logo
US and Iran have a long, complicated history, spanning far beyond Israel's strikes on Tehran

US and Iran have a long, complicated history, spanning far beyond Israel's strikes on Tehran

News2413 hours ago

Jeffrey Fields reflects on significant events in US-Iran relations, highlighting the differences between the two countries and showing where opportunities for reconciliation were lost.
Relations between the United States and Iran have been fraught for decades – at least since the US helped overthrow a democracy-minded prime minister, Mohammed Mossadegh, in August 1953.
The US then supported the long, repressive reign of the Shah of Iran, whose security services brutalised Iranian citizens for decades.
The two countries have been particularly hostile to each other since Iranian students took over the US Embassy in Tehran in November 1979, resulting in economic sanctions and the severing of formal diplomatic relations between the nations.
Since 1984, the US State Department has listed Iran as a ' state sponsor of terrorism,' alleging the Iranian government provides terrorists with training, money and weapons.
Some of the major events in US-Iran relations highlight the differences between the nations' views, but others arguably presented real opportunities for reconciliation.
1953: US overthrows Mossadegh
In 1951, the Iranian Parliament chose a new prime minister, Mossadegh, who then led lawmakers to vote in favour of taking over the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, expelling the company's British owners and saying they wanted to turn oil profits into investments in the Iranian people.
The US feared disruption in the global oil supply and worried about Iran falling prey to Soviet influence. The British feared the loss of cheap Iranian oil.
President Dwight Eisenhower decided it was best for the US and the UK to get rid of Mossadegh.
Operation Ajax, a joint CIA-British operation, convinced the Shah of Iran, the country's monarch, to dismiss Mossadegh and drive him from office by force. Mossadegh was replaced by a much more Western-friendly prime minister, handpicked by the CIA.
1979: Revolutionaries oust the shah, take hostages
After more than 25 years of relative stability in US-Iran relations, the Iranian public had grown unhappy with the social and economic conditions that developed under the dictatorial rule of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
Pahlavi enriched himself and used American aid to fund the military while many Iranians lived in poverty. Dissent was often violently quashed by SAVAK, the shah's security service.
In January 1979, the shah left Iran, ostensibly to seek cancer treatment. Two weeks later, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini returned from exile in Iraq and led a drive to abolish the monarchy and proclaim an Islamic government.
Iranian students at the US Embassy in Tehran show a blindfolded American hostage to the crowd in November 1979.
In October 1979, President Jimmy Carter agreed to allow the shah to come to the US to seek advanced medical treatment.
Outraged Iranian students stormed the US Embassy in Tehran on 4 November, taking 52 Americans hostage. That convinced Carter to sever US diplomatic relations with Iran on 7 April, 1980.
Two weeks later, the US military launched a mission to rescue the hostages, but it failed, with aircraft crashes killing eight US servicemembers.
The shah died in Egypt in July 1980, but the hostages weren't released until 20 January, 1981, after 444 days of captivity.
1980-1988: US tacitly sides with Iraq
In September 1980, Iraq invaded Iran, an escalation of the two countries' regional rivalry and religious differences: Iraq was governed by Sunni Muslims but had a Shia Muslim majority population; Iran was led and populated mostly by Shiites.
The US was concerned that the conflict would limit the flow of Middle Eastern oil and wanted to ensure the conflict didn't affect its close ally, Saudi Arabia.
The US supported Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in his fight against the anti-American Iranian regime. As a result, the US mostly turned a blind eye toward Iraq's use of chemical weapons against Iran.
US officials moderated their usual opposition to those illegal and inhumane weapons because the US State Department did not ' wish to play into Iran's hands by fueling its propaganda against Iraq.'
In 1988, the war ended in a stalemate. More than 500,000 military and 100,000 civilians died.
1981-1986: US secretly sells weapons to Iran
The US imposed an arms embargo after Iran was designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 1984. That left the Iranian military, in the middle of its war with Iraq, desperate for weapons and aircraft and vehicle parts to keep fighting.
The Reagan administration decided that the embargo would likely push Iran to seek support from the Soviet Union, the US's Cold War rival. Rather than formally end the embargo, US officials agreed to secretly sell weapons to Iran starting in 1981.
The last shipment, of anti-tank missiles, was in October 1986. In November 1986, a Lebanese magazine exposed the deal. That revelation sparked the Iran-Contra scandal in the US, with Reagan's officials found to have collected money from Iran for the weapons and illegally sent those funds to anti-socialist rebels – the Contras – in Nicaragua.
1988: US Navy shoots down Iran Air flight 655
On the morning of 8 July, 1988, the USS Vincennes, a guided missile cruiser patrolling in the international waters of the Persian Gulf, entered Iranian territorial waters while in a skirmish with Iranian gunboats.
Either during or just after that exchange of gunfire, the Vincennes crew mistook a passing civilian Airbus passenger jet for an Iranian F-14 fighter. They shot it down, killing all 290 people aboard.
The US called it a ' tragic and regrettable accident,' but Iran believed the plane's downing was intentional.
In 1996, the US agreed to pay US$131.8 million in compensation to Iran.
1997-1988: The US seeks contact
In August 1997, a moderate reformer, Mohammad Khatami, won Iran's presidential election.
US President Bill Clinton sensed an opportunity. He sent a message to Tehran through the Swiss ambassador there, proposing direct government-to-government talks.
READ | Embassy of Israel in SA: Why Iran's nuclear ambition could no longer be ignored
Shortly thereafter, in early January 1998, Khatami gave an interview to CNN in which he expressed ' respect for the great American people,' denounced terrorism and recommended an 'exchange of professors, writers, scholars, artists, journalists and tourists' between the United States and Iran.
However, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei didn't agree, so not much came of the mutual overtures as Clinton's time in office came to an end.
In his 2002 State of the Union address, President George W. Bush characterised Iran, Iraq and North Korea as constituting an 'Axis of Evil' supporting terrorism and pursuing weapons of mass destruction, straining relations even further.
202: Iran's nuclear programme raises alarm
In August 2002, an exiled rebel group announced that Iran had been secretly working on nuclear weapons at two installations that had not previously been publicly revealed.
That was a violation of the terms of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which Iran had signed, requiring countries to disclose their nuclear-related facilities to international inspectors.
One of those formerly secret locations, Natanz, housed centrifuges for enriching uranium, which could be used in civilian nuclear reactors or enriched further for weapons.
Starting in roughly 2005, US and Israeli government cyberattackers together reportedly targeted the Natanz centrifuges with a custom-made piece of malicious software that became known as Stuxnet.
That effort, which slowed down Iran's nuclear programme was one of many US and international attempts – mostly unsuccessful – to curtail Iran's progress toward building a nuclear bomb.
2003: Iran writes to the Bush administration
In May 2003, senior Iranian officials quietly contacted the State Department through the Swiss embassy in Iran, seeking 'a dialogue 'in mutual respect,'' addressing four big issues: nuclear weapons, terrorism, Palestinian resistance and stability in Iraq.
Hardliners in the Bush administration weren't interested in any major reconciliation, though Secretary of State Colin Powell favoured dialogue and other officials had met with Iran about al-Qaida.
When Iranian hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was elected president of Iran in 2005, the opportunity died.
The following year, Ahmadinejad made his own overture to Washington in an 18-page letter to President Bush. The letter was widely dismissed; a senior State Department official told me in profane terms that it amounted to nothing.
2015: Iran nuclear deal signed
After a decade of unsuccessful attempts to rein in Iran's nuclear ambitions, the Obama administration undertook a direct diplomatic approach beginning in 2013.
Two years of secret, direct negotiations conducted bilaterally at first between the US and Iran and later with other nuclear powers culminated in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, often called the Iran nuclear deal.
Iran, the US, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United Kingdom signed the deal in 2015. It severely limited Iran's capacity to enrich uranium and mandated that international inspectors monitor and enforce Iran's compliance with the agreement.
In return, Iran was granted relief from international and US economic sanctions. Though the inspectors regularly certified that Iran was abiding by the agreement's terms, President Donald Trump withdrew from the agreement in May 2018.
2020: US drones kill Iranian Maj.Gen Qassem Soleimani
On 3 January, 2020, an American drone fired a missile that killed Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, the leader of Iran's elite Quds Force. Analysts considered Soleimani the second most powerful man in Iran, after Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei.
AFP
At the time, the Trump administration asserted that Soleimani was directing an imminent attack against US assets in the region, but officials have not provided clear evidence to support that claim.
Iran responded by launching ballistic missiles that hit two American bases in Iraq.
2023: The Oct 7 attacks on Israel
Hamas' brazen attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, provoked a fearsome militarised response from Israel that continues today and served to severely weaken Iran's proxies in the region, especially Hamas – the perpetrator of the attacks – and Hezbollah in Lebanon.
2025: Trump 2.0 and Iran
Trump saw an opportunity to forge a new nuclear deal with Iran and to pursue other business deals with Tehran. Once inaugurated for his second term, Trump appointed Steve Witkoff, a real estate investor who is the president's friend, to serve as special envoy for the Middle East and to lead negotiations.
Negotiations for a nuclear deal between Washington and Tehran began in April, but the countries did not reach a deal. They were planning a new round of talks when Israel struck Iran with a series of airstrikes on 13 June, forcing the White House to reconsider is position.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tucker Carlson Rips Apart Ted Cruz's Bible-Based Defense Of Israel
Tucker Carlson Rips Apart Ted Cruz's Bible-Based Defense Of Israel

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tucker Carlson Rips Apart Ted Cruz's Bible-Based Defense Of Israel

Tucker Carlson just backed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) into a corner during a discussion about Israel and its conflict with Iran. The former Fox News host dissected Cruz's argument for America's unyielding support for Israel as his guest explained how his commitment to the country was based on what he learned back in Sunday school. 'I was taught from the Bible, those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed,' the senator said while appearing on an episode of Carlson's show posted on Wednesday. 'And from my perspective, I want to be on the blessing side of things.' Cruz's statement left Carlson with a few questions, like whether that verse was referring to the current government of Israel or if the Republican could even tell him what part of the Bible he was pulling from. When Cruz was unable to find an answer off the top of his head, right-wing pundit Carlson reminded the senator he was cribbing from the book of Genesis and then wondered how Cruz could base his opinion on scripture he couldn't even cite correctly. 'So you're quoting a Bible phrase, you don't have context for it,' Carlson said. 'You don't know where in the Bible it is, but that's your theology? I'm confused. What does that even mean?' Cruz got defensive as Carlson pushed him to define what he meant by Israel, be it the state's current borders, its current leadership, a 'political entity' or how it was defined in biblical times. When Cruz settled on the term 'nation,' Carlson straight up asked, 'Is the nation God is referring to in Genesis, is that the same as the country run by Benjamin Netanyahu right now?' Cruz and Carlson's clash reflects a growing schism within the Republican Party, where 'America First' isolationists like the commentator have found themselves at odds with Middle East war hawks like the senator. The discussion came on the heels of Israel's preemptive military strike on Iran last Thursday, a move that has forced President Donald Trump to weigh whether or not the U.S. will join its ally in its bombing campaign. Watch the testy exchange right here: New clip of Ted Cruz getting cooked by Tucker Carlson just dropped — MeidasTouch (@MeidasTouch) June 18, 2025 Tucker Carlson Tears Into Ted Cruz In The Most Gloriously Awkward Interview You'll See Marjorie Taylor Greene Makes Rare Break From Trump — And It's All About Tucker Carlson Trump Escalates His Feud With Tucker Carlson Over Israel And Iran

Former Trump Aide Steve Bannon Says Fox News Is Pushing 'Pure Propaganda' On Iran
Former Trump Aide Steve Bannon Says Fox News Is Pushing 'Pure Propaganda' On Iran

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former Trump Aide Steve Bannon Says Fox News Is Pushing 'Pure Propaganda' On Iran

WASHINGTON — Right-wing pundit Steve Bannon on Wednesday blasted some conservative media outlets and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for encouraging U.S. participation in Israel's ongoing war against Iran — accusing Fox News of pushing 'pure propaganda' and highlighting a deepening rift among the coalition close to President Donald Trump. Fox is promoting 'the exact propaganda you had in the Iraq War,' Bannon said. referring to America's 2003 invasion of Iraq, which set off years of bloodshed and instability in the Middle East. 'The traditional Republican Party' is using Fox and other platforms like National Review magazine to pursue 'forever war,' while 'that part of the Republican Party can't win national elections,' he continued, noting that Trump's rise to political prominence involved a rebuke of President George W. Bush for the Iraq War. 'There's no difference between the pitch they're making here and the pitch they made on Iraq,' Bannon said. The former Trump White House adviser made the remarks at a Wednesday breakfast with reporters organized by the Christian Science Monitor. His fierce comments demonstrated how right-wing factions supportive of Trump are openly clashing as the president says he has not yet made a decision about entering American forces into the war. And while he called himself a supporter of Israel, Bannon repeatedly criticized Netanyahu for attempting to influence the conversation in the U.S. and weighing in on the pro-Trump slogan 'America First.' 'If [Trump] decides to use combat operations, he will explain it to the American people and not be hectored and lectured by Bibi Netanyahu,' Bannon said. 'Having the gall to come on ABC News and lecture the MAGA movement: 'Do you want America first or America dead?' That is inappropriate for any foreign leader to tell us, particularly somebody that's dependent upon the United States.' Bannon believes Trump may still avoid involving the U.S. in Israel's offensive, defying pressure for a strike from some on Trump's own team and prominent hawkish voices, including many GOP lawmakers. 'The Israelis have to finish what they started … There's no rush for the United States' to intervene, he said, arguing Trump's ongoing buildup of American military forces in the Middle East is because 'Trump likes optionality' and he may seek 'coercive diplomacy' with Iran. The focus of the diplomacy would be beyond the current fighting, to a long-running dispute over Iran's nuclear enrichment program. Trump was pursuing a deal with Tehran to limit the program in exchange for relief from economic sanctions — akin to the Obama-era nuclear deal that he abandoned — and appears to believe such an agreement can still be reached. On Wednesday, the president told reporters that U.S. and Iranian officials might soon meet, even potentially at the White House. Iran's mission to the United Nations slammed the idea and most analysts believe the country will not negotiate under Israeli bombing, which has killed hundreds of Iranians while Iranian retaliatory attacks have killed at least 24 Israelis. Trump also said he told Netanyahu to 'keep going' and suggested the next several days or up to a week would be 'very big,' adding: 'Nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Bannon said he agrees Iran should not get a nuclear weapon. But Trump's negotiation effort was attempting to reach that goal, he said, and questioned why Israel launched its strikes last week, saying he does not see why the U.S. should trust officials who 'had the biggest intelligence failure since 9/11 on October 7,' 2023, when Palestinian militants invaded Israel. While Bannon praised a range of Trump appointees like Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, he blasted U.S. Central Command, or CENTCOM, which oversees American military operations in the Middle East and whose hawkish chief, Erik Kurilla, is wielding significant influence in Trump's decision-making. 'The Pentagon has a CENTCOM mentality. Until we break that, we're not going to have any progress,' Bannon said. The rifts among Trump supporters have gone viral through moments like right-wing pundit Tucker Carlson challenging pro-war Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) in a Tuesday interview about his limited knowledge of Iran. Still, flaws in the understanding of the country and surreal ideas about U.S. influence exist across those factional divides. Bannon repeatedly mispronounced the name of Iran's most sensitive nuclear facility, Fordow, as he discussed the prospect of the U.S. helping Israel to attack it. He frequently referred to Iran and Iranians as 'Persia' and 'Persians' — terms that, while appealing to pop historians, ignore the potent force of modern Iranian nationalism and seem to try to divorce the country from Islam, which has been deeply rooted there for around 1,000 years. And he suggested his own interest in regime change, the bugbear among anti-war conservatives, by saying Trump waged 'economic warfare' against Iran through sanctions during his first presidency, which Bannon claimed helped drive Iranian protests in 2022. (Iranian activists have decried attempts by Netanyahu and other outside hawks to co-opt their calls for change in their country.) 'That's kind of how you want to play it, right?' he said.

Trump's Envoy to China Calls Out Threat of Foreign Supply Chains
Trump's Envoy to China Calls Out Threat of Foreign Supply Chains

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Envoy to China Calls Out Threat of Foreign Supply Chains

(Bloomberg) -- The US wants to revamp its trading relationship with China and the world by bringing many critical supply chains back onshore, the American ambassador to Beijing said. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads How E-Scooters Conquered (Most of) Europe Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports 'Unfettered globalization has increasingly created single-source supply chain vulnerabilities,' David Perdue, who assumed his post last month, told a dinner in Washington on Thursday. 'We have all witnessed the extent to which our businesses have become overly dependent on China for components, inputs, intermediate goods and even entire supply chains,' he said, adding that American leaders had been 'blind to the hollowing out of many US strategic industries.' The assessment echoes criticism by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who said at the recent Group of Seven meeting that the world is experiencing a new 'China Shock.' Her accusation, which drew a sharp retort from Beijing, took aim at what von der Leyen characterized as China's use of its quasi-monopoly over some sectors as both a bargaining chip and a weapon to undermine competition. Perdue took a more measured view, noting in his comments that President Donald Trump doesn't blame China for pursuing its own national interest. 'President Trump's vision is to have a trading relationship with China that is based on reciprocity, fairness and respect — one in which the United States puts the American people first, just as China does for its own people,' he said via a video message to the annual dinner of the US-China Business Council. In earlier remarks at the same event, China's ambassador to the US, Xie Feng, made a case for America to become a partner and not a rival to his country, calling for the removal of still 'unreasonably high' tariffs imposed by Trump. Xie also argued that the trading relationship between China and the US was a 'two-way street,' and neither side was getting ripped off. While the US had a goods trade deficit with China, American companies generated a lot of revenue in China, which in turn ran a shortfall in its services trade with the US. For Perdue, however, the lopsided commerce between the world's two biggest economies can't go on as before. 'We must remedy the current imbalance in our relationship,' he said. 'If the United States is to pursue its own national interest in global trade while ensuring the dollar's place as world's reserve currency, then our economy cannot be so dependent on foreign supply chains that can be severed at any moment.' Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store