‘Fickle': Opposition echoes US AUKUS call
Mr Taylor was asked on Wednesday to respond to comments made by Jerry Hendrix – the man heading a US ship building blitz in line with Donald Trump's mission to 'restore America's maritime dominance'.
Mr Hendrix, a retired US Navy captain, has been vocal in his concerns about Australia's commitment to AUKUS, saying last year 'the Australians have been noticeably fickle', as reported overnight by the Sydney Morning Herald.
In a separate criticism, he said the 'challenge for AUKUS' is two-fold.
'First there will be a question of whether the Australian government will sustain their commitment across the coming years and change of (governments),' Mr Hendrix posted on social media.
'Second will be whether the US will actually be willing to give up Virginia class boats.'
Speaking to Sky News, Mr Taylor said the 'opposition's position on AUKUS is not fickle at all'.
'It is complete and utter commitment to what is an incredibly important initiative, both tranche one and tranche two – the nuclear submarines as well as the associated technology,' he said.
Pressed on the criticism, he repeated his defence but suggested it was a fair shot at the Albanese government.
'The opposition's not fickle, that's for sure,' he said.
'I worry that the government – I think it's not just me worried, I think every expert looking at this is making these comments – they're deeply worried that we're not on our way to having the defence force we need in such an uncertain time.
'We've got authoritarian regimes around the world flexing their muscles.' Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor has suggested Labor is 'fickle' on AUKUS. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
Mr Taylor was also asked about the Netherlands' defence chief warning Australia should lift its military spending in response to the build up in China.
General Onno Eichelsheim was in Australia for Talisman Sabre – annual war games hosted by the Australian Defence Force.
He said the country should 'get ready for something that you hope will never happen', drawing parallels between Russia's invasion of Ukraine and China's aggression in the Indo-Pacific.
'You should look at the facts that are around you … if Russia tells us that they want to have more, more influence, then take that seriously,' General Eichelsheim told the ABC.
'And if you see in this case in this region, China building up, take it seriously and get ready for something that you hope will never happen.
'If you prepare for war, you can avoid war. And that's how we look at it.'
However, he said percentage of GDP was not the most important measure.
Responding to the remarks, Mr Taylor said Australia 'definitely' needed to boost defence spending.
'We need to spend that money better,' he said.
'And (the Coalition has) made a commitment already to get to 3 per cent at least and that is exactly what the government should be doing.'
Labor has committed billions in extra defence funding over the next decade, which will push it to about 2.3 per cent of GDP by 2034.
But Anthony Albanese and his government have firmly rejected the US' call to boost it to 3.5 per cent, adding to friction with Washington.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
27 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
Congress seeks Morrison's advice on China. Just don't mention tariffs
Washington | There was a contradiction at the heart of a bunch of US politicians seeking help on how to stand up to China's economic coercion, but it took an hour and a half before someone finally nailed it. 'Is the current tariffs policy that we are seeing from the Trump administration, quite frankly, playing into China's hands?' Democrat representative Jill Tokuda asked former Australian prime minister Scott Morrison.
The Advertiser
27 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
US beef unlikely to flood Australia as ban lifted
Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally. Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally. Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally. Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally.
Perth Now
27 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Truth about how Australia protects your kids
In an early show of bipartisan goodwill, a Labor childcare Bill is expected to pass through parliament with relative ease, but big issues within the new law are yet to be ironed out by the federal opposition, which is concerned about the children who could be left behind. The new legislation, which was tabled in parliament by federal Education Minister Jason Clare on Wednesday, was proposed in the wake of shocking news out of Victoria where a man is accused of 70 separate instances of child abuse. Joshua Brown, 26, worked at 20 childcare centres between 2017 and May 2025. The Milestones Early Learning and Kindergarten in Greensborough is one of several daycare centres that Joshua Brown worked at. NewsWire / Aaron Francis Credit: News Corp Australia Addressing parliament, Mr Clare said 'mums and dads of thousands of children' were undergoing immense levels of stress and trauma surrounding the wellbeing of their kids. 'Governments of different colours, state and federal, have taken action but not enough and not fast enough. That's the truth,' he said. 'We have to do everything we can to ensure the safety of our children when they walk – or are carried – through the doors of an early childhood education and care service at centres across the country.' Opposition education spokesman Jonno Duniam said he was 'ultimately satisfied' with the proposed Bill, which he said the opposition 'will not delay the passage of … in any way'. 'We'll get these things through parliament this fortnight, but we now need to focus on state and territory governments and what they do to protect children in health care,' he told the ABC's Sally Sara on Radio National on Thursday morning. Federal Education Minister Jason Clare said the proposed legislation was 'not an idle threat' to childcare providers who didn't toe the line. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia 'We've got our party room and other arrangements to consider these laws that have only just been introduced, but soon after that I expect they'll be passed and enforced.' Despite the optimism, Mr Duniam said the opposition still had questions for the government about particular elements of the proposed laws. One issue revolves around 'childcare deserts', parts of the country – usually in regional and remote Australia – that have significantly less childcare options than our nation's urban hubs. One feature of the Bill allows the government to withdraw subsidies for centres that perform their child protection duties poorly, but families with no other options may end up bearing the brunt of the punishment. 'A question I've put to the government was 'well, what happens if the funding is withdrawn?' Either a centre is shut and no services are available or, in some cases, when under these arrangements funding would be withdrawn, (the centre) might then send a bill for 100 per cent of the cost to the parents, and that would be unacceptable,' Mr Duniam said. Opposition education spokesman Jonno Duniam said the proposed laws 'only go so far'. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia 'This is something that remains for interrogation.' When asked if mandatory CCTV would be discussed, Mr Duniam said he was 'kind of baffled' that it wasn't already enforced. 'It is in centres but obviously not mandatory in all jurisdictions. I think the government needs to get it right in terms of its deployment,' he said. 'There are privacy concerns. We know CCTV has been used by perpetrators of these horrendous acts, so while it is a safety measure, we need to make sure appropriate safeguards are in place.'
