logo
Javier Milei And The Risks Of Being A Donald Trump Copycat

Javier Milei And The Risks Of Being A Donald Trump Copycat

Forbes31-03-2025

Donald Trump's return to the White House seems to have pushed the world off its axis, even though it was a clearly plausible scenario ahead of the presidential election in the United States. Both inside the North American superpower and across the wider world, there's a feeling that every single one of Trump's orders and threats will have long-lasting effects that could derail the current world order, which in most cases means the consequences are perceived as negative.
Among those who ideologically identify themselves as close to the 'new right,' Trump's victory elicits a feeling of euphoria as the 'culture wars' v 'wokeism' battle returns to the center of the political debate. Javier Milei is among those who are ecstatic with the current course of global affairs. As Argentina's President, he can congratulate himself on the early endorsement of his colleague when his chances of electoral victory weren't as certain. His 'automatic alignment' with Washington's new policies allows the self-described 'anarcho-capitalist' libertarian to show that his chemistry with Trump, billionaire Elon Musk, Italian premier Giorgia Meloni and the rest of the gang is more important than underlying ideology, particularly on the economic front.
For now, the benefits appear greater than the drawbacks, particularly if Trump 2.0 acts like Trump 1.0 in pushing the International Monetary Fund to offer Argentina favorable terms in ongoing negotiations over a fresh financing program. Yet, there could be consequences for those importing US cultural battles to Argentina. Indeed, the response to Milei's speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where he ripped a page from Trump's playbook and doubled down on anti-wokeism, rather than keeping to his usual economics-focused agenda, generated a level of rejection that forced him to tone it down and explain himself. Much like during last year's marches in defence of public education and state universities, the President felt the blow but he will probably recover momentum quickly.
Much like the Looney Tunes' Tasmanian Devil, the Trump whirlwind seems to be destroying everything in its path. The early days of his second presidency seemed marked by a nervous necessity to get as much done as quickly as possible. He counts on his previous experience of four years in office and the capacity to build a team that should be much more efficient. Trump also enjoys majorities in both chambers of Congress and a favorable Supreme Court. POTUS has fully impacted on the prevailing world order by starting major trade wars with allies and enemies alike, beginning major deportations of mainly Latin American immigrants and proposed the reversal of several major issues that had become global policy agreements, including the Paris Climate Accord and even the relevance of the World Health Organization. Regarding the conflict in the Middle East between Israel and the Arab world, Trump went so far as to say the United States would actively take control of the area, relocate Palestinians to 'beautiful communities' abroad, and develop the real estate in Gaza to make it the 'Riviera of the Middle East.' It's difficult to determine when Trump is actually laying out a policy goal or just using his public statements as bargaining chips in his negotiations. What does seem clearer is that through his actions he's pushing 'economic autarchy' and the 'destruction of the Western Alliance,' as Financial Times journalist Gideon Rachman explained. His colleague, Martin Wolff, adds that not only is the trade war economically stupid, but it also generates unpredictability for the global superpower that weakens its position as a key ally, forcing other countries to look elsewhere for future pacts and agreements.
For Milei, there's nothing but joy from what Trump's doing. It doesn't seem to bother the anarcho-capitalist economist that the Republican's protectionist and anti-globalist stance is theoretically antagonistic with his vision of a libertarian wonderland. From a political standpoint, Milei and Trump are brothers-in-arms, meaning the Argentine can only benefit from the culture wars being waged by his buddy up North. By aligning himself with Trump's agenda, Milei is looking to increase his own impact, both domestically and abroad. While Argentina's President has always opposed 'cultural Marxism,' he's now fully absorbed the Trumpian version of anti-wokeism.
One of the risks of importing the United States' cultural agenda to Argentina is that he can alienate electorates that could have supported him in the upcoming midterm elections. Much like when he spoke about selling children or opening the market for selling organs, Milei sparked the ire of his critics, in this case the LGBT+ community, which in turn allowed a larger group opposed to him to bundle together and express their discontent in the streets. A similar situation occurred when the masses mobilized in favor of public education. In both cases Milei was forced to backtrack and try to explain why he had been misinterpreted by the media that were looking to hurt him politically. As his communications team, led by Santiago Caputo, knows quite well, it doesn't really matter what you meant to say, only what your audience received as the message. Milei has also ordered his Health Minister, Mario Lugones, to explain why he wishes to pull out of the World Health Organization, while indicating that he is considering pulling Argentina from the Paris Climate Agreement. In both cases he's imitating the Trump administration, and potentially moving before they do, even before it can be seen whether he's bluffing or not.
One possible explanation, beyond political proximity, has to do with practical reasons. The International Monetary Fund, which is ultimately controlled by the White House, is currently Argentina's largest creditor. As revealed by The Donald's top official for Latin America, Mauricio Claver-Carone, the Trump administration pushed the IMF to hand over a record bailout to Mauricio Macri in 2018 in part to try to prevent the return of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner to power. Claver-Carone, who has been named special envoy to the region, was at the time Washington's appointee to the IMF. Now, Milei and Economy Minister Luis 'Toto' Caputo — who was involved in orchestrating the original loan during the Macri administration — are looking to Washington to help them secure fresh funds while cutting them some slack on lifting currency controls (i.e. 'cepo') during an electoral year. Milei's popularity is in great part tied to the economy continuing on a path toward normalization, which means lower inflation and potentially a rebound. A sudden surge in inflation would therefore be destructive, meaning that they must defend their 'strong peso' policy at all costs. The IMF has its doubts.
Pegging Argentina's foreign policy to the United States is a risky strategy. Beyond the anti-woke agenda, Washington's leading geopolitical adversary is China, which is one of Argentina's most important trading partners. There's also the risk of 'importing' cultural battles that create further divisiveness. But the benefit of an extra push at the IMF board meeting, together with the political affinity between Milei and Trump, appear irresistible. For now, being a copy-cat seems like the best plan.
This piece was originally published in the Buenos Aires Times, Argentina's only English-language newspaper.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after Trump feud. What does it mean for the US space industry?
Elon Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after Trump feud. What does it mean for the US space industry?

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after Trump feud. What does it mean for the US space industry?

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. An explosive, and very public, feud between President Donald Trump and SpaceX founder Elon Musk on Thursday (June 5) has raised doubts over the future of America's space industry. The war of words could place $22 billion of SpaceX's government contracts with multiple U.S. space programs at risk, according to one estimate, although the real figure — which remains classified — could be significantly higher. Following threats from the president on his social media platform Truth Social that the U.S. could cancel the government contracts and subsidies awarded to Musk's companies, the CEO of SpaceX retorted that his space company would "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately." Hours later, Musk responded to a follower telling him to "cool off" by saying "Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." The disagreement began on Tuesday (June 3) when Musk criticized the administration's proposed tax and spending bill on his social media platform X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," Musk wrote on X. Related: 'No radio astronomy from the ground would be possible anymore': Satellite mega-swarms are blinding us to the cosmos — and a critical 'inflection point' is approaching This then escalated into a full-blown social media feud on Thursday, with Musk claiming that Trump's name appears in unreleased files relating to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The White House condemned these allegations. "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted," representatives wrote on X. Trump then claimed Musk "just went CRAZY," posting: "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" SpaceX's Dragon capsule is a reusable spacecraft capable of carrying up to seven passengers and cargo to and from Earth orbit, according to SpaceX. NASA currently relies on the capsule to ferry astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS), so canceling these government contracts effectively eliminates America's ability to launch astronauts to space from American soil, Live Science's sister website, reported. NASA also heavily relies on SpaceX for other space programs, having selected the Starship Human Landing System (HLS), a lunar lander variant of the company's next-generation Starship spacecraft, to carry American astronauts to the moon for the first time in more than 50 years aboard the 2027 Artemis 3 mission. NASA is investing $4 billion into Starship's development, and canceling its contract could seriously handicap NASA and the future of U.S.-led space exploration. While other competitors exist, such as Amazon founder Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin and Boeing's Starliner spacecraft, they lag far behind SpaceX. RELATED STORIES —Facing steep funding cuts, scientists propose using black holes as particle colliders instead of building new ones on Earth —Trump's 2026 budget would slash NASA funding by 24% and its workforce by nearly one third —NASA plans to build a giant radio telescope on the 'dark side' of the moon. Here's why. The Starliner capsule is not yet certified to fly operational astronaut missions and was responsible for "stranding" two astronauts on the ISS for nine months last year. The astronauts returned to Earth on March 18 aboard a SpaceX Dragon capsule, and neither Boeing nor NASA have offered any significant updates into fixes that will make Starliner flightworthy. SpaceX's lead on its competitors is reflected in the size of its government subsidies. In April, the U.S. Space Force, the military branch of U.S. space exploration, awarded the company nearly $6 billion in launch contracts, while the United Launch Alliance received $5.4 billion and Blue Origin $2.4 billion. In response to the feud between Musk and Trump, NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens declined to comment on SpaceX, but she did tell Reuters that "we will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met." NASA's deputy administrator Lori Garver told Reuters that, as well as not being in national interests, canceling SpaceX's contacts would probably not be legal. However, she also added that "a rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts' lives at risk, is untenable."

A top Taliban official offers amnesty to Afghans who fled the country and urges them to return

time20 minutes ago

A top Taliban official offers amnesty to Afghans who fled the country and urges them to return

A top Taliban official said on Saturday that all Afghans who fled the country after the collapse of the former Western-backed government are free to return home, promising they would not be harmed if they come back. Taliban Prime Minister Mohammad Hassan Akhund made the amnesty offer in his message for the Islamic holiday of Eid al-Adha, also known as the 'Feast of Sacrifice.' The offer comes days after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a sweeping travel ban on 12 countries, including Afghanistan. The measure largely bars Afghans hoping to resettle in the United States permanently as well as those hoping to go to the U.S. temporarily, such as for university study. Trump also suspended a core refugee program in January, all but ending support for Afghans who had allied with the U.S. and leaving tens of thousands of them stranded. Afghans in neighboring Pakistan who are awaiting resettlement are also dealing with a deportation drive by the Islamabad government to get them out of the country. Almost a million have left Pakistan since October 2023 to avoid arrest and expulsion. Akhund's holiday message was posted on the social platform X. 'Afghans who have left the country should return to their homeland,' he said. 'Nobody will harm them." "Come back to your ancestral land and live in an atmosphere of peace,' he added, and instructed officials to properly manage services for returning refugees and to ensure they were given shelter and support. He also used the occasion to criticize the media for making what he said were 'false judgements' about Afghanistan's Taliban rulers and their policies. 'We must not allow the torch of the Islamic system to be extinguished,' he said. 'The media should avoid false judgments and should not minimize the accomplishments of the system. While challenges exist, we must remain vigilant.' The Taliban swept into the capital Kabul and seized most of Afghanistan in a blitz in mid-August 2021 as the U.S. and NATO forces were in the last weeks of their pullout from the country after 20 years of war. The offensive prompted a mass exodus, with tens of thousands of Afghans thronging the airport in chaotic scenes, hoping for a flight out on the U.S. military airlift. People also fled across the border, to neighboring Iran and Pakistan. campaign against the Taliban.

Oklahoma National Guard not expected to participate in Trump's military parade
Oklahoma National Guard not expected to participate in Trump's military parade

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oklahoma National Guard not expected to participate in Trump's military parade

Gov. Kevin Stitt poses for a picture with a member of the Oklahoma National Guard before a contingent of 50 troops deploy to El Paso for a 30-day mission at the U.S.-Mexico border. (Photo provided by the Governor's Office) OKLAHOMA CITY – The Oklahoma National Guard is not planning on participating in the nation's largest military parade. The June 14 parade will feature tanks rolling through the U.S. capital's streets, thousands of soldiers marching and military fly overs to celebrate the Army's 250th birthday. Additionally, it will also be President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. Col. Kristin Tschetter, Chief of Public Affairs, said the Oklahoma National Guard is not planning on participating in the parade. Tens of thousands of people are expected to show up. The parade will feature a plethora of militarized equipment, such as helicopters used in the Vietnam War, tanks and other vehicles. In celebration of the evolution of the Army, various uniforms from throughout the years will be worn by soldiers. The parade is expected to take place on Constitution Avenue. The parade will continue to Independence Avenue. The specific cost of the event was not immediately known. Ronald Reagan National Airport was expected to halt flights during the parade. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store