Australia Post addresses ‘attempted delivery' issue
For chronic online shoppers, the anticipation of an impending parcel brings a small joy that transforms an otherwise mundane day into something exciting.
However, for many 'add-to-cart' aficionados, there's an all-too-familiar scenario that can quickly dampen their mood: receiving a notification from the postie saying that they missed their delivery.
Scrolling through social media reveals countless reports of Aussies sharing their disappointment over this admittedly first-world problem, with many pointing fingers at the country's national postal service, Australia Post.
People's main frustration lies in their claim that they were definitely at home when the supposed delivery was attempted.
One woman on TikTok joked that she needed to 'take annual leave' to guarantee she's at home during the Australia Post delivery window, while another claimed that posties 'lie' about attempts to deliver so they can conduct more 'efficient' postie runs.
Now, Australia Post is addressing this issue by implementing a new feature that allows customers to receive a photo of the attempted delivery as 'proof' that it was indeed attempted.
Members of MyPost, Australia Post's free subscription service, were informed about the change via an email sent on Wednesday, with the company stating that the change will come into effect on May 19.
It read: 'The AusPost app will provide access to the attempted delivery photo our team members take when attempting delivery. We'll gradually introduce this feature over two weeks'.
Australia Post explains the move
An Australia Post spokesperson told news.com.au that the move is 'focused on improving the digital and delivery experience for our customers'.
'This initiative will enhance the transparency of when a delivery is attempted and provide customers with assurance when we can't leave the parcel at the address,' they continued.
'The process for parcel delivery remains the same. Posties and drivers are still required to knock three times as they attempt to deliver for customers.'
If the driver doesn't get a response, they will leave an attempted delivery notification, followed by an update when the parcel is ready for collection.
It is understood that Australia Post drivers have been taking photos of where they leave parcels since last year, and this new feature is just an extension of that practice that aims to minimise the number of complaints the postal service receives.
If customers don't want attempted delivery photos, they can opt out by contacting the customer service team.
Aussies weigh in on new feature
However, after word of the new feature spread online, Aussies weighed in with their thoughts – and not everyone was convinced.
'Required to knock three times, hey,' said one disgruntled Redditor, implying they don't believe posties do that.
'Doesn't say how hard they have to knock or where!' another pointed out. 'Pretty sure our guy knocks on the inside window of the van three times as he rounds the corner 200m away'.
'Going to be using a long zoom telephoto camera lens to take the photo of the door,' a third user quipped.
'I look forward to seeing a blurry image as evidence the delivery guy didn't even stop, let alone to see if I'm actually home,' a fourth added.
Others questioned if there's a way to know if the photos are legitimate if they're not timestamped and wondered if posties could use old photos taken at addresses.
Meanwhile, a few welcomed the move, with one calling it a 'positive' change that hopefully reduces missed deliveries.
'I hope this makes a difference,' someone else shared.
'I'm hoping this means they have to actually get out of the van and make an actual attempt to deliver since we can now check the photo they supposedly take …' another person said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
6 hours ago
- News.com.au
Cybersecurity risks continue to mount amid threats from nation-state hacker groups
Fortinet Australia Chief Security Officer Glenn Maiden says the risks around cybersecurity are 'very high' and are continuing to increase. Cybersecurity risks have escalated rapidly, thanks to countries like China and Russia weaponising advanced hacking groups and creating sophisticated deepfakes. Mr Maiden discusses the 'sophisticated nation-state campaigns' which have hit some of the largest companies in the world, including US telecommunication giants. In partnership with Fortinet
News.com.au
18 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Ultimately, our goal is to build a machine a soul would want to live in'
'Ultimately, our goal is to build a machine a soul would want to live in.' Those are the words of Dmytro Klochko, the CEO of one of the biggest companion AI apps in the world Replika, speaking to It's not difficult to see why many approach the AI spheres with such caution when the head of one of the largest companion AI companies is openly saying their aim is to develop a machine as appealing to the human soul as possible. It's a statement that in a way encapsulates the debate at the heart of AI; the potential for these technologies are undeniable, but without boundaries it can be as much a detriment as a tool for advancement. How do we walk the line between progress and caution? For those unfamiliar, companion AIs are digital personas designed to provide emotional support, show empathy and proactively ask users personal questions through text, voice notes and pictures. In short to be a companion, both romantically or platonically. Let's start with the positives. In Mr Klochko's own words: 'Replika isn't about replacing connection, it's about facilitating and enhancing it. Our key metrics aren't screen time, but human flourishing in all its forms. 'The 'loneliness epidemic' was here first. While we are not trying to claim that Replika is the perfect cure or remedy for it, we are trying to build a safe place for people to be seen, heard, and felt. 'In the right context, AI companions can be a powerful bridge, not a barrier, to human connection.' In the right context. It's precisely that context which worries Associate Director and Senior Lecturer in the ANU School of Cybernetics Jessamy Perriam. 'It's very interesting to make a claim that they want to make something that a soul would want to live in because that makes some massive assumptions that they have an understanding of what the soul is. 'From reading some of their online materials and watching some of the videos that they've placed online as marketing material or further information, you do get a sense that they want people who use this technology to form intimate bonds or close connections with them.' Dr Perriam believes it's a 'very interesting thing' to try to achieve when what is running the program is a large language model (LLM). LLMs work by predicting the next likely word or phrase in a sentence and feeding that back to users and Dr Perriam said that even though Replika likely has a very sophisticated LLM, LLMs fundamentally 'can't really do intimacy or be spontaneous'. 'My concern is it can set unrealistic expectations of day-to-day relationships. They're promising someone who's available at the top of a screen, whereas in real life, you quite often get impatient at your friends because they haven't texted you back straight away. 'It's setting up that behaviour to have all that expectation of people. We're people, we're not perfect. We can't promise that to one another.' Companion AI expert and senior lecturer at the University of Sydney Dr Raffaele Ciriello said: 'On the one hand, you can't deny the promise of these technologies because the healthcare system is strained. So many people are lonely, one in four are regularly lonely. 'Therapists can't keep up with the demand and Replika kind of comes into that space, but the risks and the damages are already visible.' Dr Ciriello believes 'the loneliness pandemic' has at least partially been created by the internet, but it's difficult to see practically how AI chat bots will help to alleviate the problem. 'It's in part because everything has moved online and interactions are less physical, that we are often struggling to have real human connections,' he said. 'It's hard for me to see how AI chat bots will make that better. If anything, they're probably going to make it worse if they serve as a replacement for human interaction.' Dr Cireiello added that the profit model under which Replika and similar apps currently run under is 'fundamentally at odds with the care imperative in healthcare' but praised the company for taking on board public feedback. '[Replika] are trying to move away from their original image as this romantic erotic partner and into the wellbeing space. They're now focusing more on using this as a tool for flourishing, as they call it, mental wellbeing and so on. 
 'And I've got to give them credit, they are evolving in response to their user community and also in response to some of the political and public backlash that they have sparked.' The most public example of such backlash was a software update in early 2025 which abruptly changed user's bots' personalities, so that their responses seemed hollow and scripted, and rejected any sexual overtures. Longstanding Replika users flocked to subreddits to share their experiences. Many described their intimate companions as 'lobotomised'. 'My wife is dead,' one user wrote. Another replied: 'They took away my best friend too.' Ultimately it's a space still racked with uncertainty, but both Dr Cireiello and Dr Perriam encouraged those who are using or considering using companion AIs to think carefully on topics such as; why and how they want to use the program, what they want to get out of it, the potential drawbacks and limitations and how your private data will be shared and stored.
ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
Grape growers trial disease-fighting robots as wine industry struggles with rising costs
Wine grape growers grappling with declining sales and rising expenses hope advancements in autonomous technology can help to safeguard the industry. Global wine consumption has dropped considerably over the last two decades and the increasing cost of chemicals and a labour shortage have put vineyards under pressure. But it is hoped technological breakthroughs will provide economic and environmental solutions. Agri Automation is collaborating with Wine Australia to trial a device that uses a form of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, rather than chemicals, to treat vineyard diseases. The method involves a self-driving vehicle travelling between the vines and exposing them to UV-C with an electronic device. Agri Automation managing director Cam Clifford said UV-C was most effective when applied at night. "It works by destroying the DNA of the [diseased] cell, so it will damage it to a point that it can't rebuild itself," he said. "Once those cells are broken down … they can't rebuild themselves, which essentially controls the disease, as opposed to applying agrochemicals. Traditionally, fungicides, pesticides and herbicides are applied to crops to protect plants and grapes, which requires a number of workers and can take multiple days. Reducing the use of chemicals has been linked with improved outcomes for biodiversity, as well as improved water, soil and food quality. Similar technology is being trialled in New Zealand and the United Kingdom. The technology has been put on display at the Department of Primary Industries Regional Development research station in Orange, New South Wales. Tamburlaine Organic Wines vineyard manager Boris Ostini says it could have an extremely positive impact for vignerons. "It is getting harder to find decent vineyard workers," he said. "This makes the management of what you are trying to control easier … you can do it when you need to get it done, sometimes in the rain, hail or shine. "It will definitely help out with the profitability and the impact of disease." Tamburlaine is certified as an organic winery that does not use fungicides, pesticides and herbicides. Mr Ostini said reducing chemical use created an opportunity to attract new buyers. "It will help with the marketing side of things," he said. Growers are also using technology to Identify whether vines are diseased and need to be sprayed. Australian start-up BioScout has created a device that scans the air in a vineyard for pathogens every 12 hours. The data collected is automatically scanned and artificial intelligence is used to identify whether diseases are present in the crop. BioScout's Charles Simons said the system removed the "guess work" for growers deciding when to apply chemicals. "It gives them the amount of spores and also tells them the severity of the infection, so they can make time decisions on spray applications," he said. "You look at the environment and you look at the crop and you make the decision on gut-feel … yet you don't know what the pathogens are, which is the missing link." Mr Simons said the technology would help to reduce the use of chemicals over time. "Vineyards are blanket-spraying applications for powder and downy mildew … that is not very good for the environment," he said.
