logo
Cancer Vaccine Breakthrough: What We Know About 'Exciting' Early Data

Cancer Vaccine Breakthrough: What We Know About 'Exciting' Early Data

Newsweek3 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Researchers at the University of Florida are moving closer to developing what they have described as a "universal" cancer vaccine, according to a study published in Nature Biomedical Engineering on July 18.
The vaccine would work by "waking the immune system up against something that looks dangerous, and then that response spills over to recognize and reject the tumor," Dr. Elias Sayour, co-author of the study, director of the Pediatric Cancer Immunotherapy Initiative, and principal investigator at the RNA Engineering Laboratory at the University of Florida, told Newsweek.
Sayour said that he believed the vaccine would apply to all types of cancer, because the treatment would result in the immune system being able to "recognize and reject all forms of cancer."
"In active cancers, the immune system has been fooled or lies dormant," he said. "This approach can wake it up, restoring it in the fight against cancer."
Sayour said that the concept of the treatment is being investigated in ongoing clinical human trials. If all goes well, it "could be a completely new paradigm to treat all cancer patients."
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty
Most people think of vaccines as being "preventive," and taken to "prevent or lessen the impact of certain infectious diseases," David Braun, a professor of medicine and member of the Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology at Yale Cancer Center, told Newsweek.
While there are some efforts in this field for cancer, the majority of trials investigate "therapeutic" vaccines, which are used to try to treat cancer once it develops, he said.
"Most cancer vaccines try to steer the immune system to attack a patient's cancer, which makes it very difficult to create a universal vaccine," Braun, who is not associated with the study, said.
Referring to the study, Braun said the research team is proposing "the idea that the vaccination itself, somewhat irrespective of what it is targeting, might stimulate the immune system enough to attack cancer."
"It is a very intriguing idea, but would need to be tested very carefully in clinical studies," he added.
What Does This Mean for Cancer Treatment?
Almost 2 million new cancer cases were reported in the United States in 2022. In 2023, more than 600,000 people died of cancer, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data.
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the U.S., behind heart disease. In 2022, cancer accounted for almost 19 percent of deaths in the country, according to Statista data.
Cancer vaccines have been approved in the past, such as Provenge, the Seattle biotech company Dendreon's shot used to treat certain forms of advanced prostate cancer.
There are also others currently undergoing the clinical trial process, such as Moderna's experimental mRNA-4157 cancer vaccine, which aims to prevent the recurrence of melanoma and lung cancer and has progressed to Phase 3 in its clinical trials.
However, what makes this new study notable is the fact that it is one step closer to researchers finding a vaccine to treat all types of cancer, rather than a specific type.
"This strategy could be a promising neoadjuvant therapy prior to checkpoint blockades or other cancer therapies," Hua Wang, a professor of materials science and engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, told Newsweek.
"With more success of personalized cancer vaccines, the researchers, clinicians, and the patient community will hopefully gain more confidence in cancer vaccines," Wang, who is not associated with the study, said. "At that stage, the goal of developing a universal cancer vaccine will be more reachable."
Braun deemed the study "exciting early data," but told Newsweek it still has "a long path to having a major impact on the treatment of cancers in individuals."
Potential Challenges
While the findings are a "promising" breakthrough in cancer research, Wang said that still "rigorous safety evaluations and the optimization for therapeutic benefits are needed before this strategy can move forward."
"Generally speaking, every one of us is hoping for a universal cancer vaccine that can treat or prevent different types of cancers," he said.
However, Wang added that practically, "personalized" cancer vaccines are "more likely to cross the finish line because of the higher specificity and thus less off-target effects."
While many types of cancer vaccines are currently being tested in clinical trials, Wang said that the challenge largely lies in "the balance of therapeutic benefits and safety."
Another key issue is that "very few researchers have the resources and support needed to push forward a clinical trial on cancer vaccine," he added.
Braun also said that, while cancer vaccines hold "tremendous promise," they also raise a number of open questions.
"What are the best targets for the vaccine, or are more universal vaccines possible?" he said. "In what setting would a vaccine be most effective? What other types of treatments should be given together with the vaccine?"
He added that in the coming years, "it will be critical to answers these questions while also having definitive clinical studies to prove that cancer vaccines help patients to live longer."
Full Interview Below
Q1: What does this study mean for the general public? How could this change the prevalence and treatment of cancer?
Hua Wang, a professor of materials science and engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign: "This paper reports that the early stimulation of IFN-I pathways could increase the sensitivity of poorly-immunogenic tumors to checkpoint blockades. The researchers performed the IFN-I stimulation by using unmodified mRNAs (without a specific target). This strategy could be a promising neoadjuvant therapy prior to checkpoint blockades or other cancer therapies. However, rigorous safety evaluations and the optimization for therapeutic benefits are still needed before this strategy can move forward."
David Braun, a professor of medicine and member of the Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology at Yale Cancer Center: "This study has two important goals: (1) to understand why current immune-based treatments work so well in some patients, and (2) to try to use that knowledge to design new immune treatments. In animal models, the research team is able to make tumors more sensitivity to immune therapy using this new approach. While exciting early data, we do have to remember that this is early work in animal studies, and so there is still a long path to having a major impact on the treatment of cancers in individuals."
Q2: How long do you think it will be before a universal cancer vaccine is made?
Wang: "Generally speaking, every one of us is hoping for a universal cancer vaccine that can treat or prevent different types of cancers. However, practically, personalized cancer vaccines are more likely to cross the finish line because of the higher specificity and thus less off-target effects. With more success of personalized cancer vaccines, the researchers, clinicians, and the patient community will hopefully gain more confidence in cancer vaccines. At that stage, the goal of developing a universal cancer vaccine will be more reachable."
Braun: "When most people think of vaccines, they think of 'preventive' vaccines—the kind that children and adults typically receive to prevent or lessen the impact of certain infectious diseases. While there are some of those efforts in cancer as well, the majority of efforts are focused on 'therapeutic' vaccines, which are used to try to treat cancer once it develops. Most cancer vaccines try to 'steer' the immune system to attack a patient's cancer, which makes it very difficult to create a universal vaccine. In this study, the research team proposes a major general form of vaccination—the idea that the vaccination itself, somewhat irrespective of what it is targeting, might stimulate the immune system enough to attack cancer. It is a very intriguing idea, but would need to be tested very carefully in clinical studies."
Q3: Can you foresee any challenges in the development of a cancer vaccine? If so, what are they?
Wang: "Various types of cancer vaccines including neoantigen mRNA vaccines, dendritic cell vaccines, tumor exosome vaccines, nanomaterial vaccines, and biomaterial scaffold vaccines are being tested in clinical trials at the moment. The challenge largely lies in the balance of therapeutic benefits and safety, and varies for each vaccine platform. One dramatic challenge, in my opinion, is the overwhelming bar to pursuing the clinical translation of promising cancer vaccines. Very few researchers have the resources and support needed to push forward a clinical trial on cancer vaccine."
Braun: "Cancer vaccines hold tremendous promise to 'steer' the immune system to attack cancer cells, but there are a number of open questions. What are the best targets for the vaccine, or are more 'universal' vaccines possible? In what setting would a vaccine be most effective? What other types of treatments should be given together with the vaccine? In the coming years, it will be critical to answer these questions while also having definitive clinical studies to prove that cancer vaccines help patients to live longer."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pregnant Woman Goes Into Labor, Then Sees Her Doctor From Hospital Window
Pregnant Woman Goes Into Labor, Then Sees Her Doctor From Hospital Window

Newsweek

time6 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Pregnant Woman Goes Into Labor, Then Sees Her Doctor From Hospital Window

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The dramatic moment when a doctor sprinted across a hospital car park to deliver a baby has gone viral on TikTok, racking up 4.6 million views. The footage, shared by mom-of-four Angelica (@epicangelicanatalie), shows Dr. Christopher Kraft racing against time, as she was already 10cm dilated when he got the call. Angelica, who lives in Houston, Texas, told Newsweek: "Dr. Kraft came in perfectly calm with a 'ready to have a baby?' As if he wasn't just running in July Florida heat." The text layered over the clip states Piece Epic was born five minutes later. Angelica holding her newborn son and her family visiting them in hospital. Angelica holding her newborn son and her family visiting them in hospital. Provided by Angelica According to CDC data, a total of 3,596,017 births occurred in the United States in 2023, down 2 percent from 2022. The general fertility rate also declined 3 percent, falling to 54.5 births per 1,000 females aged 15–44 in 2023. Kraft has been Angelica's doctor for the past five years, but Epic is the first one he has delivered—just over a week ago. She told Newsweek: "The last office visit I had with him I insisted that I did not want him to miss this one! "We timed it perfectly with a very light induction considering I was very far dilated already, and my son was born eight hours later." Before filming the now-viral clip—which has gained almost 557,000 likes—Angelica said a nurse had mentioned how they often see Dr. Kraft running from his office to see patients. Then, like clockwork, they looked out of a third-floor window and saw him doing exactly that. "We found it so caring that he puts in that effort, and funny at the same time," she said. "I'm usually the one with a camera in my hand, but this time my husband Sage was the one who was recording, and his commentary made the video so perfectly wholesome." Indeed, Sage can be heard laughing, saying "he is ready," and complimenting the doctor's pace. Kraft told Newsweek: "While she was in labor, I was seeing patients in my office and monitoring her progress very closely. The nurse had reached out to me and informed me that delivery appeared imminent. "Once I got the word, I rushed from my office down four flights of stairs and ran out the backdoor to the hospital. I needed to get there as quickly as possible to ensure her safety and the safety of her baby, and running was my only option." Angelica requested a Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC), and Kraft was supportive of her decision. According to the American Pregnancy Association, most studies show that 60–80%—or about 3 to 4 out of every 5 women—who've had a previous C-section can have a successful vaginal birth. However, there are risks, which is why Kraft didn't want to miss a thing. TikTok Reacts So far, the clip has over 3,000 comments - some from parents who recognize Kraft and others sharing their birthing experiences. "My doctor came literally stumbling in. Dude got caught in the curtain got twisted up and fell and popped back up and said it's baby time," said one user. Another wrote: "My doc knew I'd deliver within minutes, we called him and he was half asleep and said "IM ON MY WAY, LOVE YOU BYE" I said "love you too." "With my 2nd the doctor said it would be 2-3 hours until I had to push. Wrong, it was 10 minutes. He came crashing into the room said "whoops" and caught my son one handed," said a third commenter. If you have a family dilemma, let us know via life@ We can ask experts for advice, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.

Woman With Type 1 Diabetes Makes Chilling Realization About Viral Milkshake
Woman With Type 1 Diabetes Makes Chilling Realization About Viral Milkshake

Newsweek

time10 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Woman With Type 1 Diabetes Makes Chilling Realization About Viral Milkshake

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A diabetic woman has gone viral for calculating how much insulin she would have to take if she drank a viral milkshake with a whopping 2,600 calories. Addy Tayler, 26 and from Glendale, Arizona, was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes in 2022, and now has to carefully watch what she eats and drinks. She told Newsweek: "I see a lot of videos on TikTok about crazy foods people eat," but "never thought twice about them" until her diagnosis. "Now that I have to count carbs and be aware of nutrition facts, I'm so intrigued by those kinds of videos," she said. Type 1 diabetes is also known as insulin-dependent diabetes, and is a chronic condition where the pancreas makes little or no insulin, the hormone which allows sugar to enter cells to produce energy, according to the Mayo Clinic. Complications from type 1 diabetes can include heart disease, nerve damage, kidney, eye and foot damage, and complications in pregnancy, however the condition can be treated by managing the amount of sugar in the blood using insulin, diet and lifestyle. Recently, Tayler came across the "extreme" nutritional facts of a drink offered by Baskin-Robbins in 2009: a chocolate Oreo milkshake, where a 32 fluid ounce serving contains 2,600 calories, 59 grams of saturated fat, 185 mg of cholesterol, and 333 grams of carbohydrates. The drink went viral at the time due to its nutrition information, and has since been discontinued. And, imagining what would happen if she drank it, on May 3 she shared a video to her Instagram account @addytayler_t1d, where she regularly shares about her life with the condition. Newsweek has contacted Baskin-Robbins for comment on this story. Addy Tayler discusses the nutritional facts in the milkshake. Addy Tayler discusses the nutritional facts in the milkshake. Instagram @addytayler_t1d In the video, Tayler shows the viral drink alongside a list of its nutrition facts. "This shake has 333 grams of carbs," she said, and calculated that if she drank it, she would have to take a "bare minimum" of 33 units of insulin. The fat content—135 grams—would cause a delayed blood sugar spike so high she couldn't "even imagine," and predicted her blood sugar would be high for a week. She then calculated how much it would cost her, as a type one diabetic, to consume the drink. Her brand of insulin is $312.50 without insurance, or around 32 cents per unit. Having that drink would force her to take 50 units of insulin, meaning drinking the shake would cost her $15.625—on top of the cost of buying the drink itself. Instagram users were shocked, awarding the video more than 82,000 likes, one commenter writing: "My blood sugar would be high for the rest of my life." Another added the tongue-in-cheek comment: "You forgot to add the cost of the ambulance." One user pointed out: "You were giving yourself anxiety just saying this out loud. It was on your face." And as one summed it up: "Holy cow." According to nutrition website Nutritionix, a drink offered by Baskin-Robbins in 2024, a large Caramel Cappucino Blast, contained 1,040 calories per serving, including 32 grams of fat, 176 grams of total carbohydrates and 430 mg of sodium, a drop from the earlier product but still not something which would be healthy to eat every day. Read more Foods that may increase kids' risk of type 1 diabetes revealed Foods that may increase kids' risk of type 1 diabetes revealed Tayler told Newsweek she hopes people realize how bad certain foods can be for your health, but admitted she believes "most people are totally unaware of what they're consuming." "I think that most people are probably unaware of nutrition facts and have no idea how to read them. It's not something that is taught in school," she said, adding: "And to be fair, I was the same exact way until I couldn't be!" As a type 1 diabetic, Tayler is still able to mostly what she wants "as long as I take the proper amount of insulin for it," but she said something like the Baskin-Robbins chocolate Oreo shake would be "very dangerous" for her. "That much insulin at one time probably just isn't a great idea," she explained. "Insulin can be unpredictable because it doesn't all work at once. It works over about four hours, and you have to account for how long the shake—or any food—takes to digest. "High-fat content items are even trickier as they take a long time, and typically have a very delayed reaction on the blood sugar, even a few hours later." As she put it: "So yes, I very well could drink that shake—but personally I never would. It would not be worth it to me!"

Millennial Mom Anxious About Baby's Sleep—Then Finds Her 1993 Crib Video
Millennial Mom Anxious About Baby's Sleep—Then Finds Her 1993 Crib Video

Newsweek

time10 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Millennial Mom Anxious About Baby's Sleep—Then Finds Her 1993 Crib Video

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Like many millennial parents, a mom from Arkansas spends a lot of time worrying about safe sleep practices for her baby—no pillows, no blankets, no bumpers and certainly no added mattresses in the bassinet. But a recently resurfaced home video from 1993 stopped Erika Glidden in her tracks. In a clip on TikTok, Glidden, 32, shared footage herself as a 2-month-old in her crib—complete with plush bumpers, thick blankets, a pillow and sleeping on her stomach. Footage from 1993 home video; Erika Glidden pictured in a crib surrounded by pillows and blankets. Footage from 1993 home video; Erika Glidden pictured in a crib surrounded by pillows and blankets. @erikaglidden A text overlay on the video reads: "Me: worried about a mattress in my baby's bassinet. Also 2-month-old me in 1993." Glidden told Newsweek she discovered the footage after her mom had a collection of old VHS tapes digitized using the iMemories app. What started as a nostalgic viewing session quickly turned into a hilarious and eye-opening reflection on how parenting norms have evolved. "I was just so shocked to see how much different the sleep practices are now compared to 30 years ago," she said. "[Back then], I was sleeping in a crib in my own room with extra padding, crib bumpers, a comforter and laying on my stomach. No owlet or breathing monitoring system and no baby monitor." Now, Glidden's baby sleeps in a bassinet with a fitted sheet and a sleep sack. "She wears an owlet sock to monitor her breathing and has a camera monitor on her the entire time," she told Newsweek. Today's sleep guidelines, recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), says safe sleep practices to reduce the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Key recommendations include placing babies on their backs to sleep, using a firm, flat fitted sheet and avoiding soft bedding such as pillows, blankets, crib bumpers or stuffed animals. Glidden's clip has gone viral on TikTok, amassing 4.3 million views and a further 377,000 likes. Thousands of users commented and were equally as shocked as the millennial mom was. Many others weighed in with the parenting practices they were raised with. "My pacifier was tied with a string around my neck," one user wrote. "I literally asked my mom how she got me to sleep through the night and she said, 'Idk [I don't know], I just went off to bed. I was tired,'" another commented. A third user added, "We're honestly built differently. My crib looked similar." "I did not expect it to blow up as much as it did, but I do agree with the majority of the reactions," Glidden told Newsweek. "I think millennials use humor to cope and that has been the majority of the responses, so I have enjoyed reading through them."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store