Parliament passes The Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill 2025
A brief debate was held on the Bill amid protests. Several Opposition MPs who stood up to participate in the debate on the Bill, demanded a discussion on SIR.
Also read: Parliament Monsoon Session Day 13 highlights
Chair Bhubaneshwar Kalita, however, said anything unrelated to the Bill will not go on record.
Moving the Bill, Shantanu Thakur, Minister of State for the Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways, said the Bill intends to replace the 100 years old, pre-independence Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.
The Act establishes the responsibilities, liabilities, rights, and immunities in case of goods carried from a port in India to another port in the country or any other in the world, and is in conformance with the International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law relating to Bills of Lading of August 1924 (Hague Rules) and subsequent amendments to it.
The Bill retains all provisions of the Act.
According to a government statement, the bill simplifies the language and structure, making the law more accessible to stakeholders, particularly Indian exporters, importers, and shipping professionals.
While retaining the substantive legal framework, the bill aligns it with contemporary drafting practices, reducing ambiguities and minimising the risk of potential litigation.
The Bill empowers the government, allowing India to swiftly adapt to evolving international maritime conventions. It also ensures transparency and accountability by providing for parliamentary oversight of executive notifications.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a minute ago
- Indian Express
Raut praises NDA V-P candidate Radhakrishnan's ‘balanced personality', hints at Sena UBT's stance on poll
Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut Monday welcomed the BJP-led NDA's decision to nominate Maharashtra Governor C P Radhakrishnan as its candidate for the vice-presidential election, praising and calling him a 'balanced and non-controversial personality'. At the same time, Raut said the Opposition INDIA bloc should not divert attention from the larger issue of electoral malpractice by getting into a contest it cannot win. The vice-presidential election, scheduled for September 9, was necessitated after incumbent Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned, citing health reasons. On Sunday, BJP president J P Nadda announced Radhakrishnan's candidature after a meeting of the party's parliamentary board, appealing for a consensus to ensure an unopposed election. While Nadda has appealed for consensus, Opposition leaders are expected to discuss the matter in an INDIA bloc meeting this week. Raut made it clear that while the Shiv Sena (UBT) welcomed the nomination of a leader associated with Maharashtra, his party would go by the INDIA bloc's collective decision. However, he also stressed that the Sena (UBT) and party chief Uddhav Thackeray always feel that elections for such constitutional posts should not be politicised, and candidates should be elected unopposed. 'He has been working calmly as governor of Maharashtra for the past year, and is a very balanced, non-controversial personality in politics. We are glad that the Maharashtra governor is getting an opportunity to become the vice-president of the country. We always welcome and congratulate such appointments,' Raut told reporters in Delhi. 'But he is the NDA's candidate, and we are in Opposition. The INDIA alliance will take a collective decision, and the Sena (UBT) will go with whatever the bloc decides. There is also a meeting to be held with Rahul Gandhi and [Mallikarjun] Kharge in Delhi, where these issues will be discussed,' he added. INDIA bloc numbers The Sena MP pointed out that the Opposition front does not have the numerical strength to defeat the NDA nominee in the vice presidential elections. 'Since the INDIA bloc doesn't have enough numbers to win the VP polls, attention shouldn't be diverted from the real issues: vote chori, manipulation of voter lists, and the SIR (Special Intensive Revision) in Bihar. These are the issues Rahul Gandhi has raised, and they must remain the focus,' he said. Raut said the Shiv Sena (UBT) will abide by the bloc's decision, and that Uddhav had already conveyed his views to Rahul and Congress president Kharge. Raut also criticised the Election Commission over its demand that Rahul Gandhi submit an affidavit to back his allegations of vote theft. 'This is arrogance. Will the EC also ask Anurag Thakur to file an affidavit when he makes similar allegations? Or is the Commission's courage only for Rahul Gandhi?' he asked. Meanwhile, Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena announced its support for the candidature of Radhakrishnan. Expressing confidence in his victory, Shinde said, 'By nominating C P Radhakrishnanji as the candidate for the post of Vice President, the NDA under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi has duly honoured an experienced, intellectual, honest, and patriotic personality in Indian politics.' 'As the Governor of Maharashtra, Radhakrishnanji has been a source of pride for us. With his vast parliamentary experience as a Member of Parliament and his deep administrative knowledge as a Governor, his candidature deserves full support from Shiv Sena. We are confident that his tenure as Vice President will prove to be remarkable for the bright future of the nation. On behalf of Shiv Sena, I extend best wishes to C P Radhakrishnan for a successful tenure.' Radhakrishnan, 66, took charge as Maharashtra's 24th Governor on July 31, 2024. A senior BJP leader from Tamil Nadu, he earlier served as Governor of Jharkhand between February 2023 and July 2024, and briefly held additional charge of Telangana and Puducherry. He represented Coimbatore in Lok Sabha twice, and also headed the BJP's Tamil Nadu unit.
News18
a minute ago
- News18
Opposition stages walkout in Rajya Sabha demanding discussion on SIR
Agency: Last Updated: August 18, 2025, 14:45 IST Representational image (Image: News18) New Delhi, Aug 18 (PTI) Opposition MPs on Monday staged a walkout in the Rajya Sabha demanding discussion on electoral rolls revision in Bihar. As the House reassembled at 2 pm, BJD's Sasmit Patra, who was in the Chair, informed the legislators that the Business Advisory Committee had decided to allot three hours for discussion on the Indian Ports Bill, 2025 and one hour on the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025. Patra then asked Union Ports, Shipping and Waterways Minister Sarbananda Sonowal to introduce the Indian Ports Bill, 2025. Sonowal then introduced the bill amid the din. Meanwhile, Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge stood up and demanded discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. He was joined by other Opposition members demanding a discussion on the issue. Swipe Left For Next Video View all However, the Chair declined to take up the matter, which led to noisy protests by the Opposition members. They raised slogans demanding discussion and staged a walkout in the House. Earlier, the Rajya Sabha proceedings were adjourned till 2 pm after the House assembled at 11 am, following protests by Opposition members over the rejection of their 19 adjournment notices on various issues. PTI AKV ANU (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments News agency-feeds Opposition stages walkout in Rajya Sabha demanding discussion on SIR Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Read More
Indian Express
a minute ago
- Indian Express
‘Vote chori' row: Opposition mulls impeachment of CEC Gyanesh Kumar
A day after Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar asked Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition (LoP) Rahul Gandhi to either submit his allegations of vote theft in a sworn affidavit within a week or apologise to the nation, the INDIA bloc is learnt to be considering moving an impeachment notice against him. Sources said the matter was discussed at a meeting of the floor leaders of the Opposition bloc chaired by Rajya Sabha LoP and Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge earlier in the day. The decision to initiate impeachment proceedings against Kumar is likely to be announced at a press conference scheduled for 3 pm. 'The ECI (Election Commission of India) cannot relinquish its Constitutional duty and evade genuine queries of political parties. The 'right to vote' is the most important right, given to us by the Constitution of India. INDIA will protest any attempt to stifle Democracy,' Kharge said. The possibility of the impeachment notice evoked a sharp reaction from the BJP, with the ruling party questioning the Opposition's intention. 'The whole of India is seeing the behaviour of the Congress party and Opposition parties for the last few days, especially with regard to the SIR issue and the Bihar elections…that the activities of the Parliament are being obstructed. No work is being allowed to be done. What is the intention behind this? What is the intention behind the tour that Rahul Gandhi is doing? There is only one intention behind this, and that intention is how to save the infiltrators,' said BJP MP Sambit Patra. 'This is a natural process that it becomes the responsibility of the Election Commission to clean up the infiltrators … How to win elections through infiltrators, how to use infiltrators, how to promote the politics of appeasement, this is what Rahul Gandhi and the Congress party have been doing…' he added. How is a CEC removed? Article 324 (5) of the Constitution states that 'the Chief Election Commissioner shall not be removed from his office except in like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court and the conditions of service of the Chief Election Commissioner shall not be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment'. It further provides that 'any other Election Commissioner or a Regional Commissioner shall not be removed from office except on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner'. The grounds for the removal of the CEC and other Election Commissioners (ECs) are also set down in Section 11 of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, which regulates the appointment, conditions of service and term of office of the CEC and the ECs. The Judges Inquiry Act, 1968, Section 3, which pertains to 'Investigation into misbehaviour or incapacity of Judge by Committee' provides that 'If notice is given of a motion for presenting an address to President praying for the removal of a Judge…(a) in the case of a notice given in the House of the People, by not less than one hundred members of that House; (b) in the case of a notice given in the Council of States, by not less than fifty members of that Council…' Following this, the Act states further, the Speaker or, as the case may be, the Chairman may, after consulting such persons, if any, as he thinks fit and after considering such materials, if any, as may be available to him, either admit the motion or refuse to admit the same.' If the motion is admitted, the Speaker or, as the case may be, the Chairman 'shall keep the motion pending and constitute, as soon as may be, for the purpose of making an investigation into the grounds on which the removal of a Judge is prayed for, a Committee consisting of three members'. One of the members 'shall be chosen from among the Chief Justice and other Judges of the Supreme Court', one from among the Chief Justices of the High Courts, and one 'a person who is, in the opinion of, the Speaker or, as the case may be, the Chairman, a distinguished jurist'. This Committee 'shall frame definite charges against the Judge on the basis of which the investigation is proposed to be held' and such charges 'together with a statement of the grounds on which each such charge is based shall be communicated to the Judge and he shall be given a reasonable opportunity of presenting a written statement of defence within such time as may be specified in this behalf by the Committee.'
