Judge Oks bulk of $32.1 million claim against defunct Park Hotel Clarke Quay operator
SINGAPORE – Ascendas Hospitality Reit (AH-Reit), the landlord of the former Park Hotel Clarke Quay property in Unity Street, was allowed to claim the bulk of a $32.1 million sum for unpaid rent and other charges against the defunct former operator Park Hotel CQ (PHCQ) under a High Court ruling on May 23.
High Court Justice Audrey Lim reduced AH-Reit's proof of debt to $31.1 million, after excluding $273,792 in property tax from Oct 1, 2022, to June 27, 2023, and costs totalling $679,454.
PHCQ was wound up by the High Court on Nov 19, 2021. This came after AH-Reit terminated its master lease with PHCQ on Aug 28, 2021, and took possession of the property after the hotel operator failed to pay $5.92 million in debt.
The hotel was then renamed Riverside Hotel Robertson Quay after CapitaLand unit Ascott International Management (AIMPL) took over from August 2021 to September 2022.
It was subsequently rebranded as The Robertson House by The Crest Collection, which opened in October 2023.
The $32.1 million claim comprises unpaid rent by PHCQ, charges payable during the handover of the property, property tax and other costs. About $25 million of the claim was disputed by another PHCQ creditor Park Hotel Group Management (PHGM).
PHGM is owned by British Virgin Islands-incorporated Good Movement Holdings which is, in turn, owned by Mr Allen Law Ching Hung, the son of Hong Kong-based billionaire Law Kar Po.
Mr Allen Law was also the sole director and chief executive of PHCQ from April 3, 2013 until March 16, 2021, when he stepped down.
The $32.1 million claim includes a claim for net rent of $20.4 million for the remainder of the lease from Aug 28, 2021 to June 27, 2023. This comprises $27.2 million of rent, minus $8.2 million plus GST, the income earned by AH-Reit during that period to reduce its rental losses from PHCQ's early termination.
PHGM argued that the liquidators had accepted the $8.2 million earned income figure without properly considering if AH-Reit had taken adequate measures to reduce its rental losses and whether it was reasonable to allow AIMPL, an entity related to AH-Reit, to operate the property from Aug 28, 2021, to Sept 29, 2022.
PHGM added that, instead of leasing the property to an independent third party, AH-Reit had subsequently entered into a related-party transaction with Ascott Hospitality Business Trust (AHBT) from Oct 1, 2022 onwards, with AIMPL continuing to manage the property.
But Justice Lim ruled that she did not find the arrangement 'unreasonable', and said the liquidators of PHCQ had 'properly' accepted AH-Reit's claim pertaining to $20.4 million in unpaid rent.
Furthermore, she agreed with the liquidators that it was speculative to assume that AH-Reit could have found another tenant willing to pay a higher rent .
'The property was essentially a hotel and the remaining duration of the lease, had it not been terminated, was short. At the time, Singapore was also just emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic,' said Justice Lim.
It is unclear how AH-Reit would have been able to find another tenant that would have been willing to take over the property's lease and run the hotel, she added.
Although the judge ruled it was reasonable for AH-Reit to lease the property to AHBT from Oct 1, 2022 onwards, she reduced the claims for property tax incurred by AH-Reit for the period from Oct 1, 2022 to June 27, 2023.
'Neither AH-Reit nor the liquidators have explained why AH-Reit did not impose the obligation to pay property tax on AHBT under the AHBT lease, nor why the tax was borne by AH-Reit,' she noted.
'That the AHBT lease did not include an obligation on AHBT to bear the property tax is to be contrasted with the lease wherein PHCQ bore such an obligation,' she said.
'AH-Reit appears to have treated AHBT more favourably ( compared with PHCQ) by not imposing an obligation on AHBT to pay property tax, only to then claim the property tax from PHCQ instead.'
She pointed out that the liquidators' acceptance of AH-Reit's property tax claim, made seemingly without any scrutiny, was unsatisfactory.
However, Justice Lim allowed the claim for $2.4 million in charges payable for the handover of the property from July 1, 2021 to Aug 27, 2021.
PHGM had disputed the claim, saying there was no explanation for why the handover of the property by PHCQ to AH-Reit took nearly two months when it could have been done in a day, and why the lease was terminated on Aug 28, 2021.
The liquidators argued that 'to ensure a proper handover, sufficient time was needed for AH-Reit to get information on the hotel operations and for PHCQ to prepare the asset listing and liaise with various parties on the novation or termination of its existing contracts'.
PHCQ also had an agreement with the Singapore Land Authority during the pandemic to operate the property as a government quarantine facility (GQF) until Aug 27, 2021.
Hence, it was not unreasonable for AH-Reit to defer the property handover until it had obtained the licences or approvals to operate the property as a GQF if this would enable the property to generate a steady stream of income and reduce the amounts payable by PHCQ, the judge ruled.
Furthermore, PHCQ and AIMPL had to work with the National Trades Union Congress to ensure a smooth handover of employees.
'I am satisfied that the two-month handover period was not objectionable,' the judge ruled.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
In China's factory heartland, warehouses weather Trump tariffs
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Workers at a delivery company in Guangzhou sort out packages of online shopping giant. GUANGZHOU, China – Labourer Shuai Hang went a week without work earlier in 2025 when sky-high US tariffs on Chinese goods overwhelmed the warehouse he works at and slowed the company's US-bound parcels to a trickle. But on Aug 12, after US President Donald Trump announced a truce on those duties would be extended , the depot in southern China's manufacturing hub Guangzhou was alive with noise as workers stuffed trucks with packages of clothes and kitchenware. Many are destined for the doorsteps of US customers of Chinese-founded online shopping giant Temu. 'Tariffs impact our daily lives,' said 31-year-old Mr Shuai, whose monthly pay of more than 10,000 yuan (S$1,800) dropped by a third previously. 'If tariffs are slightly lower, then there are more outgoing shipments, and then we have higher wages,' he said. Mr Trump's tariff policies since taking office have upended global trade and set off a blistering tit-for-tat with Beijing. But the two major economies agreed in May to a fragile truce , with each temporarily lowering levies on the other's goods. That agreement was extended to November by Mr Trump on Aug 11, hours before it expired. At the height of the tariffs, said Mr Shuai, who has been loading parcels for Guangzhou-based logistics company Weijiang International for a year, 'there was not a single truck' for him to fill, so he could not work. Overall, deliveries dropped by about 20 per cent in May, according to Weijiang's founder, Mr Xiong Wei, with the US market making up around a quarter of their cross-border business. But business has recovered since July, he said. Mr Xiong said he has not lost sleep over the looming expiration of the 90-day tariff truce this week, as he expected it would be renewed. 'We might have been worried in May, but now we are indifferent,' he said. 'We are used to it'. A worker at a warehouse of the Weijiang International delivery company seals packages of online shopping giant Temu. PHOTO: AFP 'Cards reshuffled' These days, the warehouse is sending out 100 tonnes of packages every 24 hours, with up to 70 trucks making trips. Industrial fans whirred as sweat-slicked workers methodically scanned yellow, black and sage green bundles into lorries. Mr Xiong's company has recently invested in its own warehouse in Chicago. In many ways, the uncertainty provided opportunity for smaller logistics companies like theirs, said manager Chen Weiyan, as they have taken the chance to expand their market. 'The cards have been reshuffled,' he said. Around 30 per cent of the parcels moved by Weijiang International end up in a different warehouse, this one owned by Temu-parent PDD, where they are unloaded, repacked and readied for a flight across the ocean. A truck carrying goods for delivery leaves a warehouse of the Weijiang International delivery company in Guangzhou. PHOTO: AFP While the truce is welcome, Mr Shuai, who packs three to four tonnes in a truck daily, said he still pays close attention to tariff news. 'For those of us who have travelled over 1,000km to work here, we definitely don't want frequent breaks. We all want to earn more money,' said the native of neighbouring Guizhou province. Working at the warehouse is less tiring than labouring at a construction site, and earning money has become more difficult in the past two years, he said. Mr Chen, the manager, was bullish. 'We will not give up this market,' he said. 'Folks in America need our goods'. AFP
CNA
8 hours ago
- CNA
China Evergrande Group to delist from Hong Kong
HONG KONG: Shares of embattled property giant China Evergrande Group will be delisted from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on Aug 25, the firm said in a filing on Tuesday (Aug 12). The company said the stock exchange's listing committee had decided to cancel its listing after it failed to resume trading per listing rules. Once China's biggest real estate firm, Evergrande defaulted in 2021 and has become emblematic of a years-long crisis in the country's property market that reverberated throughout the world's second-largest economy. A Hong Kong court issued a winding-up order for Evergrande in January 2024, ruling that the company had failed to come up with a debt repayment plan that suited its creditors. Evergrande's shares on the Hong Kong stock exchange were suspended that month. In a progress report published on Tuesday, Evergrande's liquidators, Alvarez & Marsal's Edward Middleton and Tiffany Wong, said that they have sold about US$255 million of its assets 18 months into the process and taken control of more than 100 of the company's subsidiaries. Of the US$255 million worth of asset sales, however, only US$11 million came from assets held directly by Evergrande, while the rest were held by its subsidiaries. The liquidators cautioned it should also not be assumed that the US$244 million derived from assets held by Evergrande's units will all be available to it. Only US$167 million has been delivered so far. They added that Evergrande's debt load was bigger than the previously estimated US$27.5 billion. Entities now under the liquidators' direct management control had a total value of US$3.5 billion at the time of the liquidation order, Middleton and Wong said. Evergrande's collapse is the largest in China, lawyers say, and the liquidation has proved a challenge as the majority of Evergrande's units and assets are offshore and many of them have been seized by creditors. Evergrande and a handful of peers have been ordered to liquidate since 2021 as they failed to come up with viable restructuring plans or to gain enough creditor support for their plans. China's property market, once a key growth driver for the world's second-largest economy, has been in a multi-year tailspin despite repeated government attempts to revive weak consumer demand.
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
Yangzijiang Financial H1 net profit up 28% at S$137.7 million
[SINGAPORE] Yangzijiang Financial Holding posted a 28 per cent rise in net profit to S$137.7 million for its first half ended Jun 30, from S$107.4 million in the previous corresponding period. This was largely driven by the reversal of credit loss allowances; higher contributions from the maritime joint ventures; and net foreign exchange gains, the investment management company said in a bourse filing on Tuesday (Aug 12). Earnings per share stood at S$0.0396 for the half-year period, up from S$0.0304 the previous year. Total income for H1 fell 23 per cent to S$123.6 million, from S$161.4 million, primarily due to lower interest income as a result of a pre-planned reduction in China debt exposure. This was partially offset by stronger contributions from maritime investments and Singapore-based private credit and cash management funds, the company said. No dividend was declared for the half year, same as the year before. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Over the next 12 months, the company said it will focus on advancing the proposed spin-off listing of its maritime investment business . Ren Yuanlin, chief executive and executive chairman of Yangzijiang Financial, said the spin-off is a 'timely move' to streamline its structure and sharpen strategic focus. Following the spin-off, the remaining group will continue to develop its core investment management and fund management segments, it said. In the near term, it will improve liquidity through the divestment of underperforming onshore assets, particularly in China real estate debt, while corresponding proceeds will be redeployed towards a more balanced domestic-offshore investment mix. In the longer-term, the company plans to deepen its presence in South-east Asia through debt investments in Indonesia, Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines. The company is also boosting its fund management capabilities in Singapore, which includes applying for a capital markets services licence. Total assets under management stood at S$4 billion as at Jun 30, 2025, from S$4.2 billion as at Dec 31, 2024, as the company continued its portfolio reallocation strategy to focus on fund management in South-east Asia and maritime investments. Shares of Yangzijiang Financial closed S$0.015 or 1.5 per cent higher at S$0.99 on Tuesday, before the results were released.
