President Cyril Ramaphosa establishes a Commission of Inquiry into delay in investigation and prosecution of Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) cases
President Cyril Ramaphosa has signed a proclamation for the establishment of a judicial commission of inquiry to determine whether attempts were made to prevent the investigation and prosecution of apartheid-era crimes.
The commission will be chaired by retired Constitutional Court Judge Sisi Khampepe. She will be assisted by retired Northern Cape Judge President Frans Diale Kgomo and Adv Andrea Gabriel SC.
The establishment of the commission of inquiry is part of an agreement reached in settlement discussions in a court application brought by families of victims of apartheid-era crimes.
President Ramaphosa said: 'For many years, there have been allegations of interference in these cases. This alleged interference is seen as the cause of an unacceptable delay in the investigation and prosecution of brutal crimes committed under apartheid. This has caused the families of victims great anguish and frustration.
'All affected families – and indeed all South Africans – deserve closure and justice. A commission of inquiry with broad and comprehensive terms of reference is an opportunity to establish the truth and provide guidance on any further action that needs to be taken.'
The Commission must inquire into, make findings, report on and make recommendations on:
- whether, why, to what extent and by whom attempts were made to influence members of the South African Police Service or National Prosecuting Authority not to investigate or prosecute cases identified by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission;
- whether any members of the SAPS or the NPA improperly colluded with such attempts to influence or pressure them;
- whether any action should be taken by an Organ of State, including possible further investigations or prosecutions, of persons who may have acted unlawfully;
- whether the payment of any amount in constitutional damages to any person is appropriate.
The commission will cover the period from 2003 to the present.
Interested parties include victims or families of victims in TRC cases who have a substantial interest in these matters, including parties in the current application proceedings against the President and government.
The commission will be expected to complete its work within six months from the date of this proclamation and submit its report within 60 days after the completion of its work.
While the families of victims and government have agreed to the establishment of the Commission of Inquiry, we were not able to reach a settlement on other matters in the application.
Government believes that these matters will be addressed through the commission of inquiry while the families want the matters to be determined by a court.
The President respects the decision of the families to seek a court order on the violation of their rights and constitutional damages through the courts. However, government is seeking a stay of application on these outstanding matters pending the conclusion and outcomes of the commission of inquiry.
'As the commission undertakes this important task, we welcome the firm commitment by the NPA and the South African Police Service to investigate and, where appropriate, to prosecute the outstanding TRC cases. In recent years, the NPA has reopened and pursued priority cases. It has assigned dedicated resources to ensure these cases are dealt with effectively.
'As this government, we are determined that those individuals responsible for apartheid crimes and who were not granted amnesty by the TRC be held to account.
'This commission of inquiry is an opportunity to draw a line under a painful period in our country's history. It is an opportunity to establish the truth and take steps, to the extent possible, to put right what may have gone wrong.
'I thank the Commission chairperson and two assistants for agreeing to take on this responsibility and wish them well in their work,' President Ramaphosa said.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of The Presidency of the Republic of South Africa.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
8 hours ago
- Zawya
Committee on Sports Summons South African Football Association (SAFA) to Round Two of Discussions After Many Unanswered Question
The Portfolio Committee on Sport, Arts and Culture will invite to Parliament the South African Football Association (SAFA) in its quest to get the governance and finances of the association back on solid ground. SAFA appeared before the committee on Tuesday where it informed the committee that its finances were not sound and that they were working on challenges. The Chairperson of the committee, Mr Joe McGluwa, said the serious issues that confronted the association necessitate that there be a follow up meeting. 'We need a way forward to pull SAFA from the financial stress it is in. It concerns the committee that a lot of crucial details to many issues at SAFA are being withheld from Members. Importantly, we could not find a sense that issues were being dealt with proactively.' Mr McGluwa said it worried the committee that SAFA lacked cogent programmes a challenge which has seen many aspiring footballers leave other provinces mainly to concentrate in Johannesburg. Among the many challenges that the committee was informed included the lack of sponsors, salary disparities related to national coaches, lack of consequence management, lack of budget with such consequence as having liabilities far exceed assets, etc. Mr McGluwa said the inability to generate revenue for the national association was worrisome and could spell disaster for provinces and regions of SAFA as many tournaments had been staged without any form of support. 'SAFA is not sustainable; SAFA cannot run its operations. This is the elephant in the room that all football loving people need to sort the mess out,' added Mr McGluwa. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Republic of South Africa: The Parliament.
Zawya
8 hours ago
- Zawya
Home Affairs Committee Makes Decisions on Interest of Justice Criterion and Other Matters Contained in Immigration Amendment Bill
The Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs yesterday made concrete decisions on various contentious issues within the Immigration Amendment Bill, including the acceptable location to codify the interest of justice criterion of the Bill. This brings the Bill closer to completion to bring it in line with Constitutional Court judgements. The committee has resolved that the interest of justice criterion that guides immigration officials in making detention decisions for undocumented immigrants will now be codified in the Bill's regulations. Despite various views on the matter, the decision was premised on the view that the department's standard operating procedure are inaccessible to the public and can be amended without stakeholder interaction. Also, the committee was of the view that codifying it in the regulations would enable oversight accountability by Parliament. Meanwhile, the committee has resolved that the Bill directly and adequately addresses the unconstitutional provisions identified by the Constitutional Court and, at this juncture, will be ideal to remedy those defects. As a result, the committee has decided that some of the recommendations identified by the stakeholders during the public participation process, including the protection of the rights of immigrant children, should be deferred to the ongoing process to review of the White Paper on Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection. 'The committee reiterates its view that the White Paper is even more urgent now to ensure policy certainty on immigration issues, hence its call for the department to expedite its processing. To avoid a piecemeal approach to legislation development, the White Paper should provide a clear framework of the migration system in the country. As a result of the committee's decision, which consequently requires the amendment of Section 7 of the principal Act and is not in the Bill, the committee will write to the National Assembly in line with NA Rules 286 (4)(c) to seek permission to amend a section of the principal Act that is not in the Bill. The Parliamentary Legal Unit, together with the Office of the State Law Advisor, have been mandated to draft the A list of the Bill reflective of the committee's resolutions. The A list will be considered in the scheduled meeting on 10 June 2025. The committee remains committed to concluding the process and ensuring the closure of gaps identified by the Constitutional Court judgement. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Republic of South Africa: The Parliament.
Zawya
9 hours ago
- Zawya
South Africa: Select Committee on Public Infrastructure Is Briefed by Auditor-General
The Select Committee on Public Infrastructure and the Ministries in the Presidency received a briefing from the Auditor-General (AG) of South Africa on the audit outcomes for the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME), Brand SA and Statistics South Africa (Stats SA). The committee expressed serious concerns about the mixed performance of these critical government institutions that report to the department. Committee Chairperson Mr Rikus Badenhorst noted that while Brand SA maintained its clean audit status, the regression in the DPME's audit outcome from clean to unqualified with findings, as well as the persistent material findings at Stats SA, point to systemic weaknesses in expenditure management, internal controls and consequence management across the portfolio. "What emerges most clearly from the Auditor-General's presentation is a culture of stagnation. Recommendations are noted but not acted upon, plans are drafted but not internalised, and repeat findings accumulate without resolution. We cannot allow inaction to become institutionalised," said Mr Badenhorst. The committee was particularly concerned about the significant backlog of unresolved irregular and fruitless expenditure cases at Stats SA, some dating back over a decade. Members of the committee argued that the vacancies in key positions, including the CFO role which has been vacant for eight years, have severely weakened the control environment and accountability mechanisms at the entity. The committee said the credibility of the data and statistics produced by Stats SA is critical for effective government planning and service delivery. The persistence of these governance and financial management failures is deeply troubling and requires urgent intervention. The committee welcomed the Auditor General's recommendations for the accounting officers, including: - Ensuring vacant positions are timeously filled to maintain effective internal controls - Enhancing reviews of performance planning and reporting processes - Swiftly resolving all cases of irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure - Monitoring the implementation of action plans with a focus on daily controls and reconciliations Members emphasised the need for the executive authority and accounting officers to be held accountable for addressing these persistent weaknesses. The committee committed to regularly engage the DPME, Brand SA and Stats SA to monitor progress on implementing the AG's recommendations and achieving tangible improvements in audit outcomes, performance and accountability. 'This report must be our guide when we engage these departments during the upcoming budget process. We cannot allow inaction to become institutionalised. The people of South Africa deserve efficient, transparent and accountable public institutions that deliver on their developmental mandate,' concluded Mr Badenhorst. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Republic of South Africa: The Parliament.
