Turkish intel academy calls for urgent security reforms after Israel-Iran conflict
The report, released last week, calls for immediate reforms to Ankara's early warning systems, urges the construction of shelters and recommends robust measures to counter potential espionage activities targeting Turkey's defence sector and industry.
Although Turkey has made significant investments in its defence industry over the past two decades, the report highlights that notable gaps and vulnerabilities remain.
Since 2016, Ankara has emerged as a drone power, producing hundreds of armed unmanned systems such as the Anka and TB2 Bayraktar, which have shifted the balance in conflicts in Ukraine, Libya, Syria and Nagorno-Karabakh.
While Turkey is working towards producing its fifth-generation Kaan fighter jet by 2030 and manufacturing air defence systems like the Hisar, its current fighter jet fleet - composed mostly of F-16s - is rapidly ageing.
The report provides a detailed analysis of Israel's aerial superiority, noting that its military was able to deploy 300 aircraft in a complex operation involving F-16s, F-35s, armed drones and aerial tankers.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The attack also featured special operations forces on the ground - or the recruitment of local actors - to strike specific military and civilian targets, and the weaponisation of platforms such as WhatsApp to locate senior officials.
Titled '12-Day War and Lessons for Turkey', the report asserts that the conflict has once again confirmed the critical importance of integrating manned and unmanned systems, such as drones, and modernising the Turkish air force's inventory.
'Throughout the war, the necessity of a multi-layered and comprehensive air defence system has also become clear,' it states.
'Moreover, Israel's inability to fully intercept advanced hypersonic missiles launched from Iran, despite extensive support from its allies, underscores the need for Turkey to intensify its own initiatives in this area.'
The report urges Ankara to focus on serial production and capacity-building for advanced military systems, including ballistic missiles and hypersonic weapons.
'Weaknesses in Iran's air defence systems have underscored the vital importance of protecting critical facilities with robust air defence,' it says. 'Special attention should be paid to low-altitude air defence systems, particularly at strategic locations such as those housing security bureaucracies.'
Additionally, the report recommends establishing an early warning system that covers the entire country, constructing well-equipped shelters, including making use of underground metro stations in major cities, and taking measures to minimise civilian casualties.
Significant vulnerability
A significant vulnerability for Iran, the report notes, has been the widespread use of technological tools and applications in daily life, such as WhatsApp, a risk that could also affect Turkey.
'Given that many global software and IT companies maintain 'special relationships' with Israel, it is especially important to keep such technologies away from strategic institutions and facilities,' the report warns.
The report also suggests that Turkey should deepen its alliances, as Israel has benefited from access to weaponry, intelligence and logistics through its partnerships, whereas organisations like Brics and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation failed to support Iran due to a lack of robust security mechanisms.
'In this context, Turkey's recent steps to repair traditional alliances, which were damaged during the Syrian civil war, have become even more significant,' the report adds. 'Efforts in recent years to improve relations with the United States have positively impacted Turkey's ties with Nato, and it is considered advantageous to continue this process.'
The report further emphasises the importance of Turkey's efforts to build its own security alliances with regional countries such as Pakistan, Syria, Qatar and Azerbaijan.
'Eli Cohens inside Iran': How Israel's war exposed deep infiltration and intelligence gaps Read More »
The report asserts that the 12-day conflict demonstrates that defence cannot be ensured by military means alone.
'It has become clear that without comprehensive deterrence in the political, economic, and technological spheres, it is impossible to deter the adversary or secure victory through military means alone,' it states.
Furthermore, the report notes that Israel has utilised the Republic of Cyprus as a strategic asset in the region.
'It is essential for Turkey to closely monitor this issue and take the necessary precautions,' it says. 'Similarly, Israel's recent interest in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) cannot be explained solely by commercial or economic motives.' There are also reports suggesting that Israelis have been purchasing property in northern Syria.
Notably, the vice president of Israel Aerospace Industries, an Israeli state arms company, wrote a column recently suggesting that his country could back a southern takeover of Northern Cyprus.
The report warns that, in a scenario where Israel and Iran continue to engage in mutual attacks, Tehran could also pose a threat to Ankara. 'At this stage, Turkey feels at least as threatened by Iran's nuclear activities, extensive missile and UAV arsenals, and regional militia networks as Israel and the United States do,' it states.
'However, in the event of heightened tensions between Turkey and Iran, there is no guarantee that Tehran will refrain from mobilising its capabilities against Ankara. Indeed, during previous Iraq-centered crises, the strongest reactions against Turkey came from Iran-backed militia leaders, who have occasionally carried out harassment attacks against Turkish bases in Iraq.'
The report also highlights that active conflict between Iran and Israel could trigger regional instability along Turkey's eastern borders.
'Israel's targeting of major cities with large ethnic minority populations, such as Tabriz and Kermanshah, during the initial attack served purposes beyond the destruction of missile facilities,' it notes.
'Therefore, Turkey must resolutely take all necessary steps to prevent the recurrence of negative developments in Iran, similar to those seen recently in Iraq and Syria.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
11 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
UAE anti-terror laws 'cover' for crackdown on peaceful dissent, report shows
The United Arab Emirates' landmark 2014 anti-terror law is being used as a tool of political control rather than a way to protect national security, a new report by Women Journalists Without Chains (WJWC) said. The non-governmental organisation was founded in 2005 by Yemeni Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Tawakkol Karman. In a 48-page report released last week, the findings point to vague legal provisions in the UAE that allow for what the authors have couched as dangerous prosecutorial overreach. Federal Law No. 7 of 2014 represents the UAE's most comprehensive legal instrument addressing terrorism-related offenses. It was created because of a confluence of regional instability and the UAE's own strategic recalibration. There was also the regional rise of the Islamic State, which added to the urgency of the law's development. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Reformists have also long said that the law was designed to halt the rise of a popular brand of political Islam in the early 2010s. But its criminalisation efforts under broad terms such as "offending the state" and "undermining national unity" raise significant human rights concerns, the report said. "Compounding this issue is the law's reference to individuals who 'threaten', 'aim', 'plan', or 'seek' to commit terrorist crimes - formulations so vague that they could encompass expressions of opinion, political advocacy or even the exercise of conscience," the authors said. As a result, Federal Law No. 7 has caused the suppression of civil society engagement and dissent, leading to the detention of journalists, lawyers and academics, and creating a chilling effect across the country, the report explained. Among the most notable cases are individuals who received a decade or longer prison sentences for being part of the so-called 'UAE 94': when 94 activists were prosecuted for allegedly plotting to overthrow the government in the wake of the Arab Spring in 2012-2013. UAE top court upholds life terms for 24 convicted in mass trial Read More » The detainees were largely affiliated with the political reform party al-Islah, whose approach was solely non-violent. But for some of the most high profile dissidents, serving their sentence was not enough - the UAE tried several of them again in 2022-2023 under the vague terms of the 2014 anti-terror law, and extended their sentences, the report showed. Many of the alleged activities in the case that became known as the 'UAE 84' in its second round pre-dated the anti-terror law itself, raising concerns about the retroactive application of criminal law. Human rights lawyer Mohammed al-Roken - after spending a decade in prison - is now serving a life sentence for opposing the act of citizenship revocation by the Emirati government, the report said. Activists Maryam al-Balushi and Amina al-Abdouli were sentenced to an additional three years in prison in 2021 for "publishing information that disturbs public order", after they shared audio recordings with United Nations Special Procedures, in which they described torture and abuse in UAE prisons. "The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found that both women were subjected to unfair trials and arbitrary detention. Their cases demonstrate how the law is used to silence prisoners who expose abuse, even while in custody," the report said. And even though they are now working in exile, Mohammed al-Zaabi and Hamad al-Shamsi, who remain advocates for the UAE's political prisoners, have been added to the country's terrorism blacklist. Recommendations But it's not just criticism of the UAE and its ruling family that has landed people in prison. The economist Nasser bin Ghaith has been arrested multiple times for his critical views of regional governments. In 2017 he was sentenced to a decade behind bars on charges including "offending the state" and "communicating with banned groups". Families of political prisoners often face harassment, travel bans and surveillance, and live in fear of acts of retaliation, the report also said. "These cases reflect the systematic use of counterterrorism legislation to dismantle civil society, criminalize peaceful expression and suppress legitimate dissent rather than targeting genuine threats," WJWC noted. Punishments in the UAE for perceived terror offenses also far exceed the international standard, it showed. "Arbitrary deprivation of liberty is prohibited; detention must be time-bound and subject to judicial oversight," the report said, adding that there must be "independent and transparent investigations into all torture allegations, holding perpetrators accountable". But the UAE allows for indefinite detention in "counseling centres" even after a prison sentence is served, without a clear path to contest continued detention. There are also no independent authorities to investigate torture complaints, which are widespread, the report indicated. "The UAE's continued failure to ratify key international treaties, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and its non-compliance with obligations under instruments it has ratified - such as the Convention Against Torture - highlight a profound gap between international human rights commitments and domestic legal practice," the authors wrote. The WJWC also issued a call to "international actors - including UN bodies, human rights organisations and the UAE's Western allies - to exert meaningful diplomatic and policy pressure to encourage reforms". The report argued that because the UAE presents itself as a key global counterterrorism partner, it legitimises its policies to governments abroad, when it is only further asserting authoritarian control. The WJWC urged immediate changes toward detailing the language in the anti-terror law, ensuring transparency in independent judicial proceedings and allowing public access to trials. It called for the repeal of provisions allowing for indefinite detention, and a "guarantee" that any "rehabilitation" programmes are in fact voluntary. The UAE must also assume full engagement with UN human rights bodies and allow for country visits for compliance assessments, the WJWC argued.
Middle East Eye
11 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Exclusive: Powerful Libyan official in talks with Israel to resettle Palestinians from Gaza
A senior official in Libya's internationally recognised government has held talks with Israeli officials over a proposal to resettle hundreds of thousands of Palestinians expelled from Gaza, multiple sources have told Middle East Eye. Speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the issue, Libyan, Arab and European officials told MEE that National Security Adviser Ibrahim Dbeibah, a relative of Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibah, was spearheading the talks despite Palestinians in Gaza flatly rejecting US President Donald Trump's postwar plan for the enclave. One Libyan source said that "practical talks" had already taken place but the specifics were vague. "The mechanisms and implementation have not yet been spoken about," the source said. Another Libyan source said that discussions were still ongoing and that members of the Tripoli-based parliament were deliberately being kept in the dark as pro-Palestine sentiment runs deep in the country. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The source said that in an attempt to placate some Libyan leaders, the US was prepared to confer economic support or other benefits in exchange for the country taking in Palestinians. The source said that Ibrahim Dbeibah had already received guarantees that the US Department of Treasury would release some $30bn in frozen state assets. In May, separate sources had told MEE that Massad Boulos, an adviser to Trump and father-in-law to his daughter Tiffany, had held discussions with Ibrahim Dbeibah about unlocking billions of dollars in sanctioned frozen wealth funds. The assets were frozen in early 2011 by former US President Barack Obama, several months before the Nato-backed ouster of longtime leader Muammar Gaddafi. Boulos flatly denied that he was involved in talks over the resettlement of Palestinians, telling MEE that the reports were "inflammatory and totally false". However, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said that Trump had "long advocated for creative solutions to improve the lives of Palestinians, including allowing them to resettle in a new, beautiful location while Gaza rebuilds". Seeking legitimacy from the US The idea of Libya serving as a possible new home for expelled Palestinians comes amid reports that Khalifa Haftar, a powerful military leader who also oversees a rival rubber-stamp parliament in the country's east, was offered greater control over the country's oil resources if he agreed to resettle hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. Haftar, who has played a seminal role in the widespread destruction and instability in Libya, as well as the ensuing civil war in neighbouring Sudan, has denied the reports. Meanwhile on Monday, hours after receiving a request for comment from MEE on the issue of resettling Palestinians, Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibah said that his government would not engage in the "crime" of resettling Palestinians. The Gaza playbook: Israel's five-step ethnic cleansing strategy Read More » He reiterated a line from a statement by the US embassy in Tripoli in May which dismissed reports that Washington was pursuing a relocation plan for Palestinians in Libya. Israel has publicly mulled expelling Palestinians from Gaza and last week, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israeli officials were in contact with "several countries" about absorbing displaced civilians from the war-torn territory. "I think this is the most natural thing," Netanyahu said. "All those who are concerned for the Palestinians and say they want to help the Palestinians should open their doors to them. What are you preaching to us for? We're not pushing them out - we're enabling them to leave… first of all, [leaving] combat zones, and also the Strip itself, if they want to." Recently, Israel's Agriculture Minister, Avi Dichter, singled out Libya as "the ideal destination" for Palestinians saying they would "happily leave" Gaza if the necessary international support was provided. "Libya is a huge country, with vast areas and a coastline similar to Gaza's," he said. "If the world invests billions to rehabilitate Gazans there, the host country will also benefit economically." Israeli officials have long advocated expelling Palestinians from Gaza and within a week of the 7 October attacks, Israel's intelligence minister at the time, Gila Gamliel, presented the cabinet with her "voluntary migration plan" where she hoped 1.7 million Palestinians would leave the enclave. Forced displacement, as observed in Gaza, violates international humanitarian law, notably Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits the forcible transfer of protected persons by an occupying power. The European source told MEE that Dbeibeh and Haftar were "simultaneously negotiating with the Israelis" in the hope of getting "more legitimacy from the Americans". The source said that if the resettlement plan was forcibly imposed on Libya, Palestinians would find themselves moving out of the frying pan and into the fire. "It will be catastrophic at multiple levels," the source said. "Firstly, for the Palestinians themselves, who would have just about made it out of the Strip alive and escaped an obliterated life in Gaza, facing forced expulsion to a country like Libya which is in deeply complicated political turmoil with divided governments, where systems and society is broken by its civil war." "The Palestinians will not be getting any care from those governments, which will push them to the following catastrophe, [which] will lead to a new wave of migration towards the shores of Europe. And this is also a scary thought, firstly because the past decades have proven to us that many of them will only make it halfway through the Mediterranean, like many of those boats that capsized. And those that would eventually get to Europe, I do not think that Europe would be welcoming of another one million Arabs arriving at its shores, as the Syrians who just made similar journeys just few years ago." The Arab official, who was intimately aware of the latest talks, warned that complicity in Israel's ethnic cleansing plan could provoke widespread anger across all of Libya. "This will be a shock to the Libyan people," he said. Mohamed Mahfouz, a Libyan political analyst, echoed his remarks, telling MEE that the US was acutely aware that discussions around Libya resettling Palestinians could cause great distress for Libyan authorities. "Accepting Palestinians could come at a high price for any of the parties that will engage with the United States on this matter. This in itself may explain why neither [Libyan] government is yet to normalise relations." Outreach to Africa In recent weeks Israeli officials have publicly said, then later denied, reaching out to leaders from across Africa and Asia to use their territories as potential destinations for expelling Palestinians. Plans have been mooted for Palestinians to be resettled in Sudan, South Sudan and the breakaway region of Somalia known as Somaliland, despite all of the territories being plagued by violence. Sudan has been gripped by intense violence since its civil war broke out in 2023, with an estimated 150,000 people killed in the past two years. South Sudan has struggled to recover from a civil war that broke out after independence, with more than seven million people facing food insecurity and at least 2.3 million children at risk of malnutrition. Meanwhile, Somaliland continues to face threats from the armed group al-Shabab over the region's memorandum of understanding with Ethiopia - one of the greatest enemies of the group. A Libyan political analyst, who requested anonymity due to fear of reprisal attacks by government-aligned militias, said that it was "unsurprising" that Ibrahim Dbeibah was leading the outreach efforts with Israel. "[Ibrahim] Dbeibah, like the Libyan government, is marked by self-interest. He is well aware of the benefits of ingratiating himself with the US and Trump." While Libya does not officially recognise Israel, the Tripoli-based government, known officially as the Government of National Unity (GNU), is known to have held several secret meetings with Israeli officials in recent years. In 2023, Najla al-Mangoush, then foreign minister under Dbeibah, secretly met Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen in Italy. The revelation sparked outrage in Libya, resulting in angry protests and her suspension. In a later interview with Al Jazeera Arabic, Mangoush claimed she had attended the meeting on direct orders from Abdul Hamid Dbeibah, and that it was coordinated between his government and Israel. Arabic Post later reported that Ibrahim Dbeibah had orchestrated the meeting, citing unnamed sources. Middle East Eye reached out to the prime minister's office and the GNU for comment but did not receive a response by time of publication.
Middle East Eye
12 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
World Central Kitchen founder faces backlash for handshake with Israeli president
World Central Kitchen (WCK) founder Chef Jose Andres is facing mounting criticism after meeting with Israeli President Isaac Herzog to discuss Israel's seven-month blockade that has cut off aid to Gaza. Andres visited Gaza for the first time since the Israel's genocide began, sharing pictures and videos of the decimation and WCK's work along the way. After leaving the Strip, Andres posted that he met with Herzog on Sunday to discuss Israel's aid blockade, which Amnesty International has recently described as a deliberate campaign of starvation. "We talked in detail about how to flood Gaza with food and medicine so there is no hunger and no looting, so we can start rebuilding with hope and humanity," Andres wrote on X. "That means full permits and access for all NGOs who can help end the despair and suffering of Palestinians... they were committed to help all they can with the release of the hostages, end of the war, providing all humanitarian aid necessary and the reconstruction for Gaza." New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Herzog's X post about the meeting, praising WCK and featuring photos with Andres, became the flashpoint of the backlash. I was pleased to meet today with @ChefJoseAndres, founder and head of the world renowned aid organisation, @WCKitchen which has worked with dedication to help provide food to those in need in Israel and in Gaza - and indeed all over the world. True humanitarian assistance comes… — יצחק הרצוג Isaac Herzog (@Isaac_Herzog) August 17, 2025 Critics slammed Andres after seeing the post, saying the meeting amounted to condoning Israel's actions, including the targeting and killing of seven WCK international aid workers in April 2024. An Israeli air strike killed an additional three workers from the international NGO in November. Middle East Eye reached out to WCK for a response to the criticism they're facing, but did not receive a reply in time for publication. "He accepted a medal from the man who supplied the bombs that killed his @WCKitchen workers," one X user wrote, referencing President Biden awarding Andres the Medal of Freedom earlier this year. "Now he shakes hands with the man directing their murders." Israel murdered 7 of his employees and now he's doing photo ops with them. @chefjoseandres disgraceful. — B L A K E L E Y™℠©® LLC (@_iamblakeley) August 18, 2025 "The people you're shaking hands with have the blood of tens of thousands of Palestinians on their hands, the very people you claim to be helping," journalist Leyla Hamed posted on X. "And let's not forget: they also killed 7 members of your own NGO. Yet you still shake their hands. Disgraceful @chefjoseandres." Greater good? Others countered these criticisms by arguing that meetings like this are a part of Andres's role, and that it is necessary to help the humanitarian crisis Israel has manufactured in the Gaza Strip. "I hate that Herzog gets a photo-op with him (at least it's not you know who), I hate that this can be seen as disrespectful to the murdered WCK members, but if it gets food to the Gazan people, I can see why he would make the sacrifice," one user argued on a Reddit thread. "He's done far more for the Palestinian people, and suffering people worldwide, than I ever have, and I'm not going to hold him in judgement over this." Another user replied to this post, arguing that after two years of Israel's genocide in Gaza, it is natural for people to be sceptical of organisations or figures that Israeli officials publicly support. People are criticizing Chef José Andrés for visiting the Israeli President, etc. I'm obviously not in his head, but I think it's admirable that he is keeping his eye on *one* ball: to feed as many people in Gaza as possible. If it takes an annoying meeting, so be it. Life first. — Ami Dar (@AmiDar) August 18, 2025 "If this does lead to more food getting into Gaza without any conditionals, then fine. I'm willing to live with this compromise even if I think it's still fair to call out the hypocrisy," the user wrote. "However, we've also seen the past few months what it looks like when Israel coordinates efforts to let aid into Gaza between the GHF [Gaza Humanitarian Foundation] and the air drops leading to more deaths. I think it's more than a little right to be skeptical about an Israeli official suddenly being fine with aid given how they've weaponized it the past 4 months." Scrutiny over WCK's ties to Israel, which has publicly lauded the group's work, deepened after Israel banned the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East (Unrwa) – which is the primary source of humanitarian support for Palestinians across the Middle East – from operating in all of occupied Palestine in January. "No one other than World Central Kitchen has been allowed by Israel to bring aid in by sea, and in the past Israel has attacked and massacred civilian groups attempting to do so," Palestinian journalist Ali Abunimah wrote in the Electronic Intifada last year. "And such a 'venture' or 'pilot project' only makes sense in a context where Unrwa is being eliminated." Israel's inconsistent treatment of WCK compared to other international NGOs, along with Herzog's public praise for Andres, has led to the current backlash. The consistent message in the critics' posts of the meeting between the chef and the president is about the concern that Israel, and the US, are potentially using influential figures like him to "'whitewash" their image. "Israel murdered the workers of his NGO, but the chef forgives: he whitewashes the US and places the 'charity of the sandwich' wherever it benefits his business," one angered user posted on X. "May this photo haunt him wherever he goes."
