
President Trump should ambrace stronger, smarter mental health parity
As someone in long-term recovery and an advocate for those battling addiction and mental health conditions, I've seen countless families shattered and lives lost because desperately needed care was out of reach. Often, the barrier isn't a lack of effective treatments, but how insurance coverage for the mind is treated as less important than for the body. This is why the current juncture regarding the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act is so critical, and why I urge President Trump to not just preserve but to boldly strengthen parity for all Americans.
The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, a landmark 2008 bipartisan law, was meant to end this discrimination. It requires health insurance for mental health and substance use disorders be no more restrictive than for medical or surgical care. Yet, for millions, this promise remains elusive. Insurers adeptly use opaque 'non-quantitative treatment limitations' — like restrictive prior authorizations, unequal network adequacy and disparate reimbursement rates — to deny or limit care.
In September 2024, a final rule from the previous administration aimed to close loopholes and enhance enforcement. However, after a January 2025 lawsuit, the Trump administration announced in May a pause on enforcing the 2024 rule. It is now reconsidering, modifying or even rescinding the final rule.
While some see this pause as a setback, I see it as a pivotal moment — an opportunity for President Trump to champion mental health and addiction parity with unprecedented force, truly making America healthy again. This isn't about more burdensome regulation; it's about smarter, fairer rules that save lives and money.
The Trump administration has laid groundwork for this. In his first term, Trump signed Executive Order 13877, 'Improving Price and Quality Transparency in American Healthcare to Put Patients First,' noting 'opaque pricing structures may benefit powerful special interest groups…but they generally leave patients and taxpayers worse off.' This led to the 2020 Transparency in Coverage Final Rule, forcing insurers to disclose actual pricing.
More recently, the president's February 2025 Executive Order 14221, 'Making America Healthy Again by Empowering Patients with Clear, Accurate, and Actionable Healthcare Pricing Information,' doubled down, stating, 'For far too long, prices were hidden from patients and employers … [allowing] powerful entities … to operate with insufficient accountability,' This executive order directs agencies to crack down on evasive pricing and reinvigorate Transparency in Coverage Rule enforcement, mandating public disclosure of actual prices and standardized data.
Here lies the powerful convergence: The president's drive for insurer transparency is key to unlocking true mental health parity. Discriminatory practices thrive in darkness. When insurers must bring their mental health provider reimbursement rates, network adequacy standards, and addiction treatment prior authorization approval rates into daylight — alongside medical/surgical data — disparities become undeniable and indefensible.
As The Kennedy Forum recently stated, 'Strong parity implementation will support the Administration's goals to reduce wasteful spending, promote transparency and efficiency, and Make America Healthy Again. The Administration's actions to make health insurance data transparent and actionable can also advance parity, providing insights into provider access, service coverage, and reimbursement issues.' They noted this would 'continue President Trump's legacy from his first term, when he advanced parity implementation and signed into law the bipartisan statute building on parity.'
This is President Trump's chance to go further than any administration. Instead of merely tweaking or reinstating the 2024 rule, he must direct the departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury to craft even stronger parity regulations. These new rules should explicitly integrate the robust transparency mandates from his executive orders.
Imagine insurers compelled to publicly disclose complete non-quantitative treatment limitations analyses in a standardized format, showing how they apply limitations to mental health benefits compared to physical health benefits. This data must include clear metrics on network adequacy, directly comparing in-network mental health specialists to medical specialists, alongside detailed reimbursement rates.
Furthermore, crucial data on claim denial rates, prior authorization timelines and out-of-network use for mental versus medical services must be readily accessible and regularly updated for public scrutiny.
By leveraging the president's championed transparency, he can create a largely self-enforcing parity framework. Public exposure of discrimination will pressure insurers to comply with the law's spirit and letter, reducing future need for costly government enforcement. It empowers consumers, employers and researchers to hold insurers accountable.
This approach is about fiscal responsibility and public health. Untreated mental illness cost our nation hundreds of billions annually (some estimates approach nearly $477.5 billion in 2024) in lost productivity, increased health care spending and criminal justice involvement. Ensuring access to care is an investment yielding healthier families, productive communities and a stronger nation.
The pause on the 2024 Parity Final Rule, while concerning, can be a strategic reset — an opportunity for decisive leadership, making President Trump's transparency agenda the engine for true mental health parity. While agencies were tasked by EO 14221 to act by late May on transparency enforcement, the president's direct intervention now can ensure transparency and parity move forward together.
President Trump has often spoken of tackling the overdose crisis and national health challenges. True mental health and addiction parity is central to that mission. It means a treatable brain illness faces no greater barriers than a treatable body illness. The president should build on his health care transparency legacy and deliver a transformative victory for millions. Trump must seize this moment to champion a new era of accountability. Ensure 'Make America Healthy Again' unequivocally includes the mind. The lives of countless Americans hang in the balance.
Ryan Hampton is a national addiction recovery advocate and author of two bestselling books on the overdose crisis: 'American Fix' and 'Unsettled.' His latest book is 'Fentanyl Nation.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
27 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Hershey creates new guilt-free candy that's a dream combo
Many of us may think we have self-control, but once we take a bite of that delicious chocolate bar we've been thinking about for the last few hours, it's almost impossible to stop at just one piece. Before realizing it, the entire chocolate bar is gone. A few minutes later, our stomachs begin to hurt, and with it comes a creeping sense of guilt that makes us swear we will never do it again. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The reality is that most of us tend to forget a few days later, turning this unhealthy habit into an ongoing vicious cycle. Related: Hershey creates new candy that's a dream combo Food companies know the guilty pleasure that unhealthy snacks and sweets evoke in millions of consumers worldwide. However, trends are evolving, with older and younger generations prioritizing low-calorie content and clean ingredients like never before. When healthier options are available, this becomes more feasible. Image source: Getty Images To avoid getting destroyed by the competition, many food companies have recently invested in developing healthier alternatives to these indulgent treats. Last year, PepsiCo (PEP) acquired the Mexican-American food brand Siete Food, and Flowers Foods (FLO) bought the healthy snack brand Simple Mills for $795 million in January. Prebiotic alternative soda brands like Poppi and Olipop have taken over the better-for-you beverage market, growing astronomically in only a few years. Related: Hershey combines two beloved products to make dream snack The global healthy snack market was estimated to be worth nearly $96 billion in 2023 and is expected to reach around $145 billion by 2030, with an annual growth rate of 6.1%, according to a study by Grand View Research. Hershey has also expanded its portfolio by investing in the better-for-you snack sector. In April, it made a major business move by acquiring the organic snack brand LesserEvil. However, it's taking the health kick to the next level. Hershey (HSY) has teamed up with the protein bar brand ONE to launch a new collaboration that makes eating chocolate healthier than ever. The result is a chocolate bar you can enjoy guilt-free. Although it might sound impossible, the ONE x Hershey's Double Chocolate protein bar contains 18 grams of protein and one gram of sugar. To promote this new creation, Hershey and ONE are maximizing the celebrity marketing trend and partnering with pro golfer Bryson DeChambeau, who has become the face of the new launch. More Retail News: McDonald's menu adds new happy meal fans will loveStarbucks brings back fan-favorite menu item after 2-year hiatusChick-fil-A quietly launches unexpected new menu items However, that's not all. If DeChambeau makes a hole-in-one from June 12 to 15, fans can try the new chocolate protein bar for free. Those who want to receive a free ONE x Hershey's Double Chocolate protein bar can sign up beginning on June 16 at 12 p.m. via the Double or ONEthing Challenge website while supplies last. The ONE x Hershey's Double Chocolate protein bar can be purchased on Amazon and at select retailers, but it will soon be available nationwide. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rescuers Respond to Call About a Neglected Dog. They Find a 'Leopard' Left with a Litter of Puppies
An animal shelter in Arizona was in for a surprise when they received a call about a "leopard" and some puppies in need of assistance The Arizona Humane Society rescued a pit bull terrier named Rainbow Brite — found painted to look like a leopard — and her nine puppies from 99-degree weather The 5-year-old dog and her puppies have received veterinary care and are in a foster home togetherAn animal shelter in Arizona was in for a surprise when they received a call about a "leopard" and some puppies in need of assistance. On Thursday, May 29, the Arizona Humane Society (AHS) in Phoenix received a call from a neighbor reporting a dog in need of help, as she and her nine puppies were tethered to a leash outdoors in the scorching Arizona heat. "The temperature that day in Phoenix was 99 degrees," a representative from AHS tells PEOPLE, and a photo of the rescue shows that the concrete sidewalk was even hotter, clocking in at 133 degrees. When the shelter's Emergency Animal Medical Technicians (EAMT) arrived on scene alongside officers from the Phoenix Police Department, they were in for quite the surprise — the mama dog, later named Rainbow Brite, was painted with multi-colored spots, meant to make her look like a leopard. "We don't know how or when she received her spots, but the condition she was in when our EAMTs arrived on scene indicated she was in need of help," AHS representative Joe Casados told Newsweek of the dogs' conditions. According to the representative, Rainbow Brite's owner surrendered the 5-year-old American pit bull terrier and her puppies to the shelter, agreeing that they "could no longer care for them." Rainbow Brite and her large litter went from their old home to the Lazin Animal Foundation Trauma Hospital, which is one of the largest level-one trauma pet hospitals in the U.S. According to AHS, Rainbow Brite's temperature was dangerously high, and veterinarians used cool towels to bring it down from 105.7 to 102.5. Vets also found that the mama dog was underweight—a concerning finding in a nursing dog, as she needs "calories to help keep her, and her puppies, healthy," the shelter tells PEOPLE. Eventually, AHS's staff stabilized Rainbow Brite. She and her nine pups — affectionately called her "sprites" — were transferred to AHS's "Mutternity Suites," a calming space dedicated to the shelter's pregnant and nursing mama dogs. Rainbow Brite's spots also made her a minor social media star. In a TikTok shared to the shelter's official account, a shelter representative visits the pit bull terrier in her enclosure and tells the viewers, "I heard we have a leopard in our mutternity suites." The video has over 75,000 views and shows Rainbow Brite happily nursing her litter and chowing down on some treats. "We don't know how or when she received her spots, but we are thankful she is cool, comfortable, and safe and getting the care she needs," the shelter tells PEOPLE. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. According to AHS, the animal family of 10 will soon be available for adoption. However, for now, all the canines have been placed with a foster family. "When ready, they will return to the shelter for spay/neuter surgeries and vaccines before AHS will work to find everyone a new, safe home," AHS says, adding that the shelter has dozens of other pets in need of fostering. In a follow-up TikTok video, the shelter heavily advocated against leaving dogs outdoors in extreme heat. It noted that tethering a dog outside in several Arizona cities is illegal. "We are happy that her owner agreed to surrender her, so that Rainbow Brite and her nine sprites have a second chance at a new life," AHS said in the video. "Sharing her story is a reminder for everyone that she is just one of the many pets in the valley who are tied outside in our extreme weather." "The [AHS] strongly urges pet owners not to tether their pets, as it is extremely dangerous," the shelter added. "Rainbow did have her spots before we picked her up, and eventually the dye will fade. But for now, she will keep people guessing if she really is part leopard." Read the original article on People

Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge rules some NIH grant cuts illegal, saying he's never seen such discrimination in 40 years
WASHINGTON — A federal judge ruled Monday it was illegal for the Trump administration to cancel several hundred research grants, adding that the cuts raise serious questions about racial discrimination. U.S. District Judge William Young in Massachusetts said the administration's process was 'arbitrary and capricious' and that it did not follow long-held government rules and standards when it abruptly canceled grants deemed to focus on gender identity or diversity, equity and inclusion. In a hearing Monday on two cases calling for the grants to be restored, the judge pushed government lawyers to offer a formal definition of DEI, questioning how grants could be canceled for that reason when some were designed to study health disparities as Congress had directed. Young, an appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, went on to address what he called 'a darker aspect' to the cases, calling it 'palpably clear' that what was behind the government actions was 'racial discrimination and discrimination against America's LGBTQ community.' After 40 years on the bench, 'I've never seen government racial discrimination like this,' Young added. He ended Monday's hearing saying, 'Have we no shame.' During his remarks ending the hearing, the judge said he would issue his written order soon. Young's decision addresses only a fraction of the hundreds of NIH research projects the Trump administration has cut — those specifically addressed in two lawsuits filed separately this spring by 16 attorneys general from Democratic states, public health advocacy groups and some affected scientists. A full count wasn't immediately available. In the California lawsuit, filed in April with the other Democratic states, Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said the UC system had received more than $2 billion in NIH awards in 2024 and that CSU had spent more than $90 million on NIH-funded research the same year. At the time of filing, Bonta wrote that the UC system's five health centers were awaiting action on grant proposals totaling $563 million. While Young said the funding must be restored, Monday's action was an interim step as the ruling could be appealed. The Trump administration is 'exploring all legal options' including asking the judge to stay the ruling or appealing, said Andrew Nixon, a spokesman for NIH's parent agency, the Department of Health and Human Services. 'HHS stands by its decision to end funding for research that prioritized ideological agendas over scientific rigor and meaningful outcomes for the American people,' he said in an email. While the original lawsuits didn't specifically claim racial discrimination, they said the new NIH policies prohibited 'research into certain politically disfavored subjects.' In a filing this month after the lawsuits were consolidated, lawyers said the NIH did not highlight genuine concerns with the hundreds of canceled research projects studies, but instead sent 'boilerplate termination letters' to universities. The topics of research ranged widely, including cardiovascular health, sexually transmitted infections, depression, Alzheimer's and alcohol abuse in minors, among other things. Attorneys cited projects such as one tracking how medicines may work differently in people of ancestrally diverse backgrounds, and said the cuts affected more than scientists — such as potential harm to patients in a closed study of suicide treatment. Lawyers for the federal government said in a court filing earlier this month that NIH grant terminations for DEI studies were 'sufficiently reasoned,' adding later that 'plaintiffs may disagree with NIH's basis, but that does not make the basis arbitrary and capricious.' The NIH, lawyers argued, has 'broad discretion' to decide on and provide grants 'in alignment with its priorities' — which includes ending grants. Monday, Justice Department lawyer Thomas Ports Jr. pointed to 13 examples of grants related to minority health that NIH either hadn't cut or had renewed in the same time period — and said some of the cancellations were justified by the agency's judgement that the research wasn't scientifically valuable. The NIH has long been the world's largest public funder of biomedical research. Neergaard writes for the Associated Press. Times staff writer Jaweed Kaleem contributed to this story.