logo
African state launches online visa approval

African state launches online visa approval

Russia Today27-02-2025
Nigeria has announced the automation of its electronic visa approval and issuance process to improve efficiency and attract more tourists and business visitors.
Interior Minister Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo made the announcement on Tuesday, saying the new system will enable travelers to apply online and receive visa approvals in 24 to 48 hours.
The initiative aims to eliminate long wait times at Nigerian airports and address issues caused by intermediaries who assist travelers in navigating bureaucratic processes. Once approved, electronic visas will be sent directly to applicants via email, removing the need for a physical visa sticker upon arrival.
Tunji-Ojo introduced the policy following a meeting with the director-general of the Presidential Enabling Business Environment Council, Princess Zahrah Mustapha Audu. 'The proposed visa policy aims to enhance the ease of doing business, boost tourism, and strengthen bilateral and multilateral relations with other countries,' the minister wrote on X.
Concerns had emerged over reports that Nigeria was discontinuing its Visa-on-Arrival program, causing mixed reactions among investors and the international community. However, the minister confirmed that the policy remains in place, with additional security checks, including pre-arrival clearance via Interpol and other background-check systems.
The new system is an upgrade rather than a replacement for Nigeria's Visa-on-Arrival program, which remains active, Audu said.
Since President Bola Tinubu took office in May 2023, the government has prioritized improving its visa processing system for foreigners and simplifying passport issuance for Nigerians. This includes setting up a contactless passport application system for Nigerians living abroad.
Meanwhile, Washington has published its list of countries eligible for the 2025 Visa Waiver Program, which allows citizens from participating nations to visit the US for up to 90 days without a visa. No African countries were included on the list.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Kiev always escalates before talks – and why it won't work this time
Why Kiev always escalates before talks – and why it won't work this time

Russia Today

time5 days ago

  • Russia Today

Why Kiev always escalates before talks – and why it won't work this time

On August 14, 2025, Russian officials reported Ukrainian drone strikes on the border cities of Belgorod and Rostov-on-Don, killing and injuring civilians. Rostov saw an apartment building struck, with over a dozen casualties; in Belgorod, three civilians were hurt when a drone hit a car downtown. This came two days after the Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD) alleged that Ukrainian forces were preparing a false-flag provocation in the Kharkov region, complete with pre-positioned journalists – supposedly to shape a narrative blaming Moscow. These incidents are not isolated. They fit into a larger operational and political pattern: each time high-level talks are scheduled Kiev steps up attacks on Russia's border regions. The results are the same: civilian deaths, destruction of civilian infrastructure, and an attempt to create a cloud over the diplomatic process. The same happened in late May and early June 2025, just before the second round of Russia–Ukraine talks in Istanbul, when two bridges in Russian territory were blown up. The attacks killed seven civilians and injured over seventy more. In Moscow's interpretation, the timing was too precise to be coincidence – it was about setting a tone of hostility, perhaps provoking Russia into walking away from the talks entirely. And yet, Moscow did not take the bait. Russian negotiators showed up in Istanbul as planned. For the Kremlin, this has become a point of principle: no matter the provocations, Russia will attend discussions that could bring an end to the conflict – on its own terms. The upcoming Alaska summit on August 15, 2025, between Presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, is the latest such opportunity. The alleged Kharkov region provocation and the strikes on Belgorod and Rostov are seen in Moscow as deliberate background noise meant to derail the meeting or at least to sour its atmosphere. But just as in Istanbul, the Kremlin insists it will not be deterred. For Moscow, attending these talks is about more than optics. It underscores a long-held stance: Russia is prepared to end the conflict, but not at the price of what it views as its core national interests. Walking away now, after years of costly military and political investment, would make little sense. Instead, the aim is to secure a resolution that cements Russia's gains and ends the war on Moscow's terms – not by fighting 'to the last Ukrainian,' but by ensuring that the outcome is final and strategically advantageous. From the Kremlin's perspective, Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky's motives are clear. Accepting a peace that involves territorial concessions would not only be a bitter political defeat – it could spell the end of his political career. More critically, it would remove the emergency powers he has repeatedly invoked since the start of the conflict to cancel elections and prolong his term in office. Those powers have also enabled controversial measures: forced conscriptions, suppression of opposition media, and an intensified crackdown on dissent. These steps have eroded his popularity inside Ukraine, making his hold on power dependent on the continuation of the wartime state of emergency. If the war ends, so does the legal shield of emergency rule – and with it, his immunity. Zelensky therefore has both political and personal incentives to keep the fighting going, even at significant cost to Ukraine's population. Key European backers share Zelensky's preference for prolonging the conflict. While EU leaders publicly frame Ukraine as a 'bulwark' against what they call Russian imperial ambitions – claiming that Moscow would move against Western Europe if Ukraine fell – domestic political realities tell another story. Across major EU countries, ruling parties and governments are facing historically low approval ratings. Their grip on power is increasingly tenuous, and a perpetual external threat provides a potent rally-around-the-flag effect. By keeping Russia framed as the imminent danger, these governments can justify unpopular policies, military spending hikes, and restrictions in the name of national security. They involve themselves in the conflict just enough to signal solidarity with Ukraine – supplying arms, funding, and training – without crossing the threshold into direct combat. For Moscow, this is a political theater that depends on the war continuing; remove the war, and the 'threat' narrative collapses, leaving these governments exposed to electoral defeat. Against this backdrop, Moscow views the Alaska talks as uniquely promising – not because they will magically end the war in one session, but because of who is not at the table. Neither Zelensky nor the EU will be present. Instead, the discussions will be between Putin and Trump, leaders who, in Moscow's reading, operate from a position of pragmatic realism. That realism includes acknowledging Russia's current battlefield advantages. Moscow believes it is winning the war, and that any serious settlement will reflect that balance of power. For the Kremlin, the likely outcome is that Ukraine will have to give up some or all of the contested territories – a step Zelensky would fiercely resist, and the EU would likely block outright if they were part of the talks. Without them, however, such a settlement becomes more feasible. The logic is straightforward: first, Putin and Trump agree on the framework; then, Trump leverages Washington's decisive influence over Kiev to bring Zelensky on board. In Moscow's calculus, this is where Trump's role is crucial. Without American military and financial support, Kiev would not have been able to sustain the war effort for nearly as long as it has. From the Kremlin's point of view, the recent attacks on Belgorod and Rostov, and the alleged false-flag operation in the Kharkov region, are tactical provocations with a strategic goal: derail the Alaska summit or force Moscow into an overreaction. But history suggests the tactic will fail. Moscow will be at the table in Alaska, just as it was in Istanbul, determined to push for an end to the conflict on terms favorable to Russia. If the Alaska talks proceed as planned, they could open the way to a negotiated settlement without the spoilers who have the most to lose from peace. In Moscow's eyes, that is precisely why the provocations are happening – and why they must be ignored.

African state scraps visa-free deal for French diplomats
African state scraps visa-free deal for French diplomats

Russia Today

time08-08-2025

  • Russia Today

African state scraps visa-free deal for French diplomats

Algeria has revoked a decade-old agreement granting visa-free travel to French diplomatic and service passport holders, in retaliation for what it called France's 'provocation, intimidation, and bargaining' amid deteriorating relations between the two countries. The Algerian Foreign Ministry said on Thursday that Paris had informed Algiers of its suspension of the 2013 Algeria-France accord that exempted diplomatic and official passport holders from visa requirements. It said a senior French embassy official was summoned to a meeting where two notes verbales were delivered, one of which denounced France's decision. 'This denunciation goes beyond the simple suspension previously notified by the French side and definitively puts an end to the very existence of this agreement,' it stated. 'It [Algiers] reserves the right to apply to the issuance of these visas the same conditions as those set by the French Government for Algerian nationals. This is a strict application of the principle of reciprocity,' the ministry added. Fragile relations between Paris and its former colony began deteriorating in July 2024, when French President Emmanuel Macron endorsed a controversial Moroccan autonomy plan for the disputed territory of Western Sahara. Last month, Algeria withdrew all privileged access cards granted to staff of the French Embassy at the country's ports and airports, describing it as a reciprocal move in response to restrictions placed on its diplomats in France. On Wednesday, Le Figaro reported that Macron had sent a letter to French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou directing him to tighten visa requirements for Algerian diplomats. He also reportedly asked his interior minister to seek support from other Schengen countries in enforcing the policy, including by consulting France before issuing short-stay visas to Algerian officials and to holders of passports covered by the 2013 agreement. 'France must be strong and command respect. It can only receive this from its partners if it shows them the respect it demands from them,' Macron said. In response, Algeria said it is additionally terminating the free provision of state-owned properties used by the French Embassy in Algiers as part of efforts to 'introduce balance' in bilateral ties.

US slaps $15,000 visa bond on two African states
US slaps $15,000 visa bond on two African states

Russia Today

time06-08-2025

  • Russia Today

US slaps $15,000 visa bond on two African states

Zambian and Malawian passport holders applying for certain categories of US visas will be required to pay bonds of up to $15,000 starting later this month, the State Department announced on Tuesday. The measure is part of a recently launched 12-month pilot program aimed at curbing high visa overstay rates from countries including the two southern African states, the department said in a notice on its website. It applies to people seeking temporary business or tourist visas. 'Starting August 20, 2025, any citizen or national traveling on a passport issued by one of these countries who is found otherwise eligible for a B1/B2 visa must post a bond in amounts of $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000, determined at time of visa interview,' it stated. The full amount, according to the statement, will be refunded if the applicant complies with all conditions of the non-immigrant visa, including departure from the US by the authorized date and adherence to the bond terms. A State Department spokesperson said countries would be identified based on 'high overstay rates, screening and vetting deficiencies, concerns regarding acquisition of citizenship by investment without a residency requirement, and foreign policy considerations.' US President Donald Trump has prioritized a hardline stance on immigration since returning to the White House in January, expanding border enforcement and ramping up arrests of undocumented migrants. In June, Trump issued an executive order imposing entry bans on citizens of 19 countries, citing national security concerns and 'unacceptable' visa overstays. Passport holders from seven African states – Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan – were among those blacklisted. Burundi, Sierra Leone, and Togo were among seven others hit with partial restrictions under the directive. Last month, Washington announced changes to its 'reciprocal non-immigrant visa policy,' reducing visa duration to three months and tightening entry conditions for most travelers from countries including Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Nigeria. Nigerian Foreign Minister Yusuf Tuggar described the move as a 'coercive' attempt by the Trump administration to force African states into accepting foreign nationals deemed unfit to remain in the US.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store