Why SA barred Russian vessel
Image: Facebook
THE South African government's last-minute scramble to secure a deal to avoid Donald Trump's 30% unilateral tariffs is believed to be among the reasons it refused a Russian Navy Baltic Fleet training vessel entry in Cape Town.
The Smolny, reportedly carrying cadets on a training mission to hone their maritime, communication, and navigation skills, had intended to make a brief stopover in Cape Town for restocking, replenishment, and resupply earlier this week.
About 400 personnel are on board the vessel, comprising 200 naval cadets and foreign military personnel from allied nations. The Russian Ministry of Defence stated that future naval officers will receive practical training during the voyage.
The Smolny, on its first African tour, visited Equatorial Guinea (July 20) and Sao Tome and Principe (July 23), offering guided tours to military, police, students, and local Russians. On July 27, it docked in Pointe-Noire, Republic of Congo, where naval cooperation talks were held.
After departing on July 30, The Smolny arrived in Cape Town on August 5. Following South Africa, it travelled to Tanzania and Vietnam before returning to Vladivostok in late September.
While the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) has remained tight-lipped regarding the specific allegations, a senior government source, speaking on condition of anonymity, attributed the denial to "late negotiations with Donald Trump over the tariffs saga".
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
'These visits typically signify friendly relations and mutual recognition between nations. However, this 'tariffs saga' with US President Donald Trump introduces a new dynamic. While the details of these late negotiations remain undisclosed, it is plausible that South Africa faced pressure or made a strategic concession to avoid punitive tariffs or to secure favourable trade terms with the United States,' the source said.
DIRCO spokesperson Chrispin Phiri did not respond to text messages containing questions regarding why the vessel was denied entry.
The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) said the decision to deny the ship entry was as a direct affront to long-standing bilateral ties with Russia.
"Denying access to the port of entry in Cape Town can only strain diplomatic relations between South Africa and Russia," the MK Party's statement read.
The party said Russia was a "key strategic partner to South Africa and a fellow member of BRICS".
Beyond the immediate diplomatic implications, the MK Party also slammed President Cyril Ramaphosa, demanding his "urgent intervention" in the matter.
They accused his "continuous absence from leadership at critical moments" of undermining the South African government, weakening the economy, and now, with the Russian ship incident, threatening to strain South Africa's relations with Russia.
Political analyst Dr John Molepo said the timing of The Smolny's arrival, coinciding with the critical tariff negotiations, may have placed the South African government in a precarious position, forcing a decision that, while perhaps uninviting, was deemed necessary for broader economic or strategic considerations.
'The government's apparent silence on the matter, with DIRCO only acknowledging 'allegations', further suggests the sensitivity surrounding the decision. Publicly acknowledging a direct link to US tariff negotiations could be perceived as a submission or a lack of sovereign decision-making, potentially straining relations with other allies.'
Molepo said maintaining a degree of uncertainty allows the government to manage the diplomatic fallout and avoid explicitly siding with one global power over another, despite its stated neutral stance on international affairs.
Cape Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Unfazed: South Africa's stance on US visa policies impacting Zimbabwe
US President Donald Trump continues to disrupt global diplomacy after a recent visa ban imposed on Zimbabwe. Image: Picture: Evan Vucci/AP The South African government seems unaffected by the recent US visa ban imposed by the embassy in Harare, Zimbabwe, despite President Donald Trump's ongoing disruptions to global diplomacy through tariff increases and immigration policies. The US has suspended all routine immigrant and non-immigrant visa services to Zimbabwe due to concerns over misuse and overstays, although other visa types remain unaffected. Although South Africa was exempt from new Trump visa restrictions on SADC countries, a new policy has been implemented for Malawi and Zambia. Citizens of these nations are now required to pay a bond of $5 000 (R88 656) to $15 000 (R265 967) to travel to the US. Additionally, the citizens are required to use one of three airports—Boston's Logan International, New York's JFK International, or Dulles International near Washington D.C.—for both arrival and departure. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ When asked whether South African citizens should be worried, Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) spokesperson Chrispin Phiri gave a brief response: "We do not provide commentary on other countries' visa regimes, and this is our general position, it's not specific to the US." A senior government official, however, downplayed the likelihood of South Africans being affected by the US visa restrictions. "Remember Trump is only in our case because of the International Court of Justice case against Israel and our involvement in BRICS. Nothing more and nothing less," the official said. "South Africans visiting the US are mostly professionals who either go for business or a holiday. We seldom have citizens wanting to immigrate to the should have nothing to worry about,' he said. The US embassy explained that the reasons for the restrictions was because the administration was working to prevent visa overstay and misuse as part of national security. "The Trump administration is protecting our nation and citizens by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety through our visa process," the embassy said. "We are always working to prevent visa overstay and misuse." In June, the US imposed travel bans on citizens from 12 countries, with seven of them located in Africa. Additionally, heightened restrictions were applied to seven other nations, three of which are African. The US has issued a demand to 36 countries, predominantly in Africa, to enhance their traveler vetting procedures. Failure to comply could result in a ban on their citizens visiting the US. International Relations analyst Rejoice Ngwenya said it was unfortunate that the US had an obsession with immigration issues. "All democratic countries must encourage international country movements. However it is incumbent upon citizens that they don't abuse regulations. But one thing to acknowledge in terms of implementation of immigration laws globally is not to interfere and dissuade inter country movements of students because knowledge sharing and education is a universal right,' Ngwenya said.
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Sanction Rosatom and send clear signal that occupation of nuclear plants will not be tolerated
The occupation by Russia of Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) is the first instance in history where a nuclear power plant has been militarily occupied and operated for over three years during active warfare. The deadline that US President Donald Trump had established for Russia to start a ceasefire, stop its aggression against Ukraine, or otherwise face the threat of sanctions was 8 August 2025. This was the sixth time that Trump had demanded that Vladimir Putin stop the war; however, Putin had previously declined such offers. The day passed uneventfully. During the 11 years of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, numerous peace initiatives have emerged, including the African Peace Mission. But analysts see little sign that Putin is prepared to abandon his intention to take control of Ukraine. In 2022, Russia declared in its Constitution that four Ukrainian regions were part of its territory, but failed to fully take over any of them militarily. Now Putin would have to amend the Russian constitution to halt the aggression at the current frontline — a highly risky political move that could bring about the end of his political power. Thus, he is demanding that Ukrainians leave their homes 'voluntarily' because the Russian army failed to take these territories by force. In July this year, Russia launched more than 6,000 drones and fired dozens of missiles targeting Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities, killing civilians far from the frontline. Just in the first half of this year, 6,754 civilians have been killed or injured, according to the UN. The war remains intense, and no one is safe in Ukraine. Nevertheless, hopes are high again for 15 August, when Trump is expected to meet with Putin in Alaska, the territory the US once bought from Russia. President Cyril Ramaphosa, who has previously spoken in support of Ukraine's territorial integrity, also spoke with both the Russian and Ukrainian presidents last week, raising expectations that a ceasefire may be possible. Sanctions The expectations are that Trump can speak from a position of strength and threaten sanctions. However, given Russia's negligible trade with the US, what sanctions could Trump introduce that would be meaningful? The Russian state budget used to receive about 50% of its revenue from oil and gas exports; this had already dropped to 30% in 2024. Further sanctions could seriously undermine the Kremlin's ability to fund the war, which is expensive to run. In 2025, a record 40% of Russia's state budget has been allocated to defence and security. Another 6%-10% of revenue comes from the Russian state agency Rosatom, which serves a dual role: developing civilian nuclear reactors and acting as a strategic arm of the Kremlin's military sector by producing parts for non-nuclear weapons and other defence technologies. Rosatom's subsidiaries supply components to Russia's military-industrial complex, including drone technologies. Some of these facilities, such as the drone production factory in Alabuga, have been accused by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime of recruiting African women aged 18 to 22 to drone production under allegedly false promises of a 'work-study programme'. Rosatom, whose regional office has operated in South Africa since 2012, plays a key role in the military occupation of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, Europe's largest nuclear power plant, seized by Russian military forces in March 2022 and turned into a geopolitical hostage. The occupation of the plant is the first instance in history where a nuclear power plant has been militarily occupied and has been operated for more than three years during active warfare. Rosatom plays a key role in this precedent. The violations of the International Atomic Energy Agency's seven nuclear safety pillars — the physical integrity of facilities, operability of safety systems, autonomy of staff decision-making, secure off-site power, uninterrupted logistics, effective radiation monitoring and reliable communication with regulators — have already been documented at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. The detailed analysis of these violations and what they mean for the African continent is presented in the Policy Brief on Nuclear Safety during Military Invasion, presented ahead of the African Union's Mid-Year Coordination Meeting in Accra in July 2024. The brief presents a comprehensive case study of nuclear vulnerability during wartime and calls for urgent action by African countries, including South Africa, to prevent similar situations on the continent. However, the challenges at the occupied Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant go beyond the risk of physical damage to the facility. In May 2025, the International Labour Organization (ILO) reported that 13 Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant employees had been abducted, including three cases this year. The whereabouts of at least one detained worker remains unknown. The organisation also documented forced labour, coerced union membership and serious occupational safety risks for staff. Pressure to sign contracts More than 40 documented witness accounts by human rights organisations such as Truth Hounds suggest that since March 2022, Rosatom experts were fully aware of the pressure that the military personnel were putting on the nuclear operators to sign contracts with Rosatom. They were aware of interrogations, detentions, torture, psychological coercion and decisions to deny shift rotations. This is not a technical dispute. It is a systematic breach of international humanitarian law and nuclear safety norms, and of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. International mechanisms such as the UN have been powerless in the face of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant occupation. In July 2024, the UN passed a resolution — 'Safety and security of nuclear facilities of Ukraine, including the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant' — condemning the Russian occupation of the plant and calling for the immediate withdrawal of military forces to ensure global nuclear safety. Many African countries supported this resolution, recognising the threat to international peace posed by the militarisation of a civilian nuclear site. In addition, 13 African states — including Ghana, Kenya, and Zambia — endorsed the Peace Summit Communiqué in Switzerland, affirming Ukraine's sovereign control over its nuclear sites. However, these international documents lack binding power. Torture Instead, sanctions or a refusal to cooperate with organisations that support torture could reduce the funding available for the war. Such sanctions can be implemented by any country that aims to promote human rights and nuclear safety. South Africa co-chairs the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Ukraine is one of the few countries that gave up its nuclear weapons, despite holding the world's third-largest nuclear arsenal prior to 1994. That year, it voluntarily disarmed, joined the Non-Proliferation Treaty, accepted International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards, and allowed international inspections. In return, the US, the UK and Russia committed to respecting and protecting Ukraine's borders and sovereignty. The silence and acceptance of military risks, and the violations of international labour practices, corporate responsibilities and human rights, show why governments that want to protect their population must act — not in reaction to a European war, but in defence of their own nuclear future. DM Dzvinka Kachur is with the Ukrainian Association of South Africa. Volodymyr Lakomov and Ilko Kucheriv are with the Democratic Initiatives Foundation.
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Ukrainian POW camp where an African who fought for Russia waits for the end of war
Daily Maverick joins a group of African journalists on a tour of a prisoner-of-war camp in western Ukraine. Mohamed Salah is a 23-year-old would-be Android IT developer from Egypt. Now, he is being held in a prisoner-of-war camp in western Ukraine, with a release date which is probably as uncertain as the duration of the war itself. Salah was studying IT Android programming in Russia last year, when his visa expiry date loomed. He was told he needed a Russian passport to remain in the country to complete his studies. The only way he could get a Russian passport was to volunteer for military service. He did that and was called up to fight on the frontline in Ukraine. After three months of training, he was thrown into the ferocious warfare in Ukraine's eastern province of Donetsk, which he doesn't want to talk about. He was injured by a Ukrainian drone on his first mission. He says his wound was 'dangerous' but that the Ukrainians treated him well in a hospital in Dnipro before he was moved to the capital, Kyiv, and then here. There have been reports of other Africans being tricked into fighting for Russia after being lured to the country under false pretences. But Salah said he knew what he was getting into — even though he regrets volunteering and said he wouldn't do it again. He now believes Russia's war against Ukraine is wrong. He is optimistic that he will be a free man soon. He believes that as a soldier who served Russia as well as any Russian, he should be part of one of the regular prisoner-of-war swaps between the two countries. However, he noted, none of the foreign soldiers being held in the camp where he was had been freed — only Russian nationals. 'Are you being discriminated against?' Daily Maverick asked him. 'Maybe after the war,' he would be released, he replied, and would then return to Russia to complete his studies. He has a wife and daughter in Russia and parents in Egypt, where he would like to visit soon, but he thinks there may be a case against him there for joining a foreign military force (which is also an offence in South Africa). Salah says the general treatment he receives in the prison is 'normal'. Like others, he works an eight-hour daily shift, in his case making wire and wooden frames for beehives. 'Josh', a Ghanaian held in the prison, was deceived into fighting for Russia, according to an account he gave to the Ghanaian journalist Kent Mensah, who was part of a group of African journalists, including Daily Maverick, who were shown around the prison by Ukrainian authorities. Mensah wrote in Africa Report that Josh was in Moscow last year, planning to begin studying, but missed a deadline to register, and his visa was about to expire. A Nigerian acquaintance, Kylian, offered him a job as a security guard in territory captured by the Russian military. 'The job came with promises of a fast-tracked Russian passport and a monthly salary of 195,000 roubles (around $2,480). It sounded like salvation.' Hit by a bomb Josh signed a contract in July 2025, but instead of guarding buildings, he was given a crash course in military training. Then he was sent to the frontline in Donetsk, where a bomb dropped by a Ukrainian drone hit the tank he was in, killing eight of his comrades. He was captured. An Ecuadorian national, William Vladimir Luje Kimia, had a similar experience to the Egyptian Salah. He had been studying engineering in the southwestern city of Rostov-on-Don for three years, earning money by doing various jobs, including chef and programmer. Then Russia invaded Ukraine, and the West retaliated with sanctions against the Russian banking system. Kimia ran out of money and faced deportation, so he joined the Russian army to get a Russian passport to guarantee his continued residence in Russia. He was badly injured last year in the fierce fighting around the city of Bakhmut in Donetsk province when a bullet grazed his lung. He was captured and spent three months recuperating in a Ukrainian hospital. The Ukrainian authorities told Daily Maverick that there was also a South African in the camp, but he did not wish to be interviewed. The building that houses the camp has a rugged industrial look and dates back to at least World War Two, when it was first used by the Germans to imprison Soviet soldiers as the Germans marched eastward, then later by the Russians to confine Germans when the German army retreated. After that, it became a rehabilitation centre for drug addicts. A prison official told us that there were many non-Russian POWs 'because Russia goes to great lengths to recruit people from other countries — in Africa, Asia and South America — to try to show they are receiving global support for their war, which is a lie'. The camp seemed, from our tour, to be reasonably comfortable. The beds looked okay, the water was hot, and the prisoners got soap, toothpaste and deodorant. They work an eight-hour shift in the hospital or kitchen or in the workshops making basic things like garden furniture and, rather anomalously, Christmas trees. They get paid $9 a month 'for chocolates', as our guide said, which they can buy along with other goodies at the tuckshop. They get one hour off for exercise, which could be playing soccer or pumping iron in the gym. The wardens said they eat the same food as the inmates. We tried it and it was tolerable. The POWs also get parcels of food from their families, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and other charities. The ICRC visits every two months and stays for two weeks to check that the prisoners are not being abused, said the prison authorities. They do not see the full ICRC reports, only the recommendations for changes, which, they said, were minor, such as a prisoner requesting a cat for psychological comfort, which was refused. We met no prisoners of Russian nationality. Jailed for murder We did, however, meet a pro-Russian separatist, Andrey Maslov (58), making garden furniture in the prison workshop. He is a Ukrainian national from Donetsk province, and joined the Russian army in exchange for freedom from the prison where he was serving a sentence for murder. He was promised freedom after six months of fighting, but that didn't happen. He was captured after two years of military service. 'Even my prison term has now expired,' he remarked ruefully. 'To be honest, no one needs this war.' When we picked him from a lineup in the courtyard, Igor Zubachov seemed to be Russian. But it turned out that he was also a Ukrainian from Russian-occupied Donetsk, and like Maslov, a pro-Russian separatist. He was mobilised by the Russian army in 2022 after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. He was in charge of a medical evacuation unit and, during the fierce fighting around Avdiivka in Donetsk, was ambushed by Ukrainian soldiers while picking up wounded Russian soldiers. He had been in prison for 26 months. Our interview soon turned into a rather heated but frank debate between African journalists, Ukrainian officials and Zubachov. He said everything was fine in this prison, but at his first prison in the east, 'they hit and tortured me … but it was no surprise because, as I was told, I was a Ukrainian fighting against my own'. Prison officials escorting the journalists asked him why he was fighting against his people, and he replied that in his home in eastern Donbas, 'I saw civilians die, children die, so I joined the Russians to defend my family.' 'How did you feel about killing your fellow citizens?' asked an official. 'They were shooting at me, I was shooting at them,' he replied. Would he do it again? Yes, he said, but not because he wanted anyone to die at his hands, 'but because I would still have had no choice'. However, later he said that if he were to be freed in an exchange, he would not return to fighting. He said he wanted Donetsk to be part of Russia. 'I was thinking of that happening in a peaceful way, but the way it did happen was terrifying.' Colonel Andriy Chernyak of Ukraine's Defence Intelligence Agency told us that Russia had resettled eastern Ukraine with Russians after wiping out much of the Ukrainian population in the Holodomor, the genocidal famine of 1932-1933. 'Due to propaganda, those people considered themselves Russians exclusively.' In reality, he said, 'Russia uses these people as cannon fodder. They don't know if they will be exchanged because Russians don't consider those people their own.' DM Peter Fabricius was among a group of African journalists who recently conducted a study tour to the Czech Republic, Poland and Ukraine, sponsored by the governments of those three countries and the European Union.
