logo
Trump's LA National Guard orders draw comparisons to Jan. 6

Trump's LA National Guard orders draw comparisons to Jan. 6

USA Today17-06-2025
Trump's LA National Guard orders draw comparisons to Jan. 6 Some legal experts and Democratic lawmakers question why Trump didn't deploy the Guard to quell the Jan. 6 Capitol assault but is doing so in LA.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
National Guard major general clarifies military's role in Los Angeles
National Guard Major General Scott Sherman outlined the role of military personnel in Los Angeles and said troops will not conduct arrests.
President Trump said the National Guard was needed to put down a 'form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States."
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Congressional leaders had pleaded for National Guard troops during the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the Capitol by Trump supporters.
A former Trump-appointed prosecutor told USA TODAY the 2020 Geroge Floyd riots are a more appropriate comparison with Trump's actions in Los Angeles.
WASHINGTON – One group was considered a rampaging mob whose members bear-sprayed and beat police officers while breaking into the seat of American democracy to stop the peaceful transfer of power.
The other was a more dispersed and uncoordinated group of violent agitators burning empty cars, looting and throwing rocks at police.
In the first incident, the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, then-President Donald Trump never called in the National Guard, despite pleas from local officials and some congressional lawmakers. They said troops were needed to prevent further violence from an angry mob that Trump himself had riled up to stay in power after losing the 2020 election.
In the second case, which is still ongoing, Trump not only deployed the California National Guard over the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom, he also called in 700 active duty Marines to quell anti-ICE protests that erupted in Los Angeles over aggressive immigration raids.
The contrast between Trump's actions in 2021, when the U.S. Capitol was overrun by a violent mob, and this month in Los Angeles is proof, his critics say, the president is using the U.S. military for political purposes.
But some supporters of the president say the more appropriate comparison isn't with the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, but the riots and disturbances that rocked American cities in the summer of 2020 after the police killing of George Floyd.
The Floyd protests showed "you've got to put out small fires before they turn into forest fires,' Jay Town, who served as U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama during Trump's first administration, told USA TODAY.
Trump said the troops were needed in Los Angeles to put down a 'form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States."
The protests in Los Angeles are seen as more tepid compared to the Jan. 6 riots in terms of constituting a rebellion or threat to the federal government, according to Newsom, Democratic lawmakers, and legal experts.
They accuse Trump − who was impeached and criminally indicted over Jan. 6, though the charges were dropped after his reelection − of deploying soldiers to serve his own political ends.
"There was not plausibly a rebellion in Los Angeles, under any reasonable interpretation of the term," said Chris Mirasola, a law professor at the University of Houston and a former Department of Defense legal advisor.
Critics saw a cracked mirror image of Jan. 6 in Trump's mobilization of the National Guard in Los Angeles.
'This is a reverse of Jan. 6, where Trump allowed his most violent supporters to attack the Capitol on his behalf," Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., told USA TODAY, "and here he is sending in federal troops to provoke his opponents to attack them.'
"In both instances, his aim is chaos,' Swalwell said.
What happened on Jan. 6, 2021?
Four people died during the Jan. 6 assault on Congress and five police officers died in its aftermath − one from a stroke the following day and four by suicide. About 140 other law enforcement officers were injured.
More than 1,575 people were charged in connection with Jan. 6, ranging from misdemeanors such as trespassing to felonies such as assaulting police officers and seditious conspiracy. At least 600 were charged with the felony of assaulting or impeding law enforcement, according to the Police Executive Research Forum.
Damages for Jan. 6 surpassed $2.7 billion, according to an investigation by Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
How much damage in LA?
In the current case, at least nine LAPD officers and an unknown number of protesters have been hurt, with most sustaining minor injuries.
The Los Angeles Police Department has arrested more than 500 people in eight days of protests, the majority of them on minor charges such as failure to disperse or not obeying a nighttime curfew.
Two were charged with throwing firebombs, authorities said on June 11.
Though the extent of damage from the current LA protests are unknown, it is far less significant than on Jan. 6, Democratic lawmakers and city and state officials say.
What's Trump's response?
Trump and other administration officials repeatedly have said there's no comparison between Jan. 6 and the Los Angeles violence, and that California and LA officials forced the President's hand by failing to quell the growing protests.
'Generations of Army heroes did not shed their blood on distant shores only to watch our country be destroyed by invasion,' Trump told Army soldiers in a June 10 speech at Fort Bragg, N.C. 'As commander in chief, I will not let that happen.'
Trump didn't make any such pronouncements four years ago as a stunned nation watched the Capitol attack unfold, with organized groups including the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers militia taking leading roles.
In 2021, Trump spent 187 minutes watching the Capitol assault on TV, while mobs ransacked Congressional offices and hunted for Democratic lawmakers and even his own vice president, Mike Pence, according to a House committee investigating the attack.
Hours later, only after the crowd began dispersing, Trump posted a video on social media at 4:17 p.m.: 'Go home. We love you, you're very special.'
It wasn't until 5:20 p.m. on Jan. 6 that the first National Guard troops arrived at the Capitol, while police secured the complex.
'In a bipartisan way, on Jan. 6 − with violence against the Constitution, against the Congress and against the United States Capitol − we begged the president of the United States to send in the National Guard,' former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi , D-Calif., told reporters. 'He would not do it.'
'And yet, in a contra-constitutional way, he has sent the National Guard into California,' Pelosi said on June 10. 'Something is very wrong with this picture."
On June 13, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily halted a federal judge's order blocking Trump's Guard mobilization in Los Angeles.
'Small fires' vs 'forest fires'
Supporters of Trump's National Guard call-out in California point to a different set of disturbances to justify his actions.
Jay Town, the Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama from 2017 to a 2020 and a former Marine, described a more complex set of circumstances than Pelosi.
He cited statements by Steven Sund, the U.S. Capitol Police chief at the time, that he begged for National Guard assistance on Jan. 6 but that it was congressional officials who reported to Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell who delayed approval.
More: Amid LA deployment, Hegseth falsely attacks Tim Walz over 2020 George Floyd riots
Town said the appropriate comparison isn't with Jan. 6, but the National Guard deployments in 2020 during riots following the murder of George Floyd by a police officer in Minneapolis.
'What we learned in 2020, as a guy who was in office then, is that you've got to put out small fires before they turn into forest fires,' Town told USA TODAY. "President Trump is not going to let what happened under the failed local and state leadership in Minneapolis and Seattle and so many other places happen again.'
Trump's order in Los Angeles
On his first day back in office in 2025, Trump pardoned all but 14 of the approximately 1,270 convicted Jan. 6 rioters.
He and Cabinet members including Attorney General Pam Bondi say they will prosecute anyone who even touches a law enforcement official in Los Angeles to the fullest extent of the law.
Asked if that was hypocritical in light of Trump's Jan. 6 pardons, Bondi said, "Well, this is very different."
"These are people out there hurting people in California right now,' Bondi said in an on-camera gaggle with reporters at the White House. 'This is ongoing."
Newsom, who is suing Trump over the Marines and Guardsmen in Los Angeles, disagreed.
"Trump, he's not opposed to lawlessness and violence, as long as it serves him,' Newsom said. 'What more evidence do we need than Jan. 6?"
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump mocks Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon: 'Maybe, he ought to just focus on being a DJ'
Trump mocks Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon: 'Maybe, he ought to just focus on being a DJ'

Business Insider

time16 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Trump mocks Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon: 'Maybe, he ought to just focus on being a DJ'

Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon is probably wondering how he got here. President Donald Trump on Tuesday criticized the investment bank for not giving his trade policy enough "credit." It's not immediately clear what sparked Trump's ire, but the president laid into Solomon directly, even calling out the longtime CEO's DJing hobby. "I think that David should go out and get himself a new Economist or, maybe, he ought to just focus on being a DJ, and not bother running a major Financial Institution," Trump wrote on Truth Social. Goldman economists warned in an August research report this month that consumers would increasingly bear the cost of tariffs, Bloomberg News reported. Goldman declined to comment to Business Insider. Trump and the White House have repeatedly said that consumers will not have to pay higher prices due to tariffs. A number of prominent companies, including Walmart, Nike, and Nintendo, have said they raised prices or will consider doing so as a result of tariffs. Solomon, like others on Wall Street, warned in April about broader "uncertainty" in the markets following Trump's "Liberation Day" announcement of tariffs on a wide range of countries. Solomon told the Financial Times in 2023 that he DJed his daughter's wedding but that his "hobby" would not distract him from his full-time job. "David Solomon and Goldman Sachs refuse to give credit where credit is due," Trump wrote. "They made a bad prediction a long time ago on both the Market repercussion and the Tariffs themselves, and they were wrong, just like they are wrong about so much else." Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. What is your job title? (1 of 2) Entry level position Project manager Management Senior management Executive management Student Self-employed Retired Other Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . Trump's Tuesday post followed the closely watched July consumer price index report, a key inflation measure. The Bureau of Labor Statistics said the year-over-year inflation rate held at 2.7%, surpassing analyst expectations of a higher 2.8% rate. The Federal Reserve has held interest rates steady amid Chairman Jerome Powell's wait-and-see approach to the inflationary impact of tariffs. Trump took Tuesday's numbers as a sign of victory. "It has been proven, that even at this late stage, Tariffs have not caused Inflation, or any other problems for America, other than massive amounts of CASH pouring into our Treasury's coffers," Trump wrote on Truth Social. Solomon is just the latest CEO to find himself on the receiving end of a presidential attack. Last week, Trump went after Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, calling for his resignation. Trump seemed to reverse his views on Tan after meeting with him at the White House on Monday.

Adam Schiff authorized classified intel leaks to smear Trump during Russiagate, whistleblower claims
Adam Schiff authorized classified intel leaks to smear Trump during Russiagate, whistleblower claims

New York Post

time18 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Adam Schiff authorized classified intel leaks to smear Trump during Russiagate, whistleblower claims

A seasoned intelligence officer who aided Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee repeatedly alleged to the FBI that then-Rep. Adam Schiff approved leaking classified information to tarnish President Trump's image during the Russiagate probe, shocking newly released documents reveal. Now-Sen. Schiff (D-Calif.), then the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, openly discussed plans to reveal sensitive information about the Trump-Russia collusion probe starting soon after the 45th president's inauguration in 2017, the unidentified male whistleblower alleged. During an FBI interview in June 2023, the source recalled being part of an all-staff meeting called by Schiff, at which the Democrat 'stated the group would leak classified information which was derogatory to President of the United States Donald J. TRUMP. SCHIFF stated the information would be used to Indict President TRUMP.' Advertisement The whistleblower said he objected to Schiff's idea, a summary of the interview reveals, only to be told by other participants that 'they would not be caught leaking classified information.' Sometime later, the whistleblower said he was approached again about leaking against Trump and responded that they 'believed this activity to be unethical and treasonous.' The whistleblower later reached out to the FBI and was even invited to attend a mock grand jury hearing, only to later be told that the Justice Department would not investigate further. Advertisement Investigators believed Schiff, now 65, was protected by the Constitution's Speech or Debate Clause, which bars the apprehension of legislators for their professional activities except in the event of 'Felony, Treason and Breach of the Peace.' The whistleblower claimed during his June 2023 interview that he 'did not believe' Schiff's actions were covered by the Speech or Debate Clause. The whistleblower's claims were first reported by Just the News, with FBI Director Kash Patel confirming on X Monday night: 'We found it. We declassified it. Now Congress can see how classified info was leaked to shape political narratives – and decide if our institutions were weaponized against the American people.' Patel previously worked as a top aide to former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and authored a memo accusing FBI officials of abusing their power during the Trump-Russia investigation, which proceeded under the code name Crossfire Hurricane. Advertisement The whistleblower, who worked for Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee for 12 years after more than two decades in the intelligence community, was described as 'friends with both Schiff and Nunes' and someone who 'worked with senior political leaders from both major political parties.' However, an October 2017 FBI memo claimed that word was spreading among committee staff that the whistleblower had been fired for a 'perceived lack of party loyalty.' When a Republican staffer went to offer condolences, the memo relates, the whistleblower told them they had lost their job because 'there was an expectation of leaking and he refused to participate.' Over drinks that evening, the whistleblower claimed that Democrats on the intelligence committee had established a 'system' for leaking in which sensitive information would be given to Schiff, 'after which a decision was made as to who would leak the information.' One prominent oversharer, according to the whistleblower, was Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) another intel committee member. Advertisement In a December 2017 FBI interview, the whistleblower recounted how a 'particularly sensitive document' was seen by a small group of lawmakers and staff, including Schiff and Swalwell, but leaked out 'almost verbatim' within a day. The whistleblower allegedly claimed to have 'been warned to be careful because he [Swalwell] had a reputation for leaking classified information.' 4 Sen. Adam Schiff had drawn suspicions of leaking during the first Trump administration. AP 4 President Trump has seethed at Rep. Adam Schiff, who had been one of his top House Democratic adversaries during his first term. AP 4 Russiagate loomed large over the first Trump administration. REUTERS Schiff, who spearheaded the first impeachment of President Trump in 2019, had long been suspected by Republicans of leaking classified information during the Russiagate saga. He also infamously read key portions of the since-debunked Steele Dossier into the congressional record in 2017. In 2023, House Republicans voted to censure Schiff for his role in Russiagate, only for him to be elected to the Senate the following year. In the December 2017 interview, the whistleblower claimed that Schiff had been furious at Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton, believing he would have been tapped as CIA director had the Democrat won. Last week, The Post reported that a grand jury has been convened in Maryland to investigate whether Schiff 'falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms.' Advertisement 4 FBI Director Kash Patel turned over the bureau's findings on the whistleblower's accusations to Congress. REUTERS The California senator is accused of mortgage fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud and false statements to financial institutions for certifying a Maryland property as his primary residence while also claiming a California condominium as his main home for tax and mortgage purposes. The FBI earlier this month initiated an investigation into former CIA Director John Brennan and ex-FBI Director James Comey for any potential criminal actions taken as part of the Trump-Russia probe. Advertisement The Justice Department also launched a 'strike force' last month after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released a long-anticipated, 44-page report from the House Intelligence Committee that found 'egregious' errors committed by Brennan in the compiling of an assessment that claimed Moscow preferred Trump to defeat Clinton. Representatives for Schiff and Swalwell did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

US Department of Education launches nationwide tour
US Department of Education launches nationwide tour

American Press

time18 minutes ago

  • American Press

US Department of Education launches nationwide tour

By Nolan Mckendry | The Center Square The Department of Education launched a national tour this month in its continuing efforts to dismantle the agency and revert power back to the states. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon announced the Returning Education to the States Tour in an effort to ensure President Trump's goal of dismantling the U.S. Department of Education . During the education tour, Secretary McMahon will visit all 50 states and meet with schools, hear from teachers and students on education and ways to improve learning outcomes, and ensure families have the freedom to choose the best educational path for their child's needs. The tour officially kicked off this week with McMahon visiting Louisiana, Arkansas and Tennessee. 'President Trump entrusted me with a vital mission to return education to the states, and part of that is learning best practices from each state,' said U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon. 'As students head back to school, I will travel across our great nation to visit classrooms, listen to voices on the ground, and spotlight the incredible work happening at the local level.' Trump wants all children to have access to quality education, McMahon stated, by ultimately giving it to the states where education is closest to the child and allowing states to enact regulations. 'Let's have parents be at the center of that because parents are with their children. They know what is best for their child, and they should have the choice to put their children in schools where they can flourish,' McMahon said. 'No child should be a prisoner of a failing school.' On Monday, McMahon toured an East Baton Rouge school in Louisiana, along with various lawmakers and education officials. 'As I'm starting 'Returning Education to the States', I want to make sure that states can have best practices to look at,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store