‘It cannot carry on as things have been' – Gayton McKenzie as he cuts funding for Downtown Music Hub
Statement details how Downtown Music Hub received just over R93M since the 2008/2009 financial year to now.
After years of alleged mismanagement, during which staff went months without receiving their salaries, Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture Gayton McKenzie has cut funding for the Downtown Music Hub to facilitate a full investigation.
'It is simply unsustainable for the department to keep carrying this project due to budget constraints. We will focus on what the future of this important, nostalgic music heritage site will be, but it is clear that it cannot carry on as things have been,' McKenzie said.
Downtown is a recording facility in Johannesburg boasting over 40 years of recording history.
The minister said he was cutting funding to allow for a full investigation to be finalised on funds that have been disbursed since 2008 and to decide what needs to be done with the asset.
ALSO READ: Event organiser demands over R80k refund after Pearl Thusi no-show
The Downtown Music Hub project
The Downtown Music Hub project was initiated in 2008 by then-minister of arts and culture, Pallo Jordan, to lower barriers to recording facilities, among other objectives, following the purchase of Downtown Studios in Johannesburg.
'Based on an agreement between the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture (DSAC) and the National Arts Council (NAC), the building and its assets were to be donated to a Special Purpose Entity (SPE) following its establishment,' reads the DSAC statement.
The SPE was subsequently established in 2010 as a non-profit company known as Downtown Music Hub.
The Downtown Studios business was purchased as a going concern, which required that the employees be transferred from the seller to the buyer by Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act.
The employees were not transferred to the NAC, but were later absorbed by the SPE.
The NAC-led process of transferring and/or donating the assets to the SPE was never implemented due to a lack of common ground between the DSAC, the NAC, and the National Treasury.
'It was said that there would be no substantive and justifiable reasons for the department to donate the assets to an institution that was not associated with government in terms of any applicable legislation.
'This divergence created delays in the finalisation of the transfer. A counter proposal emerged that the assets be transferred to the department of public works instead, which also did not occur,' the statement said.
The NAC was ultimately compelled to incorporate the assets into its books, which created accounting problems for the state-owned entity, particularly regarding the method of property acquisition.
This resulted in adverse audit findings, which were finally resolved when the then minister of arts and culture, with the minister of finance, condoned the acquisition of the building.
In terms of Section 6(3) of the NAC Act, however, the NAC is prohibited from acquiring and operating an income-generating business, in this case, the recording studios.
The NAC was therefore forced to allow the SPE to run the business independently.
ALSO READ: Holding cell drama in Mozambique: Scotts Maphuma in 'hot water' over no-show
Operating at a loss
According to the DSAC, the studio business has been operating at a loss, placing a liability on the department to cover its running and building maintenance costs.
'The SPE's management made it clear that it was unable to approach private investors due to the matters connected to the ownership of the building and the studios. Health and safety hazards in the building have also had an adverse impact on opportunities for making additional income.'
The DSAC's statement details how Downtown has received just over R93 million since the 2008/2009 financial year to now.
In 2021, the department's director general appointed an internal task team to investigate and guide on the future of Downtown.
'Following its work, it was recommended that the project be repositioned and be incorporated into one of the declared cultural institutions of the department, but no final decision was taken.'
NOW READ: 'I'm not gonna lie, this is rocking me': Prince Kaybee opens up about health battle
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
14 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘It cannot carry on as things have been' – Gayton McKenzie as he cuts funding for Downtown Music Hub
Statement details how Downtown Music Hub received just over R93M since the 2008/2009 financial year to now. After years of alleged mismanagement, during which staff went months without receiving their salaries, Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture Gayton McKenzie has cut funding for the Downtown Music Hub to facilitate a full investigation. 'It is simply unsustainable for the department to keep carrying this project due to budget constraints. We will focus on what the future of this important, nostalgic music heritage site will be, but it is clear that it cannot carry on as things have been,' McKenzie said. Downtown is a recording facility in Johannesburg boasting over 40 years of recording history. The minister said he was cutting funding to allow for a full investigation to be finalised on funds that have been disbursed since 2008 and to decide what needs to be done with the asset. ALSO READ: Event organiser demands over R80k refund after Pearl Thusi no-show The Downtown Music Hub project The Downtown Music Hub project was initiated in 2008 by then-minister of arts and culture, Pallo Jordan, to lower barriers to recording facilities, among other objectives, following the purchase of Downtown Studios in Johannesburg. 'Based on an agreement between the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture (DSAC) and the National Arts Council (NAC), the building and its assets were to be donated to a Special Purpose Entity (SPE) following its establishment,' reads the DSAC statement. The SPE was subsequently established in 2010 as a non-profit company known as Downtown Music Hub. The Downtown Studios business was purchased as a going concern, which required that the employees be transferred from the seller to the buyer by Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. The employees were not transferred to the NAC, but were later absorbed by the SPE. The NAC-led process of transferring and/or donating the assets to the SPE was never implemented due to a lack of common ground between the DSAC, the NAC, and the National Treasury. 'It was said that there would be no substantive and justifiable reasons for the department to donate the assets to an institution that was not associated with government in terms of any applicable legislation. 'This divergence created delays in the finalisation of the transfer. A counter proposal emerged that the assets be transferred to the department of public works instead, which also did not occur,' the statement said. The NAC was ultimately compelled to incorporate the assets into its books, which created accounting problems for the state-owned entity, particularly regarding the method of property acquisition. This resulted in adverse audit findings, which were finally resolved when the then minister of arts and culture, with the minister of finance, condoned the acquisition of the building. In terms of Section 6(3) of the NAC Act, however, the NAC is prohibited from acquiring and operating an income-generating business, in this case, the recording studios. The NAC was therefore forced to allow the SPE to run the business independently. ALSO READ: Holding cell drama in Mozambique: Scotts Maphuma in 'hot water' over no-show Operating at a loss According to the DSAC, the studio business has been operating at a loss, placing a liability on the department to cover its running and building maintenance costs. 'The SPE's management made it clear that it was unable to approach private investors due to the matters connected to the ownership of the building and the studios. Health and safety hazards in the building have also had an adverse impact on opportunities for making additional income.' The DSAC's statement details how Downtown has received just over R93 million since the 2008/2009 financial year to now. In 2021, the department's director general appointed an internal task team to investigate and guide on the future of Downtown. 'Following its work, it was recommended that the project be repositioned and be incorporated into one of the declared cultural institutions of the department, but no final decision was taken.' NOW READ: 'I'm not gonna lie, this is rocking me': Prince Kaybee opens up about health battle
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
Goodyear to shut down Nelson Mandela Bay manufacturing plant — 900 jobs at risk
After 78 years of manufacturing tyres in Kariega, Nelson Mandela Bay, the Goodyear factory will close. Restructuring that includes the closure of the company's manufacturing arm in South Africa will take place – Section 189A retrenchment notices have been served. The jobs of 900 workers are at risk and thousands of jobs from secondary industries are being threatened as Goodyear announced this week that it was closing its factory in Nelson Mandela Bay. The factory, in Kariega (formerly Uitenhage), was opened in 1947. About 900 employees will lose their jobs, but fears are that this will have a larger secondary impact as other industries, such as catering, security and corporate social investment projects will be affected by the decision. Company representatives would not answer questions on Thursday, but issued a general statement confirming that it was shutting down its manufacturing arm in South Africa. 'Goodyear is transforming its go-to-market strategy in the Europe, Middle East and Africa region to optimise its footprint and portfolio. 'As part of that transformation, Goodyear South Africa is launching a restructuring process in accordance with the provisions of the Labour Relations Act to address proposals regarding the closure of its manufacturing facility in South Africa and the realignment of certain sales, administration and general management functions. Goodyear South Africa will continue to maintain a sales and distribution, and Hi-Q retail presence in South Africa,' the statement read. 'This proposal is in no way a reflection of the commendable efforts or the years of dedication of our South Africa team, for which we are grateful,' the statement added. The process will be facilitated by the CCMA. 'As a company, we recognise our responsibilities towards our employees and their families and are firmly committed to acting fairly and providing them with appropriate support,' the company's statement continued. National Metal Workers Union representative Phakamile Hlubi-Majola said the union had not yet received a Section 189 notice from Goodyear. CEO of Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber Denise van Huyssteen said the chamber would assist workers through its job loss mitigation initiative. The initiative connects companies seeking artisans with those whose jobs had been made redundant. Previously, the chamber helped redirect employees of specialist tyre manufacturer, Continental Conti-tech when it closed its plant in Nelson Mandela Bay. Van Huyssteen said the chamber was saddened to receive the news of the Goodyear retrenchments at the Kariega factory. 'This comes just months after Conti-tech announced that it was closing its plant, and the Bridgestone plant closure of over four years ago. 'This highlights the massive pressure which tyre manufacturers are under due to enabling environment issues such as the logistics challenges; lack of service delivery at a municipal level; inadequate maintenance of electricity, water and sanitation infrastructure; increased costs relating to safety and security; above-inflation input costs for essential services such as electricity; as well as cheap tyre imports which are flooding the market,' she said. Nduduzo Chala from the South African Tyre Manufacturers Conference said that while he wanted to allow Goodyear to go through the process it had begun, he could say that trading conditions for local manufacturers had been very difficult over the past few years. The conference represents the four big tyre manufacturers in South Africa — Bridgestone, Dunlop, Goodyear and Continental. 'The market has been plagued with an unfair trade environment. It is a question of producers vs importers, and low-cost products have been introduced into the market,' he said. He said they had persuaded the government, even though it took more than a year, to introduce anti-dumping duties on China recently. 'It was a very unfair trading environment,' he said. 'But there are always loopholes, and the Chinese companies are now shifting operations to Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam. We then had to do the same for these countries,' he said. 'However, the sustainability of manufacturing has become challenging,' Chala said. DM
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
SA Rugby's financial future looking rosy
The South African Rugby Union (Saru) is set to buck the global trend and report a profit of more than R100m for 2025. South African rugby's continued investment in membership of northern hemisphere rugby competitions led to a R93m group loss in 2024, but the organisation had already wiped out that deficit with a strong start to 2025, the annual meeting of Saru was told in Cape Town today. Saru's reported profit in 2025 would ensure the 15 member unions receive their full funding, while support of the Springboks and all national teams would continue unchecked. In the last reporting cycle, other international federations had lost as much as R913m, with five other tier-one nations reporting losses of between R588m and R181m. The next 'best' performance after South Africa's was a loss of R126m, members were told. SA Rugby CEO Rian Oberholzer said that the investment in participation in the Vodacom URC and European Professional Club Rugby (EPCR) had come at a net cost of R124m in 2024. 'We have been investing in the long-term future of South African rugby to become full members of the URC for the best part of eight years,' said Oberholzer. 'It has come at a significant cost to the sport but there is no doubt that it has been the right thing to do. 'Once we fulfill certain membership obligations this year, we will begin to reap the on and off field rewards of such investment. 'If we had not undertaken this journey, we would have been reduced to playing only domestic competitions, which would have had catastrophic high performance as well as financial ramifications for rugby in South Africa. 'It has been a tough financial road, but we have annually outperformed our global peers since the pandemic, while taking on the unusual cost of our investment into URC and EPCR.' Oberholzer said the turnaround in 2025 was being achieved by a reformatting of SA Rugby's offering to partners, featuring enhanced rights at enhanced values, as well as the creation of a new commercial delivery model. Overall, in 2024, group commercial revenues exceeded R1.5b for the first time (R1.552b), up from R1.440b in 2023. Total income with the addition of grants (principally from World Rugby of R186m) took total income to R1.76b. Revenues for 2025 are forecast to exceed R2b. The 7.8% increase in revenues was attributable to increased broadcast revenues in a non-world cup year, competition sponsorships and a strong performance in merchandising receipts which more than doubled from R30m to R62m. Expenses increased from R1.816b to R1.871b. The 2.9% increase was put down to investment in hosting three World Rugby tournaments (R133m), a R24m increase in player image rights (to R148m) and the costs associated with the mooted private equity transaction (R13m). Total expenditure attributable to the northern hemisphere international franchise competition was R446m while SA Rugby was still able to make a full distribution to member unions. Spending on the No 1-ranked Springboks, and other national teams, was R433m, a reduction of R27m on the world cup winning year of 2023 (R460m). 'Reporting a loss can never be desirable but the irony is that we are more than satisfied with our position,' said Oberholzer. 'We had budgeted for a loss in 2024 in the expectation that the members would approve the private equity transaction that they had sought, releasing funds to cover the deficit. 'When that did not happen, we continued with our planned commercial reset, and other revenue generation plans, which have borne fruit. We are in the very rare position among our international peers of continuing to be debt-free and confident of posting a surplus in 2025.' ALSO: SA Rugby defends Bok ticket prices Oberholzer said the financial outlook beyond next year was equally healthy with strong revenues forecast for 2026 with new competition formats in the pipeline. 'The income that SA Rugby generates all goes back into supporting the growth and promotion of rugby in the country,' he said. 'It allows us to fund Springbok campaigns, expand women's rugby programmes and fuel our other national teams. It pays for our members' activities in their communities, as well as their professional teams. It underwrites our rugby safety programme BokSmart; supports referee and coaching development and our age group competitions, as well as development programmes and allows us turn on sell-out Test match entertainment and our domestic competitions. 'Ultimately, every rand that we earn goes into powering the game in some shape or form and after a challenging 2024 we have a good news story to tell our South African rugby community as we look ahead.' The post SA Rugby's financial future looking rosy appeared first on SA Rugby magazine. Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal.
