logo
GOP finds early success battling Democrats' Medicaid message with legal threats

GOP finds early success battling Democrats' Medicaid message with legal threats

The Hill16-04-2025

The House GOP's campaign arm in recent weeks has successfully pressed three advertising companies to pull down Democratic billboard displays bashing vulnerable Republicans over Medicaid — a setback to Democratic campaigners hoping to make health care a liability for battleground Republicans around the country.
In a series of cease-and-desist letters, the National Republican Campaign Committee (NRCC) said the imposing roadside ads — sponsored by a splinter group of the top Democratic super PAC in six battleground districts — promoted 'patently false' claims against the targeted GOP incumbents, warning the companies that they would be complicit in defaming those lawmakers if the billboards were left up for public consumption.
The threat proved successful — the billboards in all six districts were taken down almost immediately.
The development, parts of which were first reported by The Washington Examiner, has buoyed Republican campaign operatives, who say it gives them a playbook for defusing Democratic messaging — which has leaned heavily on warnings that Republicans intend to gut Medicaid — heading into next year's midterms.
'This proves our argument that Democrats are lying in their Medicaid messaging, and will make it much more challenging for them to make those arguments going forward,' said Mike Marinella, national spokesman for the NRCC.
Democrats think otherwise. They're defending the veracity of their Medicaid campaign, saying the ad companies didn't pull the billboards based on the accuracy of the NRCC complaint, but because they're terrified of the current political moment, when President Trump is attacking political opponents in the public and private sectors alike.
'These were unfortunately decisions not based in fact, but made due to coercion and threats from anti-free speech Republicans,' said CJ Warnke, spokesman for House Majority Forward, a liberal advocacy group closely affiliated with the House Democrats' leading super PAC.
'House Republicans and the [Congressional Budget Office] have publicly confirmed that they are cutting Medicaid, and they will stop at nothing to silence the truth.'
The billboard fight is just one battle line in the broader partisan clash over the Republicans' plans for enacting Trump's favored tax cuts and broader domestic agenda, the fate of which could hinge on how GOP leaders approach Medicaid.
Amid that fight, House Majority Forward (HMF) had contracted last month with three companies to display billboard ads in six districts held by Republicans facing tough reelection contests across five states: Virginia, Texas, Nebraska, Pennsylvania and Colorado. Weeks earlier, those lawmakers had voted to adopt the House Republicans' budget blueprint, designed to usher Trump's agenda into law, which set the stage for steep Medicaid cuts later in the year.
Each billboard contained the same formulaic message, accusing the GOP lawmaker of voting 'to cut Medicaid in order to give billionaires like him tax cuts.' The 'him' was a reference to Elon Musk, the world's wealthiest person and the leader of Trump's efforts to slash federal spending, whose picture appeared on the billboards along with the targeted lawmaker.
HMF's broadest contract was with Lamar Advertising Company, a Louisiana-based firm hired to display the Medicaid attack ads in four GOP districts, represented by Reps. Jen Kiggans and Rob Wittman in Virginia; Monica De La Cruz in Texas and Ryan Mackenzie in Pennsylvania.
On March 19, NRCC lawyers wrote to Lamar arguing that the HMF's claims are 'demonstrably false,' noting that nowhere in the House-passed budget resolution was Medicaid even mentioned. If the company did not pull down the ads, the NRCC warned, 'you will be liable for the defamatory messages spread to voters in each district.'
'To avoid defaming a half-dozen sitting Members of Congress, your company must cease any and all plans to display these billboards to the public,' the NRCC lawyers wrote.
The same day, Wendi B. Loup, Lamar's assistant general counsel, responded with a letter, sent via email, saying the company had complied with the request.
'Lamar's National Sales Campaign Specialist has confirmed that the copy is no longer running,' she wrote. Loup also offered 'to assist the NRCC with counter messages or future campaigns.'
A spokesperson for HMF accused the NRCC of using 'dirty tricks' to force the hand of Lamar, while alleging the company has ties to GOP Speaker Mike Johnson (La.), which might have been a factor in Lamar's decision.
Loup and Lamar did not respond to requests for comment.
HMF hired a second contractor, Georgia-based Link Media Outdoor, to display a billboard ad in Nebraska attacking GOP Rep. Don Bacon over Medicaid. On March 22, the NRCC sent a cease-and-desist letter to Kerry Yoakum, general counsel for Link Media, with the same defamation warning the group had sent to Lamar.
On March 24, Yoakum responded to say the company 'has decided to tell the advertiser that it will no longer run the advertising content but will allow them to submit revised content that accurately reflects the circumstances.'
'If they decide to resubmit, I will review the content to determine that it is accurate,' he added.
The HMF spokesperson said the group declined to submit a revised ad 'because we stand by the facts' of the original message. The spokesperson also claimed that, during discussions between lawyers for HMF and Link Media, the company's counsel had expressed fears of sparking a public 'controversy' if the billboards were not pulled down.
Yoakum and Link Media did not respond to requests for comment.
HMF's contract with a third company, Colorado-based Street Media Group, followed the same narrative arc. Street Media was hired to run an attack ad in the district of Rep. Gabe Evans (Colo.), a vulnerable Republican who represents a region north of Denver.
On March 26, the NRCC wrote to the company with its defamation threat. The same day, Ashley Steinbach, Street Media's general manager, responded to say the company had 'addressed the concern, and the ad was taken down as of 4:15 MDT this afternoon.'
Citing conversations with Street Media, the HMF spokesperson said the company simply wanted to 'avoid becoming part of a political battle.'
Reached by phone on Tuesday, Steinbach declined to comment.
At the heart of the dispute is the fate of the Medicaid program under the Republicans' recently adopted budget blueprint, which GOP leaders passed through both chambers of Congress earlier this month.
Trump's agenda includes several major provisions, including an extension of his 2017 tax cuts, that by themselves would add trillions of dollars to the federal debt.
To counter those deficit spending effects, House GOP leaders have vowed to cut at least $1.5 trillion from federal programs over the next 10 years. More than half of that — $880 billion — is under the purview of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicaid.
The Congressional Budget Office, Congress's independent scorekeeper, has asserted that it's mathematically impossible to reach that level of savings without hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts to Medicaid spending.
Republicans say they can reach their mark by cutting waste, fraud and abuse under Medicaid, which provides health coverage to more than 70 million low-income and disabled people. They're also floating eligibility changes, like new work requirements for able-bodied adults. Both strategies, they say, would allow Republicans to cut Medicaid costs without cutting patient benefits.
During last week's House vote on the GOP budget blueprint, moderate Republicans pressed Johnson and GOP leaders for assurances that their support for the resolution wouldn't translate into cuts to Medicaid benefits later in the year. They said they got that pledge.
'We just wanted to be clear again with the Speaker, as we've had numerous times before, that we won't vote for something that shifts benefits from seniors and our vulnerable population that rely on traditional Medicaid,' Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) said after the vote.
Democrats aren't convinced that there's any way to slash Medicaid spending at the levels the GOP budget demands without eroding patient benefits. They're vowing to continue taking that message directly to voters — even after the NRCC's success in taking down the Medicaid billboards.
2024 Election Coverage
'Republicans can run from their proposal, which is the largest Medicaid cut in American history, but we will never allow them to hide,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) told reporters in the Capitol last week.
'Now that the committee process has been set in motion in connection with the budget resolution,' he continued, 'they will have to spell out the very cuts to Medicaid and other programs that we have been making clear for weeks now they are determined to visit on the American people.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Trump's troop deployment in LA a prelude to martial law?
Is Trump's troop deployment in LA a prelude to martial law?

Boston Globe

time8 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Is Trump's troop deployment in LA a prelude to martial law?

Neither did Hegseth announced that National Guard members and the Marines will stay in Los Angeles for Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up At a Advertisement This is a Trump made-for-TV spectacle of authoritarianism disguised as law and order. It's likely a prelude to martial law. Rob Bonta, California's attorney general, is Advertisement Protests were sparked last week after Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials conducted several workplace raids in Los Angeles, including a But what began as boisterous but peaceful protests against Trump's anti-immigrant scheme which now demands 'If I didn't ''SEND IN THE TROOPS,'" Trump said Tuesday on social media, Los Angeles 'would be burning to the ground right now,' before he disparaged Bass and Newsom. Yes, there has been looting, and some cars have been burned and vandalized. But Trump is lying about the extent of lawlessness. Trump is following his bad policies with even worse provocations that could portend a modern-day Kent State tragedy with soldiers firing live bullets at protesters. But for Trump, the more chaos, the better. As a White House official said, 'We're happy to have this fight.' To some extent this fight to suppress dissent has been boiling in Trump for five years. During nationwide demonstrations after the police murder of George Floyd in 2020, Trump, then in his first term, asked members of his Cabinet whether protesters could be shot. 'He thought that the protests made the country look weak, made us look weak, and 'us' meant him,' Mark Esper, Trump's former defense secretary, Advertisement Esper recalled Trump saying to now-retired General Mark Milley, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ''Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?' … It was a suggestion and a formal question. And we were just all taken aback at that moment as this issue just hung very heavily in the air.' Ultimately, Trump was talked out of it. That won't happen this time, with an administration packed with people whose only loyalty is to him, not to the Constitution or rule of law. After Tom Homan, Trump's bloviating border czar, If not for the ICE arrest of But not now. Everything in Trump's second administration is designed to codify his authoritarianism. If Trump can convince enough people, especially among his white base, that he alone represents the thin orange line between civilization — as Advertisement Right now, the administration claims the military is in Los Angeles to protect federal buildings and assets — theoretically. Trump has not invoked the Insurrection Act, but neither has he ruled out unleashing US troops on protesters. With his draconian policies, Trump has lit the fuse for what could be a long and difficult summer of protests. With an occupying military force in this nation's second largest city, he has declared war against America itself. Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at

Trump promised not to send in military to tamp down on NYC protests — if NYPD keeps demonstrators in line
Trump promised not to send in military to tamp down on NYC protests — if NYPD keeps demonstrators in line

New York Post

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump promised not to send in military to tamp down on NYC protests — if NYPD keeps demonstrators in line

President Trump promised NYPD brass over the weekend that he will not send in the military or National Guard to tamp down on anti-ICE protests in New York City — as long as cops keep the demonstrators in line, The Post has learned. Trump's pledge was made to Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Kaz Daughtry and NYPD Chief of Department John Chell as the pair palled around with the president at his New Jersey golf club. Sources with knowledge of the meeting said Trump had voiced concerns over the destructive mass protests engulfing Los Angeles and them being replicated in the Big Apple. Advertisement But Chell reassured the president that any demonstrations in the city would not get out of hand, the sources said. Kaz Daughtry and John Chell though didn't tee it up with the commander in chief. Linkedin/john-chell The two Big Apple police officials met with Trump on Sunday. Linkedin/john-chell Advertisement Trump then told the two he didn't believe the National Guard would be necessary in New York City. It came after he ordered an initial 2,000 National Guard troops to LA Saturday amid the raging protests over federal immigration enforcement raids. Since then, the Trump administration has in total dispatched roughly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to the city– sparking an emergency request by California Gov. Gavin Newsom Tuesday for a federal court to block the deployment. On Monday, Mayor Eric Adams and his police commissioner, Jessica Tisch, decried the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles and issued a stern warning to New Yorkers to not follow suit. 'The escalation of protests in Los Angeles over the last couple of days is unacceptable and would not be tolerated if attempted in our city,' Adams said. Advertisement Tisch added that 'any attacks against law enforcement will be met with a swift and decisive response from the NYPD.' Earlier Monday, dozens of protestors calling for an end to the ICE raids were arrested at Trump Tower after refusing to leave the Manhattan high-rise. The meeting between Trump and Adams' allies raised eyebrows in New York City political circles — after Daughtry and Chell posted photos on social media from the Bedminster club. 'Great day on the links today with POTUS, #45-#47 – Donald J. Trump. Good conversation with a few laughs and a great lunch. Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Kaz Daughtry and I were grateful for the invite,' Chell wrote. Advertisement Sources said the two Big Apple officials didn't actually tee it up with the prez, despite the photos showing them chatting with him on the links. Still, Adams defended the outing on Tuesday, telling reporters, 'A lot of great deals have been made on the golf course.' 'I thank the two of them for doing it,' he said. 'Many of you who play golf know that great decisions are made on the golf course.' Both Chell and Daughtry also joined the mayor at Trump's inauguration earlier this year.

Reports: Virginia Democrats outdoing Republicans in raising campaign contributions
Reports: Virginia Democrats outdoing Republicans in raising campaign contributions

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Reports: Virginia Democrats outdoing Republicans in raising campaign contributions

Democratic House of Delegates hopeful Kimberly Pope Adams raised the second-highest amount in Virginia of contributions to House campaigns for the latest campaign reporting period, according to the nonpartisan Virginia Public Access Project. Pope Adams, who has already locked up the Democratic nomination in the 82nd House District, reported a total of $262,048 in money raised for the April 1-June 5 window, based on data from the Virginia Department of Elections that was compiled by VPAP. That trailed only House Speaker Don Scott of Portsmouth, who raised just over $344,000 for the period. Political watchers were keeping a close eye on this round of reports, the last before the crucial June 17 party primaries across Virginia. Like Pope Adams, Scott already has the Democratic nod sewn up. He also does not appear to have any GOP opposition this year. The only House primary next week in the Tri-City area is in District 75 where three Democrats are vying to oppose Republican incumbent Carrie Coyner. In that contest, Lindsey Dougherty continues to outdistance Dustin Wade and Stephen Miller-Pitts. For the reporting period, Dougherty raised $171,695, compared to $136,276 for Wade and $4,471 for Miller-Pitts. As of June 5, Wade showed more than $100,000 in cash on hand over Dougherty and five times more than Miller-Pitts. VPAP reported Dougherty raising the sixth-highest amount of contributions for the period, and Wade the 12th. Dougherty and Miller-Pitts ran against Coyner in the 2019 and 2023 elections, respectively. The 75th District covers all of Hopewell and portions of Chesterfield and Prince George counties. More: The primary menu for June 17: Heavy on the state races and a first time for Petersburg In the 82nd District [Petersburg, Surry County, portions of Dinwiddie and Prince George], Pope Adams continues to run away from GOP incumbent Kim Taylor in campaign contributions. For the latest reporting period, Pope Adams' total was more than four times that of Taylor, who listed receiving $64,489 in donations. Her cash-on-hand amount of $289,468 was eight times more than Taylor's $34,502. The race is a rerun of 2023's race, one of the top three most expensive contests in recent Virginia political history. Taylor squeaked out a victory over Pope Adams by only 53 votes following a recount, and Democrats are clocking the 2025 race as pivotal in holding their slim majority in the House for the next two years. Pope Adams' contributions included $25,000 from the Clean Virginia Fund on April 23, $7,500 from the Jane Fonda Climate PAC on May 14, and three $5,000 donations from Elizabeth Simons on May 29, The Next 50 PAC on April 30 and Fund Her PAC on April 29. Taylor's largest contributions for the period were $20,000 from the Dominion Energy PAC on May 8, $10,000 from the Wren Williams for Delegate campaign on April 24, and identical $7,500 amounts from Friends of Scott Wyatt on April 2 and Chris Runion for Delegate on June 5. The reports indicate Taylor getting three donations of $100 or less, and Pope Adams receiving 1,461. More: House GOP incumbent lauds endorsement from local Democratic group. Democrats cry 'foul' In the 75th District primary, Dougherty received two contributions totaling $80,000 from the super PAC Secure Progress and $35,000 from the campaign of Democratic Del. Dan Helmer. Wade's top donations were $5,000 from himself and two donations from Anita Thurston totaling $4,500. Miller-Pitts' sole contribution of over $100 for the period was $250 from Rhonda Clanton-Davis. Coyner, a Republican seeking her fourth term in the House, received $69,056 in contributions over the period. Her largest donations were $10,000 from Carolyn Williams, $7,500 from Strong Start PAC, and three of $5,000 each from Thomas McInerney, Vision Management Services, and Clean Virginia Fund. Records indicate her having $315,350 in cash on hand as of June 5. The district traditionally leans Republican. Coyner has won re-election with as much as 55% of the vote, but Democrats still target her as vulnerable. In Petersburg, history is being made with the first-ever Democratic primary for the constitutional officer Commissioner of the Revenue. Incumbent Brittani Flowers is being challenged by Mary 'Liz Stith' Howard for the right to be the Democrat on the November ballot. Five years ago, the Virginia General Assembly voted to allow any local-office candidate [except School Board] to seek official party backing. The law went into effect last year, as Petersburg Vice Mayor Darrin Hill received the Democratic nomination for his Ward 2 seat by acclimation. The commissioner primary is the first contested one in Petersburg. Campaign records show Flowers receiving just shy of $3,000 in contributions for the reporting period. Her largest donations were $500 from former state Senate candidate Waylin Ross and $300 from Bernard Flowers Jr. Howard did not record any contributions for the reporting period. Petersburg City Councilor Marlow Jones, who is running as an independent for Virginia's lieutenant governor, raised $700 in donations during the latest reporting period. Five hundred dollars came from three contributions of more than $100. The remaining $200 was split among five contributions of less than $100. To see the latest donation data for any race this year, click on the VPAP website. Bill Atkinson (he/him/his) is an award-winning journalist who covers breaking news, government and politics. Reach him at batkinson@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @BAtkinson_PI. This article originally appeared on The Progress-Index: Virginia primary 2025: Campaign finance reports show money pouring in

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store