Judge rules some NIH grant cuts illegal, saying he's never seen such discrimination in 40 years
WASHINGTON — A federal judge ruled Monday it was illegal for the Trump administration to cancel several hundred research grants, adding that the cuts raise serious questions about racial discrimination.
U.S. District Judge William Young in Massachusetts said the administration's process was 'arbitrary and capricious' and that it did not follow long-held government rules and standards when it abruptly canceled grants deemed to focus on gender identity or diversity, equity and inclusion.
In a hearing Monday on two cases calling for the grants to be restored, the judge pushed government lawyers to offer a formal definition of DEI, questioning how grants could be canceled for that reason when some were designed to study health disparities as Congress had directed.
Young, an appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, went on to address what he called 'a darker aspect' to the cases, calling it 'palpably clear' that what was behind the government actions was 'racial discrimination and discrimination against America's LGBTQ community.'
After 40 years on the bench, 'I've never seen government racial discrimination like this,' Young added. He ended Monday's hearing saying, 'Have we no shame.'
During his remarks ending the hearing, the judge said he would issue his written order soon.
Young's decision addresses only a fraction of the hundreds of NIH research projects the Trump administration has cut — those specifically addressed in two lawsuits filed separately this spring by 16 attorneys general from Democratic states, public health advocacy groups and some affected scientists. A full count wasn't immediately available.
In the California lawsuit, filed in April with the other Democratic states, Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said the UC system had received more than $2 billion in NIH awards in 2024 and that CSU had spent more than $90 million on NIH-funded research the same year. At the time of filing, Bonta wrote that the UC system's five health centers were awaiting action on grant proposals totaling $563 million.
While Young said the funding must be restored, Monday's action was an interim step as the ruling could be appealed.
The Trump administration is 'exploring all legal options' including asking the judge to stay the ruling or appealing, said Andrew Nixon, a spokesman for NIH's parent agency, the Department of Health and Human Services.
'HHS stands by its decision to end funding for research that prioritized ideological agendas over scientific rigor and meaningful outcomes for the American people,' he said in an email.
While the original lawsuits didn't specifically claim racial discrimination, they said the new NIH policies prohibited 'research into certain politically disfavored subjects.' In a filing this month after the lawsuits were consolidated, lawyers said the NIH did not highlight genuine concerns with the hundreds of canceled research projects studies, but instead sent 'boilerplate termination letters' to universities.
The topics of research ranged widely, including cardiovascular health, sexually transmitted infections, depression, Alzheimer's and alcohol abuse in minors, among other things. Attorneys cited projects such as one tracking how medicines may work differently in people of ancestrally diverse backgrounds, and said the cuts affected more than scientists — such as potential harm to patients in a closed study of suicide treatment.
Lawyers for the federal government said in a court filing earlier this month that NIH grant terminations for DEI studies were 'sufficiently reasoned,' adding later that 'plaintiffs may disagree with NIH's basis, but that does not make the basis arbitrary and capricious.' The NIH, lawyers argued, has 'broad discretion' to decide on and provide grants 'in alignment with its priorities' — which includes ending grants.
Monday, Justice Department lawyer Thomas Ports Jr. pointed to 13 examples of grants related to minority health that NIH either hadn't cut or had renewed in the same time period — and said some of the cancellations were justified by the agency's judgement that the research wasn't scientifically valuable.
The NIH has long been the world's largest public funder of biomedical research.
Neergaard writes for the Associated Press. Times staff writer Jaweed Kaleem contributed to this story.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stocks to Watch Tuesday: SunRun, Enphase Energy, Mitsubishi, Roku
↘️ SunRun (RUN): Solar stocks slid in off-hours trading after Senate Republicans kept in a full phase-out of solar and wind-energy tax credits in President Trump's budget bill. SunRun shares plunged almost 25%, while Enphase Energy (ENPH) and First Solar (FSLR) fell sharply, too.
USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's LA National Guard orders draw comparisons to Jan. 6
Trump's LA National Guard orders draw comparisons to Jan. 6 Some legal experts and Democratic lawmakers question why Trump didn't deploy the Guard to quell the Jan. 6 Capitol assault but is doing so in LA. Show Caption Hide Caption National Guard major general clarifies military's role in Los Angeles National Guard Major General Scott Sherman outlined the role of military personnel in Los Angeles and said troops will not conduct arrests. President Trump said the National Guard was needed to put down a 'form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Congressional leaders had pleaded for National Guard troops during the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the Capitol by Trump supporters. A former Trump-appointed prosecutor told USA TODAY the 2020 Geroge Floyd riots are a more appropriate comparison with Trump's actions in Los Angeles. WASHINGTON – One group was considered a rampaging mob whose members bear-sprayed and beat police officers while breaking into the seat of American democracy to stop the peaceful transfer of power. The other was a more dispersed and uncoordinated group of violent agitators burning empty cars, looting and throwing rocks at police. In the first incident, the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, then-President Donald Trump never called in the National Guard, despite pleas from local officials and some congressional lawmakers. They said troops were needed to prevent further violence from an angry mob that Trump himself had riled up to stay in power after losing the 2020 election. In the second case, which is still ongoing, Trump not only deployed the California National Guard over the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom, he also called in 700 active duty Marines to quell anti-ICE protests that erupted in Los Angeles over aggressive immigration raids. The contrast between Trump's actions in 2021, when the U.S. Capitol was overrun by a violent mob, and this month in Los Angeles is proof, his critics say, the president is using the U.S. military for political purposes. But some supporters of the president say the more appropriate comparison isn't with the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, but the riots and disturbances that rocked American cities in the summer of 2020 after the police killing of George Floyd. The Floyd protests showed "you've got to put out small fires before they turn into forest fires,' Jay Town, who served as U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama during Trump's first administration, told USA TODAY. Trump said the troops were needed in Los Angeles to put down a 'form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." The protests in Los Angeles are seen as more tepid compared to the Jan. 6 riots in terms of constituting a rebellion or threat to the federal government, according to Newsom, Democratic lawmakers, and legal experts. They accuse Trump − who was impeached and criminally indicted over Jan. 6, though the charges were dropped after his reelection − of deploying soldiers to serve his own political ends. "There was not plausibly a rebellion in Los Angeles, under any reasonable interpretation of the term," said Chris Mirasola, a law professor at the University of Houston and a former Department of Defense legal advisor. Critics saw a cracked mirror image of Jan. 6 in Trump's mobilization of the National Guard in Los Angeles. 'This is a reverse of Jan. 6, where Trump allowed his most violent supporters to attack the Capitol on his behalf," Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., told USA TODAY, "and here he is sending in federal troops to provoke his opponents to attack them.' "In both instances, his aim is chaos,' Swalwell said. What happened on Jan. 6, 2021? Four people died during the Jan. 6 assault on Congress and five police officers died in its aftermath − one from a stroke the following day and four by suicide. About 140 other law enforcement officers were injured. More than 1,575 people were charged in connection with Jan. 6, ranging from misdemeanors such as trespassing to felonies such as assaulting police officers and seditious conspiracy. At least 600 were charged with the felony of assaulting or impeding law enforcement, according to the Police Executive Research Forum. Damages for Jan. 6 surpassed $2.7 billion, according to an investigation by Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. How much damage in LA? In the current case, at least nine LAPD officers and an unknown number of protesters have been hurt, with most sustaining minor injuries. The Los Angeles Police Department has arrested more than 500 people in eight days of protests, the majority of them on minor charges such as failure to disperse or not obeying a nighttime curfew. Two were charged with throwing firebombs, authorities said on June 11. Though the extent of damage from the current LA protests are unknown, it is far less significant than on Jan. 6, Democratic lawmakers and city and state officials say. What's Trump's response? Trump and other administration officials repeatedly have said there's no comparison between Jan. 6 and the Los Angeles violence, and that California and LA officials forced the President's hand by failing to quell the growing protests. 'Generations of Army heroes did not shed their blood on distant shores only to watch our country be destroyed by invasion,' Trump told Army soldiers in a June 10 speech at Fort Bragg, N.C. 'As commander in chief, I will not let that happen.' Trump didn't make any such pronouncements four years ago as a stunned nation watched the Capitol attack unfold, with organized groups including the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers militia taking leading roles. In 2021, Trump spent 187 minutes watching the Capitol assault on TV, while mobs ransacked Congressional offices and hunted for Democratic lawmakers and even his own vice president, Mike Pence, according to a House committee investigating the attack. Hours later, only after the crowd began dispersing, Trump posted a video on social media at 4:17 p.m.: 'Go home. We love you, you're very special.' It wasn't until 5:20 p.m. on Jan. 6 that the first National Guard troops arrived at the Capitol, while police secured the complex. 'In a bipartisan way, on Jan. 6 − with violence against the Constitution, against the Congress and against the United States Capitol − we begged the president of the United States to send in the National Guard,' former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi , D-Calif., told reporters. 'He would not do it.' 'And yet, in a contra-constitutional way, he has sent the National Guard into California,' Pelosi said on June 10. 'Something is very wrong with this picture." On June 13, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily halted a federal judge's order blocking Trump's Guard mobilization in Los Angeles. 'Small fires' vs 'forest fires' Supporters of Trump's National Guard call-out in California point to a different set of disturbances to justify his actions. Jay Town, the Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama from 2017 to a 2020 and a former Marine, described a more complex set of circumstances than Pelosi. He cited statements by Steven Sund, the U.S. Capitol Police chief at the time, that he begged for National Guard assistance on Jan. 6 but that it was congressional officials who reported to Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell who delayed approval. More: Amid LA deployment, Hegseth falsely attacks Tim Walz over 2020 George Floyd riots Town said the appropriate comparison isn't with Jan. 6, but the National Guard deployments in 2020 during riots following the murder of George Floyd by a police officer in Minneapolis. 'What we learned in 2020, as a guy who was in office then, is that you've got to put out small fires before they turn into forest fires,' Town told USA TODAY. "President Trump is not going to let what happened under the failed local and state leadership in Minneapolis and Seattle and so many other places happen again.' Trump's order in Los Angeles On his first day back in office in 2025, Trump pardoned all but 14 of the approximately 1,270 convicted Jan. 6 rioters. He and Cabinet members including Attorney General Pam Bondi say they will prosecute anyone who even touches a law enforcement official in Los Angeles to the fullest extent of the law. Asked if that was hypocritical in light of Trump's Jan. 6 pardons, Bondi said, "Well, this is very different." "These are people out there hurting people in California right now,' Bondi said in an on-camera gaggle with reporters at the White House. 'This is ongoing." Newsom, who is suing Trump over the Marines and Guardsmen in Los Angeles, disagreed. "Trump, he's not opposed to lawlessness and violence, as long as it serves him,' Newsom said. 'What more evidence do we need than Jan. 6?"
USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
The trickle-down effect of President Trump's massive NIH budget cuts
The trickle-down effect of President Trump's massive NIH budget cuts U.S. medical research is at a precipice as President Trump proposes cutting $18 billion from the National Institutes of Health. Show Caption Hide Caption Cuts to health research could impact clinical studies and trials at the NIH The Trump administration wants to cut health spending in the coming year, and plans to cut the budget at the National Institutes of Health by $18 billion. Trump administration officials say they are restoring trust in public health and cutting waste. Universities said the Trump administration is marking important studies as Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs and mistakenly cutting their funding. Fyodor Urnov left the Soviet Union for the United States more than 35 years ago with a dream: To become a scientist and cure rare diseases in the country that was a beacon for biomedical research. Umrov recently was a key member of a team that used gene editing technology to treat a 'stinking cute' New Jersey baby born with a severe disability. That breakthrough, like decades of other medical research he's done, was funded by the National Institutes of Health. But millions of dollars in NIH research has now ground to a halt at universities across the country after the Trump administration cut studies it says are driven by diversity initiatives or a fixation on COVID-19. And the remaining research stands at a precipice as President Donald Trump's budget proposes cutting $18 billion from the NIH next year – the largest cut to any single government agency. NIH grant money doesn't sit in Washington – it gets funneled down to research universities across the country, where professors, graduate students, and doctors do their life's work. The schools include prestigious Ivy League institutions, such as Harvard University, and dozens of lesser-known private and public colleges. 'I really hope that we're going through a focused, phased of review of how funding is distributed,' Urnov said. 'I just cannot imagine a future where American biomedical research is not the shining light that leads the world.' On Jan. 16, a federal judge in Boston said NIH's cancellation of more than $1 billion in research grants on the basis of DEI was illegal and reinstated them. He signaled he could issue a more sweeping decision in the case as it moves forward. But Trump officials say they are restoring trust in public health and cutting waste. 'In recent years, Americans have lost confidence in our increasingly politicized healthcare and research apparatus that has been obsessed with DEI and COVID, which the majority of Americans moved on from years ago,' Kush Desai, a spokesman for the White House, said in a statement. 'The Trump administration is focused on restoring the Gold Standard of Science – not ideological activism … to finally address our chronic disease epidemic.' Texas university loses virus catalog funding The University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, which receives about $150 million in NIH grants annually, has already lost $19.3 million, according to Scott Weave, the scientific director for Galveston National Laboratory. Weaver said he's most concerned about the World Reference Center, a collection of thousands of viruses that has been preserved since the 1950s to help scientists conduct emergency research into new viral threats, such as Zika or West Nile virus. In recent years, the research focused on COVID-19. NIH terminated the center's grant funding in full on March 24. In a letter obtained by USA TODAY, the agency wrote: 'These grant funds were issued for a limited purpose: to ameliorate the effects of the pandemic. Now that the pandemic is over, the grant funds are no longer necessary.' Weaver said that framing is incorrect. The project on viruses isn't just focused on COVID-19. Historically, the center worked on mosquito-borne viruses, not respiratory ones. The group only pivoted briefly to help with the pandemic health emergency. He believes the grant was eliminated in error. 'I think it would've been clear if anyone with an understanding of science had read the information about of our grant that we were not a COVID grant,' Weaver said. Research programs mistaken for DEI Andy Johns, who administers research grants at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, described a similar situation. The school lost $7.7 million in NIH contract terminations, which he said began in February but picked up pace in March and April. The cuts include a study on how to improve tobacco regulatory science to reduce health disparities, a study to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in rural communities, a study on neurobiological susceptibility to peer pressure and drug use among teenagers, and a study on malaria in Africa. 'The ones that might sting the most are ones that get caught up because they're perceived as being involving a particular issue that they don't actually involve – where a project may have been deemed as DEI, but there's actually not a DEI focus in any way shape or form,' Johns said. Sometimes, only a small portion of a research project involves analyzing how research affects a specific demographic, experts said, but this has been enough for the Trump administration to flag the grant as DEI. Johns said professors involved in the defunded studies asked NIH to let them continue the underlying scientific research and simply omit the demographic analysis. But the university hasn't haven't seen much success with this approach, he said. Weaver, the Texas researcher, mentioned a grant that helped students who graduated from small colleges that lack research opportunities get research experience before applying to PhD programs. He said NIH cut that on the grounds it was a DEI initiative. Weaver said that while the grant may have technically fit into that category, it was 'more opportunity-based.' He lamented what stripping the campus of the program means: 'I've really taken a lot of pleasure in seeing them succeed and go on and thrive as scientists.' Layoffs in Maryland and California Daniel Mullins, a health outcomes professor at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, said he laid off off five people and reduced the workload of a sixth worker after NIH told them to stop work on a five-year, $9.4 million grant for a health care study. The grant helped Mullins study how to make patients more likely to participate in clinical trials − a vital step in the approval of new medicines. He describes the program as a 'health equity hub,' but says there's no one disease or demographic of people it is specifically designed to help. Mullins' biggest challenge has been walking into work every day and seeing people who are about to lose their jobs. 'I asked the department chair and the dean if we could just fund these people a little bit so they could at least find a job,' he said. Kim Elaine Barrett, the vice dean of research at the University of California Davis School of Medicine, said her school lost grants aimed at building a biomedical workforce that is more representative of the population. Other terminated grants provided stipends and salaries for graduate students and junior faculty. Barrett said the school historically received just over $200 million a year from the National Institutes of Health. She said the funding loss affects about 100 people. "If the situation continues for much longer, and/or gets worse, then we will have to start looking at layoffs, and not just for trainees, but for lab personnel in general," Barrett said. "A lot of faculty derive some or all of their salaries from research grants." 'I wish we had better medications' At Northwestern University, just outside of Chicago, Dr. Benjamin Singer, the vice chair for research in the Department of Medicine, said the university has been 'very gracious' in helping his research group fill in the funding gaps to keep his research group's work going. Singer treats patients in the intensive care unit, and some of his research focuses on how a specific cell can help rebuild a damaged lung – research that can benefit people suffering from pneumonia. His group also identifies targets for potential future prescription drugs. 'I take care of critically ill patients at a high risk of dying,' Singer said. 'When they're really up against a tough spot, I think, 'I wish we had better medications. I wish we had better therapies to help your mom, your son, your daughter.'' The University of Minnesota, which reported losing 24 NIH grants as of early May, created a program to help researchers continue their work if their funding was terminated or they received a stop-work order from the federal government. 'I just can't be clear enough, however," said Rebecca Cunningham, the university's president. "There is no mitigation for the loss of federal funding.' Contributing: Reuters
