logo
Bills dealing with religious freedom moving in Kentucky General Assembly

Bills dealing with religious freedom moving in Kentucky General Assembly

Yahoo26-02-2025
A Louisville church is shown. Several bills in the General Assembly have to do with faith. (Kentucky Lantern photo by McKenna Horsley)
FRANKFORT — Several bills moving in the Kentucky legislature this session deal with faith — from regulating the expression of religion in public schools to addressing what legal actions someone can take if they feel their religious expression has been hindered.
Of the more than a dozen religious bills or resolutions filed by lawmakers have been introduced in previous legislative sessions, but a few are poised for successful floor votes in the House and Senate this time around.
On Tuesday, the Senate passed Senate Bill 19, which would require schools to have a moment of silence at the start of each school day where students may 'meditate, pray or engage in any other silent activity.' It now goes to the House for further consideration, where a similar measure has been introduced.
Also in the House, bills have been filed that would allow the Ten Commandments to be read or posted in public schools.
Senate committees last Thursday forwarded a few pieces of legislation dealing with religion, such as Senate Bill 60, which would give citizens who feel that their religious exercise 'has been substantially burdened' a right to sue.
The topic was so frequent on Thursday, Democratic Caucus Chair Sen. Reggie Thomas, of Lexington, said in the Senate Education Committee that 'I guess this is my religious day at the Capitol.'
After the committee meeting, Thomas told the Kentucky Lantern that he agreed with some of the legislation, like studying alleged cases of antisemitism on campuses. He also said he didn't have an issue with the moment of silence bill since students may use the time how they want.
'However, where we see religion being used as a means to disrupt health regulations or safety regulations or discriminate against members of the LGBTQ community, I will oppose those always,' Thomas said.
Sen. Lindsey Tichenor, R-Smithfield, called religious legislation 'maybe in response to some of the things we've seen rising up in Kentucky in the last several years.' Tichenor appeared before the education committee to present her Senate Joint Resolution 55, which resolution is aimed at combating antisemitism at Kentucky public universities and requiring reporting on such cases.
Joining her were Louisville Democratic Rep. Daniel Grossberg and Rabbi Shlomo Litvin, chairman of the Kentucky Jewish Council. The resolution could soon move to the Senate floor for a full vote.
'I could maybe argue that we have seen an attack on religion in Kentucky by some, and this is more than likely just a natural response to get back to, 'OK, what's our what's our history? Where does Kentucky stand on these issues?'' Tichenor told the Lantern.
During the Senate committee debate on the moment of silence bill, Tichenor argued there is 'a deep, deep history of Christianity in this country' and could be an opportunity to teach students about how Christianity has impacted U.S. laws.
'I think teaching that as a historical fact to our students can be incredibly valuable — alongside letting them know this is voluntary. It's not something required,' Tichenor said.
The office of Republican Attorney General Russell Coleman opined last week that legislation to restore a Ten Commandments monument to the Capitol grounds and to public schools to display the Ten Commandments in ways that 'lack a 'plainly religious,' 'pre-eminent purpose'' and highlight the texts 'undeniable historical meaning' would likely not be unconstitutional. The opinion had been requested by multiple lawmakers in the House and Senate.
Richard Nelson, the executive director of the conservative Commonwealth Policy Center, said in a Tuesday interview that the U.S. is 'not a secular nation, nor are we a nation that imposes a national religion or a national church.' He said that 'threats, largely at the national level, to religious freedom' may be why Kentucky lawmakers are introducing bills on the topic of religious freedom.
'Religious freedom' is more than attending a worship service, Nelson said. It also includes the ability to freely live your life without government coercion in public spaces, personally-owned businesses and one's community.
'The legislature believes in this so strongly that they are doing all they can to shore up religious freedom for every Kentuckian, and I think that's a good thing,' Nelson said.
David Walls, the executive director of conservative policy group The Family Foundation, said in a statement to the Lantern that while the organization was 'grateful that the U.S. Supreme Court has moved to restore a proper understanding of religious liberty in recent cases,' the commonwealth 'still has a way to go at the state level to adequately protect religious liberty.'
'A recently released index on religious liberty placed Kentucky at 34th in the country due to the weaknesses of our current laws on religious freedom,' Walls said. 'We encourage the General Assembly to support legislation that will strengthen and add to our current religious freedom protections, like SB 60, to ensure that Kentuckians of all faiths may practice their religion freely without excessive interference from the government.'
'If there's an attack on religion in Kentucky, it would certainly be an attack on minority religious views,' said Corey Shapiro, the legal director of the ACLU of Kentucky.
'If we want to be promoting religion, we should be promoting it in a way that reflects the diversity in our commonwealth,' he said. 'Any sort of response to a purported attack is ignoring how that's going to make the Jewish student from Louisville, the Muslim student from Lexington, feel when they're either in school or at the Capitol.'
It's also an 'incredible missed opportunity to focus on best practices in public schools, none of which involve religion,' Shapiro argued.
'It is clear that the people in Kentucky want our legislature to focus on public schools and improving our public schools, and putting money into religion is not the answer, and it's not what Kentuckians want.'
Mindy Haas, the executive director of the Jewish Federation of the Bluegrass, said in a statement that while the Jewish community 'is not a monolith and perspectives may vary,' many within it agree 'on the importance of upholding religious freedom and preventing government overreach into matters of faith.'
Haas noted that 'extreme actions at both the federal and state levels make it clear that personal agendas are often prioritized over the well-being of the American people.' She also raised concerns over a 'growing trend of political decisions being increasingly influenced by religious ideology, creating division rather than protecting religious expression and inclusion.'
'This shift blurs the critical separation between religion and state, a principle that safeguards both government neutrality and religious freedom,' Haas said. 'When lawmakers impose religious doctrine through policy, it threatens the pluralism that allows individuals to practice their faith — or no faith at all — without government interference.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signs redistricting measure in response to new Texas House map
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signs redistricting measure in response to new Texas House map

New York Post

timea few seconds ago

  • New York Post

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signs redistricting measure in response to new Texas House map

California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed off Thursday evening on a redistricting plan aimed at countering Texas Republicans' planned implementation of new congressional maps for the Lone Star State. Newsom enacted the so-called 'Election Rigging Response Act,' setting a Nov. 4 special election asking whether Golden State voters approve of new House districts designed by legislators. The Democrat-controlled state Senate passed the special election measure in a 30-8 vote, shortly after the Dem-held state Assembly approved it in a 57-20 vote. Advertisement If the new map is approved by voters — and if it survives near-certain legal challenges — Democrats could win up to five additional House seats in next year's midterm elections, canceling out the five seats Republicans in Texas are expected to gain as a result of their redistricting push. Newsom announced that California would forge ahead with redistricting at a rally-like press conference in Los Angeles last week. AFP via Getty Images 'The president and the Texas Republicans are rigging the election … it is our duty to fight fire with fire,' state Sen. Jerry McNerney (D-East Bay) said during debate on the measure. Advertisement McNerney argued that 'California voters should have the right to decide if the state should respond to the president's effort to rig the election.' Since the measure seeks to override the Golden State's voter-approved, nonpartisan redistricting commission, a special election is necessary to redraw the existing congressional map. State Democrats maintain that the mid-decade redistricting measure is a one-off, needed to directly respond to Texas Republicans, but some in the legislature expressed fear that California would never return to its original system. President Trump strongly backed Texas' effort to redraw congressional maps in the Lone Star State. REUTERS Advertisement 'With the reported involvement of the [Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee] in this action – that has been developed behind the scenes – one has to be awfully suspicious of significant changes to this process,' argued Republican state Sen. Roger Niello (R-Sacramento County). 'Indeed, the intent or the power to continue on our previous track after 2030 is of great concern to me and I think should be of great concern to everybody who votes in favor of this,' he added. Former President Barack Obama weighed in on California's redistricting earlier this week at a DCCC fundraiser, arguing that Newsom's plan 'was a smart, measured approach' to counter Texas' move.

HHS nixes California sex ed grant after refusal to drop ‘radical' gender lessons
HHS nixes California sex ed grant after refusal to drop ‘radical' gender lessons

New York Post

time31 minutes ago

  • New York Post

HHS nixes California sex ed grant after refusal to drop ‘radical' gender lessons

An office within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) terminated a federal grant funding California's sex education program aimed at preventing teen pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases after the West Coast state reportedly refused to remove 'radical gender ideology' from its curriculum, Fox News Digital exclusively learned Thursday. 'California's refusal to comply with federal law and remove egregious gender ideology from federally funded sex-ed materials is unacceptable,' Andrew Gradison, acting assistant secretary at the Administration for Children and Families, said in comment provided to Fox News Digital Thursday. 'The Trump Administration will not allow taxpayer dollars to be used to indoctrinate children. Accountability is coming for every state that uses federal funds to teach children delusional gender ideology.' Advertisement The Administration for Children and Families, an office under HHS' umbrella that funds state, local and tribal organizations to provide support for families such as child care, announced Thursday morning that it was terminating the funding to California's Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) grant. The PREP program aims to educate California's youth, ages 10–19, on preventing teen pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted infections, which the state says has led to students in the program 'delaying sexual activity, increasing condom or contraceptive use for sexually active youth, or reducing number of sexual partners.' 4 An office within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) terminated a federal grant funding California's sex education program aimed at preventing teen pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases after the West Coast state reportedly refused to remove 'radical gender ideology' from its curriculum. REUTERS 'Program services are engaging, nonjudgmental, medically accurate and tailored to the unique needs of youth participants and their communities,' the PREP website states. 'Services are offered in a range of settings, including schools, juvenile justice facilities, homeless shelters and foster care group homes. CA PREP activities also include community engagement and promotion of clinical linkages to youth-friendly reproductive health services.' Advertisement PREP specifically aims to assist those who 'reside, attend school or receive reproductive health services in a high-need geographic area; are homeless and/or runaway; attend an alternative or continuation school; are in or emancipated from foster care; are in the juvenile justice or probation system; identify as LGBTQ; are receiving treatment for mental health or substance abuse issues; have special needs; live in migrant farmworker families or are expectant/parenting female youth up to age 21.' The PREP grant has been under scrutiny by the Trump administration since at least March, when the Administration for Children and Families requested program leaders send copies of its curriculum and other relevant course materials to them for review. The probe was initially launched to ensure the state's sexual education programming is medically accurate and age-appropriate. 4 The Administration for Children and Families, an office under HHS' umbrella that funds state, local and tribal organizations to provide support for families such as child care, announced Thursday morning that it was terminating the funding to California's Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) grant. AFP via Getty Images Previous grant funding shows California's PREP program received just under $6 million from the federal government in fiscal year 2022. All in, California could lose $12.3 million in funding that it has not yet received, covering multiple years, according to HHS. Advertisement The Administration for Children and Families reviewed the program's curriculum and other teaching materials, and found a lengthy list of subjects and language deemed to fall outside the program's 'authorizing statute,' in particular references to 'gender ideology.' In June, Fox News Digital reported Administration for Children and Families gave the sex education program a 60-day deadline to remove all references to gender identity or face potential termination of its funding. The 60-day deadline just ran dry, with the Administration for Children and Families subsequently terminating the funding and sending a letter to Sydney Armendariz, the division chief of Maternal Child, and Adolescent Health Division at the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), and Matthew Green, the deputy director of the Center for Family Health at CDPH, declaring it was 'terminating all California State Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) awards and suspending the funding effective August 21, 2025.' The letter sent Thursday reported that following the Administration for Children and Families' June request to remove what it said was radical gender ideology from PREP teachings, California refused in a letter of its own. 4 The PREP grant has been under scrutiny by the Trump administration since at least March, when the Administration for Children and Families requested program leaders send copies of its curriculum and other relevant course materials to them for review. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 'CDPH will not make any such modifications at this time for several reasons,' the California Department of Public Health said in a letter to ACF earlier this week, according to HHS. 'The listed reasons were: 1) PREP materials had already been reviewed and approved by ACF; 2) the materials are medically accurate; 3) the gender ideology content is relevant to purposes identified in the authorizing statute, specifically the adult preparation subjects listed at 42 U.S.C. § 713(b)(2)(C); and 4) ACF does not have authority to take an enforcement action.' Among the materials Administration for Children and Families found amid its review of the curriculum was a lesson for middle school-aged students that sought to introduce them to the concepts of transgenderism, Fox News Digital previously reported. 'We've been talking during class about messages people get on how they should act as boys and girls—but as many of you know, there are also people who don't identify as boys or girls, but rather as transgender or gender queer,' the lesson states to students. 'This means that even if they were called a boy or a girl at birth and may have body parts that are typically associated with being a boy or a girl, on the inside, they feel differently.' Other flagged lessons in the materials included curriculum for high school-aged students with instructions on what it means to be 'nonbinary' and language that informed students 'gender-identity' is 'essentially a social status.' 4 California could lose $12.3 million in funding that it has not yet received, covering multiple years, according to HHS. Christopher Sadowski 'In a disturbing and egregious abuse of federal funds, California has been using taxpayer money to teach curricula that could encourage kids to contemplate mutilating their genitals, 'altering their body… through hormone therapy,' 'adding or removing breast tissue,' and 'changing their name.' It instructed teachers to 'remind students that some men are born with female anatomy,'' HHS said in a Thursday press release of the teachings. The Administration for Children and Families also had raised concerns over materials for teachers within the program, including lessons on avoiding misgendering individuals. Advertisement 'All people have a gender identity,' the teacher training materials stated, Fox Digital previously reported. It also instructed educators to refer to people who identify with their sex 'assigned at birth' as 'cisgender,' and added that those who are not 'cisgender' may identify as 'non-binary, agender, bigender, genderfluid, (or) genderqueer.' Gradison's letter to the California health leaders Thursday underscored that Administration for Children and Families' decision to terminate the grant is final unless California health leaders file an appeal. 'This is the final decision of the Administration for Children and Families,' the letter reads. 'It shall be the final decision of the Department unless, within 30 days after receiving this decision, you submit a notice of appeal to the Departmental Appeals Board (DAB).'

U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas says he'll bow out if redistricting stands
U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas says he'll bow out if redistricting stands

Axios

time31 minutes ago

  • Axios

U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas says he'll bow out if redistricting stands

Longtime Austin Democratic congressman Lloyd Doggett said Thursday that he won't seek reelection if new congressional maps are not overturned by courts. Why it matters: Doggett's move prevents a potentially nasty Democratic primary in the wake of a Republican redistricting effort, allowing U.S. Rep. Greg Casar, D-Austin, a rising progressive, to remain in power. State of play: Casar and Doggett would have battled for a single Austin-based district under the new congressional map that the Texas House approved on Wednesday and which the Senate is expected to pass soon. Gov. Greg Abbott has said he'll sign the legislation. Doggett, who has been repeatedly targeted by Republicans in redistricting during his over 30 years in Congress, currently represents much of Austin and its suburbs. Casar, a former Austin city council member first elected to Congress in 2022, represents parts of southern and eastern Austin in a district that snakes down to San Antonio. Flashback: In a campaign email nearly two weeks ago, Doggett wrote that "seniority is an asset, not a liability." He urged Casar to "not abandon" his reconfigured district, arguing that Casar could "use his organizing skills and populist message to win over the disaffected, particularly disaffected Hispanic voters." What they're saying: Unless the new maps are overturned by courts, "I will not seek reelection," Doggett said in a statement Thursday. "I had hoped that my commitment to reelection under any circumstances would encourage Congressman Casar to not surrender his winnable district to Trump." "While his apparent decision is most unfortunate, I prefer to devote the coming months to fighting Trump tyranny and serving Austin rather than waging a struggle with fellow Democrats." On X, Casar wrote: "Lloyd Doggett is an Austin institution. I've learned so much from him. I'm grateful to him. The fight for democracy continues." The big picture: The new map could give Republicans an additional five seats in Congress. Democrats say the map disenfranchises Black and Latino voters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store