwood City Councilmember Juan Muñoz-Guevara said the rules would be a long-overdue step toward environmental justice for communities like his. 'I've seen firsthand how families in my community are forced to live with the health consequences of dirty air. Our children grow up with asthma, our elders struggle with respiratory illness, and too many lives are cut short," he said. "Gas appliances in our home are one of the largest sources of smog-forming pollution in the region. We cannot meet clean air goals without tackling this.' Peggy Huang, a member of Yorba Linda's City Council, urged the board to reject the rules. 'As someone who's been advocating for affordable housing, this will increase costs for us to meet those goals,' Huang said. Chino's mayor pro tem, Curtis Burton, echoed some of Huang's concerns. He said the rules would 'create an additional financial burden on residents and businesses.' But air quality regulators say the rules would save consumers money by reducing energy bills.
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Lululemon sees stock plunge 20% as brand says it will raise prices
Lululemon's shares plunged 20 percent on Friday as the athleisure brand reels from the consequences of Trump's tariffs — and said it would up prices on some of its products. The brand — which has earnt a cult following among millennial and Gen Z exercise enthusiasts — beat Wall Street's expectations for its first quarter earnings, but cut its guidance for the rest of the year. Sales were only up 1 percent year over year, compared to the 3 percent predicted by analysts. The company said the 'dynamic macroenvironment' of tariffs and concerns about an economic downturn meant it has to readjust. This will involve 'strategic price increases' to offset the negative effects of tariffs, chief financial officer Meghan Frank told analysts on the first quarter earnings call. 'It will be price increases on a small portion of our assortments, and they will be modest in nature,' she said. The company has already faced criticism for the price of some of its items , including $128 yoga pants. The price hikes will begin within a matter of weeks, Frank added. CEO Calvin McDonald said he was 'not happy' about US growth figures and acknowledged that consumers are nervously pulling back their spending. Lululemon has been hit hard by Trump's trade policies as it sources from China, currently under a 30 percent tariff, and a range of other countries currently levied at 10 percent. Last year 40 percent of the company's products were manufactured in Vietnam, 17 percent in Cambodia and 11 percent in Sri Lanka and Indonesia respectively. Lululemon rival Gap said last week that it expects tariffs to cost its business $100 million to $150 million a year. Nike said it would also be raising prices on a wide range of products. It is not just clothing brands that have reacted to tariffs by hiking prices. Walmart revealed that it would be passing on some of the cost of tariffs to its shoppers . The grocery giant — which imports 60 percent of its goods from China — said the worst increases are still yet to come. 'The industry already has an affordability problem.' Toyota expects to pay $1.3 billion in tariff costs in April and May alone — and it's already forecasting a 20 percent drop in profits for the upcoming year.
