Queensland police go to court in bid to stop Story Bridge pro-Palestine protest march
Justice for Palestine Magan-djin (Brisbane) have advertised plans to march over the bridge at 1pm on Sunday – replicating similar protests that occurred earlier this month in Sydney and Melbourne.
Spokesperson for Justice for Palestine Magan-djin Remah Naji said the group is expecting at least 7000 people to attend the rally. The Queensland police oppose the march on public safety grounds.
'Under provisions of the peaceful assembly act, police will lodge documentation with Brisbane magistrates court for a decision to be made with respect to the notice of intention to hold a public assembly,' a spokesperson for the Queensland Police Service said.
The matter is yet to be given a date of listing.
A cycling group was denied the right to march or ride over the bridge earlier this year at a hearing at the magistrates court on public safety grounds.
Naji said the march organisers had already briefed lawyers and were ready for a legal fight.
'We're very much willing to defend our fundamental right to peaceful assembly. If they want to go down this path, we're ready,' she said.
Police in New South Wales sought to deny legal protection to a planned protest over the Sydney Harbour Bridge earlier this month – but that bid was overturned by the NSW supreme court at the 11th hour.
Police say 90,000 people marched across that iconic structure, organisers put the figure at closer to 300,000 – regardless, the scale of the turnout ranks the protest as historic and the day went ahead without major incidents.
In Melbourne on the same day, in contrast, pro-Palestine protesters were met by a wall of police in riot gear behind barricades and backed by a row of mounted officers and riot squad vans when they sought to cross the King Street Bridge.
Justice for Palestine Magan-djin conducted mediation with Queensland police on Monday morning. QPS presented two options to the protest group for locations other than the bridge.
A spokesperson for the QPS confirmed that mediation had taken place on Monday morning 'however an agreement could not be met'.
Naji didn't rule out violating a court injunction if the magistrates court ruled against them, saying it would be a decision for the group collectively.
She said the bridge is a central part of the protest because the urgency of the situation in Gaza
'This ongoing livestreamed genocide demands visibility. It is not enough for us to do the usual routes,' Naji said.
She said the aim of the march was 'to apply the maximum pressure on our government'.
Justice for Palestine Magan-djin has been holding regular protests in Brisbane for the last 22 months since the escalation of the conflict in Gaza after Israel responded to Hamas' attack on 7 October 2023 with a full-scale invasion, bombardment and blockade of aid in the Gaza Strip.
More than 60,000 people have been killed in Gaza - mostly women, children and elderly people – since the war began, according to Palestinian health officials.
-With additional reporting by Joe Hinchliffe
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
39 minutes ago
- Spectator
Where have all the upper-class Tories gone?
A currently fashionable conservatism is militantly against Ukraine and, by more cautious implication, pro-Russia. We who disagree are, I quote Matthew Parris in these pages last week, 'prey to the illusion that the second world war was a template for future conflict, and Hitler a template for Putin'. Others put it more unkindly, speaking of 'Ukraine brain' as a mental affliction among the Cold War generations. One should not project the entire second world war on to now, but some similarities with the 1930s are undeniable. Dictator exploits resentment at what he says is an unequal treaty after defeat; claims land in various places as the true property of his people; occupies some of it, changing borders by the threat of force, later by direct force; keeps demanding more; keeps threatening. The European democracies mostly dislike what is happening, but understandably wish to appease. As it all gets nastier, some incline to criticise the behaviour of the victim nations and their leaders (Benes then; Zelensky now) and downplay the sins of the aggressor. Matthew, for example, wants Zelensky to 'get off his high horse' without noticing that Putin's horse is much, much higher. The United States wants as little to do with it as possible. Dictator has a much firmer purpose than his democratic opponents, so he wins. At first, only the direct victim suffers. Later, all of us do. This argument is not exact, but it is not idiotic either. Elsewhere in this week's issue, Ursula Buchan writes about her grandfather John Buchan's time at The Spectator, the grounding for his career in political life and as a celebrated novelist. His very first article for the paper (20 January 1900) was called 'The Russian Imperial Ideal'. Buchan identified 'the two parties in the [Tsarist] government… both vigorous, one demanding internal reform, the other seeking external empire. At present she seems to have chosen for the latter, but… an Empire and commercial supremacy can only be built upon a genuine and healthy national life, and Russia, while she has the materials for such a life, has hitherto neglected to use them. Militarism and economic reform, where the former is so triumphant and the latter so urgent, are the lion and the lamb which will never lie down together.' They never did, though Gorbachev tried. The lion ate the lamb long ago. Tom Gordon, a Liberal Democrat MP, is leading a campaign to recruit more working-class people for parliament. He praises the few 'salt of the earth guys who are making it all happen' in his part of England (Harrogate and Knaresborough: not, it must be said, a super-working-class area). Mr Gordon does not confront the problem that nowadays the working class has been almost abolished, partly by the largely good trend of upward mobility and partly by the largely bad one of a welfare system which pays the poorly educated not to work. Looking at the 2024 intake of MPs, I would say that by far the greater problem is that so many, whatever their family roots, came into politics through politics/activism/politicised charity work, and know about nothing else. Looking at the question in class terms, I would say the more noticeable absence is members of the upper class. Nearly 40 years ago, I commissioned a scholarly piece (The Spectator, 3 May 1986) by the late Hugh Montgomery-Massingberd called 'The Descent of Tory Man'. It analysed the social class of all Conservative MPs at that Thatcher high tide and found 19 (including William Waldegrave, Nicholas Ridley, Lord Cranborne and Nicholas Soames) in the top social class, 33 in the second highest, 86 in the third, and the majority (there were 392 Tories at that time) in classes four to ten. Trying to apply that analysis to the present 121 Conservatives, I can think of only one – the wise and public-spirited Jesse Norman – who could be described as upper-class, and even he might have reached only class 2 according to Massingberd's exacting criteria. What applies to the Tories applies, a fortiori, to all MPs. So when parliament is more despised than at any time since the Great Reform Bill, it is also the least aristocratic it has ever been. Are these two phenomena related? I wish all the argument about pronouns had been raging when I was a teenager. That was the time when it first became commonplace to address God as 'You' in the liturgy and in translations of the Bible. I was against the change then because it sacrificed beauty, but I could never quite answer those who said it was better to speak to God less formally and more intimately. In my then ignorance, I did not know that 'Thou', as is the case with the second person singular in many other languages, was historically the more intimate and loving form, and so I did not understand that the plural 'You' was the more distant one. The use of 'You' is also theologically inaccurate, since it grammatically implies that there is more than one God. The Trinity, after all, are not some things. It is one thing. Recently, I booked a hotel room in the north of England. We could have 'de luxe' or 'superior'. It was explained to me that superior, in this context, meant inferior: de luxe had been recently 'refreshed'; superior had not. We were inclined to take 'de luxe', but then I asked whether de luxe had baths. No, it had only walk-in showers. Superior, however, had baths. So we took superior, thereby saving more than £100. This must be the first generation in human history which has paid less for a room with a bath than for one without. Why the change? I can think of four possible reasons: 1) Americans prefer showers. 2) Showers save water, and therefore the planet. 3) Showers save space, and therefore property cost. 4) Many customers are too old or fat to get out of baths. In another generation, will baths be objects only of historical interest, like mangles?
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Nine students trapped in Gaza will get help to take up places at UK universities
Nine students in Gaza with full scholarships to study at British universities have been told the UK government is working to facilitate their evacuation. The students – who have all been awarded Chevening scholarships, funded by the Foreign Office in recognition of their potential as future leaders – welcomed the development on Wednesday, but dozens more Palestinians in Gaza with university places are still awaiting news. The breakthrough follows months of advocacy and campaigning by more than 100 MPs, university leaders and other civil society organisations. More than 80 Palestinian students in total have offers at UK universities, including 40 who have secured full scholarships. Dr Nora Parr, a researcher at the University of Birmingham who has been coordinating efforts to support the students, said: 'We received news of the government plans with mixed emotions. On the one hand, relief that indeed there is a shared sense of the importance and urgency of the students' situation – and on the other our hearts sank. What about the rest? We must believe that this is only a start.' Khulud, 28, who has a place at University College London to study for a master's degree in dental health, said: 'Receiving the news about the evacuation today was overwhelming.' The students have been unable to travel and begin their studies because of a Home Office requirement for biometric data for a visa application. The UK-authorised biometrics registration centre in Gaza closed in October 2023 and it has been impossible for them to travel to other centres in neighbouring countries. Other countries, including Italy, Ireland and France, have already evacuated students. It is understood the British government is considering requests for support from other Palestinian students with places at UK universities. 'Through all these struggles, our voices are finally being heard,' said Khulud. 'Nothing we have endured has been in vain. I hope these steps are completed smoothly so that we can join our studies on time.' Of her fellow students who are still waiting, she said: 'I hope their determination is recognised, and that they too receive the support they deserve to continue their studies and achieve their dreams.' Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion A government spokesperson said: 'We are working urgently to support Chevening scholars in Gaza who have offers from British universities to leave and take up their places in the UK. 'We are doing everything we can to support their safe exit and onward travel to the UK but the situation on the ground in Gaza makes this extremely challenging.'
The Courier
3 hours ago
- The Courier
EXCLUSIVE: Fife Reform defector was 'passionate' anti-Brexit voter
A Fife councillor who defected to Nigel Farage's Reform UK campaigned fiercely against Brexit – and won backing from Labour's most pro-EU wing. Councillor Julie MacDougall quit Labour in 2024 after being blocked from standing as a General Election candidate. She is now in Reform, which evolved from the anti-EU Brexit Party. The Courier can reveal Ms MacDougall had publicly supported EU membership and been endorsed as an MP hopeful by Labour Movement for Europe, a pro-EU faction. 'You don't get an endorsement from them without pledging true allegiance to the EU,' a source explained. Ms MacDougall also superimposed the stars of the EU flag over her Facebook profile picture in 2020. One former party colleague described the councillor as a 'passionate' EU supporter who 'despised' Brexit. A Labour source added: 'Julie MacDougall's desperate search for relevance continues. 'Having been rejected as a Labour candidate multiple times, she is now abandoning what she previously said she believed in to try to get herself a seat with any party in any parliament that might have her. 'She has previously been strident in her pro-EU views, as a member of the Labour Movement for Europe, and even displaying an EU flag around her face in social media profile pictures. 'She needs to explain to people in her council ward why she has suddenly abandoned these views in favour of Reform, who were previously called the Brexit Party.' Ms MacDougall told The Courier she had backed Remain during the EU Referendum in 2016, and says she does not know how she would vote if the ballot was re-run. She said: 'I've always been pro-European. It's more about the fact the country has voted to leave. That's what the people of the country decided, and that's democracy. 'I accept that decision by the people that voted.' Asked how she would vote now, the councillor added: 'I haven't thought about a vote at the moment, because I don't think that's something on the table.' Ms MacDougall, whose late father John was a Labour MP in Fife, also denied accusations of careerism. 'Everyone can have their own opinion. Labour was where my heart was. Sadly, things have changed,' she added. 'Had I really wanted to progress my career, I would have joined another party years ago when other parties approached me. It's taken me till now to make my decision.' A Reform UK spokesman said: 'Unlike Labour, who continue relitigating Brexit and driving us ever closer to the EU, Councillor MacDougall is committed to a free, sovereign country that is governed by its citizens. 'We welcome anyone who shares our values of slashing immigration, cutting taxation, and building a better Britain.'
