Post Office interim boss Brocklehurst lined up for permanent role
The acting chief executive of the Post Office is being lined up to take the job on a permanent basis as the state-owned company continues talks with ministers over its long-term funding arrangements.
Sky News has learnt that Neil Brocklehurst, who was named interim chief last September, is close to being handed the role.
Whitehall sources said on Monday that an announcement about Mr Brocklehurst's appointment was likely to be made in April.
The decision, which requires the approval of business secretary Jonathan Reynolds, will bring a degree of stability to an organisation still grappling with the financial and reputational consequences of the Horizon IT scandal, which saw hundreds of sub-postmasters wrongly convicted of fraud and false accounting.
Reliant on the government for its funding, the Post Office has been in negotiations with ministers about delivering a previously pledged pay uplift this year.
yet to gain certainty from Whitehall about a £120m increase for this year.
The sum was promised in November as part of a strategy to rebuild the Post Office in the wake of the Horizon scandal.
The Post Office has outlined plans for an ambitious transformation which includes franchising more than 100 directly managed branches.
A substantial number of jobs are also being cut at the company's head office as part of the restructuring.
Several tranches of those have already taken place.
Mr Brocklehurst replaced Nick Read at the Post Office's helm following a turbulent period for the outgoing boss.
Mr Read was repeatedly accused of being obsesses with his pay arrangements and being at the centre of a series of rows with both board colleagues and his government employers.
Like Mr Railton, Mr Brocklehurst is a former executive at Camelot, the previous National Lottery operator.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Inflation is so high, even Rachel Reeves's voice is going up: Chancellor suffers from technical gaffe as inflation surges to 3.5% - far higher than expected as Labour's economy spinsout of control
Rachel Reeves demonstrated it isn't just inflation soaring higher today as she was seen on TV defending her economic record in a bizarre falsetto. An unfortunate technical error meant the under-fire Chancellor's response to a dramatic spike in prices was delivered in a tone more akin to Mickey Mouse. The episode left Sky News presenter Wilfred Frost - son of Sir David - briefly dumbfounded before he said: 'I think we have a problem...' Ms Reeves said: 'The numbers today are clearly disappointing. We want to see inflation coming down after the cost of living challenges that people have been through these last few years.' Her voice was then silenced entirely as broadcast bosses realised things were going awry. The glitch sparked hilarity on social media, with users comparing the rise in Ms Reeves's voice to Labour party policies which have caused 'ballooning national debt'. Speaking to Sky News , Ms Reeves said: 'The numbers today are clearly disappointing. We want to see inflation coming down after the cost of living challenges that people have been through these last few years' Ms Reeves was facing the music after headline CPI rate rocketed from 2.6 per cent in March to 3.5 per cent last month, a peak not seen since January 2024. Worryingly, it was significantly more than the 3.3 per cent analysts had pencilled in, with Ms Reeves acknowledging the figures were 'disappointing' and her national insurance hikes were partly to blame. Core CPI - excluding energy, food, alcohol and tobacco - was also at the highest for a year. The grim data will fuel Bank of England concerns about underling pressures, with chief economist Huw Pill having already warned that interest rate cuts have been too fast. Experts immediately suggested that Threadneedle Street might pause reductions at the next monetary policy committee meeting next month. The Bank had forecast that inflation would top out at 3.5 per cent in the third quarter of the year. The spike comes after Ofgem 's energy price cap rose by 6.4 per cent in April, having fallen a year earlier. That was alongside a raft of bill rises for struggling households, including steep increases to water charges, council tax, mobile and broadband tariffs. Meanwhile, Labour's NICs and minimum wage increases will have been stoking pressure in the system. Office of National Statistics (ONS) acting director-general Grant Fitzner said: 'Significant increases in household bills caused inflation to climb steeply. 'Gas and electricity bills rose this month compared with sharp falls at the same time last year due to changes to the Ofgem energy price cap. 'Water and sewerage bills also rose strongly this year, as did vehicle excise duty, which all pushed the headline rate up to its highest level since the beginning of last year.' Ms Reeves said: 'I am disappointed with these figures because I know cost of living pressures are still weighing down on working people. 'We are a long way from the double-digit inflation we saw under the previous administration, but I'm determined that we go further and faster to put more money in people's pockets. 'That's why we have increased the minimum wage for millions of working people, frozen fuel duty to protect commuters and struck three trade deals in the past two weeks that will go towards cutting bills.' Asked if the inflation figures had been pushed up by measures including the NICs hike, Ms Reeves said: 'When I became Chancellor last year, I faced the very difficult challenge that there was a £22billion black hole in the public finances. 'We had to fix that, and if we hadn't have done the Bank of England would not have been able to cut interest rates four times this last year, which has obviously had a direct effect on the mortgages and the rents that people pay. 'And also that money that we raised from national insurance, but also cracking down on non-doms, tax - VAT - on private schools, increasing capital gains, particularly on private equity firms, that money has gone into our National Health Service, which is why waiting lists and waiting times are going down after spiralling out of control the last few years. 'So I do recognise that all policies have consequences, but if I hadn't have acted to stabilise the public finances, we would be in a worse position today.' However, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride squarely blamed Ms Reeves for the hike in inflation. He said: 'This morning's news that inflation is up - and now well above the 2 per cent target - is worrying for families. 'We left Labour with inflation bang on target, but Labour's economic mismanagement is pushing up the cost of living for families - on top of the £3,500 hit to households from the Chancellor's damaging jobs tax. 'Higher inflation could also mean interest rates stay higher for longer, hitting family finances hard. 'Families are paying the price for the Labour Chancellor's choices.' Speaking at an event held at Barclays in London yesterday, Mr Pill said the pace of interest rate reductions since August last year has been 'too rapid'. He said progress of 'disinflation' was partly a signal that easing monetary policy – meaning rates coming down – was working. 'And in my view, that withdrawal of policy restriction has been running a little too fast of late, given the progress achieved thus far with returning inflation to target on a lasting basis.' 'I remain concerned about upside risks to the achievement of the inflation target,' he added. Mr Pill, who is a member of the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), was among the members to vote against cutting rates to 4.25 per cent, instead preferring to leave them unchanged. The bank's base rate has come down from a peak of 5.25 per cent, when it was hiked to try to quell surging inflation across the UK. He said his vote to hold interest rates at this month's policy meeting was more of a 'skip' than a 'halt' in rate cuts. This reflects his view that the 'pace of bank rate reduction should be 'cautious', running slower than the 25bp (basis points) per quarter we have implemented since last August', the economist said. 'That requires a 'skip' in that quarterly pattern at some point. And I decided that the May meeting was an appropriate moment for that 'skip'.' Meanwhile, Mr Pill stressed that he was concerned about inflation persistence – meaning price rises remaining elevated – which would mean 'you need to run the economy a little bit cooler'. 'That's an uncomfortable message, but it may be an important message for policymakers with inflation targets to normalise,' he said. 'I do worry about the fact that inflation has stayed stubbornly high, and pay dynamics have stayed stubbornly strong, even as activity has been relatively disappointing… over the last two to three years. 'So that's what I worry about… and I think that does influence the way I vote in the committee as an individual.' Daniel Casali, chief investment strategist at wealth manager Evelyn Partners, said: 'This acceleration in inflation for April was driven by a triple-whammy of factors. One, large indexed and regulated price increases, including mobile phone charges, vehicle excise duty, and water and energy bills. 'Two, a later-than-usual Easter weekend, which lifted airfare and accommodation prices, and three, businesses passing on the higher National Minimum Wage and employers' National Insurance (NI) contributions to consumers... 'If inflation exceeds expectations – as today's figure suggests it could - the MPC could well delay a further interest rate cut at its next meeting on June 19, particularly if news on the real economy remains stable.'
North Wales Chronicle
5 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
More than £1 billion paid to those wronged by Horizon scandal, Government says
The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) said money has now been paid out to more than 7,300 subpostmasters across all Horizon-related redress schemes. The announcement comes just weeks after lead campaigner and former subpostmaster Sir Alan Bates said the schemes had 'turned into quasi-kangaroo courts'. Sir Alan told the Sunday Times last month that DBT 'sits in judgement of the claims and alters the goal posts as and when it chooses'. Between 1999 and 2015, more than 900 subpostmasters were prosecuted after faulty Horizon accounting software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts. Many are still awaiting compensation. In figures published on Monday, DBT said £559 million has been paid out to 6,337 claimants from the Horizon shortfall scheme. The data also says that of the 492 subpostmasters who joined Sir Alan Bates in taking the Post Office to court between 2017 and 2019 that have not been convicted, also known as the Group Litigation Order Scheme (GLO), 488 have received £167 million between them. Elsewhere, £245 million has been paid out to 463 subpostmasters who had their convictions quashed by legislation put in place last summer, and £68 million has been paid to those who have had their convictions quashed in the courts, DBT said. Post Office minister Gareth Thomas said: 'Since entering Government, it has been our priority to speed up the delivery of compensation to victims of the Horizon scandal and today's milestone shows how much progress has been made. 'We are settling cases every day and getting compensation out more quickly for the most complex cases, but the job isn't done until every postmaster has received fair and just redress.' Post Office chief executive Neil Brocklehurst said: 'I welcome the news that over £1 billion has been paid to victims of the Horizon IT Scandal. 'Each week we are seeing more people receive their final settlements so they can begin to look beyond this painful chapter of their lives. 'However, I am also aware that more work remains to be done so that all victims receive full redress as quickly as possible and this is an absolute priority for the Post Office. 'And finally, to anyone else who thinks they may have been affected, I encourage you to come forward and apply for redress.'
Glasgow Times
8 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Around 1,000 doctors urge MPs to vote against ‘unsafe' assisted dying Bill
The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will return to the House of Commons for debate on Friday, with MPs expected to consider further amendments. But in a letter, published this week, doctors from across the NHS have urged lawmakers to listen to those 'who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill'. They warn the Bill 'poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'. In its current form the proposed legislation, which applies only to England and Wales, would mean terminally ill adults with only six months left to live could apply for assistance to end their lives, subject to the approval of two doctors and an expert panel. Last month, MPs approved a change in the Bill to ensure no medics would be obliged to take part in assisted dying. Doctors already had an opt-out but the new clause extends that to anyone, including pharmacists and social care workers. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. The letter to MPs said: 'As experienced medical professionals who regularly work with dying patients and who have reviewed the worldwide evidence on assisted dying, it is our opinion that this Bill poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce, and we urge you to vote against it. 'We are concerned that the private member's Bill process has not facilitated a balanced approach to the collection of evidence and input from key stakeholders including doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups. 'This Bill will widen inequalities, it provides inadequate safeguards and, in our collective view, is simply not safe. 'This is the most important piece of healthcare legislation for 60 years and we urge you to listen to the doctors who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill.' Sir Ed Davey welcomed the letter on Monday, telling Sky News he had 'real concerns'. 'I have voted against this assisted dying legislation, as I did on previous occasions,' the Liberal Democrat leader said. 'I have real concerns about the pressure on individuals, that they will put on themselves, if they think they are a burden on their family, so I welcome this letter.' He added: 'I hope, as time has gone on, as the arguments have been better exposed, that MPs will switch sides and join the side that I and many MPs are on.' But Sir Chris Bryant said he would be voting in favour. The technology minister told Sky News: 'The Government doesn't have a formal position at all and individual members are free to choose how they vote. 'I'm not going to hide my own personal preference. I abstained on the first time round, I decided I wasn't going to vote because I wanted to hear the debate. 'I have listened to a lot of the debate. Of course, I don't want anybody to feel that they are a burden on society and that should lead them towards taking their own life, but I also have heard the cries of people who are absolutely miserable, and that's why I will be voting for the Bill.' Some of the Bill's opponents have urged MPs to focus on improving end-of-life care rather than legislating for assisted dying. Ahead of last month's Commons debate on the Bill, two royal medical colleges raised concerns over the proposed legislation. The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) said it believes there are 'concerning deficiencies', while the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) said it has 'serious concerns' and cannot support the Bill. People with terminal illnesses, surrounded by loved ones, display their dying wishes on tags outside the Palace of Westminster in London to urge MPs to support the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Jas Lehal/PA) Opinions among members of the medical profession remain varied, with TV doctor Hilary Jones describing assisted dying for the terminally ill as 'kind and compassionate', adding that he would help a patient to end their life if the law was changed. The GP, often seen on ITV's Good Morning Britain and the Lorraine show, told the PA news agency he believes medicine will go 'back to the Dark Ages' if proposed legislation being considered at Westminster is voted down. While Friday is expected to see debate on further amendments to the Bill, it is thought a vote on the overall legislation might not take place until the following Friday, June 20.
