Pentagon drawing up quick reaction force of National Guard ready to quell civil unrest at any moment: report
The plan, reported by the Washington Post, for a "Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force" calls for 600 troops on standby at all times, ready to deploy in as little as one hour, The troops would reportedly be split into two groups of 300, stationed at military bases in Alabama and Arizona.
The documents, reportedly prepared for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth by policy chief Elbridge Colby, outline a "predecisional" idea.
"The Department of Defense is a planning organization and routinely reviews how the department would respond to a variety of contingencies across the globe," a defense official told Fox News Digital. " We will not discuss these plans through leaked documents, pre-decisional or otherwise."
Trump has already deployed the military for domestic purposes, first in Los Angeles in June, sending 5,000 National Guard members and Marines to tamp down anti-immigration enforcement riots. On Monday, he deployed 800 D.C. National Guard troops to support law enforcement in Washington, D.C., in cracking down on violent crime.
The administration has also sent thousands of troops to the southern border in a show of force to discourage illegal immigration.
The administration would rely on Title 32, a status in which the National Guard operates under the command of a state governor but is funded by the federal government, according to the Post. The authority is typically used for domestic missions, such as responding to natural disasters. When deployed under Title 32, Guard members may be granted limited law enforcement powers. A section of the U.S. Code allows the commander in chief to bypass certain restrictions on using the military for domestic purposes.
The troops, from the Army and Air Force National Guard, would be outfitted with weapons and riot gear and receive training for the mission.
The quick reaction teams would work on 90-day rotations to "limit burnout."
The documents also laid out potential negative implications of the idea: questions about appropriate civil-military balance and legal considerations, budget and logistical constraints, and reduced availability for local emergency missions.
The National Guard first tested the concept of a reaction force ahead of the 2020 election, when 60 troops in Arizona and Alabama were told to be on alert and ready to deploy to respond to political violence. The Guard deployed to numerous locations to respond to protests in the wake of George Floyd's death.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
27 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Live updates: Federal agents will patrol Washington 24/7
The increased presence of local and federal law enforcement officers in Washington, D.C. has intensified in the days following President Donald Trump's unprecedented announcement that his administration would take over the city's police department for at least a month. For two days, small groups of federal officers had been visible in scattered areas of the city, but more were present in high-profile locations on Wednesday, setting up at least one vehicle checkpoint in a busy corridor that drew hecklers. Troops are expected to start more missions in Washington on Thursday, according to a National Guard spokesman who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the planning process. Update: Date: 2025-08-14 12:20:00 Title: Ask AP reporters a question Content: Update: Date: 2025-08-14 12:03:43 Title: Catch up on the latest headlines Content: AP Morning Wire curates the most important stories and sends them straight to your inbox. Sign up for the free newsletter here.
New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Live Updates: Federal Deployment Ramps Up in D.C.
President Trump made a show of force in Washington, D.C., this week, exercising his unique powers over the nation's capital to commandeer the city's police force, deploy the National Guard and send hundreds of federal law enforcement agents into the city in what he described as an effort to combat crime. It is the first time a president has used a declared emergency to wrest control of the city's police, a step that its mayor said was 'unsettling' though allowed under the law. Congress and the executive branch have long exerted controls over the city's budget and other decisions. But the president's move may represent the biggest encroachment on the city's autonomy since it was granted home rule 52 years ago. While crime is a concern for many residents, the situation on the ground differs from Mr. Trump's hyperbolic statements in justifying the moves: Official data shows that crime is falling — particularly violent crime, which hit a 30-year low last year — after surging during the pandemic. Mr. Trump, who has stoked fears of violent crimes in America's cities going back more than 35 years, delivered increasingly dire threats after returning to office in January that if he was not satisfied with the city's efforts to combat crime, he would order a federal takeover of Washington — in effect dissolving the local government to rule it directly. Mr. Trump took his first firm steps in that direction last week, after a prominent young administration official was beaten by a mob of young assailants in an attempted carjacking in Washington. Here's what to know. What is Trump doing on law enforcement in Washington? And how is he able to do it? In the span of a week, Mr. Trump rapidly ratcheted up moves going over the heads of D.C. leaders. He has invoked his authority in overseeing federal law enforcement and a 1973 law that gives the president the power to take temporary control of the city's police. He ordered a surge of roughly 500 federal agents into the city beginning last Friday, after the beating of Edward Coristine — an operative of the Department of Government Efficiency — that week. Then on Monday, Mr. Trump used a provision of the D.C. Home Rule Act, the law that established a local government and granted the city limited autonomy, to temporarily take over the Metropolitan Police Department, the city's main police force. A White House official said the current takeover would last 30 days, the maximum outlined in the law before the president must seek an extension of that authority through Congress. Mr. Trump has expressed interest in seeking such an extension. What powers do federal agents have on city patrols? On Tuesday, National Guard troops began to deploy in Washington for the first time since 2020, when Mr. Trump ordered a crackdown on Black Lives Matter protests in the city. Unlike the 50 states, D.C. does not control its National Guard unit and has little ability to push back against a federal deployment, as Gov. Gavin Newsom of California did earlier this year. About a dozen troops were spotted on the National Mall on Tuesday as others gathered at the D.C. Armory, the headquarters of the D.C. National Guard. The initial deployment near the Washington Monument was a far cry from the aggressive policing carried out by the D.C. Guard in 2020. The troops were seen snapping photos of themselves with visitors, and left roughly two hours after they arrived. One complicating factor of using federal agents to patrol Washington is that those agents do not have the same authority as police officers to arrest people for minor criminal offenses. Trump administration officials have suggested that if federal agents see someone commit such a crime, they can stop and detain the person until a local police officer arrives and makes an arrest. City officials have said the National Guard troops would not have the authority to make arrests, as the use of the military for civilian law enforcement is limited by the Constitution. Mayor Muriel Bowser of Washington said this week that the president 'has the authority, by virtue of the statute, to request services.' But she said city officials retained the authority to hire and fire people in the Police Department. She added that the police chief would work 'hand in hand with the people that the president has designated.' Could Trump fully take over D.C.? Even before the current crisis, Mr. Trump held a significant amount of control over D.C. The president nominates the city's judges and top prosecutor. Much of the City Council's powers to make laws and plan the annual budget is also subject to congressional oversight. Mr. Trump in effect exercised his presidential powers to set aside some of the city's autonomy, declaring a public safety emergency and temporarily commandeering the city's police force. In theory, Mr. Trump could go further, with the approval of the Republican-controlled Congress. Lawmakers could extend the emergency, keeping the police under Mr. Trump's authority for the duration. Mr. Trump may also be able to keep the National Guard and other federal agents deployed in the city indefinitely. In California, a fraction of the Guard force that Mr. Trump had federalized is still operating under federal control months after being called up. He could also direct federal units to more forcefully police the city, using tear gas, riot gear, armored vehicles, low-flying aircraft and other aggressive tools and tactics. The White House had previously said that federal agents in the city would be 'identified, in marked units, and highly visible,' but those restrictions are not mandated by law, and those units could quickly shift to crack down on city residents. The most extreme — and most unlikely — outcome is that Mr. Trump calls on Congress to repeal the D.C. Home Rule Act. That would dissolve the local government and place the city directly under federal control. The city's 700,000 residents — more than the population of Vermont or Wyoming — would lose the ability to elect their mayor and local council members. Mr. Trump has in recent months expressed support for a federal takeover, and Republicans in both the House and the Senate have introduced legislation to do so. But the chances of those laws passing are still very low. Under current Senate rules, such a law would need 60 votes to advance, and there are only 53 Republicans in the Senate. Has something like this happened before? Mr. Trump is the first president to use a declared emergency to wrest control of D.C.'s police. But federal police and the military have previously been deployed in the city, most recently during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob. Mr. Trump had also deployed the National Guard to Washington in 2020 as part of a crackdown on racial justice protests after the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. The D.C. Guard was at the forefront of that deployment, which was widely seen as a debacle at the time. Mr. Trump had also considered a deployment of active-duty military units like the 82nd Airborne, and senior Army leaders warned National Guard officers that Army units would replace them on the ground if they were insufficiently aggressive in controlling the protests. There have been other encroachments on the city's autonomy during home rule. Before this week, the most significant was a financial control board, established by Congress in 1995 to steer the city out of a fiscal crisis.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Blue cities in Trump's crosshairs after DC police takeover
As President Donald Trump looks to crack down on crime within Washington, D.C., by sending in federal law enforcement to patrol the city, data reveals the nation's capital is plagued by violent crime when compared to other metropolitan areas around the country. In a news conference Monday, Trump announced he is planning to deploy members of the National Guard to the city's streets while taking control of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) in an effort to restore safety and combat violence. "You can be anything you want, but you want to have safety in the streets," Trump said. "You want to be able to leave your apartment or your house where you live and feel safe and go into a store to buy a newspaper or buy something, and you don't have that now." The move comes as the nation's capital "averaged one of the highest robbery and murder rates of large cities nationwide," according to an executive order, "Declaring a Crime Emergency in the District of Columbia." "Indeed, the District of Columbia now has a higher violent crime, murder, and robbery rate than all 50 states, recording a homicide rate in 2024 of 27.54 per 100,000 residents," the order states. In 2024, Washington D.C. placed fourth among 24 of the nation's cities when comparing homicide rates per 100,000 citizens, according to a report conducted by the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT). "The recent increase of federal law enforcement officers across Washington, D.C., has already stopped vicious criminals, the distribution of deadly narcotics and the violent use of stolen handguns," a White House spokesperson said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "President Trump's bold leadership and decisive action will make our nation's capital beautiful and safe again for its residents and visitors from all the world. The president's efforts to crack down on crime is an incredibly popular policy that everyday Americans support." St. Louis, New Orleans and Detroit accounted for more homicides per capita, the study reported. When compared to other major metropolitan cities, Washington D.C.'s homicide rate remained exceptionally high when placed alongside New York City's rate of and Los Angeles' rate, according to RIT. MPD did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. While Trump's ability to utilize the MPD is unique to the nation's capital, federal law enforcement could integrate into other cities with high crime rates utilizing consent decrees, according to former NYPD Lt. Darrin Porcher. "That's when the federal government comes in, and they review a police department," Porcher told Fox News Digital. "And they'll make a series of recommendations based on what the police department is not doing." Porcher pointed to the ability of federal law enforcement to collaborate with local authorities in crime-ridden cities in an effort to reform a department's response to violence. "A lot of task force activity would be the key component," Porcher said. "So, what the feds can do is send a series of FBI, DEA or ATF agents to a particular city, and they would be a part of a task force that works with the localized police departments. The resources would bridge together from both the city and the federal government to target the excessive crimes that are being committed in that particular area, whether it's homicides, robberies, burglaries." Despite the higher-than-average rates, the homicide rate within Washington, D.C., dropped 35% when compared to 2023, marking the lowest violent crime rates the city has seen in 30 years, according to the Department of Justice. "In addition to the overall violent crime reduction, homicides are down 32%," the DOJ said in a news release. "Robberies are down 39%; armed carjackings are down 53%; assaults with a dangerous weapon are down 27% when compared with 2023 levels, with the District reporting the fewest assaults with dangerous weapons and burglaries in over 30 years." However, residents within the nation's capital insist the move by the Trump administration is a step in the right direction. "This is something I think that's been long overdue," Jenn Pellegrino, chief spokesperson of America First Policy Institute, told Fox News Digital. "If you walk around our nation's capital, which sees over 20 million visitors from all around the world every year, this is a lot of people's first impression of what the United States of America is like." Pellegrino has been living in Washington, D.C., for 15 years and has become disheartened by the state of the city she calls home. "While the left is saying that there's nothing to see here, that the White House is overreacting to this situation, it's about how people feel," Pellegrino said. "They can say that the crime stats are down, which some are, but some are rising, like carjacking. People don't feel safe, and something needs to be done to address that." Although instances of violent crime within Washington, D.C. are down when compared to 2023, reports of incidents involving property remain either relatively stagnant or trending upward. "I think that there is a significant need for crime reduction in a lot of these large cities, such as Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, Washington, D.C.," Porcher said. In 2025, property crime within the city is down by 4%, according to the MPD. Additionally, there have already been 2,926 reports of motor vehicle theft logged this year, approaching last year's total of 2,940. "It's time to get tough on some of the smaller crimes to prevent the more violent crimes that have been going on in the city," Pellegrino said. "Because, honestly, if you walk around D.C., even in the middle of the daytime [or] a weekday, you've got to have your head on a swivel." Pellegrino hopes the Trump administration's efforts will set a standard for other cities grappling with crime throughout the country, while ensuring the nation's capital is a safe place to visit, live and work. "These violent crimes can happen to anybody," Pellegrino told Fox News Digital. "They don't discriminate based on your politics. And, again, whether you're a tourist coming to visit or you're somebody that's lived here, or you just work in the city, we deserve better than that. This is the United States of America. It's the greatest country on Earth. Our nation's capital should represent something better than the standard it's been held to over the last several years."
