logo
The Weekly Vine Edition 54: Trump vs Indian Babu, SRK, and a Siraj-ical Strike

The Weekly Vine Edition 54: Trump vs Indian Babu, SRK, and a Siraj-ical Strike

Time of India06-08-2025
Nirmalya Dutta's political and economic views vacillate from woke Leninist to Rand-Marxist to Keynesian-Friedmanite. He doesn't know what any of those terms mean.
Hello and welcome to another edition of the Weekly Vine. Over the last year, the Weekly Vine has gathered around 2,30,000 subscribers and for that, we are deeply grateful. There's absolutely no feeling on this planet that can compete with the joy of people taking time out of their doomscrolling to read something you wrote. That's a privilege and honour.
Next up, some exciting news. The Vine, along with a host of new newsletters, is going to turn up in your inbox. Just head over to our newsletter landing page and sign up.
Now, returning to regular programming—in this week's edition, we run the rule over Muhammad Siraj and India's epochal win at the Oval to draw the Test series, Donald Trump vs Indian Babu, SRK finally winning a National Award, and Siraj channelling his inner Ronaldo.
Trump vs Indian Babu
Franz Kafka is one of the most written-about authors in the world. By some estimates, over 15,000 books have been written about him, totalling over 1.5 billion words—which is delightfully ironic because Kafka wanted all his works burnt. Much like Kafka, billions of words have also been spilled on Donald Trump, trying to decode his actions, understand his motivations, and compare him to every strongman from Genghis Khan to Hitler. All of it is futile, like trying to study an Einstein-Rosen Bridge from within.
Trump's foreign policy is pure performance. One week he's dismissing India-Russia ties; the next, he's promising to drill oil in Pakistan and sell it to India. His approach isn't diplomacy—it's a loyalty test.
There are just vague guidelines to deal with him.
Call him Sir.
Flatter him like he's Jesus in a Brioni suit.
Buy a McDonald's mobile van.
Name things after him.
Nominate him for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Offer oil deals, crypto schemes, mobile van plans, gold-plated planes—it's all welcome.
And when all else fails, call him Daddy.
But New Delhi is unlikely to do that because Trump is going to meet the most Kafkaesque force known to man, an individual who can make The Trial look like Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara (which, when you think about it, is also an appropriate name for The Trial): the Indian Babu.
By virtue of clearing the most difficult exam known to man, the Indian Babu has gone far beyond being just a descendant of Sir Humphrey Appleby and is the closest thing to divinity known to man—to the point that anyone portraying his struggles directly wins a National Award. He is a relic of the Raj. A gatekeeper of staplers and noting sheets. One who needs your birth proof in triplicate. He is immune to charm and impervious to threats.
Trump might be the unstoppable force. The Babu is the immovable object. Or as the latter would say: Lunch ke baad aana.
The SRK Show
When I arrived in Mumbai 15 years ago, fresh off an engineering school dropout, I encountered a peculiar symptom that infects all those who end up in the city: the SRK Syndrome.
Let me explain.
In an essay titled Goodbye to All That, Eula Biss wrote: 'The myth of New York seems to be sustained by the fact that so many people who live there are from somewhere else. They come to the city and immediately dedicate themselves to making it the city of their imagination. The—you know—glittering city of endless opportunity that oozes riches and delights for the young and talented. I also came from somewhere else.'
One can easily replace New York with Mumbai, and the notion that this is a city which rewarded SRK with Mannat, then it will reward me as well. The journey has, at its heart, a singular message of triumph over adversity: If an outsider like Shah Rukh Khan could come here and make it, so can you. It's the mantra that Mumbaikars repeat in their heads in trying times, when even the commute makes one feel like Sisyphus pushing a boulder up a hill.
So it's nice to see SRK finally winning a National Award, even though his outsider-in-Mumbai myth is a little overblown. Still, fans—fresh from reporting the SRK Hakla Meme (a rabbit hole that you don't want to go into)—wondered why India's second most famous globetrotting mascot didn't win any gongs for his earlier portrayals. Like that of an NRI who predicted America's anti-immigration rhetoric and swapped NASA for ISRO, or a transphobic hockey coach who really loved centralisation: 'Mereko state ke names na dikhayi dete hain, na sunai dete hain.' Cooperative federalism be damned.
Either way, the award for SRK must feel a little odd for politically aware folks who claimed, when the movie came out, that it was a stinging indictment of the current dispensation. Which would mean that the current dispensation is now handing out awards to its own critics. Or the more likely explanation: the propaganda is in your head and extrapolation bias at play.
Then there's the other bunch who claim that Jawan wasn't a particularly good movie, even though one must say the older version of SRK (Vikram Rathore), where he cosplays a little like Rajinikanth, gave us a glimpse of what post-60 SRK could be: slower, saltier, and far more lethal. The strongest argument yet for him playing age-appropriate roles. Because the older version of the superstar was quite kickass.
And maybe that's the true arc of Shah Rukh Khan. Not just the boy who came to Mumbai with a suitcase and a dream, but the man who stayed long enough to play both the romantic idealist and the grizzled patriot, the NRI heartthrob and the homegrown rebel, the outsider who became the establishment. He has outlasted waves of nationalism, liberal disillusionment, Twitter mobs, box office slumps, and the great Bollywood brain drain.
SRK is no longer just a symbol of aspiration. He's a mirror to the country's contradictions—campy, chaotic, idealistic, occasionally cringe, and somehow still holding it all together with charisma and conviction.
He didn't just get Mannat. He became the myth.
SiuuuuuuuRaj
As Muhammad Siraj and Prasidh Krishna came out to bowl on the last day of the Oval Test, the entire newsroom gave up any pretence of work as everyone was glued to the screen while we all collectively prayed for the things the previously colonised world loves the most: British tears. England only needed 35 runs to win, and the smart money would have been on the British winning the Test and the series 3-1. Except a Cristiano Ronaldo fan had some different ideas.
Siraj woke up at 6 am—two hours earlier than usual—because fate doesn't knock politely. He grabbed his phone, summoned Cristiano Ronaldo from the depths of Google, found an image that screamed BELIEVE, and made it his wallpaper. Incidentally, it was a picture of Ronaldo from the 2007–08 season, when he defied logic and physics to become the best player on the planet and lead United to a Premier League and Champions League double.
And when Siraj bowled on Day 5, he was practically possessed by Cristiano Ronaldo's indomitable will to never give up. And yet, he had every reason to crumble. Just the evening before, Siraj had turned a wicket into a six, gifting Harry Brook a lifeline and possibly the Test. England smelt blood. But Siraj wasn't sulking. He was simmering. And when he ran in the next morning, it wasn't just with pace—it was with poetry.
Crawley's off stump? Evicted. Atkinson's defence? Torched.
Siraj bowled 185 overs in the series. Not once did he look tired. Not once did he look mortal.
India won by six runs. The narrowest away Test win in our history. It was, as one newspaper put it: a Siraj-ical Strike.
Cat Nap
If you've been wondering where ByteCat and Prof Meowrty are this week—don't panic. Meow Times is just taking a short creative catnap. Not to disappear. Just to stretch, sharpen our claws, and plot our next pounce.
Over the past few months, our feline friends have purred through politics, hissed at hypocrisy, and knocked over more than a few sacred cows and rhetorical mugs. You've laughed, shared, and occasionally sent us fan mail in paw prints. For that—we're grateful. But even the sassiest cats need to recharge. So we're briefly slipping out of the frame to fluff the format, scratch up fresh ideas, and restock the sardonic treats.
When we return, Meow Times will still be the same mischief-maker at heart. Still curious. Still clawing at nonsense. Still refusing to sit on command.
So while we're off licking our wounds (and possibly rewriting VAR), know this isn't goodbye. Just a purr-spective pause. We'll be back soon—with bolder lines, sharper claws, and plenty to say.
Till then, stay playful. Stay alert. And if anyone asks you to reignite your passion on a spreadsheet—just yawn, stretch, and walk away like a cat with a secret.
In the words of a famous Austrian: Hasta La Vista.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration to vet immgration applications for anti-Americanism
Trump administration to vet immgration applications for anti-Americanism

Mint

time11 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump administration to vet immgration applications for anti-Americanism

Anti-Americanism will be 'overwhelmingly negative' factor Trump has used label on museums and protesters Immigration advocate likens move to McCarthyism WASHINGTON, - President Donald Trump's administration has said it will assess applicants for U.S. work, study and immigration visas for "anti-Americanism" and count any such finding against them, sparking concern about implications for free speech. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said in a "policy alert" dated Tuesday that it gave immigration officers new guidance on how to exercise discretion in cases where foreign applicants "support or promote anti-American ideologies or activities" as well as "antisemitic terrorism." Trump has labeled a range of voices as anti-American, including historians and museums documenting U.S. slavery and pro-Palestinian protesters opposing U.S. ally Israel's military assault on Gaza. "Anti-American activity will be an overwhelmingly negative factor in any discretionary analysis," USCIS said. "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies." The announcement did not define anti-Americanism. But the policy manual refers to a section of federal law about prohibiting naturalization of people "opposed to government or law, or who favor totalitarian forms of government." The full text mentions supporters of communism or totalitarian regimes and people who advocate overthrow of the U.S. government and violence against government officers, among other factors. USCIS said it expanded the types of applications that have social media vetting, and reviews for "anti-American activity" will be added to that vetting. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said the step hearkened to the 1950s when Senator Joseph McCarthy hunted alleged communists in a campaign that became synonymous with political persecution. "McCarthyism returns to immigration law," he said. Anti-Americanism "has no prior precedent in immigration law and its definition is entirely up to the Trump admin." In April, the U.S. government said it would begin screening the social media of immigrants and visa applicants for what it called antisemitic activity. Rights advocates raised free speech and surveillance concerns. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Losing India would be a strategic disaster in face of China: Nikki Haley to Trump
Losing India would be a strategic disaster in face of China: Nikki Haley to Trump

India Today

time11 minutes ago

  • India Today

Losing India would be a strategic disaster in face of China: Nikki Haley to Trump

Former United States Ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, warned that US-India relations are at a breaking point and must be repaired quickly if Washington hopes to contain China's global a Newsweek op-ed published Wednesday, Haley said the Trump administration cannot afford to let tariffs and disputes over Russian oil drive a wedge between the world's two largest United States should not lose sight of what matters most: our shared goals," she wrote. "To face China, the United States must have a friend in India."WASHINGTON, NEW DELHI AT ODDS OVER RUSSIA OIL Tensions escalated after President Donald Trump imposed 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs and an additional 25 per cent levy on New Delhi for continuing to buy Russian oil. The move followed months of friction, including claims over America's role in India-Pakistan ceasefire backed Trump's pressure campaign, saying India's energy purchases "are helping to fund Vladimir Putin's brutal war against Ukraine."But she cautioned against treating India like an adversary. "Scuttling 25 years of momentum with the only country that can serve as a counterweight to Chinese dominance in Asia would be a strategic disaster," she argued that India is essential to Washington's economic and security goals. As the United States seeks to shift supply chains away from China, India offers manufacturing capacity "at China-like scale" for industries like textiles, phones and solar pointed at India's increasing defence ties with the United States and allies like Israel make it a "crucial asset to the free world's security."INDIA'S RISE COULD SURPASS CHINA'S IMPACTIn the long run, she added, India's rise may be the most significant geopolitical development since China's economic ascent. "Simply put, China's ambitions will have to shrink as India's power grows," Haley former South Carolina governor urged direct talks between Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi to end what she called a "downward spiral."Without action, she warned, Beijing would exploit the rift. "It would be a massive -- and preventable -- mistake to balloon a trade spat into an enduring rupture."Haley concluded by echoing Ronald Reagan's words to Indira Gandhi at the White House in 1982: although Washington and New Delhi may at times "travel separate paths," their destination should remain the same."The United States should not lose sight of what matters most: our shared goals. To face China, the United States must have a friend in India," she wrote.- EndsWith inputs from agenciesMust Watch

Why Putin's delegation used cash to refuel jets during Trump summit
Why Putin's delegation used cash to refuel jets during Trump summit

India Today

time11 minutes ago

  • India Today

Why Putin's delegation used cash to refuel jets during Trump summit

Russian President Vladimir Putin's delegation had to pay nearly USD 250,000 (about Rs 2.2 crore) in cash to refuel three aircraft during a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump in Alaska on August 15, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told NBC News that the unusual payment was a direct consequence of US banking sanctions against Moscow, which prevent Russian officials from using the American financial system. 'When the Russians landed in Alaska, they were there to refuel. They had to offer to pay in cash to refuel their aeroplanes because they can't use our banking system,' he face consequences every single day, but the bottom line is that it has not altered the direction of this war. That doesn't mean those sanctions were inappropriate; it means it hasn't altered the outcome of it," he added. Putin and his team remained in Alaska for nearly five hours, attending a nearly three-hour meeting with Trump. While Trump later stated that 'no deal' or ceasefire agreement had been reached, reports indicate Russia presented a proposal that Trump encouraged Ukraine to meeting Putin, Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders in Washington on Monday to discuss lasting security guarantees for Kyiv. Zelenskyy said he was willing to hold direct talks with Putin but rejected any deal involving territorial defended the existing sanctions' regime, saying all measures imposed before Trump took office remain intact and continue to exert daily pressure on Russia. However, he acknowledged that these penalties have not significantly altered the course of the conflict. 'Sanctions take months and sometimes years to bite,' he said, arguing that additional sanctions could jeopardize ongoing diplomatic efforts to bring both sides to the negotiating table.- EndsTune InMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store