logo
Britain's voters can't resist a messy drama. How fortunate for Nigel Farage and Reform

Britain's voters can't resist a messy drama. How fortunate for Nigel Farage and Reform

The Guardian10-06-2025
It was a busy week for on-again off-again Reform chair Zia Yusuf, whose job over the past 11 months had been to reform Reform. (I know.) Zia quit on Thursday. Had his job split on Friday. Returned on Saturday. Chilled on Sunday. The job split seems to have endured though, as Yusuf will now run a UK version of Doge – as we know, the perfect role for highly emotional men – while this very morning, Nigel Farage was unveiling a new chair: Dr David Bull. David brings extensive experience with witchcraft, ghosts, spirits and beasts from his time as presenter of paranormal reality TV show Most Haunted Live, where he packaged the wailings of reekingly obvious charlatan/compelling spirit medium Derek Acorah for a studio audience. I can't imagine what this CV could do for Reform, but Nigel Farage must have seen something in it.
Derek Acorah crossed permanently to the spirit world in January 2020, but it would be nice to think that shouldn't be a bar to his being selected as one of those Reform candidates credited with being able to make deep connections with a public that is desperately searching for something beyond the ordinary. It would certainly be a less mad development than some other of the party's activities this week. On Monday, Farage could be found in Wales promising to reopen Port Talbot steelworks, a plan so nutso that it could only really be believed by conspiracy theorists. Jet fuel can't melt steel beams – and Nigel Farage can re-melt steel furnaces that have cooled solid. Sure thing! Also, he might very well win the next election, so make of that what you will.
From the Rupert Lowe conflagration to the Yusuf hokey cokey last weekend, it has to be said that the endless drama in Reform this year hasn't dented Farage's party's poll ratings one tiny bit. In fact, up they climb. My theory is that at some level, people actively like it. They liked Boris Johnson's fecklessness and chaos too – until, admittedly, they really didn't. Still, what a run. As discussed here previously, Britain is a majority nutter nation, and in recent history our deepest and most long-lasting political affections have been reserved for figures across the spectrum who had something of the nutter to them. Thatcher, Blair, Johnson … all nutters. Even Corbyn did miles better than he should have, simply by virtue of being a nutter – though he ultimately failed for not being a kindred nutter. Reform give the impression of being long and strong in nutters. 'He crawled out under the wire,' twinkled Farage this morning of Yusuf's 'bid for freedom', 'but we got him back in!'
'Sorry to put you all through that!' said Yusuf with a slightly strangulated smile. 'I did realise the only way I was going to get a couple of days off was to resign and then come back again … I can't thank Nigel enough for having me back. I regret those tweets, I was exhausted.' As Farage implied, this is just the sort of thing that happens when passionate people care almost too much.
For decades, the deepest analysis afforded to the England football side was that they needed to play with more 'passion', and there is now a huge amount of this in the way we assess politicians. Keir Starmer, a sterile lawyer who communicates with all the vim of a recorded 'see it, say it, sorted' message, does not reach the parts that need reaching. Farage speaks a more natural language, and consequently gets away with dismissing with one joke a row that would have consumed other parties' PR machines for weeks. 'Reform hit a speed bump last week,' he said in Wales of Yusuf's resignation and unresignation. 'Maybe it's because we were driving above the recommended 20mph …'
Arguably, it was ever thus. Reform keeps refreshing its moniker, but in many ways it's still the same – like a bankrupt who changes his name each time he moves town and starts another double-glazing business. Ukip, the Brexit party, Reform – every time Nigel leads another one you hear a lot about professional revolution, but at some level they're still the same outfit where one MEP had some altercation with another one, after which the latter collapsed in the European parliament. As Neil Hamilton insisted at the time, this is simply the sort of thing that happens when 'passions run high'.
But by far the most important part is: it doesn't seem to matter. What's changed in a post-Trump world is that chaos and drama can be repolished as political assets. As I say, I think the lack of discipline is part of the appeal. Discipline – what really is there to love about that word for most people? It smacks of being told off, which many have had quite enough of over the past decade of elite cultural policing. Politicians who manage rigidly conventional discipline above almost anything else have become regarded as robotic, while prodigals like Farage are polling like they're worth laying on a fatted takeaway for.
Instead of trying to counter Farage with the very conventions to which he is an adverse reaction, the two main parties should consider how unbelievably badly they've cocked things up that Nigel's rolling drama seems like a good idea. 'Can we do it?' wondered Dr David Bull rhetorically this morning of making Farage prime minister. 'Well, to quote Bob the Builder: YES WE CAN.' Can't help thinking it was someone other than Bob the Builder who made 'yes we can' into an iconic political slogan … but – to use words which may function equally well as a Reform slogan – let's not get bogged down in details.
Marina Hyde is a Guardian columnist
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is mass surveillance the way forward to police society?
Is mass surveillance the way forward to police society?

The Independent

time22 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Is mass surveillance the way forward to police society?

Most sources suggest that Britain, in terms of CCTV cameras and coverage per head in cities, is one of the most surveilled nations in the world, albeit coming some way behind China, where it seems to be even more routine. The trend towards 'snooping' on British folk seems to be accelerating. More live facial recognition vans are to be deployed across seven police forces in England in a mass-surveillance trial. The aim is to identify and locate suspects in some of the crimes that most worry the public, such as sexual offences, violent assaults and murder. Ticket touts are also targets. Crime is a major concern among voters, but so are their civil liberties... How will it work? Quite passively, as has been the case for some years. Just like in films, the police can place vans in crowded places such as high streets and automatically scan the faces of people walking past, checking them against a databank of images of wanted people. If it relies on busy officers spooling through hours of footage, it might not always be worth the effort; they have enough trouble at present trying to find shoplifters. Does it work? Yes. There have been many successes over the years, though it obviously works best in the big cities, where it operates like a fishing boat trawling for a catch. Ministers say that in London over the past year, facial recognition technology has helped to secure 580 arrests, including the detention of 52 registered sex offenders who breached their conditions. At a time of shrivelled police budgets, a shortage of officers and concerns about 'lawless Britain' (it isn't, by the way), facial recognition harnessed to AI could transform police productivity – and cut crime. It could quite conceivably lower the risk of mass murder through terrorism, for example, which tends to take place in urban centres. Win-win? Not quite. There are practical problems. The software can make mistakes, leading to embarrassment for innocent parties. Twins don't like it, for obvious reasons. The system can't work if people change their appearance or wear a face-covering, and if villains steer clear of the big cities. People wearing face-coverings for religious or health reasons could be stigmatised as 'camera dodgers'. What about the human right to a private life? Quite. One glaring issue is that there is no legislation covering this area of police work, and no national debate has taken place about the creeping ubiquity of various types of surveillance – online as well as on the streets. Parliament does need to create some kind of framework, and one that is consistent with existing laws and international commitments on human rights. So are we becoming a 'big brother' society? With 5 million CCTV cameras, plus an unknown number in offices, plus dashcams in cars and doorbell cameras, the British can hardly cough without it being captured in high definition. Civil liberties groups claim that the UK is becoming a 'big brother society', a 'surveillance state' where privacy is at risk. There's certainly the possibility of a 'Coldplay moment', where someone having an affair is caught on camera and the evidence finds its way into the public domain. Former health secretary Matt Hancock springs to mind. Plenty more risks like that... What does the government say? Dame Diana Johnson, the minister responsible, pleads that it is 'a powerful tool for policing' and will only be used in 'a very measured, proportionate way' to find individuals suspected of serious offences. But there's dissent. Shami Chakrabarti, who served as shadow attorney general under Jeremy Corbyn, says the technology is 'incredibly intrusive', remarking: 'Some would say this is yet another move towards a total surveillance society.' Some would indeed. And the opposition? Well, the present shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, in his role as a Home Office minister a few years ago, oversaw a substantial increase in CCTV use. In October 2023, for example, he suggested that police force leaders in England and Wales should aim to exceed 200,000 searches of still images against the police national database. Predictably, Nigel Farage, despite his summer crime campaign (to clarify, a campaign against crime), simply declared that he 'doesn't want to live in China'.

JD Vance arrives in Scotland for family holiday
JD Vance arrives in Scotland for family holiday

The Independent

time22 minutes ago

  • The Independent

JD Vance arrives in Scotland for family holiday

US Vice-President JD Vance has arrived in Scotland as part of a family holiday to the UK. The Republican's stay is expected to require a considerable policing operation. It follows a visit by his boss, US President Donald Trump, who recently spent five days in Scotland split between his golf courses in South Ayrshire and Aberdeenshire and during which time he met the First Minister and Prime Minister. Mr Vance arrived at Prestwick Airport on Wednesday evening and is expected to head to the luxury Carnell Estate in East Ayrshire. Airspace restrictions are in place around the estate until Sunday. A Police Scotland spokesperson previously said: 'Planning is under way for a potential visit to Scotland by the vice-president of the United States. 'Details of any visit would be for the White House to comment on, however it is important that we prepare in advance for what would be a significant policing operation.' Mr Vance had been holidaying in the Cotswolds but travelled to the Foreign Secretary's Chevening House retreat in Kent on Friday, and he joined David Lammy carp fishing at the countryside estate. Earlier on Wednesday, JD Vance described the UK and US' relationship as 'a beautiful alliance', during a speech at RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire. The group Mothers Against Genocide have signalled they will stage a protest against Mr Vance's visit to Scotland.

Water pistol attackers who sprayed Jews let off with ‘slap on wrist'
Water pistol attackers who sprayed Jews let off with ‘slap on wrist'

Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Water pistol attackers who sprayed Jews let off with ‘slap on wrist'

Police have been urged not to turn a blind eye to anti-Semitism after two men who targeted Orthodox Jews with water pistols were let off with a 'slap on the wrist'. The pair, who filmed themselves driving around Greater Manchester spraying pedestrians dressed in Orthodox clothing with an unidentified liquid, were arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated assault last week. But Greater Manchester Police have now imposed community resolution orders – the most lenient option available – after the pair apologised for their actions. Community resolutions, which carry no criminal record, can only be issued for hate crimes in exceptional circumstances should the offender admit the offence, the victim not wish to press charges and an inspector sign off on disposing the case. But the leniency shown to the men, who sprayed adults and children before posting the footage to Instagram accompanied by the Jewish folk song Hava Nagila, has provoked outrage. 'Public humiliation for profit' Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, urged police to look at the case again and take 'the most robust action'. He said: 'Spraying members of the Jewish community with water pistols while jeering from the safety of a car is cowardice. It is public humiliation for profit, fuelling online hate, and encourages others to join in. 'This is happening against the backdrop of over 1,500 anti-Semitic incidents in just the first half of this year, one of the highest totals ever recorded. Jewish communities are being harassed, spat at, and attacked, and now filmed. This is not something Britain can turn a blind eye to. 'The police should look again at this case and take the most robust action where possible. We cannot allow a Britain where Jewish families feel unsafe on their own streets simply because of their faith.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store