logo
Bills dealing with religious freedom moving in Kentucky General Assembly

Bills dealing with religious freedom moving in Kentucky General Assembly

Yahoo26-02-2025

A Louisville church is shown. Several bills in the General Assembly have to do with faith. (Kentucky Lantern photo by McKenna Horsley)
FRANKFORT — Several bills moving in the Kentucky legislature this session deal with faith — from regulating the expression of religion in public schools to addressing what legal actions someone can take if they feel their religious expression has been hindered.
Of the more than a dozen religious bills or resolutions filed by lawmakers have been introduced in previous legislative sessions, but a few are poised for successful floor votes in the House and Senate this time around.
On Tuesday, the Senate passed Senate Bill 19, which would require schools to have a moment of silence at the start of each school day where students may 'meditate, pray or engage in any other silent activity.' It now goes to the House for further consideration, where a similar measure has been introduced.
Also in the House, bills have been filed that would allow the Ten Commandments to be read or posted in public schools.
Senate committees last Thursday forwarded a few pieces of legislation dealing with religion, such as Senate Bill 60, which would give citizens who feel that their religious exercise 'has been substantially burdened' a right to sue.
The topic was so frequent on Thursday, Democratic Caucus Chair Sen. Reggie Thomas, of Lexington, said in the Senate Education Committee that 'I guess this is my religious day at the Capitol.'
After the committee meeting, Thomas told the Kentucky Lantern that he agreed with some of the legislation, like studying alleged cases of antisemitism on campuses. He also said he didn't have an issue with the moment of silence bill since students may use the time how they want.
'However, where we see religion being used as a means to disrupt health regulations or safety regulations or discriminate against members of the LGBTQ community, I will oppose those always,' Thomas said.
Sen. Lindsey Tichenor, R-Smithfield, called religious legislation 'maybe in response to some of the things we've seen rising up in Kentucky in the last several years.' Tichenor appeared before the education committee to present her Senate Joint Resolution 55, which resolution is aimed at combating antisemitism at Kentucky public universities and requiring reporting on such cases.
Joining her were Louisville Democratic Rep. Daniel Grossberg and Rabbi Shlomo Litvin, chairman of the Kentucky Jewish Council. The resolution could soon move to the Senate floor for a full vote.
'I could maybe argue that we have seen an attack on religion in Kentucky by some, and this is more than likely just a natural response to get back to, 'OK, what's our what's our history? Where does Kentucky stand on these issues?'' Tichenor told the Lantern.
During the Senate committee debate on the moment of silence bill, Tichenor argued there is 'a deep, deep history of Christianity in this country' and could be an opportunity to teach students about how Christianity has impacted U.S. laws.
'I think teaching that as a historical fact to our students can be incredibly valuable — alongside letting them know this is voluntary. It's not something required,' Tichenor said.
The office of Republican Attorney General Russell Coleman opined last week that legislation to restore a Ten Commandments monument to the Capitol grounds and to public schools to display the Ten Commandments in ways that 'lack a 'plainly religious,' 'pre-eminent purpose'' and highlight the texts 'undeniable historical meaning' would likely not be unconstitutional. The opinion had been requested by multiple lawmakers in the House and Senate.
Richard Nelson, the executive director of the conservative Commonwealth Policy Center, said in a Tuesday interview that the U.S. is 'not a secular nation, nor are we a nation that imposes a national religion or a national church.' He said that 'threats, largely at the national level, to religious freedom' may be why Kentucky lawmakers are introducing bills on the topic of religious freedom.
'Religious freedom' is more than attending a worship service, Nelson said. It also includes the ability to freely live your life without government coercion in public spaces, personally-owned businesses and one's community.
'The legislature believes in this so strongly that they are doing all they can to shore up religious freedom for every Kentuckian, and I think that's a good thing,' Nelson said.
David Walls, the executive director of conservative policy group The Family Foundation, said in a statement to the Lantern that while the organization was 'grateful that the U.S. Supreme Court has moved to restore a proper understanding of religious liberty in recent cases,' the commonwealth 'still has a way to go at the state level to adequately protect religious liberty.'
'A recently released index on religious liberty placed Kentucky at 34th in the country due to the weaknesses of our current laws on religious freedom,' Walls said. 'We encourage the General Assembly to support legislation that will strengthen and add to our current religious freedom protections, like SB 60, to ensure that Kentuckians of all faiths may practice their religion freely without excessive interference from the government.'
'If there's an attack on religion in Kentucky, it would certainly be an attack on minority religious views,' said Corey Shapiro, the legal director of the ACLU of Kentucky.
'If we want to be promoting religion, we should be promoting it in a way that reflects the diversity in our commonwealth,' he said. 'Any sort of response to a purported attack is ignoring how that's going to make the Jewish student from Louisville, the Muslim student from Lexington, feel when they're either in school or at the Capitol.'
It's also an 'incredible missed opportunity to focus on best practices in public schools, none of which involve religion,' Shapiro argued.
'It is clear that the people in Kentucky want our legislature to focus on public schools and improving our public schools, and putting money into religion is not the answer, and it's not what Kentuckians want.'
Mindy Haas, the executive director of the Jewish Federation of the Bluegrass, said in a statement that while the Jewish community 'is not a monolith and perspectives may vary,' many within it agree 'on the importance of upholding religious freedom and preventing government overreach into matters of faith.'
Haas noted that 'extreme actions at both the federal and state levels make it clear that personal agendas are often prioritized over the well-being of the American people.' She also raised concerns over a 'growing trend of political decisions being increasingly influenced by religious ideology, creating division rather than protecting religious expression and inclusion.'
'This shift blurs the critical separation between religion and state, a principle that safeguards both government neutrality and religious freedom,' Haas said. 'When lawmakers impose religious doctrine through policy, it threatens the pluralism that allows individuals to practice their faith — or no faith at all — without government interference.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

So, You Misgendered Someone. Here's How To Address The Mistake.
So, You Misgendered Someone. Here's How To Address The Mistake.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

So, You Misgendered Someone. Here's How To Address The Mistake.

Transgender and nonbinary people are under attack by hate-driven legislation and unfair restrictions policing their bodies. Voting people out who support anti-trans legislation, speaking up for the LGBTQ+ community and learning the acts and behaviors that can make the community feel supported are integral. One way to support the community is by getting folks' pronouns and names right — a task that shouldn't be hard but is a battleground for many people. It's known as misgendering and deadnaming. 'Misgendering is intentionally or unintentionally referring to someone using signifiers of a gender other than the one they identify with,' said Bre Kidman, the co-executive director of Maine Transgender Network and the first openly nonbinary person in history to run for U.S. Senate. 'This can be things like 'he' or 'she' or 'sir' or 'ma'am' or 'Miss' or 'Mister,' really just any sort of gender signifiers that don't line up with how the person identifies,' they said. Additionally, using someone's deadname, which is the name someone used before they transitioned, can be another form of wrongly identifying a trans or nonbinary person and can be just as hurtful, Kidman said. Kiara St. James, the founder and co-executive director of programs at New York Transgender Advocacy Group, said that in her experience, this behavior happens intentionally more often than not. It's about someone not wanting to acknowledge a trans person's gender or a nonbinary or gender nonconforming person's request to be respected in the identity that best represents them. 'So, it's really an act of violence when people misgender ... especially if it's done consistently and intentionally. It does a lot of mental damage to those folks who are being misgendered,' St. James said. For those who do it unintentionally, it can be awkward and uncomfortable — but not as awkward and uncomfortable as it is for the person being misgendered. 'I think people are just so terrified of messing up the pronouns that they make it even harder for themselves,' said Jack Boyum, the creative director at The Coven, a Minneapolis-based organization that is self-described as 'a community and co-working space that centers the experiences of women, nonbinary and trans [individuals].' 'What I tell people all the time is you can literally just ask people their pronouns. It makes people feel very seen, and they'll be happy to tell you what their pronoun is,' Boyum said. Below, we asked trans activists what they'd like you to do if you unintentionally misgender someone. If you realize you accidentally misgendered someone, don't ignore it, Kidman said. Whether it's in the moment or after the fact, it's important to acknowledge your misstep and to use the correct pronoun moving forward. 'I've had people message me later on and apologize, and that's made me feel very seen; as long as they've pivoted to the right pronoun, that's OK,' Boyum added. 'I personally prefer ... that they apologize and then pivot and get the pronoun right in the future,' Boyum said. Lightly addressing the mistake is appropriate, they added, because it does not draw a lot of attention to the person you misgendered. 'I think if you're around other people that you do not know, it draws attention to it when everyone else is using your pronoun correctly. It kind of like gives a little doubt to maybe a new person, too, that would then also start to make a mistake,' they said. 'I would rather get over it as fast as possible.' Family members can sometimes feel like they can get away with more because they're family. (And they often feel his way when it comes to gender identity and a whole bevy of other topics.) But this could not be further from reality. In fact, Boyum said it's doubly important for family members of trans and nonbinary folks to use someone's correct pronouns or name. 'Family, specifically, doing that work and pre-research and trying really hard goes so long because we kind of build our other families outside of our biological family,' they explained. 'But when families can come through and see and respect you in that way, I think it goes so far for folks.' 'It's really important to resist the urge to make it the trans person's fault that you're making a mistake about their identity,' Kidman said. In other words, the onus falls on you. No matter when they transitioned or how long you've known them, it's not right to put the blame on them for your misstep. Don't say things like 'Oh, well, you didn't tell me' or 'How would I have known' when they correct your mistake. 'I also want to acknowledge that it can be embarrassing or uncomfortable to be corrected, especially if it feels like the other person is irritated with you for making a mistake that seems simple or minor to you,' Kidman said. 'I'd like to encourage people to try to remember, you're probably not the first person to misgender them even that day, and they may be tired of not feeling seen or understood by the world.' It may seem like a no-brainer, but getting reactive when someone corrects your pronoun usage is problematic. St. James said this behavior is usually exclusive to those who are intentionally misgendering, but she said people will insist they call her by her dead name or use incorrect pronouns when addressing her. Additionally, asking invasive questions after you misgender someone is not OK, she noted. 'There are people who are very, very stubborn [and] resistant to change. They're resistant to respecting identities, and they exist in the world,' St. James said. 'Don't put the person who you misgendered in a position of having to comfort you or reassure you for your mistake,' Kidman explained. They said this could look like saying things like 'I'm so sorry, I'm a terrible person!' after you misgender someone, which then requires the person you misgendered to say something like, 'No, you're not. You're great!' In the end, this centers the situation on you and requires the person you misidentified to make you feel better, Kidman said. 'Just be mindful, like, 'Oops, I slipped up.' Let me fix it real quick and keep it moving. Keep it light,' they added. Once you know someone's pronouns, make use you use them when they aren't around, too, according to Boyum. 'First of all ... you're still misgendering someone if they aren't in the room,' they noted. Secondly, it helps you train yourself to use the right pronouns when the person is nearby, Boyum added. It's important to do your research to learn about the importance of correct pronoun usage and the struggles that trans people face to unlearn the problematic ideas that are rampant in society. '[There are] tons and tons of books and blogs and information online, too, that people can access and do research prior to asking the one queer person you know,' Boyum said. That being said, they added that many queer and trans folks are likely happy to talk about it, too, as long as it's asked in an appropriate and respectful way. 'We live in the age of Google, so I don't think there's any excuses for people to be as ignorant as unfortunately, a lot of them insist on being,' St. James said. 'Everyone has a right to be able to identify in ways that affirm them,' said St. James. 'These pronouns are a form of signifiers to one's identity.' When you use someone's correct pronouns, it's a way of showing respect, she said. 'You're showing them that you see them, right? You're showing like, 'I know you're trans, I know you're gender nonconforming, gender nonbinary, and I want to respect your pronouns. I want you to know that I see you, I hear you.'' 'And that's why pronouns are important because that's what it [connotes]. It [connotes] a trans person being seen, a nonbinary person being seen and heard. And so that's why when you respect people's pronouns, trust me, you really start to see that you'll have a better connection with those communities,' St. James said. How To Find A Therapist Who Focuses On Trans Mental Health Conversations About Abortion Are Missing Voices: Trans And Nonbinary People 6 Common Phrases You May Not Realize Are Actually Fat-Shaming

GOP's health care plan: We're all going to die, so whatever
GOP's health care plan: We're all going to die, so whatever

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

GOP's health care plan: We're all going to die, so whatever

If death and taxes are the only certainties, Joni Ernst is here to cut one and fast-track the other. 'We all are going to die," she said. You might think that's a line from a nihilistic French play. Or something a teenage goth said in Hot Topic. Or an epiphany from your stoner college roommate after he watched Interstellar at 3 a.m. But that was actually the Iowa Senator's God-honest response to concerns that slashing Medicaid to achieve President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' would lead to more preventable deaths. The full exchange at a May 30 town hall included one audience member shouting at the stage, 'People will die!' And Ernst responding, 'People are not — well, we all are going to die, so for heaven's sake.' That's not a health care policy — that's a horoscope for the terminally screwed. As you can imagine, the internet didn't love it, because losing your health should not trigger the equivalent of a shrug emoji from someone elected to serve the public good. But rather than walking it back, Ernst leaned in, filming a mock apology in a graveyard because nothing says, 'I care about your future,' like filming next to people who don't have one. Opinion: Nurses are drowning while Braun ignores Indiana's health care crisis Ernst's comments aren't just philosophical musings. She's justifying policy choices that cause real harm. If passed, this bill would, according to the Congressional Budget Office, remove health coverage for up to 7.6 million Americans. That's not just 'we all die someday' territory. That's 'some people will die soon and needlessly.' What makes this even more galling is that the people pushing these cuts have access to high-quality, taxpayer-subsidized healthcare. Congress gets the AAA, platinum, concierge-level government plan. Meanwhile, millions of Americans are told to try their luck with essential oils or YouTube acupuncture tutorials. Honestly, it felt more like performance art than policy: 'Sorry about your grandma getting kicked out of her assisted living facility. Please enjoy this scenic view of her future! LOL!' We're not asking you to defeat death, senator. Death is both inevitable and bipartisan. But there is a broad chasm between dying peacefully at 85 and dying in your 40's because your Medicaid plan disappeared and your GoFundMe didn't meet its goal. Fundamentally, governing is about priorities. A budget is a moral document. When a lawmaker tells you 'we're all going to die' in response to a policy choice, they're telling you 'I've made peace with your suffering as collateral damage.' And if a U.S. Senator can stand in a cemetery and joke about it, you have to wonder — who do our federal legislators think those graves are for? Opinion: Indiana DCS cut foster care in half — and now claims children are safer This isn't just about one comment or one bill. It's about a mindset that treats healthcare as a luxury rather than a right. If death is inevitable, then access to healthcare you can afford is what helps determine how long you have, how comfortably you live, and whether you get to watch your kids grow up. Healthcare isn't about escaping death. It's about dignity and quality of life while we are here. Ernst got one thing right: death will come for us all. But leadership, real leadership, is about helping people live as long and as well as they can before that day comes. You want to make jokes, Senator? Fine. But if your punchline is 'You're all going to die anyway,' don't be surprised when your constituents realize the joke's on them. Kristin Brey is the "My Take" columnist for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Joni Ernst films graveyard video after telling sick people "we all die" | Opinion

Rally for LGBTQ+ rights to convene at historic site in Washington
Rally for LGBTQ+ rights to convene at historic site in Washington

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Rally for LGBTQ+ rights to convene at historic site in Washington

By Daniel Trotta WASHINGTON (Reuters) -LGBTQ+ people will gather on Sunday at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, site of Martin Luther King's 1963 "I Have a Dream" speech, for a political rally aimed at preserving decades of progress while protesting setbacks under President Donald Trump. After the festive nature of a parade on Saturday through the streets of the capital, the political demonstration may be the main event of the weeks-long WorldPride celebration, which moves around the globe every two years. It occurs in Washington at a time of high tension over LGBTQ+ rights in the U.S. Speakers are certain to rail against Trump, who has issued executive orders limiting transgender rights, banned transgender people from serving in the armed forces and rescinded anti-discrimination policies for LGBTQ+ people. The White House has defended its dismantling of diversity, equity and inclusion programs, calling DEI a form of discrimination, and said its transgender policy protects women by keeping transgender women out of shared spaces. The Trump administration has also touted its appointment of a number of openly gay people to cabinet posts and judgeships as evidence that Trump aims to serve all Americans. Before the main rally, transgender supporters will hold their own march to protest Trump's rhetoric and myriad state laws around the country that ban transgender healthcare services for minors. Backers of those laws say they are attempting to protect minors from starting on a path they may later regret. The transgender rally will march from the offices of the Human Rights Campaign, the largest LGBTQ+ organization in the U.S., toward the Lincoln Memorial, which is considered hallowed ground in the U.S. civil rights movement as the site of the King speech and the March on Washington that preceded historic legislation such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store