
How This City's Private Sector Is Rewriting The Rules Of Public Art
In a city celebrated for its cultural diversity, Toronto's most compelling art experiences are increasingly unfolding far beyond traditional museums and galleries. They pulse through the rush of commuters at Union Station, resonate in the bustling corridors of suburban shopping malls, and transform sterile office plazas into destinations. This shift isn't accidental – it's driven by a pioneering coalition of private sector giants and grassroots arts organizers who are proving that commerce and culture, far from being at odds, can create vibrant, accessible, and deeply meaningful artistic encounters for millions.
Fueled by a potent blend of civic vision, community accountability, and savvy business strategy, companies like Osmington Inc. (managing Toronto's iconic Union Station) and Oxford Properties (one of Canada's largest real estate developers) are partnering with innovative curators like MakeRoom Inc., and community organization The Remix Project, to democratize art access and amplify underrepresented voices. The result? A blueprint for how corporations can authentically integrate art into the daily fabric of urban life.
In partnership with Union Station, MakeRoom Inc. curated "A Transit Through Time" for the West Wing ... More of Union.
When Osmington Inc. won the fiercely competitive bid to manage Union Station's retail and programming over a decade ago, Vice President Syma Shah described a profound sense of duty. "Osmington felt it was their civic duty to make Union Station a destination," she explains. "We wanted it world-class and accessible for all." The initial vision involved partnerships with giants like The Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) and the Toronto Symphony Orchestra (TSO).
But Shah, drawing on her experience producing major festivals like North America's largest South Asian festival, Masala! Mehndi! Masti!, knew authentic connection required deeper roots. The challenge? Union is first and foremost a regulated, heritage-designated transportation hub handling 300,000 people daily. "It's a very different beast," Shah notes. "You can't just hang art everywhere."
Her team literally walked the station "like a palette," identifying spots where art could be safe, respected, seen, and wouldn't compromise heritage elements – a process demanding close collaboration with the City of Toronto, the building's owner. Osmington quickly recognized authentic representation required trusted partnerships. "I'm a woman of color of South Asian origin, but I can't program something like Black art authentically myself. That should come from within that community," Shah emphasizes.
A Transit Through Time opening at Union (l to r): Rico Poku, Segun Caezar, Heritier Bilaka, Destinie ... More Adélakun, Camille Kiffin, Pixel Heller, Trevor Twells, Jordan Sook, Wan Lucas
This led to transformative collaborations with organizations like MakeRoom Inc., the Nia Centre, and the Gord Downie & Chanie Wenjack Fund, the latter of which ensured Indigenous artists worked with Indigenous curators on exhibitions like 2023's "We Are Still Here." The approach involves setting clear parameters for artists: respecting the space's functional realities and heritage status—no foul language or nudity—while encouraging stories tied to the themes of transit, connection, and community. Exhibits launch during heritage months but extend far beyond – Black History Month in February leads to exhibitions showcased nearly year-round, funded partly through sponsorships like TD Bank.
The impact is personal. Shah recounts the story of Black mature artist Gloria C. Swain, whose image was used in artist Anique Jordan's Mas' at 94 Chestnut as part of the city's 2021-2022 cohort of public art initiative ArtworxTO. Exhibited at Union Station, the photo was vandalized with a racist slave collar drawing. "Sorry isn't enough," Shah states. Osmington and MakeRoom responded by featuring Swain as the highlighted artist in the 2023 exhibition I Am Still Here. "It was meaningful to her, not only as a Black person, but as a senior artist, to say 'I am still here,'" Shah says. "Every exhibition is like that. We ensure their story is told, and every year it's elevated."
BigArtTO projects art onto buildings in partnership with MakeRoom Inc.
Trevor Twells, founder of MakeRoom Inc., is a key partner for Union and others. His organization exists to dismantle the nepotism and gatekeeping pervasive in the art world. "Our mission is platforming marginalized and underrepresented voices," Twells states. 'What makes us different is radical transparency and accountability.' MakeRoom Inc. operates on strict principles, including open calls with pre-determined themes but never pre-selected artists.
"All our public exhibits are open call," Twells states unequivocally. "Artists know exactly how much they're getting paid, and know exactly what criteria they're selected from. We don't care who you know or your prior experience so much as about the art submitted for the theme."
Mature artist Gloria C. Swain speaking at the "I Am Here: Black Joy Is Resistance" Exhibit In Union. ... More She's flanked on either side by (l) Adetona Omokanye and MakeRoom Inc. founder Trevor Twells (r).
MakeRoom Inc. built its own digital platforms for submissions and partners with community artists and curators to jury the work, ensuring diverse perspectives select the art. According to Twells, Union has been an ideal partner precisely because they embraced this ethos. Through exhibitions sponsored by TD and co-curated in partnership with MakeRoom, Twells has been given carte blanche on projects. 'They understood we needed full transparency, open calls, and their involvement was just helping with the jury process," says Twells. This alignment allowed for powerful, year-round exhibitions. Theodore Walker Robinson's large-scale Braille transcription of the Langston Hughes poem 'Dreams' as part of 2024 exhibition Black Dreams and Aspirations comes to mind, as does the currently running A Transit Through Time, celebrating the legacy and creativity of Black communities, alongside featured artist Jordan Sook's butterfly-themed Nothing More, Nothing Less. "Union isn't just Black-washing for February. The work is up two-thirds of the year," Twells notes, countering superficial diversity efforts.
The human impact is Twells' driving force. "Seeing a little Black girl looking up at artwork featuring someone like her... that felt transformational." MakeRoom intentionally focuses on joy and possibility alongside historical narratives. "It's well-received to focus on Black joy because people see themselves represented without the trauma porn aspect often presented through a white colonial lens." He's even been asked to give tours of MakeRoom exhibits at Union, more proof people are visiting the station specifically for the art.
Curated work courtesy The Remix Project at Scarborough Town Centre featuring artists Isa Rocha, ... More Chawntay Barrett, Laneigh Ramirez, Lakia Sage, Amaiah Alexis, Rod Osei, MJ Shimaka, and Glo Romy.
While Union transforms a transit hub, Oxford Properties is reimagining the suburban shopping mall and Toronto's office towers. Daniel O'Donnell, Senior VP of Corporate Affairs, articulates a clear philosophy: "We want our buildings, especially our shopping centers, to be like the town square — not just for commerce, but for socializing, connection, and experiencing culture. Art is integral to that."
Their flagship initiative was with The Remix Project, a Toronto-based organization that provides mentorship and professional training to budding artists 16 to 24 years of age. This started at suburban malls including Scarborough Town Centre, Square One, Yorkdale, and offices in Toronto's downtown financial district. "These malls are the downtown for their communities," O'Donnell explains. "Scarborough Town Centre is where people hang out and meet friends. Putting art there feels authentic because it's genuinely part of their community asset."
Jaume Plensa's "Dreaming" sculpture outside Oxford Properties Richmond-Adelaide Centre in Toronto's ... More Financial district.
Oxford leverages its colossal audience — 54 million visitors across its three suburban malls in 2023 and 2024 — to offer artists unprecedented visibility and career support. "It's a win-win," O'Donnell stresses. "It keeps the customer experience fresh, allows people to see themselves represented, and provides artists a huge platform. Who knows what connection or sale it might spark?" Beyond space, Oxford also provides direct financial support for equipment and materials that help young artists and creatives in their career pursuits.
The power of art to transform is evident in projects like Spanish artist Jaume Plensa's "Dreaming" sculpture at Oxford's Richmond Adelaide Centre. "Before, it was just a terrace in the financial core," O'Donnell recalls. "Now, it attracts thousands daily." He highlights the deliberate juxtaposition: Plensa's modern sculpture alongside the historic, publicly accessible Group of Seven painter J.E.H. MacDonald's mural nearby. "Art creates a sense of place and elevates us from the mundane while creating a sense of community and connection."
Celebrating the beginning of National Indigenous History month by opening the Toronto Stock Exchange ... More with drummers and hoop, grass and jingle dress dancers.
Despite operating in different spaces—transit hubs, curated pop-ups, sprawling malls — Shah, Twells, and O'Donnell champion core principles driving this movement's success. Authentic partnerships over tokenism, with corporations ceding significant curatorial control to trusted community organizations. A way of working authentically that isn't about checking boxes, or having one-sided conversations. Toronto's private sector, guided by passionate leaders and grassroots partners, is proving that supporting art is far more than corporate philanthropy. Enhanced brand value, deeper community connection, enriched customer experiences, and the profound satisfaction of empowering diverse voices are driving this movement.
Most importantly, it brings art directly to where people already are—in the rush of their commute, the routine of their shopping, the lunch break in a financial district. It democratizes access and proves that culture doesn't just thrive behind the white walls of institutions, but also the vibrant, everyday tapestry of the city. When the private sector makes genuine, respectful space for art, where gallery walls vanish and the city becomes the canvas, everyone wins.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
With 65% institutional ownership, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:RIGL) is a favorite amongst the big guns
Key Insights Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Rigel Pharmaceuticals' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions 51% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. To get a sense of who is truly in control of Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:RIGL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 65% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Rigel Pharmaceuticals. Check out our latest analysis for Rigel Pharmaceuticals What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rigel Pharmaceuticals? Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. We can see that Rigel Pharmaceuticals does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Rigel Pharmaceuticals' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 15% of Rigel Pharmaceuticals shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.7% of shares outstanding. Armistice Capital LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 8.5% of common stock, and Morgan Stanley, Investment Banking and Brokerage Investments holds about 8.3% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Raul Rodriguez is the owner of 0.8% of the company's shares. We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. Insider Ownership Of Rigel Pharmaceuticals While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$5.5m worth of the US$392m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. General Public Ownership With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Rigel Pharmaceuticals. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. Next Steps: It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Rigel Pharmaceuticals better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Rigel Pharmaceuticals that you should be aware of before investing here. If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
STERIS (NYSE:STE) Will Pay A Larger Dividend Than Last Year At $0.63
STERIS plc's (NYSE:STE) periodic dividend will be increasing on the 26th of September to $0.63, with investors receiving 11% more than last year's $0.57. Despite this raise, the dividend yield of 1.0% is only a modest boost to shareholder returns. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. STERIS' Payment Could Potentially Have Solid Earnings Coverage It would be nice for the yield to be higher, but we should also check if higher levels of dividend payment would be sustainable. Before making this announcement, STERIS was easily earning enough to cover the dividend. This means that most of what the business earns is being used to help it grow. Looking forward, earnings per share is forecast to rise by 59.3% over the next year. If the dividend continues on this path, the payout ratio could be 26% by next year, which we think can be pretty sustainable going forward. See our latest analysis for STERIS STERIS Has A Solid Track Record The company has a sustained record of paying dividends with very little fluctuation. Since 2015, the dividend has gone from $0.92 total annually to $2.28. This implies that the company grew its distributions at a yearly rate of about 9.5% over that duration. Companies like this can be very valuable over the long term, if the decent rate of growth can be maintained. We Could See STERIS' Dividend Growing The company's investors will be pleased to have been receiving dividend income for some time. We are encouraged to see that STERIS has grown earnings per share at 5.2% per year over the past five years. Growth in EPS bodes well for the dividend, as does the low payout ratio that the company is currently reporting. We Really Like STERIS' Dividend Overall, a dividend increase is always good, and we think that STERIS is a strong income stock thanks to its track record and growing earnings. Earnings are easily covering distributions, and the company is generating plenty of cash. Taking this all into consideration, this looks like it could be a good dividend opportunity. Market movements attest to how highly valued a consistent dividend policy is compared to one which is more unpredictable. At the same time, there are other factors our readers should be conscious of before pouring capital into a stock. As an example, we've identified 1 warning sign for STERIS that you should be aware of before investing. Looking for more high-yielding dividend ideas? Try our collection of strong dividend payers. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's How Long $1 Million in Retirement Savings Will Last You After Age 70
How long $1 million in retirement savings will last as a 70-year-old depends on a number of factors, including where you live, what type of lifestyle you lead, how healthy you are and how much insurance coverage you have. Here's a look at how these factors affect how long your savings will last, using Bureau of Labor Statistics data regarding average expenses in that age group. Check Out: Read Next: BLS Statistics The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics conducts an annual survey of the average annual expenditures of Americans across various age groups. The most recent data, for the year 2023, shows that Americans 65 and older — of which 70-year-olds are obviously a part — spent an average of $60,087 for the year. Using a straight mathematical average, this would suggest that for the average 70-year-old, $1 million would last approximately 16.64 years, or until they are nearly 87. Watch Out: How Health and Insurance Play a Role Generally speaking, healthcare costs increase after you retire. Even if you consider yourself relatively healthy, there's no telling how many injuries, illnesses or chronic conditions you may have to deal with as you get older. While genetics and personal lifestyle choices can prolong your life, there are no guarantees when it comes to health. Obviously, frequent trips to doctors and hospitals can quickly add to your expenses, shortening the duration of your $1 million. This is one of the reasons why good health insurance is essential in terms of the survival of your $1 million nest egg. If you have to pay out of pocket for your healthcare as you age, you could quickly increase that 'average' $60,087 annual spend to $100,000 or more, rapidly depleting your savings. Another factor to consider is that if you actually remain healthy and live a long life, you'll need to stretch that $1 million in retirement savings even further. A nest egg that only lasts for 17 years after average spending won't do you much good if you're going to live 30 years or more in retirement. In that scenario, you'll either need to boost your savings or learn how to live off less. Budgeting and Lifestyle Factors The way you live your life can have a huge effect on how long your money will last in retirement. Assuming an 'average' lifestyle, a pot of $1 million would last you about 17 years. But few retirees living in Manhattan, for example, could get by on $5,000 per month, even if they consider themselves frugal. In that scenario, $1 million may only last 10 years or less. But if you live a simple life in a rural community in Mississippi, for example, your money might last 30 years or more. The key to making your retirement savings last is to create a realistic budget. It's this simple — if you can live well beneath your means, then your $1 million will last longer. If you live a rockstar lifestyle, it will last less. The Importance of Investment Returns Very few people with $1 million simply keep it 'under a mattress,' or in an account that doesn't earn any interest. At the very least, most people with seven-figure account values keep that money in a low-risk, low-return investment like a high-yield savings account or a U.S. Treasury bill. Those with a bit more risk tolerance may keep some or even all of that amount potentially higher-yielding investments like intermediate-term bonds or dividend-paying stocks. Either way, it's highly likely that by taking on even a little bit of risk you can earn much more than 0% on your $1 million nest egg in retirement — and with higher returns, you can greatly extend the life of your nest egg. As shown above, it would take roughly 17 years for the average 70-year-old American to spend $1 million. But if you could earn even a 3% return on the $1 million, it could instead last for about 21 years. Boosting that return to 6% would nearly double the time that your money would last, to over 33 years. This simple example shows the immense power of investment returns when it comes to the longevity of your nest egg. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement This article originally appeared on Here's How Long $1 Million in Retirement Savings Will Last You After Age 70 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data