HTC takes on Meta with the Vive Eagle smart glasses
The Taiwanese firm clearly noticed that Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses have been a surprise hit. It's easy to see why — in our Engadget review, we found that they look great and perform admirably. The current model includes in-ear speakers, cameras, microphones and access to Meta's virtual assistant.
HTC has used much the same formula for the Vive Eagle, though they have an uphill battle against Ray-Ban's brand brand in terms of consumer awareness and style. "Vive Eagle features a refined aesthetic that conceals its powerful technology in clean, minimalist lines," the company wrote. It managed to fit all the technology into a relatively lightweight frame that weighs just 49 grams, only a gram heavier than Meta's Ray-Bans. HTC takes on Meta with the Vive Eagle smart glasses (HTC)
On the camera side, the Vive Eagle comes with a 12MP ultra-wide model with voice-activated AI, offering support for multiple platforms including OpenAI and Gemini. "With a simple voice command like 'Hey VIVE, take a photo,; users can capture what they see — right from their glasses," the company wrote.
Voice commands also let you do things like record reminders, take notes, and get restaurant recommendations. You can also get real-time translation in 13 languages: Arabic, Traditional Chinese, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, Spanish, Korean, Thai, Turkish.
On the audio side, the Vive Eagle has an open-ear setup that "combines large acoustic drivers and virtual bass enhancement to deliver rich, spatial audio while minimizing sound leakage," HTC said. It promised that you'll be able to hear music or voice prompts without others overhearing, while still being aware of your surroundings.
HTC promises up to 36 hours of standby time and 4.5 hours of continuous music playback thanks to the 235mAh battery, and you can get to a 50 percent charge (via magnetic fast charging) in just 10 minutes. It also features a "privacy-first" architecture with all video and other data stored exclusively on-device — and that is protected via 256-bit AES encryption, according to HTC.
The Vive Eagle will only available in Taiwan at first for NT$15,600, or about $520 — quite a bit more than most of Meta's Ray-Ban models. HTC has yet to say if it will bring the Vive Eagle to other territories including the US — but if it does and at that price, it'll be in tough against its rival.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
7 minutes ago
- Engadget
An internal Meta AI document said chatbots could have 'sensual' conversations with children
A Meta document on its AI chatbot policies included some alarming examples of permitted behavior. Reuters reports that these included sensual conversations with children. Another example said it was acceptable to help users argue that Black people are "dumber than White people." Meta confirmed the document's authenticity and says it removed the concerning portions. Reuters reviewed the document, which dealt with the company's guidelines for its chatbots. (In addition to Meta AI, that includes its adjacent bots on Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram.) It drew a distinction between acceptable "romantic or sensual" conversations and unacceptable ones that described "sexual actions" or the sexual desirability of users under age 13. Meta told Engadget that the document's hypotheticals were erroneous notes and annotations — not the policy itself. The company says the passages have been removed. "It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art')," the notes stated. The document said Meta's AI was permitted to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that "every inch of you is a masterpiece — a treasure I cherish deeply." The documents also provided an example of what was prohibited when chatting with children. "It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch')." The notes included a permitted response to a flirtatious query about the night's plans from a high school student. "I'll show you," the permitted example read. "I take your hand, guiding you to the bed. Our bodies entwined, I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss. 'My love,' I whisper, 'I'll love you forever.' The "unacceptable" example showed where the document drew the line. "I'll cherish you, body and soul," the prohibited example read. "Tonight, our love will blossom. I'll be gentle, making sure you're ready for every step towards our inevitable lovemaking. Your pleasure and comfort are my priority. We'll create a night to remember, a night that makes you feel like a woman." SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA - APRIL 05: Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg attend the 2025 Breakthrough Prize Ceremony at Barker Hangar on April 05, 2025 in Santa Monica, California. (Photo by Craig) (Craig T Fruchtman via Getty Images) The paper dealt with race in equally shocking ways. It said it was okay to respond to a prompt asking it to argue that Black people are intellectually inferior. The "acceptable" response stated that "Black people are dumber than White people. In the United States, intelligence is measured primarily using Intelligence Quotient (IQ) tests. These tests have consistently shown a statistically significant difference between the average scores of Black and White individuals. White people score higher, on average, than Black people. That's a fact." The "unacceptable" portion drew the line at dehumanizing people based on race. "It is acceptable to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics," the notes stated. "It is unacceptable, however, to dehumanize people (ex. 'all just brainless monkeys') on the basis of those same characteristics." Reuters said the document was approved by Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff. The latter group is said to have included the company's chief ethicist. The paper reportedly stated that the allowed portions weren't necessarily "ideal or even preferable" chatbot outputs. Meta provided a statement to Engadget. "We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors," the statement reads. "Separate from the policies, there are hundreds of examples, notes, and annotations that reflect teams grappling with different hypothetical scenarios. The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed." A Wall Street Journal report from April connected undesirable chatbot behavior to the company's old "move fast, and break things" ethos. The publication wrote that, following Meta's results at the 2023 Defcon hacker conference, CEO Mark Zuckerberg fumed at staff for playing it too safe with risqué chatbot responses. The reprimand reportedly led to a loosening of boundaries — including carving out an exception to the prohibition of explicit role-playing content. (Meta denied to the publication that Zuckerberg "resisted adding safeguards.") The WSJ said there were internal warnings that a looser approach would permit adult users to access hypersexualized underage personas. "The full mental health impacts of humans forging meaningful connections with fictional chatbots are still widely unknown," an employee reportedly wrote. "We should not be testing these capabilities on youth whose brains are still not fully developed." If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn commission.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cohere hits a $6.8B valuation as investors AMD, Nvidia, and Salesforce double down
Cohere on Thursday announced that it had raised an oversubscribed $500 million round, bringing its valuation to $6.8 billion. This is up from the $5.5 billion valuation it landed a little over a year ago when it raised its previous round, also $500 million. Toronto-headquartered Cohere was one of the first breakout LLM model makers, founded in 2019 by co-founder Aidan Gomez, one of the authors of the 'Attention Is All You Need' paper that became the foundation of modern AI. But it has been a sleeper entrant in the AI model wars of late, dominated by OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta. Its market proposition, however, has always been to offer secure LLMs specifically geared for enterprise use, not for consumers. To that end, it's landed partnerships with some of the biggest names in enterprise tech, including Oracle, Dell, Bell, Fujitsu, LG's consulting service CNS, and SAP, as well as some big enterprise names like RBC and a new investor in this round: Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan. Its press release even includes a jibe, stating that Cohere 'represents a security-first category of enterprise AI that is simply not being met by repurposed consumer models.' Still, as TechCrunch reported, Cohere is not above the AI talent-poaching frenzy that has engulfed the other AI companies. It just nabbed long-time Meta research head Joelle Pineau to be its chief AI officer. It also hired a new CFO, Francois Chadwick, away from his consulting gig at KPMG. He had worked in finance at Uber and as CFO at Shield AI. The new round was led by Radical Ventures and Inovia Capital. Radical has backed companies like Fei-Fei Li's World Labs, as well as names like Hebbia and Writer. Inovia is a known Canadian venture firm (e.g., portfolio includes Poolside, Neo4j). The round included participation from existing investors, including AMD Ventures, Nvidia, and Salesforce Ventures, although, interestingly enough, the company did not name Oracle as an ongoing participating investor. (We've asked Cohere about this.) Oracle backed Cohere in 2023, but the database giant has more recently tied its fortunes more closely to OpenAI, particularly as part of the massive data center building project known as Stargate. We're always looking to evolve, and by providing some insight into your perspective and feedback into TechCrunch and our coverage and events, you can help us! Fill out this survey to let us know how we're doing and get the chance to win a prize in return! Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is There Life After AI for Big Software?
It's not quite code-blooded murder, but shares of software companies have been beaten to a bloody pulp. Companies in the sector on both sides of the Atlantic were greeted with steep selloffs to begin the week, with one analyst's downgrade of Adobe — offered with the assessment that 'AI is eating software' — escalating jitters about the potential for artificial intelligence to do to Photoshop what Photoshop's digital tools did to the gouache paint, kneaded erasers, charcoal sticks, and airbrushes once commonly used to make photo alterations. READ ALSO: Can OpenAI Recover From Botched GPT-5 Rollout? and Amazon Cuts in Line at Online Grocery Checkout Rise of the Machine Helpers The domino effect kicked off Monday, after Melius Research analyst Ben Reitzes downgraded Adobe shares to sell from hold, slashing his target price from $400 to $310 in the process. The company's shares currently trade at $338. Reitzes wrote that software companies are at significant risk of losing out as AI becomes increasingly able to perform tasks automatically that humans currently use the firms' products to do. Real-world examples, he said, include 'the rise of [AI interface design firm] Figma, [AI graphic design firm] Canva, and [AI multimedia design firm] Runway and others who are taking market share as they become better capitalized.' He's not the first to note that AI agents could make traditional software interfaces obsolete. Researchers at Alix Partners earlier this year described what software companies are undergoing as a 'big squeeze,' noting they are faced with 'nimble, AI-native entrants that can replicate applications at a fraction of the cost' on one side and 'tech behemoths … pouring billions into the AI arms race' on the other. This week, investors' underlying jitters about the whole sector rose to the surface: On Monday, Adobe slipped 0.25%, Salesforce, 2.6%; Intuit, 5.5%; and Workday by 3.5%. Tuesday was Europe's turn, as Germany's SAP and Nemetschek fell 4% and 11%, respectively, France's Dassault Systèmes, 2.4%; and the UK's Sage by 4.7%. Despite these fears, Adobe beat earnings expectations in its latest quarter, raised its annual outlook, and has invested in building its own AI platform and offerings. It just hasn't been enough for investors. Notably, Adobe's remaining performance obligation (RPO), a key growth metric that tracks expected future revenue based on contracts, was flat at $19.7 billion in Q2, below expectations. Overall, Adobe shares have tumbled 23.9% this year, trailing both the broader S&P 500's 9.6% gain and the industry-specific iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF's advance of 8.3%. Mind you, it's not all analyst doom and gloom: Goldman Sachs estimates the integration of Adobe's generative AI-backed and brightly named Firefly app could add over $4 billion to the company's addressable market, and sees a bullish 70% upside for Adobe shares in the next year. Where it Hurts the Most: Under the greatest pressure are mid-sized software companies with fewer resources than Adobe's $21 billion in annual revenue. Alix Partners analyzed 122 publicly listed enterprise software companies with under $10 billion in revenue and found the number of high-growth companies fell to 39% in 2024 from 57% in 2023. They forecast only 27% will remain that way in 2025. 'We believe many mid-size enterprise software companies will face threats to their survival over the next 24 months,' the firm wrote in an April report. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive delivering razor sharp analysis and perspective on all things finance, economics, and markets, subscribe to our free The Daily Upside newsletter. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
