Anderson Cooper evacuates Israeli hotel on camera after Iranian missile alarms
Anderson Cooper was forced to evacuate while filming live in Tel Aviv after an alarm warned of an upcoming missile launch from Iran.
In a video "Anderson Cooper 360°" shared on X, the journalist and in-person correspondents evacuated their filming location while broadcasting from a hotel balcony in Israel early Monday, June 23, local time.
"I should just say that we're now hearing an alert," international correspondent Clarissa Ward said matter-of-factly as the alarm was heard on the broadcast, giving them a 10-minute warning to seek shelter.
"So these are the alerts that go out on all of our phones when you're in Israel," Cooper said of the alert. "It's a 10-minute warning of incoming missiles or something incoming from Iran. So now the location we're in has a verbal alarm telling people to go down into bomb shelters."
Ward then asked if they should keep going, with Cooper adding with a chuckle that they "should probably go down." The crew for Cooper's long-running CNN show then prepared to move to shelter, intent on continuing the broadcast in the process. After switching mics and heading through a hotel hallway, Cooper noted it was the first alarm of the day, but something people in the Israeli city had "gotten used to" over the last week and a half.
Taking an elevator to lower ground, Jerusalem correspondent Jeremy Diamond went on to describe the damage from previous airstrikes, adding that there hadn't been any Israeli fatalities from Iran's retaliatory fire in about a week.
What is Iran's next move? Israel steps up attacks after US bombing: Live updates
The broadcast then went in and out before losing signal completely and switching to CNN senior White House correspondent Kristen Holmes.
USA TODAY has reached out to Cooper's representative for comment.
Tensions heightened June 23 over possible payback by Tehran against the U.S. or its allies after strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities amid fears that the Mideast conflict could spiral into a wider war. Israel stepped up airstrikes on Iran, hitting several locations the Israeli defense minister described as "regime targets" in Tehran.
The U.S. remained on alert with its 40,000 troops in the region two days after President Donald Trump ordered the bombing of Fordow, a uranium enrichment facility deep inside a remote mountain in Iran, and facilities at Natanz and Isfahan.
Contributing: Susan Miller and Christopher Cann
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
14 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Trump Wants to ‘Make Iran Great Again'
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. When Donald Trump raised the idea of toppling Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei yesterday, it wasn't just the idea that was surprising. It was the particular phrase he used to describe it. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' he posted yesterday on Truth Social. The phrase became toxic for a reason. Two years ago, an essay in the Claremont Review of Books noted that regime change entered the popular lexicon in 'the early days of the 9/11 wars, when the Bush (43) Administration argued that the security of America and of the entire world depended not merely on defeating hostile countries militarily but on changing their governments into ones more inherently peaceable and favorable to our interests.' Of course, regimes change all the time, but regime change came to mean 'external, forcible transformation from 'authoritarianism' or 'dictatorship.'' This sounds very much like what Trump is discussing. Having switched from discouraging Israeli military strikes against Iran to joining them, he appears to now be toying with broader ambitions. (Trump offers few endorsements stronger than calling something 'politically incorrect.') But the writer of the Claremont Review essay, a prominent right-wing intellectual, warned about such projects. 'We know how that worked out. Regimes were changed all right, but not into democracies,' he wrote. 'And some of them—e.g., the one in Afghanistan—20 years later changed back to the same regime American firepower had overthrown in 2001.' That writer was Michael Anton. Today he is the director of the policy-planning staff at the State Department (a bit of an oxymoron in this administration), and in April, the White House named him to lead the U.S. delegation at technical talks with Iran on a nuclear deal—negotiations that are presumably irrelevant for the time being. Trump's abrupt shift has thrown the MAGA right into acrimony. In truth, the president has never been a pacificist, as I wrote last week. During the 2016 GOP primary, Trump cannily grasped public anger at the Iraq War and turned it against his rivals. Thinkers such as Anton and politicians such as Vice President J. D. Vance then tried to retrofit a more complete ideology of retrenchment and restraint onto it, but Trump is an improviser, not an ideologue. No one should have been too surprised by the president's order to bomb. Still, his rhetorical embrace of regime change was stunning even to those who never bought into his identity as a dove, and certainly to some of his aides. Perhaps Anton was not surprised to see his view so cavalierly discarded; after all, he once likened backing Trump to playing Russian roulette. But Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were unprepared for the change in rhetoric. Rubio solemnly told Fox Business that the U.S. is not at war with the country it just dropped hundreds of thousands of pounds of ordnance on. Vance, on Meet the Press, insisted, 'Our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change. We do not want to protract this or build this out any more than it's already been built out.' A few hours later, Trump contradicted him directly, in what would have been embarrassing for someone still capable of the emotion. Vance's views on foreign policy are deeply shaped by the Iraq War, in which he served. Now his boss is at risk of speedwalking that conflict one country to the east. The Iraq War was the product of months of preparation by the George W. Bush administration: military mobilization, avid though unsuccessful attempts to rally international support, an extended period of manufacturing consensus in Congress and in the American public. Yet despite that work, and as even proponents of regime change in Iran acknowledge, the Bush administration's handling of the Iraq War was a disaster, perhaps the worst American foreign-policy blunder in history. The U.S. government had good war plans for getting rid of Saddam Hussein's regime but had not effectively thought through what would happen after that. Trump has done even less of that thinking, and leads a nation far more politically divided and warier of foreign intervention. Americans have long viewed Iran negatively: A Fox News poll before this weekend's airstrikes found that roughly three-quarters of them view Iran as a 'real security threat.' Still, another poll earlier this month found that most don't want the U.S. to get involved in armed conflict there. A Pew Research Center poll in May even found that slightly more Americans think that the United States is its own 'greatest threat' than that Iran is. Trump's flippant transformation of 'Make America great again' into 'Make Iran great again' exemplifies the hubris of the Iraq War project that he had promised to leave behind. Just as U.S. officials claimed that Iraq could be easily and quickly converted into an American-style democracy, Trump wants to export his catchphrase to Iran, where the implementation would be even hazier than it is here. Iran is a country of some 90 million people, not a dollhouse to be rearranged. Can regime change work? The answer depends on how success is defined. In 1973, for example, the U.S. backed a coup in Chile, toppling the leftist leader Salvador Allende. It worked: Allende was killed and replaced by Augusto Pinochet, who created a stable, market-based, U.S.-friendly Chilean government. But doing that involved horrifying repression and the killing and disappearances of thousands of critics, leaving a black mark on the U.S. record. In another case of regime change, the U.S. government helped topple Iranian leader Mohammed Mossadegh in 1953. This, too, was an immediate success. Mossadegh was removed, and the Washington-friendly Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was restored to power. But the legacy of the moment stretched on much longer. The shah was also brutally repressive, and Iranians remembered the 1953 coup bitterly. In 1979, a revolution swept Iran, deposing Pahlavi and installing a virulently anti-American government. That regime still rules in Tehran—for now, at least. Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Iran launched strikes on a U.S. base in Qatar, which were intercepted by Qatar's air-defense system, according to the Qatari government. The Supreme Court temporarily allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to countries other than their own without giving them the chance to contest their removals. President Donald Trump called on 'everyone' to ' keep oil prices down ' after America's recent attack on Iranian nuclear sites sparked fear of higher oil prices. Dispatches Explore all of our newsletters here. Evening Read Extreme Violence Without Genocide By Graeme Wood Signs of violent criminality are ubiquitous in South Africa. Electric fences and guard dogs protect homes containing something worth stealing. Reported rapes, carjackings, and armed robberies all occur far more frequently than in the United States. In Bloemfontein, one of the safer cities, I asked a hotel clerk for directions to a coffee shop, and she said it was 'just across the road,' not more than 500 feet away. When I headed out on foot, she stopped me and said that for my safety, 'I would prefer that you drive.' More From The Atlantic Culture Break Play. In Death Stranding 2, people play as an unlikely hero: a courier who trips over rocks and experiences sunburn. It's the Amazonification of everything, now as a video game, Simon Parkin writes. Disconnect. Franklin Schneider has never owned a smartphone. And, based on the amount of social and libidinal energy that phones seem to have sucked from the world, he's not sure he ever wants to.
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
What the Iran conflict means for gas prices
The Big Story Americans could see modest increases in the prices they pay at the pump in the wake of increasing conflict with Iran, analysts say. © iStock Andrew Lipow, president of consulting firm Lipow Oil Associates, told The Hill on Monday that any additional increases in gasoline prices will likely be just a few cents. 'I expect that gasoline prices are going to drift up about three to five cents a gallon over the next couple of weeks,' Lipow said. He added that after an initial 5 percent jump in the price of crude oil, 'the market has sold off since then and now has turned negative.' Oil prices fell Monday, and U.S. benchmark WTI crude was down to about $69 per barrel Monday afternoon — after jumping as high as $75 per barrel late last week in anticipation of U.S. strikes on Iran. The U.S. hit Iranian nuclear facilities Saturday night, bringing the country directly into Iran's conflict with Israel. Gasoline prices were higher Monday, averaging $3.22 per gallon, up from $3.14 a week ago. Austin Lin, principal analyst for refining and oil products at Wood Mackenzie, told The Hill he believed that fuel prices were higher than they would otherwise be as a result of the conflict, but that he did not believe they would rise much further. 'There's a good argument that says Q3 versus everyone's expectations from a month ago is going to see higher pricing,' Lin said. 'I would temper that and say, I don't think there's probably a lot of uplift from where we currently are.' Read more on the subject at Welcome to The Hill's Energy & Environment newsletter, I'm Rachel Frazin — keeping you up to speed on the policies impacting everything from oil and gas to new supply chains. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect the energy and environment sectors now and in the future: New York planning first large US nuclear plant in years: Hochul New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) ordered the state's public power utility this week to start working on a zero-emissions advanced nuclear energy site that would be the nation's first major nuclear plant project in nearly two decades. Trump in wake of Iran attack: 'Everyone, keep oil prices down' In the wake of the U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, President Trump on Monday urged 'everyone' to keep oil prices down. Parliamentarian rules against Senate effort to force Postal Service to sell off EVs The Senate parliamentarian says Republicans cannot include a measure that would force the sale of electric vehicles (EVs) used by the U.S. Postal Service in their 'big, beautiful bill.' Green energy credits phaseout divides Senate Republicans How to phase out Biden-era green energy tax credits is emerging as a key flashpoint among Senate Republicans as they seek to advance their version of the 'big, beautiful bill.' What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets touching on energy issues, the environment and other topics: There Might Not Be a Map for That: Budget Cuts Threaten Geological Surveys (The New York Times) A potent heat dome is building over the US, sending temperatures into the triple digits (CNN) On Tap Upcoming news themes and events we're watching: What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: Supreme Court lifts third country deportation limits; liberals pen scathing dissent The Supreme Court on Monday lifted judge-imposed limits on the Trump administration's deportations to countries where migrants have no ties over a scathing dissent from the court's liberal justices. Read more Former ambassador to Russia: Putin, Xi will celebrate Trump's 'preemptive war' in Iran Former U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul offered warnings on Saturday of how U.S. strikes on Iran could influence U.S. adversaries around the world. Read more You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here
New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump's courageous Iran strike: Letters to the Editor — June 24, 2025
The Issue: The US military bombing three Iranian nuclear sites to destroy Tehran's weapons program. President Trump made the right call to deploy American forces to strike nuclear sites in Iran, and he should be commended for his decisive leadership (' 'Bunker busters' hit 3 nuke sites,' June 22). Iran should never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. Thanks to the resolve of our commander in chief and the courage of our armed forces, America, Israel and the free world are safer. Advertisement Iran should now stand down and abandon any thought of retaliation against Americans or be prepared to face the consequences. Trump has proven again that the United States is the leader of the free world and that America stands with Israel. God bless our troops. Paul Bacon Advertisement Hallandale Beach, Fla. Our president had the courage to do what was absolutely necessary, but let's not allow ourselves to rejoice in victory just yet. As with every other military operation — especially in the Middle East — the long game awaits us. Iran will surely try to save face, and it's just a question of how far it will go. Many options are on the table, but we know for certain that we have a president who will protect us at any cost, and that's very reassuring as we go through our daily lives. Rob Feuerstein Advertisement Staten Island Thank you, Trump, for your decisive leadership in obliterating the cataclysmic threat posed by the world's leading sponsor of terror: The Iranian regime. Iran aspires not for the well-being of its own people but for death to America and Israel. All of us who truly seek and celebrate peace join in praising and thanking Trump for his historic efforts to achieve it. Brian Goldenfeld Advertisement Thousand Oaks, Calif. President Trump acted decisively, and with overwhelming strength, to destroy Iran's ability to build a nuclear bomb. For over four decades, Iran's calls for 'Death to the Great Satan' were met with little response from the United States — until Iran's ability to build a nuclear bomb became imminent and its threats approached reality. Undoubtedly, there will be second guessing by Democrats — and some rogue Republicans — regarding the legality of Trump's military action, but one fact is undeniably true: Trump gave Iran every opportunity to avoid our intervention. By refusing, Iran brought this action upon itself. The only consequence of Trump's action is that America, and the world, became much safer than 24 hours earlier. Jack Kaufman Naples, Fla. Finally: A president who says what he means and means what he says and has courage and faith in the greatest military in history to carry out their mission. God bless our country, our president and our military. Advertisement R.A. Lessin Staten Island After decades of exporting terrorism and lying about its ambitions, Iran has received Trump's message that it can't have nuclear weapons. The president also made it clear that negotiations with us could result in a reset in relations that would lead to a new era of cooperation between Washington and Teheran. Advertisement With no air-defense systems left and his country being pummeled by the Israeli Air Force, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei would be smart to take Trump up on his offer. Mel Young Lawrence Iran has proven to be a malignant state that seeks the elimination of Israel and America, its perceived Great and Little Satans. Advertisement Iran and its proxies are moving in close steps toward Nazi Germany's intended goal of exterminating the Jewish people and recreating the world in its own image. During the Holocaust, the world remained silent; thankfully, in our time, Trump refused to do so. Our president stands firm and is committed to Israel's survival and America's leadership. There are few options available when dealing with the cancer known as Iran: Either you terminate it, or it terminates you. The world closed its eyes during the Holocaust, but Trump is keeping our eyes wide open. S.P. Hersh Advertisement Lawrence Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
